Supreme Court Upholds Bombay HC Ruling: 18 Unauthorized Flats in Tardeo Must Vacate
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The High Court clarified that such members would be entitled to occupy the flats only after the Occupancy Certificate is granted.
On July 15, Justices Girish Kulkarni and Arif Doctor of the High Court also observed the lack of a Fire NOC for the entire high-rise but stayed any civic demolition action and adjourned the issue of the first 16 floors for hearing by two weeks. Aggrieved residents rushed to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan on Friday dismissed a special leave petition filed by Willingdon View Cooperative Housing Society seeking to challenge the High Court judgment. The Supreme Court judges said, "We are of the view that we should not interfere with a very well-considered, bold, and lucid judgment delivered by the High Court."
"We appreciate the concern expressed by the High Court," Justices Pardiwala and Mahadevan said, adding, "We also appreciate the courage and conviction exhibited by the High Court in taking stern steps against such unauthorised constructions.
Sympathy towards the occupiers of such flats on the ground of hardship and difficulties at the end of the Court would be thoroughly misplaced. At the end of the day, the rule of law must prevail.
"
However, the Supreme Court provided some relief to the residents, saying if they wanted time to vacate, they may approach the High Court with such a request. The Supreme Court also directed that the High Court shall "ensure that all its directions are scrupulously complied with.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Necessary legal action shall also be taken against the wrongdoers and erring officials if any."
Before the High Court, there was a batch of petitions. There were more than two categories of petitions, the High Court said. There were petitions filed by purchasers/members of the Willingdon View Cooperative Housing Society Limited, who intended to defend the illegal constructions under the garb of regularisation.
There was also a writ petition filed by Sunil B. Jhaveri H.U.F., who assailed several illegalities, including the lack of an Occupancy Certificate for floors 17 to 34 and the lack of a Fire NOC, rendering the building illegal. The High Court expressed its reservations about people occupying even floors 1 to 16 but had stayed BMC's hands in resorting to any demolition under its notices for illegal constructions and posted the issue of the first 16 floors for further hearing on July 29.
The High Court order noted that BMC had for years been attempting to take legal actions against these illegalities. "There being no fire NOC, no Occupancy Certificate for floors 17 to 34, itself is glaring. It appears that the persons who are occupying the 34-storey building are least bothered about their own lives. If this be so, how can they be bothered about anybody else, in the event of any untoward incident of any nature taking place? Such an approach, which is wholly contrary to law, cannot be countenanced.
In fact, it would set an example to perpetuate illegalities. It needs to be deprecated."
What the High Court said:
All the occupants or society members who are illegally occupying floors 17 to 34 are required to vacate their respective premises, and in the event they fail to vacate, the Municipal Corporation needs to take appropriate steps in accordance with the law to get the tenements vacated.
We would be justified to say that in the present facts, the flat purchasers who have taken the law into their own hands in occupying construction which has no Occupancy Certificate are a selfish lot, who not only with open eyes are acting contrary to the building regulations but also have means to defeat legal actions being taken by the Municipal Corporation by indulging in several statutory violations, which can never be permitted.
