North Dakota lawmakers approve needs, some wants with $20.3 billion budget
North Dakota House lawmakers meet during the final hours of the session on May 3, 2025. (Kyle Martin/For the North Dakota Monitor)
North Dakota lawmakers adjourned early Saturday after approving a total state budget of $20.3 billion for 2025-27, with investments including a historic property tax package for homeowners, a new State Hospital and funding to address overcrowding at jails and prisons.
The overall budget, which includes federal dollars and other special funds, is a 3.5% increase over the current two-year budget cycle.
'We managed to address all of our needs and some of our wants, and we did it without raising any taxes. We did it without borrowing any money, and we provided record (property tax) relief,' said Senate Majority Leader David Hogue, R-Minot, as lawmakers adjourned about 4 a.m. Saturday.
The preliminary two-year budget for general fund spending for 2025-27 is $6.25 billion, an increase of 2.6% over 2023-25.
Though legislators started the 2025 session with excess revenue, they're keeping a cautious eye to the future with the state's growth projected to slow amid lower oil prices, declining oil tax revenue and uncertainty about tariffs. Lawmakers also funded investments that aim to spur new oil production and diversify the state's economy.
Gov. Kelly Armstrong said he's excited the Legislature passed a property tax package that includes a $1,600 primary residence tax credit and provisions to limit future property tax increases, an idea he pitched at the start of the session. Armstrong said he's also pleased lawmakers adopted a 'bell-to-bell' cellphone ban for public schools, another idea he championed.
'I think those two things will have an immediate impact,' Armstrong said early Saturday.
The property tax package is funded with earnings from the state's $12 billion Legacy Fund. Armstrong said if lawmakers allow the fund to continue to grow, it could put most homeowners on a path to paying zero property taxes within a decade.
'What a legacy for our kids and grandkids, to be able to have a significant amount paid toward their property tax,' said House Majority Leader Mike Lefor, R-Dickinson.
House Minority Leader Zac Ista, D-Grand Forks, told his colleagues he's glad they spent more time on the 'real issues facing North Dakotans' this year than they had in recent years, referring to culture war issues that dominated much of the 2023 session.
'Let that be the start of a positive trend for our body, and let us commit to resisting the pull of polarization and extremism,' Ista said.
Some, including Armstrong, said the Legislature missed an opportunity to do more to address the state's housing and workforce needs.
'But those are tough issues, so we always have more time for that,' Armstrong said.
Legislators approved $300 million to construct a new State Hospital in Jamestown, which will replace an outdated facility. The project will provide 140 beds to serve people in need of acute mental health services.
Rep. Jon Nelson, R-Rugby, who chaired the division of the House Appropriations Committee that handled the budget for Health and Human Services, said that project is critical for the state. Lawmakers had considered reducing the funding to $285 million, but ultimately approved $300 million. The Office of Management and Budget will oversee construction of the project.
'It was our highest priority in our section with the Human Service budget,' Nelson said.
Lawmakers approved other investments in regional behavioral health services, including nearly $13 million to create 24 new in-patient acute psychiatric beds in Grand Forks and $1.5 million for 10 beds in Williston.
Legislators also fully funded the Free Through Recovery and Community Connect programs that help people with recovery support.
The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation budget includes $28.4 million for payments to county and regional jails, which are housing inmates due to crowding at state prisons. The department is looking to staff and operate unused space in Grand Forks County's new jail expansion for some state prisoners. Armstrong's administration secured a letter of intent from the Grand Forks County Commission to enter into an agreement, with terms still being finalized.
North Dakota prisons find extra inmate beds in county facilities amid overcrowding
The budget also includes more than $35 million to complete the Heart River Correctional Center in Mandan, the first state prison designed for women. Another $8 million is dedicated for a temporary facility to add beds for the Missouri River Correctional Center and $20 million to design and plan a new medium-security prison that's proposed to be built next to the State Penitentiary.
A group of three bills backed by the corrections department aims to keep people out of the criminal justice system and lead to a lower recidivism rate after inmates are released.
The recidivism rate was a point of discussion as Attorney General Drew Wrigley backed what he called a truth-in-sentencing bill. Senate Bill 2128 sought to make sure inmates in the state prison system spend most of their sentence behind bars, but it was defeated in the House.
