logo
£3m strikes cost to Scottish Water in 'fat cat' bonus & pay row

£3m strikes cost to Scottish Water in 'fat cat' bonus & pay row

The three Scottish Water staff unions, which also include Unite and Unison, have already written to chief executive Alex Plant accusing the company of acting in bad faith, condemning its management culture in failing to deal with the dispute.
Seven day action involving hundreds of workers which started on Monday has the potential to disrupt essential services, including water supply maintenance, waste water treatment, and emergency response to leaks or flooding.
But Scottish Water has previously said that contingency plans are in place to enable it to maintain a normal service.
Read more by Martin Williams:
It has told users: "We will do all we can to ensure customers do not experience any disruption to their water supplies and that treatment of the country's waste water continues as usual, despite the planned industrial action.
Union members on the picket line (Image: Andrew Milligan)
"A reliable water source is vital for everyone. Maintaining public health and protecting the environment are our priorities, and it is the responsible course of action for us to have contingency plans ready."
The estimates of the current strike action are based on revelations that it contingency plan costs of dealing with four days of strikes between November 10 and November 13 in 2023 amounted to £1.603m.That included a £947,000 bill for water operations and customer service contractors
It means that Scottish Water would be facing a further estimated bill of £2.8m to cover the third strike of the latest pay dispute which is to last seven days.
It follows three 24-hour strikes, one in March and two in April which is estimated to have cost a further £1.2m
Union sources say that Scottish Water would, however, be making an estimated saving of £125,000 a day on strike staff labour costs which would amount to £1.25m over the 10 days of strikes so far..
On Wednesday, striking Scottish Water workers staged a demonstration about over fair pay to Scottish Water's Glasgow offices in Renfrew Road.
GMB Scotland says the dispute has potential to become one of the most significant in Scotland's public sector, with both sides miles from reaching an agreement.
Further discussions over a new offer were being mulled over yesterday [Thursday].
It comes amidst a row over Mr Plant receiving a 50% rise in the existing pay package - despite public sector pay rules saying he should expect to have a 10% cut.
The £483,000 remuneration for Alex Plant over just ten months of 2023/24 is nearly £100,000 more than the outgoing chief executive Douglas Millican, received in his last full year before taking flexible retirement which resulted in a cut in salary and reduced pension benefits.
The Scottish Government's public sector pay policy has since 2010 included an "expectation" that the remuneration of a new chief executive appointment will be at least 10% lower than that of the outgoing officer.
MSPs raised their concerns in the Scottish Parliament after The Herald further revealed that executives of the nation's state-owned water supplier saw bonuses hiked by over a third in one year - taking a five-year total to nearly £1.6m despite public sector pay rules suspending the payments.
While Scottish Water has remained included on the list of public sector organisations that should conform with the pay policy, the Scottish Government say that they are exempt.
The GMB said Mr Plant attended the talks on Tuesday for the first time after his absence had been criticised for only staying a few minutes before leaving.
GMB Scotland said the Scottish Water strike costs should "shame" its negotiating team.
Claire Greer, the union's organiser at the publicly-owned utility, said management have allowed the pay dispute to escalate without the apparent will or expertise to resolve it.
She said: 'The cost to the public purse of this ongoing industrial action is likely to far outweigh what it would have cost Scottish Water to find a resolution to what should have been a very straightforward pay negotiation.
Claire Greer (Image: GMB)
'That is beyond the pale and should dismay taxpayers and alarm ministers. It has become impossible to guess if Scottish Water are trying to play games in these negotiations or are simply incompetent.
'What is certain is that clear and transparent talks should have resolved this dispute months ago.
"It is shameful that millions of pounds of public money is on the line because the management of this company is unwilling or unable to engage in pay talks in a competent manner.'
Scottish Water workers downed tools on Monday after rejecting the company's latest pay offer.
It initially offered workers a basic pay rise of 3.4% or £1,050 for those on the lowest grades.
But after a 24-hour strikes in the spring, the offer was changed to 7% over two years.
The strike comes as water bills have risen by 9.9% from April with the public utility firm saying it was necessary to cope with period of "drought and intense rainfall" brought on by climate change.
Ms Greer has written to Gillian Martin, the Scottish Government minister responsible for Scottish Water, urging her to encourage executives to seriously engage with negotiations.
She highlighted a number of concerns around the negotiations accusing management of trying to bypass unions and negotiate with workers directly; making a revised offer that was worse than one already rejected by workers; and quoting incorrect and misleading salary details in a formal offer.
She states: 'Management have clearly demonstrated they do not intend to engage in good faith with trade unions, take the basic and necessary steps to avert strike action, or deliver a pay offer that values the workforce.'
'Industrial relations are at an all-time low because of a management culture which seems anti-union and holds the workforce in complete disregard.'
Unions have warned that the pay rises and bonuses to executives have only increased the frustration of Scottish Water workers.
After being challenged about the bonuses in the Scottish Parliament, climate action minister Alasdair Allan defended the pay policy saying: "The Scottish Government does seek to ensure that executive pay is kept under control".
And he said it had sought that "when new chief executives come in to post that there are controls around wages and bonuses put in place".
Scottish Water has defended the salary packages saying that they maintain and operate a "simple remuneration structure" with a pay policy that aims are to "attract, develop, motivate and retain highly talented people at all levels of the organisation" and to "incentivise and reward good individual and corporate performance as well as out-performance".
Scottish Water operates under an annual borrowing limit set by the Scottish Government. The annual borrowing limit controls the amount by which Scottish Water can increase externally sourced finance.
As at March 31, 2023, government loans totalled £4.5 billion.
Net new borrowing by Scottish Water from the Scottish Government was planned to be to the tune of £196m in 2023/24 alone to carry out its activities.
A spokesperson for Scottish Water said: 'We are committed to constructive talks with our trade union colleagues to find a sensible solution to this dispute.
"The best way to avoid additional costs caused by the industrial action is for the strikes to stop and a resolution to be found as soon as possible.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alcohol at football plans supported by local club as Stirling fans enjoy tipple
Alcohol at football plans supported by local club as Stirling fans enjoy tipple

