
Himachal Pradesh farmers demand ban on Turkish apple imports, seek 100pc duty on foreign apples
Shimla (Himachal Pradesh) [India], May 14 (ANI): Following Turkey's open support for Pakistan amid recent tensions between India and its neighbour, farmer organisations across Himachal Pradesh have called on Prime Minister Narendra Modi to impose a complete ban on the import of apples from Turkey and enforce strict import duties and quality standards on apples coming from other countries.
This move also comes in response to the sharp increase in subsidized, cheap foreign apples flooding Indian markets, which local farmer bodies say is crippling the domestic apple economy, especially in Himalayan states like Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir and Uttarakhand.
In a letter addressed to Prime Minister Modi, the Himalayan Apple Growers Society, the Himachal Pradesh Sanyukt Kisan Manch and other farmer groups highlighted how the country's 'Vocal for Local' and 'Aatmanirbhar Bharat' missions are being undermined by uncontrolled imports.
'Under your leadership, 'Vocal for Local' and 'Aatmanirbhar Bharat' have instilled a new sense of self-reliance. However, the continued and increasing import of apples, particularly from Turkey, is pushing our mountain farmers into a deep economic crisis,' the letter reads.
The letter noted that over 13 lakh families depend on apple cultivation for their livelihoods across the three Himalayan states, 4 lakh in Himachal, 8 lakh in Jammu and Kashmir, and 1 lakh in Uttarakhand. The practice is not only an economic lifeline but also intertwined with the socio-cultural identity and traditional rural economy of the region.
According to the farmer organisations, Turkey's apple exports to India have exploded over the past decade.
They say it was 205 tons in 2015-16, in 2023-24 it increased to over 1,20,000 tons.
The value of apple imports from Turkey has experienced significant growth. According to the data shared in the letter, apple imports were valued at Rs 563 crore in 2021-22. This increased to Rs 739 crore in 2022-23 and rose further to Rs 821 crore in the latest figures for 2023-24.
'This aggressive increase has created an oversupply of cheap and subsidised apples in the Indian market, pushing out locally grown apples and severely impacting domestic growers' incomes and market share,' the letter stated.
The farmers' organisation have collectively placed the demand of immediate and complete ban on apple imports from Turkey, Enforcement of a Minimum Import Price (MIP) on apples from all countries, Strict phytosanitary and quality standards for imported apples, A special horticulture protection policy for Himalayan states, including price stabilization, storage, and marketing support and Direct income support or Minimum Support Price (MSP) for apple growers.
'This is not just an economic issue but one of dignity, self-reliance, and rural identity,' the letter emphasises. 'Without timely government intervention, traditional apple-growing regions face a bleak future.'
Speaking to ANI, Sanjay Chauhan, Co-convener of the Himachal Pradesh Sanyukt Kisan Manch (Joint Fourm of Farmer organisations) and President of the states Seb Avm Fal Utpadak Sangh, voiced strong concerns about India becoming a dumping ground for foreign agricultural products.
'Agricultural produce from multiple countries is being dumped in India, especially apples from Turkey, US, Iran, Iraq, and others. This is creating a severe crisis in our domestic horticulture, especially in Himachal, Uttarakhand and Jammu and Kashmir,' he said.
Chauhan added that 123,000 metric tons of apples were imported from Turkey last year, exceeding Himachal Pradesh's annual production.
The US exported 2,30,000 metric tons to India. Iran, exploiting SAFTA provisions, is also flooding Indian markets with cheap apples routed through third countries.
'Why can't import duties on apples be raised to 100 per cent, just like they are for tea and coffee? If done, the minimum cost per kg would rise to Rs 100, discouraging illegal and cheap imports,' Chauhan argued.
Himachal Pradesh has 11 lakh hectares under cultivation, with 2 lakh hectares under fruit crops, half of which are dedicated to apples. The state produces about 5.5 lakh metric tons of apples annually, generating Rs 5500-6000 crore in revenue. With rising input costs for packaging, transport, and orchard maintenance, the lack of a support system has left growers vulnerable.
Farmer organisations also criticised the withdrawal of the Market Intervention Scheme, which earlier allowed states to procure apples at a base price.
Chauhan also questioned why India cannot raise import duties on apples to protect the apple growers of the country when Japan can levy 300-1000 per cent duties on rice.