K-12 education was a major topic for lawmakers, but proposals to establish private school vouchers or Education Savings Accounts did not survive the session. Armstrong vetoed one bill because it only affected private school students, and lawmakers defeated a more comprehensive bill, in large part due to the high price tag.
Lawmakers did approve a bill establishing public charter schools in North Dakota for the first time.
Legislators voted down proposals to provide free school meals to all students, an idea that was strongly supported by the public.
Lawmakers did include $7.3 million in the Department of Public Instruction budget to make free lunch available to students from families within 225% of the federal poverty level. That's an increase from 200% of the poverty line that was funded in the 2023 session. It means a family of four with an income of about $72,000 would qualify for free school lunches.
Free school lunch advocates call on Legislature to act
The Together for School Meals coalition has said it's deeply disappointed the Legislature did not pass universal school meals.
'Free school meals is a policy supported by 79% of North Dakotans and championed by over 80 local organizations committed to ending child hunger,' said Amy Jacobson, executive director of Prairie Action ND and a member of the coalition. 'This bill had the power to put real money — an estimated $850 per child per year — back into the pockets of hardworking parents.'
The overall Department of Public Instruction budget contains a 2.5% increase of the per-pupil payment for each year of the biennium, raising it to $11,349 in fiscal year 2026 and $11,633 the following year. The Senate advocated for 3% each year.
Legislation signed by Armstrong will make public K-12 schools phone-free, requiring personal electronic devices to be stowed and inaccessible during instructional time. The law takes effect Aug. 1.
Lawmakers debated several controversial issues that ultimately failed. A resolution urging an end to same-sex marriage passed the House but later was defeated in the Senate.
Lawmakers also defeated a bill to require the display of the Ten Commandments in schools and public colleges and rejected a resolution that declared the kingship of Jesus Christ.
The Legislature spent a considerable amount of time on policing the content in public libraries and bathrooms at public schools.
North Dakota governor vetoes controversial library content bill
Armstrong vetoed a bill that addressed content in public libraries and K-12 schools, which expanded on legislation approved two years ago. Failure to comply could have cost the library or school state funding and resulted in criminal charges.
'The bill imposes vague and punitive burdens on professionals and opens the door to a host of unintended and damaging consequences for our communities,' Armstrong said in his veto message.
Armstrong signed a bill that prevents K-12 public schools from building new all-gender, multistall bathrooms. Lawmakers added an exemption for existing restrooms after schools complained they would have to spend millions to bring their facilities into compliance. Schools could be fined if they don't comply with the bathroom policy and other regulations in the same section of code, including a requirement for schools and teachers to inform a students' parents if they learn the child is transgender.
The governor also signed a bill that amends Century Code to state 'words used to reference an individual's gender mean the individual's sex,' a proposal some critics called discriminatory to transgender and intersex North Dakotans.
Landowner groups and local government officials argued with lawmakers this session to maintain local control, though frequently ended up on the losing side of the debate.
House Bill 1258 gave the Public Service Commission more authority over setback rules on large electrical transmission lines, taking away authority from townships and counties.
Sen. Terry Wanzek, R-Jamestown, represents an area where a large power line is planned. A township created a half-mile setback from residences, and Wanzek said such rules hinder the project and threaten others like it across the state.
House Bill 2321, which aimed to strengthen the position of landowners in negotiations with oil and infrastructure developers by helping them recoup legal fees, had support in the Senate but ultimately failed in the House.
The bill was sponsored by Sen. Jeff Magrum, R-Hazelton, who represents an area where the controversial Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline is routed. His other bills to strengthen landowner rights and limit carbon capture development made little headway.
On the final day of the session, lawmakers approved a bill that aims to keep North Dakota on the forefront of rare earth mineral development. The Northwest Landowners Association argued the bill is unconstitutional.
During the session, House members mourned the loss of Rep. Josh Christy, R-Fargo, who died in February at age 43.
Last week, Armstrong signed two bills sponsored by Christy, who had developed a niche in the Legislature on the subjects of artificial intelligence and technology.