Daily Record

time23 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Alcohol at football plans supported by local club as Stirling fans enjoy tipple

Stirling Albion unveiled a complimentary beer tasting ahead of their weekend home match - with the club having a successful trial of alcohol at a 'fanzone' earlier this summer. Football fans in Stirling over the weekend enjoyed the chance for an extra special tipple as part of a newly launched initiative as club chiefs gave backing to alcohol sales at matches once again. ‌ The launch of the new draught beer system at the stadium was unveiled ahead of the match between Stirling Albion and Annan Athletic on Saturday, with fans of both clubs enjoying complimentary tastings of beers run by West Brewery. ‌ The new service also featured a 'bottom-fill' system for fans wanting an alcoholic drink ahead of kick-off to enjoy a flawless pint. ‌ It's the latest innovation run by Stirling Albion as the debate around alcohol and Scottish football continues to grow over the summer. The Binos were one of several clubs across Scotland who took part in a pilot project during the recent Premier Sports Cup fixtures, with a special 'fanzone' set up at the Forthbank terracing to allow alcohol sales in the build-up to a fixture against Hamilton Accies. The club's commercial director, Fraser McIntyre, gave the Observer a special tour of the facilities on offer for fans - and said the opportunity to bring controlled alcohol sales back to stadia could prove a financial boon for clubs across the country. He said: 'For us, it first started from the SPFL pilot project which started a few months ago and culminated with us having a fanzone at the Hamilton match a few weeks ago. 'We required a beer supplier for that to have partnership with and we spoke to the guys at West Brewery and whether they were willing to come and stock the beer, coming in and helping out. ‌ 'Through conversations on the fanzone, the brewery team discussed the possibility of a low maintenance, low destruction draft system so they put us in touch with a company which has allowed us to launch our supporters bar with a draught system which we haven't been able to do before. 'This arrangement ticks a lot of boxes because we've been able to lock in our pricing with West for the year where previously we would have been vulnerable to changes in the market.' The ban on alcohol inside stadiums was introduced following a riot between Celtic and Rangers supporters after the 1980 Scottish Cup Final. ‌ Mr McIntyre is confident attitudes towards alcohol sales in football are starting to shift and that clubs possess the knowledge to ensure a return would be a safe one. 'I think there's a place for it moving forward,' he continued. 'Alcohol sales in football stadia were banned due to a very high-profile game years ago and for clubs like us who are fighting financially, we have to look at different revenue sources. 'The pilot project is the perfect example. The SPFL were actually wanting to do that for the Hearts game but we saw that as too high-profile with a sell-out with thousands of Hearts fans here. 'It was the club's decision not to run it that day and that shows we have the foresight and the understanding on picking and choosing the games that would be suitable for alcohol sales in collaboration with safety officers from both clubs.'

The SNP's welfare spending rise outpaces revenue growth
The SNP's welfare spending rise outpaces revenue growth