'If Japan can impose a 300 to 1000 per cent import duty on rice to protect its farmers, why can't India raise duties on apples?' Chauhan asked. 'Our government imposes 105 per cent import duty on tea and coffee. But apple growers get no such protection, despite millions depending on it for their livelihood,' he questioned.
Citing the recent visit of US Vice President JD Vence and the expected trade agreements with the US, farmer groups have demanded transparency in negotiations, especially if duties on Washington apples are being reduced. They warned that government subsidies abroad, combined with reduced import duties in India, are killing the domestic apple market.
Sanjay Chauhan stated that if the government does not act, the farmers' movement will intensify.
'If the government cannot ban imports, it must impose at least 100 per cent import duty. We will approach the Governor to forward our memorandum to the Prime Minister, launch a poster campaign, and intensify our protest. This is about our livelihood, our dignity, and our future,' Chauhan added further.Farmer unions have vowed to continue their agitation until concrete action is taken to protect India's apple-growing regions from economic collapse. (ANI)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
28 minutes ago
- The Hindu
India abstains on Gaza ceasefire resolution in UNGA, just six months after voting for a similar resolution
India abstained from a UN General Assembly resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza for the fourth time in three years, indicating a growing trend in the Modi government's policy not to vote on statements critical of Israel's bombardment of Gaza, in which 55,000 have been had voted in favour of a UNGA resolution for ceasefire in December 2024, making this a significant departure from India's position just six months ago. India's vote came in even as External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar is in Paris for bilateral talks with French Foreign Minister Barrot, who is expected to request a high-level participation from India for a UN conference on creating conditions for a 'Two-State solution', that France is organising jointly with Saudi Arabia. Diplomatic sources for both countries said they have not so far heard about India's participation at the conference dated June 17-20, or well India would be represented by the Permanent Mission of India in New York. The MEA did not comment on the issue. According to a leaked demarch reported by U.S. media, the Trump administration has 'warned' partner countries not to join the conference or to make pledges for the recognition of Palestine. India recognised Palestine in 1988, and is among 147 of 193 UNGA countries that have already recognised the Palestinian state. The resolution at the UNGA on Thursday evening was introduced by Spain, and applause broke out in the assembly as it was passed with more than 4/5ths of all countries voting for it. India was one of 19 abstentions on the vote along with Albania, Dominica, Ecuador, Kiribati, Malawi and other countries, while 149 of 180 countries voted for the resolution entitled 'Protection of civilians and upholding legal and humanitarian obligations'. The United States voted with Israel and ten other countries against the resolution. India was the only country in South Asia, BRICS or the SCO groupings to abstain. Explaining the vote, India's Permanent Representative to the United Nations Paravathaneni Harish said that India was 'deeply concerned' about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, but that it decided to abstain 'in continuation' of previous votes in December 2022 criticising Israel for Human Rights violations and in December 2024 that referred the Israeli bombardment of Gaza to the International Court of Justice. India had also abstained in vote calling for a ceasefire in October 2023 and two other resolutions pertaining to human rights investigations in 2023-2024. 'Our vote today is in continuation of [these votes], in the belief that there is no other way to resolve conflicts but through dialogue and diplomacy. Our joint effort should be directed towards bringing the two sides closer,' Mr. Harish said, calling for an early resumption of 'direct peace negotiations' between Israel and Palestine. The single exception in the recent past, was on December 13, 2024, when India joined 158 countries at the UNGA that demanded an immediate ceasefire at the time. The resolution passed at the UNGA had called on Israel and Hamas to comply with international law obligations, and an 'immediate and permanent facilitation of full, rapid, safe and unhindered entry of humanitarian assistance at scale in Gaza, including food and medical supplies, fuel, shelter and access to clean drinking water'. #BREAKING UN General Assembly ADOPTS resolution that demands an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in the war in #Gaza. In favor: 149 Against: 12 Abstain: 19 — UN News (@UN_News_Centre) June 12, 2025 In their explanation, the U.S. Acting Ambassador Dorothy Shea criticised the resolution for not being critical of Hamas, although it called for the immediate return of the remaining hostages. However, Russian Ambassador Vasily Nebenzya said the death toll from Israel's bombardment and blockade of Gaza restricting humanitarian aid into the enclave was unacceptable and a ceasefire was necessary immediately. In the past three months since Israel cancelled the ceasefire, UN agencies including WHO estimate that dozens of children have died due to malnutrition effects, while about half a million of the 2million people in Gaza face a 'catastrophic situation of hunger, acute malnutrition, starvation, illness and death'. 'There was a time when the world was still horrified that the number of those killed in the Gaza Strip was approaching 15-, 20- or 30,000 people,' Mr. Nebenzya said. 'Now that number is almost twice that — 55,000.' All eyes are now on the French-Saudi conference that will bring together all members of the UN General Assembly to discuss how to implement a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine beginning June 17, just after the G-7 summit in Canada. 'Faced with the facts on the ground, the prospects of a Palestinian State must be maintained. Irreversible steps and concrete measures for the implementation thereof are necessary,' said Anne-Claire Legendre, Middle East and North Africa advisor to French President Emmanuel Macron, said at preparatory meeting last month. The Conference will produce an action-oriented outcome document entitled 'Peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine and implementation of the two-State solution'. According to a concept note from France and Saudi Arabia, the conference will also feature eight thematic roundtables with working groups on security arrangements for both Israelis and Palestinians, the economic viability of a Palestinian State, and humanitarian action and reconstruction.