'While we continue to mourn, we celebrate the achievements he made and the legacy he left with his service,' Ista said.
As lawmakers closed out the session they also acknowledged Rep. Jim Kasper, R-Fargo, who was hospitalized late in the session.
Lawmakers adjourned on day 74 of the session, which means they have six days remaining of their 80-day limit.
Several expressed a desire to save days in case lawmakers need to return to address impacts on the state from cut federal funds.
'It's highly likely that we'll need to get called back,' said Sen. Judy Lee, R-West Fargo.
Lee, who chaired the Senate Human Services Committee, said she's watching potential cuts to Medicaid or other human services funding that could require the state to respond.
'Without the money, the state has to be able to step up,' Lee said. 'And we're lucky to be in a position to know that we're probably going to be able to do that.'
The state Democrats issued a statement warning of 'misguided and chaotic national policies' that threaten local impacts.
'Already we've lost promised funds for rural infrastructure, mental health care and even the care of disabled persons,' Ista said.
The governor can also call a special session, which would not have a time limit.
'We'll wait and see where we're at,' Armstrong said Saturday. 'It costs money to bring everybody back. Obviously, if there's a real reason to do it, we will do it.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
13 minutes ago
- CNBC
Sen. Ron Johnson rips into 'immoral' GOP spending bill: 'I can't accept it'
Republican Sen. Ron Johnson on Wednesday blasted President Donald Trump's "one big, beautiful bill" as "immoral" and "grotesque," and reiterated that he will vote against it unless his GOP colleagues make major changes. "This is immoral, what us old farts doing to our young people," Johnson said on CNBC's "Squawk Box" after sounding alarms that the massive tax-and-spending-cut bill would add trillions of dollars to national deficits. "This is grotesque, what we're doing," Johnson said. "We need to own up to that. This is our moment." "I can't accept the scenario, I can't accept it, so I won't vote for it, unless we are serious about fixing it," he continued. Johnson has been among the Senate's loudest GOP critics of the budget bill that narrowly passed the House last month. Johnson and other fiscal hawks have taken aim over its impact on the nation's debt. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated later Wednesday that the bill would add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Johnson has proposed splitting the bill into two parts, though Trump insists on passing his agenda in a single package. "The president and Senate leadership has to understand that we're serious now," Johnson said of himself and the handful of other GOP senators whose opposition to the bill could imperil its chances. "They all say, 'Oh, we can pressure these guys.' No, you can't." Republicans hold a narrow 53-47 majority in the Senate, so they can only afford to lose a handful of votes to get the bill passed in a party-line vote. "Let's discuss the numbers, and let's focus on our children and grandchildren, whose futures are being mortgaged, their prospects are being diminished by what we are doing to them," Johnson said. Johnson's comments came one day after Elon Musk ripped into the spending bill, calling it a "disgusting abomination" that will lead to exploding deficits. The White House brushed aside Musk's comments. Johnson said that Musk's criticisms bolster the case against the bill. "He's in the inside, he showed ... President Trump how to do this, you know, contract by contract, line by line," Johnson said of Musk. "We have to do that." Johnson said that his campaign against the bill in its current form is not a "long shot," because he thinks there are "enough" Republican senators will will vote against the bill. "We want to see [Trump] succeed, but again, my loyalty is to our kids and grandkids," he said. "So there's enough of us who have that attitude that very respectfully we just have say, 'Mr. President, I'm sorry, 'one, big, beautiful bill' was not the best idea," he added.


Boston Globe
17 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
What is the Congressional Budget Office? And why is it a target of Trump?