The Herald Scotland

time35 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

The SNP's welfare spending rise outpaces revenue growth

The difficulty for the SNP, with the Scottish Fiscal Commission warning of a £5 billion black hole in the finances, is whether we can afford it. READ MORE Wednesday's GERS figures show total public spending for Scotland rose 5.5% to £117.6 billion in 2024/25, but within that the biggest line item — social protection — grew 7.9%, faster than the UK's 5.3%, and now accounts for roughly 30% of all spending. Officials explicitly link that faster growth to programmes such as the Scottish Child Payment and the replacement disability benefits. The Adult Disability Payment is due to rise to £3.13 billion from £2.63 billion, the Child Disability Payment to £514 million, and the Scottish Child Payment to £454 million. This is reflected in the increased spending per head in Scotland, now £2,669 more per person than the UK average, up from £2,311. Revenues are not keeping up with that growth. Overall Scottish revenue edged up to £91.4 billion, while spending rose to £117.6 billion, taking the net fiscal balance to -11.7% of GDP. How will the SNP bridge that gap? They are putting a lot of stock in their efficiency programme. Ministers believe a Public Service Reform drive can make £1 billion of savings over five years, largely through corporate functions and shared services. Speaking to journalists in St Andrew's House, Public Finance Minister Ivan McKee, who is charged with delivering these efficiencies, said he was confident the government would meet its promises. 'We are absolutely clear-eyed about what that challenge is, but also about what the solutions are, and we have been very explicit in laying those out.' The welfare spending, he added, was an investment. 'It's about getting young people, giving them the best start in life, so they end up being contributing members to society, rather than the opposite. And that's really, really important.' The tables accompanying the GERS report show devolved social security payments rising by hundreds of millions. Aggregate social security spending in Scotland rose from £25.29 billion to £27.60 billion in a single year, before adding social care and pensions-related items within social protection. The government argues that devolved revenues cover devolved spending. But GERS shows that total spending growth is being driven by social protection faster than revenue growth, which is why the overall balance deteriorated despite onshore tax gains. Even if Mr McKee meets his £1 billion target, the annual increases in social security and wider social protection are already outpacing it. The question then is: what next? If social protection is ,er, protected in the budget, and if health spending is, as per usual, protected, then what needs to give for the government to keep its social contract? The obvious choices are higher taxation or further cuts. There are tough choices ahead.

Scottish Government panned for lack of Israel-linked arms firm checks
Scottish Government panned for lack of Israel-linked arms firm checks

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Scottish Government panned for lack of Israel-linked arms firm checks

A Freedom of Information request has revealed that two major arms companies in receipt of Scottish Enterprise grants – Italian arms giant Leonardo and American multinational Raytheon Systems – haven't received a human right due diligence check since October 2019 This funding comes despite both firms continue to supply Israel with weapons amid its genocide in Gaza. In that timeframe, both firms have also been in receipt of Scottish public money – Leonardo received £786,125 in 2023 while Raytheon Systems, which has a factory in Glenrothes, was given £500k in the first half of 2024. Leonardo produces laser targeting systems for Lockheed Martin, which sells the F-35 jets Israel, and Raytheon makes Paveway II guided missiles which are also used by Israel. READ MORE: JD Vance panned for 'lies about Scotland' ahead of luxury Ayrshire holiday The last time a check was performed on French arms firm Thales was July 2021, while Babcock was last checked in March 2022 and Chemring Energetics in December 2021. Bae Systems received a check in February 2024. In response, human rights charity Amnesty International told The National that the 'more we learn' about the checks 'the more concerning it becomes' that Scottish Enterprise and Scottish ministers are defending the process. Scottish Greens co-leader Lorna Slater, meanwhile, said it was 'shocking', adding: 'There is no point in having human rights checks at all if they are never carried out.' In total, Scottish Enterprise has given £8 million to 13 companies involved in weapons manufacturing since 2019. The Scottish Government has repeatedly insisted that no public funding goes towards the manufacturing of munitions specifically but other areas these companies operate in, including research, training and apprenticeships. Scottish Enterprise, meanwhile, has strongly denied its human rights checks are not adequate. However, that has been called into question given that, of the 199 human rights checks between 2021 and 2023, no firm has ever failed. When pressed on the issue in an exclusive interview with The National last weekend, First Minister John Swinney defended the grants. 'We won't support the production of munitions. That's our hard line. And we get criticised for taking that hard line, and I'm very confident that hard line is applied,' he said. The First Minister was then pressed on the argument that any funding – even if ring-fenced by the Scottish Government – will directly help a company's cash flow and could, hypothetically, free up money to be used elsewhere, including in the building of munitions. 'I understand that point. But there are also defence requirements of Scotland. Scotland is part of an island nation. We require, for example, shipbuilding resources to support the maritime defense of the United Kingdom because nobody wants to see us vulnerable to an attack from Russia. I certainly don't want to,' he responded. An Amnesty International spokesperson said: "Amnesty is aware from our own research that payments were made to companies known to supply Israel without a new check being triggered by the unfolding genocide in Gaza. 'Alarmingly, that is the process Scottish Enterprise and the Scottish Government attempted to characterise as robust and well aligned to international standards. The recent in-house review of the human rights checks recommended some improvements, but unsurprisingly they don't go far enough. We will be meeting with Scottish Enterprise in the coming weeks to take these concerns forward." Slater, meanwhile, said it 'flies in the face of any kind of due diligence'. "These are some of the biggest arms companies in the world. They have armed human rights abusers and dictatorships and some have directly enabled and profited from the genocide in Gaza,' she said. "They should not be receiving public money in the first place, and the Scottish Government absolutely should not be setting up tests to win favourable headlines while refusing to actually implement them. "How can we trust a word they say on ensuring they are applying human rights standards when they are refusing to even ask the right questions of those they are giving public money to?" Scottish Enterprise has been approached for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store