The Wire
28 minutes ago
- The Wire
Why the Response to Rahul Gandhi's Accusation of a Stolen Election Is Less Than Convincing
It has taken the Election Commission four months to respond to opposition leader Rahul Gandhi's first disturbing accusation at a press conference in February – that the Commission had somehow managed not to notice that there were 16 lakh more adults on the voters' list for the Maharashtra assembly elections than the entire adult population of the state , and that while the electorate in the state had increased by 32 lakh persons between the 2014 and 2019 Lok Sabha elections, it had increased by 39 lakhs in five months between the Lok Sabha and assembly elections in 2024 . On June 7, Rahul Gandhi repeated the accusation with elaborations in an editorial page article in the Indian Express . Its responses came in the same newspaper in the form of an elaborate piece by reporters quoting an unnamed official of the Election Commission and a condescending article belittling Rahul Gandhi, by no less important a person than the chief minister of Maharashtra, Devendra Fadnavis. That these were published within 24 hours of Gandhi's article shows that the Indian Express had felt it necessary to submit Gandhi's letter to the Modi government and had waited for its response before publishing . This extraordinary act of caution from a newspaper widely respected for its courage shows just how severe the pressure from the Modi government on the media has become during the past 11 years. Since these are separate pieces, I shall deal with their merits separately. Defending the present system for the constitution of the Election Commission, the piece by three Indian Express writers asks why no previous government did not institutionalise a 'more transparent appointment mechanism'. The answer is that till the advent of the Modi government, no previous regime had felt the need to do so. This was because the Chief Election Commissioner was appointed by presidents and prime ministers of India who so deeply respected the letter and the spirit of the Constitution that the possibility that any one of them would conspire with the government in power to gerrymander the result of a Lok Sabha or assembly election had never arisen. T. Swaminathan was the CEC in 1975 when Indira Gandhi declared the Emergency and in 1977 when, despite having been warned by the Intelligence Bureau that the Congress would lose heavily in the next election she went ahead with it. As P.N. Dhar, her principal secretary in those years, has written in his memoirs, the possibility of continuing the Emergency for another year never arose in her mind. By the same token, S.L. Shakdher was the CEC when the Congress (I) came roaring back to power in 1980. No one questioned his complete integrity either then or later. Then, T.N. Seshan put an end to booth capturing by splitting the Lok Sabha elections into several phases and getting every polling station guarded by the police or the Central Reserve Police Forces. The opposition went to the Supreme Court only after it became convinced that Modi was pressuring the Election Commission members to secure decisions from them. This became public knowledge when the next-in-line CEC, Ashok Lavasa, abruptly submitted his resignation to the President of India, to join the Asian Development Bank in August 2020 . He did so because he did not agree with the CEC's exoneration of Modi and home minister Shah from charges of violating the EC's Model Code of Conduct during their campaigning for the 2019 elections. It was this blatant discord within the Commission that made the Supreme Court issue its directive in 2023 that future election commissioners had to be selected jointly by the prime minister, the leader of the opposition, and the Chief Justice of India. The Modi government once again treated this directive with contempt, and made a mockery of the Supreme Court directive by passing an amended version that replaced the CJI in the three-member panel of selectors with a minister, pretty much, of the prime minister's choice. The Indian Express piece quotes an unnamed 'senior Election Commission official', who says: 'Now for the first time a law made by Parliament under article 325 is in place for the appointment of the CEC and ECs … now there is consultancy, there is transparency'. This is an insult to anyone who reads the English language. The only 'transparency' in the new law is that in the future it shall be the prime minister who will appoint all the members of the Election Commission. Coming to Rahul Gandhi's second charge, that 41 lakh new voters were added to the electoral rolls in five months between the Lok Sabha and assembly elections, the lengthy response on Indian Express can be summed up in one sentence: if there has been widespread electoral malpractice, then why did no one from a