The budget office also projected that by 2034, 10.9 million more people would be uninsured, due to proposed spending cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. Related : The bill now Advertisement In the weeks ahead of the CBO's analysis, the White House and Republican leaders have criticized the budget office in an effort to sow doubt in its findings. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Here's what to know about the nonpartisan agency and what the Trump administration has said about it: What is the CBO? The CBO is a nonpartisan agency that helps lawmakers estimate the cost of proposed legislation and provides reports on federal spending. It's led by a director appointed by Congress to a four-year term, with the selection alternating between the House and Senate Budget Committee chairs. The CBO emphasizes that political affiliation plays no role in its hiring process, stating it selects candidates 'solely on the basis of his or her fitness to perform the duties of the position.' Advertisement Is the CBO partisan? CBO hires analysts based on their expertise, not political affiliation. Staff is expected to maintain objectivity and avoid political influence. In evaluating potential employees, the CBO says that for most positions it looks at whether that person would be perceived to be free from political bias. Like other federal employees, the CBO's staff is also prohibited from making political contributions to members of Congress. The CBO's director, Phillip Swagel, served in former Republican President George W. Bush's administration as an economic adviser and as an assistant secretary at the Treasury Department. What has the CBO said in the past about Trump policy? The budget office said in April 2018, during Trump's first term, that tax receipts would reach $27 trillion from fiscal years 2018 to 2024. However, receipts came in about $1.5 trillion higher than the CBO projected and Republican lawmakers have seized on that discrepancy since then. The CBO later reported that revenues were higher than expected because of the 'burst of inflation' during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. There was also an increase in economic activity in 'the later years of the period' adding $700 billion. Also, new tariffs added about $250 billion, with other legislation partially offsetting those factors. What Trump and his allies have said about the agency Ahead of the CBO's analysis, Trump slammed the agency in a 'The Democrat inspired and 'controlled' Congressional Budget Office (CBO) purposefully gave us an EXTREMELY LOW level of Growth, 1.8% over 10 years,' Trump wrote. 'I predict we will do 3, 4, or even 5 times the amount they purposefully 'allotted' to us (1.8 percent) and, with just our minimum expected 3 percent growth, we will more than offset our tax cuts (which will, in actuality, cost us no money!),' Trump added. Advertisement In an 'The CBO sometimes gets projections correct, but they're always off every single time when they project economic growth,' Johnson told NBC News. '[The CBO] always underestimate the growth that will be brought about by tax cuts and reduction in regulations,' Johnson added. At a Alyssa Vega can be reached at
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republican leaders push back on Musk ‘abomination' criticism of Trump bill
Republican congressional leaders pushed back Wednesday on Elon Musk's harsh criticism of President Donald Trump's signature budget bill as a fiscally dangerous 'disgusting abomination.' Sen. John Thune and Rep. Mike Johnson both aggressively defended Trump's sprawling Big Beautiful Bill even as a non-partisan congressional watchdog group said it would add 2.4 trillion to the national debt, seemingly bolstering Musk's point. 'I think he's flat wrong, and I've told him as much,' Johnson, the House Speaker, told reporters at a news conference Thune, the Senate majority leader, likewise downplayed the influence of Musk, who recently left the administration after a mostly failed effort to slash spending using his Department of Government Efficiency. 'Obviously [Musk] has some influence, got a big following on social media,' Thune said. 'There are going to be a lot of people who share commentary about this, and we just got to make sure we're doing everything we can to get our arguments out there.' So far Trump himself has not commented on Musk's withering attack on his top priority of his second term in office, a measure that would cut trillions in taxes and reduce spending by a significant, but much smaller, amount. Musk, who was until recently considered the most powerful person in Washington next to Trump, showed no signs of softening his attack on Trump's bill. 'This is debt slavery for the American people,' Musk tweeted Wednesday, after he said he could no longer stay silent about the impact of the bill. The Congressional Budget Office, the most respected non-partisan arbiter of budget impacts, issued a report saying the bill as passed by the House would increase deficits by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. The CBO also estimates the bill's provisions would cause 10.9 million people to lose their health insurance under the bill by 2034. The package would reduce federal outlays, or spending, by nearly $1.3 trillion over that period, while cutting taxes by $3.75 trillion, the watchdog group said. The vast majority of the tax savings will go to the ultra-wealthy and big business. Musk and other fiscal hawks want the bill to cut spending by far more, or cut taxes by much less, in order to avoid further swelling the national debt. But many moderate Republicans fear deep spending cuts, especially to health programs, could spark massive blowback against them at the ballot box in the midterm elections and beyond. GOP leaders need to bridge the gaping divide to win the virtually unanimous support of Republican lawmakers in both chambers of Congress needed to pass the bill under the intricate reconciliation process.