— Bombay High Court Justices Girish Kulkarni and Arif Doctor
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Over 2 lakh forms requesting Mahadevi's return to Nandani Jain mutt sent to President
Kolhapur: An online petition initiated by MLC Satej Patil garnered 2,04,421 signatures nationwide, demanding the relocation of the elephant, named Mahadevi alias Madhuri, to the Jain mutt in Nandani. On Saturday morning, the signed petition forms were sanctified by Jinsen Bhattarak Pattacharya, the chief of the Jain mutt, and sent to President Draupadi Murmu via post from Kolhapur's Ramanmala post office by Satej Patil and former MLA Ruturaj Patil. Speaking on the occasion, Satej Patil said, "After the Supreme Court's decision, a lot of disappointment spread among the people. This discontent can be seen as within 48 hours, 2,04,421 people from across the nation signed the petition supporting the call to bring the elephant back to the Nandani Jain mutt. We took printouts of all these forms, sanctified them by the chief of the mutt, and then sent them to the President. We request President Draupadi Murmu to give attention to this and resolve thë issue." Patil also commented on Vantara CEO Vivaan Karani's visit to Kolhapur on Friday, saying, "We were not invited. Only Mahayuti party MLAs and MPs were invited for the meeting when the CEO of Vantara arrived in Kolhapur. Therefore, we do not know anything about what discussions were held, what agreement took place or whether a settlement was done. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The guardian minister has said it is a legal issue and legal procedure will have to be followed, but Mahayuti MLAs and MPs should declare in how many days the elephant will be brought back. As an opposition party member, we have done the work of showcasing public sentiments in front of the President." He added, "Elephants causing menace in Ajara, Chandgad, and Bhudargad regions should be taken to Vantara instead of this tamed temple elephant. If they give a protocol, then we assure them that the elephant will be taken care of as per their guidelines. This is an issue of religious and traditional beliefs. If over 14,000 cow shelters are run by Jain communities across the world, then how can someone say that they can't manage a single elephant?" Meanwhile, several villages in Kolhapur and Sangli districts observed a village bandh on Saturday, shutting down businesses and schools. Rallies were held in these villages demanding the return of the elephant to Nandani. The elephant's rehabilitation from the mutt to a Jamnagar facility, carried out on the night of July 29 after the Supreme Court dismissed the mutt's appeal against the Bombay high court order directing such relocation, prompted an emotionally and politically charged campaign to bring Mahadevi back. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Access to safe, well-maintained roads a part of right to life: Supreme Court judgment
The Supreme Court has clarified that access to safe, motorable and well-maintained roads is an essential part of the fundamental right to life under the Constitution. A Bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan held the right to travel to any part of the country was a basic right. 'Since the right to access any part of the country, with certain exceptions and restrictions under certain circumstances, is a fundamental right guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, the right to safe, well-maintained, and motorable roads is recognised as a part of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India,' Justice Mahadevan, who authored the recent judgment, observed. The Court said the maintenance of roads was squarely the responsibility of the State. 'It is the responsibility of the State to develop and maintain the roads directly under its control,' the court noted. The judgment was based on an appeal filed by Umri Pooph Pratappur (UPP) Tollways Private Limited against the Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Limited (MPRDC). The dispute appeal was against a State High Court decision on a concession agreement between the two entities for the development of the Umri-Pooph-Pratappur Road on a 'Build, Operate and Transfer' basis. The total cost of the project was ₹73.68 crore for the augmentation of the existing road from the T-Junction of State Highway 45 at Umari Village to 43.775 km on the Umri-Pooph-Pratappur section of Major District Road in the State.
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
Technology can bring legal aid to doorstep: SC judge
Using technology 'thoughtfully and inclusively…can bridge the persistent gaps in our justice system', said Supreme Court judge Justice Surya Kant Saturday, and underlined that it cannot, however, replace the human element and 'the heart of justice must remain human'. Speaking at the Justice RC Lahoti Memorial Lecture in Manav Rachna University, Faridabad, on 'Bridging the Gap: Reimagining Legal Aid in the Digital Age for Inclusive Justice in India', Justice Kant said: 'With the right vision and safeguards, technology can break geographical barriers, democratise legal awareness, and bring legal aid to the doorstep — or rather the palm of every citizen. If harnessed thoughtfully and inclusively, it can bridge the persistent gaps in our justice system.' He said that though the country has made big technological strides, 'yet, access to justice remains largely analogue.' 'Courts are online, laws are also digitised, but quality legal aid has yet to trickle down to the last person in line. The digital divide has become the new face of inequality,' Justice Kant said. Emphasising the need 'to address the challenges faced by linguistic and cultural minorities,' Justice Kant said that 'digital platforms must not only be multilingual but also culturally nuanced' and 'when citizens see their own stories, customs, and worldviews reflected in legal education content, barriers of alienation and mistrust crumble, making way for genuine engagement and confidence in the system.' Justice Kant called for holding virtual Lok Adalats by harnessing secure video platforms but cautioned that 'the excitement of technology must be tempered with restraint. The digital divide is very real.' 'No technology is neutral. The tools we build reflect the values we embed in them. As we digitise legal aid, we must design systems with built-in ethics. Privacy must be paramount…' he said. Justice Kant said, 'artificial intelligence algorithms must be designed to flag, not exacerbate, the biases so entrenched in society' and that 'privacy by design, user consent, and continuous public oversight should be the hallmarks of all digital legal solutions, assuring citizens that their quest for justice does not come at the cost of their security or dignity.'
