Why China needs bold fiscal expansion to hit 5% growth target
In the years following the 2008 global financial crisis, bold stimulus measures enabled China to achieve a V-shaped recovery. Since then, however, the government has largely maintained neutral – even tight – macroeconomic policies. If China is to achieve
its growth target for 2025 , this must change. In fact, since September 2024, China has reoriented its macroeconomic stance substantially.
Advertisement
Two indicators typically dictate whether a government pursues expansionary or contractionary macroeconomic policies: the rate of economic growth (or the employment rate), and the inflation rate. Low growth calls for expansion (as long as
inflation also remains low ), and high inflation requires contraction (calibrated not to crush growth). By this standard, the case for expansionary policies in China today is clear.
China's PPI inflation has been in negative territory for the better part of the past 13 years, and its annual average CPI inflation has also been very low, at just 0.2 per cent in 2024. At the same time, China's GDP growth rate has declined from 10.6 per cent in 2010 to
5 per cent last year.
So why didn't Beijing embrace macroeconomic expansion much earlier? First and foremost, it fears the deterioration of its fiscal position. At the end of 2023, China's government debt-to-GDP ratio was approaching 61 per cent, and its 'augmented government debt-to-GDP ratio' (which includes debt held by
local government financing vehicles ) had reached nearly 117 per cent.
While these levels are much lower than those in most developed economies, they are high by Chinese standards, leaving the government reluctant to raise its budget deficit-to-GDP ratio above 3 per cent.
Advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
31 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Philippines urged to ratify UN marine resource treaty or risk being sidelined
France is stepping up its diplomacy in Asia to gather support for a key United Nations treaty on marine resource protection, warning that any delay in its ratification could leave the Philippines and other regional countries on the sidelines of a crucial global conference next week. Advertisement Only 29 countries have ratified the landmark High Seas Treaty – also known as the Marine Biodiversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) treaty – which requires ratifications by at least 60 countries to take effect. One of 116 signatories, the Philippines signed the treaty in 2023 but has yet to ratify it. The treaty aims to regulate and protect marine resources in international waters, which are maritime areas beyond any single country's jurisdiction. They cover nearly half the Earth's surface and sustain vital ecosystems and fishing industries across Asia. Adopted in June 2023, the treaty aims to fill governance gaps in what advocates describe as a 'lawless wilderness', where fragmented oversight has enabled overfishing, pollution and extensive deep-sea mining. Analysts say the treaty is especially relevant for developing coastal and archipelagic states in Asia, where limited resources and vast exclusive economic zones make enforcement challenging. Concerns over unclear obligations, enforcement costs and industry pushback have hindered its ratification in many countries. Advertisement At a forum held in Manila on May 28, French Ambassador Marie Fontaniel urged the Philippines to be among the first 60 countries to ratify the treaty ahead of the UN Ocean Conference in Nice next week.
South China Morning Post
31 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
How China could benefit from a ‘Mar-a-Lago Accord'
The provisional trade deal reached by China and the United States in Geneva last month exceeded expectations, with the two sides agreeing to roll back for 90 days most tariffs and other countermeasures they had imposed in the preceding weeks. Advertisement To be sure, a number of tariffs remain – including all those the US imposed on China during Donald Trump's first presidency – and little progress was made in resolving underlying disagreements, such as over fentanyl flows into the US. But with more talks set to take place (amid and despite accusations by both sides that the provisional agreement has been violated), a robust agreement may well be in the offing. To understand what such an agreement might look like, it is worth considering the grievances behind Trump's tariff policy. Conventional economic theory holds that, in a flexible exchange-rate system, changes in a currency's value should lead to a stable trade balance in the issuing economy. But, as experience shows, a number of factors can disrupt this dynamic. In the case of the dollar, it is very easy to pin down the main one: its status as the world's dominant reserve currency As the economist Robert Triffin explained in 1960, unless the country that provides the world's reserve currency runs a current account deficit, the world loses its largest source of liquidity for reserves, with catastrophic consequences for economic growth and stability. But the ever-expanding deficit can undermine confidence in the reserve-issuing country – what is known as the Triffin dilemma. The Trump administration's chief complaint is that permanent demand for dollars keeps the currency strong, even when the US Federal Reserve pursues very accommodative interest rate policies, as was the case for well over a decade after the 2008 global financial crisis. Given this, improving America's export competitiveness – and, thus, its trade balance – requires policy intervention. Advertisement To this end, the Trump administration has floated the idea of a ' Mar-a-Lago Accord ' inspired by the 1985 Plaza Accord, under which the five largest industrialised economies agreed to devalue the US dollar relative to the Japanese yen and the German Deutschmark. The new iteration – the brainchild of Stephen Miran , now the chair of Trump's Council of Economic Advisers – would be negotiated at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, rather than the Plaza Hotel in New York City.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Citigroup to cut 3,500 tech support jobs in China to trim costs
Citigroup is laying off 3,500 technology staff in mainland China as part of its global effort to streamline operations and reduce costs, while pledging its commitment to corporate and institutional clients in the world's second-largest economy. Advertisement The affected employees, who provide technology support for operations in the Asia-Pacific region, are based in Shanghai and Dalian in the northeastern province of Liaoning, according to a statement on Thursday. The cuts would be completed in the fourth quarter, it added. Some roles would be eliminated while others would be relocated and excess office space would be reduced, the bank said, adding that the separation packages were higher than the local industry average. The downsizing would not affect its Shanghai-based unit, which houses its core banking business, or its other service centre in Guangzhou. 'We are committed to our corporate and institutional clients in China and supporting their cross-border banking needs, as well as clients across our international network who do business there,' said Marc Luet, Citigroup's head of banking and Japan, Asia North and Australia. The bank supports a large number of leading companies, including 70 per cent of the Fortune 500 companies in China, he added. CEO Jane Fraser wants to simplify Citigroup's organisational structure to align with its business strategy. Photo: Dickson Lee Citigroup, the third-largest lender in the US, is still aiming to establish a fully owned securities and futures unit in China, Luet said, which seems to have been delayed by strained US-China ties.