single opposition party lodge a complaint before the election? It points out, '[P]olitical parties are involved at every stage of preparing the final electoral roll…Election authorities regularly hold meetings with political parties, provide them free copies of draft and final rolls, and publish these on official websites. During the summary revision period, weekly lists of additions and deletions are shared to allow objections.' The Election Commission's website has, in fact, a 24-page detailed report that elaborates upon this process at length. Ahead of the Maharashtra election, it went on to add, it held discussions with 103,727 representatives of the various parties, of whom 27,099 were from the Congress. The piece does not say 'various opposition parties', so this offers no clarity on how many were from the Maha Vikas Agadi opposition coalition. What this 'scrutiny' piece did not say was that even if we assume that half of these representatives – so, 52,000 – were from the MVA, then for this number of representatives to examine the lists of 100,186 polling booths, each MVA representative had to examine current and earlier versions of voters' lists that contained close to 2,000 names. Closely comparing current and earlier voting lists for every polling booth, even if comparable lists existed or had been preserved, would have been a mammoth task that few would have been able to accomplish, even if they had considered it necessary. And before the 2024 elections it had never been considered necessary because the nation's trust in the Election Commission had been complete. This is the trust that the Modi government has shattered. This loss of faith is justified. When the Aam Aadmi Party did begin to examine the updated voters' lists closely after its shock defeat in Delhi, it found that the names added and deleted in 17 out of its 70 constituencies using Form 7 of the Election Commission's registration forms had shifted an average of 3% of the vote to the BJP. The impact of these additions and deletions can be judged from the fact that the BJP's winning margin of the vote in Delhi was just 1.99%. It is not surprising therefore that the EC has so far adamantly ignored the demand for access to all the Form 7s that were used to add or delete voters to and from the electoral lists in Maharashtra. Finally the paper is silent on Rahul Gandhi's two most important allegations: How has the voters' list exceeded the entire adult population of Maharashtra by 16 lakhs, and how did the size of the electorate increase by nearly 41 lakhs in five months from the Lok Sabha elections of 2024 to the assembly elections of 2025, when it had increased by only 31 lakhs in five years from 2019 till 2024 ? To this, needless to say, the Election commission has given no answer. So I went to Grok, the 'most advanced' artificial intelligence system developed in the world so far, for an answer. After surveying each and every election and by-election held in India over the past 75 years, it concluded that the result of the assembly election in Maharashtra 'is the biggest mystery in the history of Indian elections'. This is part one of a two-part series on Rahul Gandhi's claims on the Maharashtra elections. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.


The Wire
29 minutes ago
- The Wire
Post-Degree Jobs Won't be Available Any More in the US, But It is Still the Best Option
Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute Now India sends students to the US in record numbers, but this academic year, applicants are feeling anxious before they head out. The changing policies of the Trump administration is likely to cause delays and tougher immigration questioning, among other things. Moreover, it is likely that the Optional Practical Training (OPT) programme, which allows F-1 visa holding students to work for a year or more, will be modified if not terminated. That was one of the great attractions for foreign students in the US. So is it still worth going to the US to study? 'Absolutely' says Viral Doshi, who has advised Indian students heading to the US for the last 20 years. 'No other country can match up to the US,' he says, in sheer number of colleges, in the kinds of courses it offers and in the experiences one can have. He acknowledges that parents have anxieties but 'I tell them, have patience,', he says in a podcast discussion with Sidharth Bhatia. 'Almost 50 percent students have already got visas and others will too, maybe a few weeks late for the first semester.' He says universities depend foreign students and are saying they will allow students to come late.' 'America is not the same as it was some years ago. Things have changed. 'No more internships and no more jobs or work experience'. And most important, he adds, 'Avoid political activism.' The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.