Plunge in European hiring sinks profit at recruitment giant Hays
The London-based company blamed 'considerable headwinds from economic conditions', as operating profit fell to £26 million, down 56% versus the same period in 2023.
Meanwhile, it closed 15 of its UK and Irish offices during the calendar year, and slashed the number of consultants by more than 1,100, including about 300 roles in the UK and Ireland.
Headcount has fallen by about 2,700 over the last two years, and stood at about 6,800 at the end of 2024.
Hays is among the biggest recruitment agencies in Europe, and its fortunes are closely tied to the market for office-based jobs in the UK, Germany, France and others.
It mainly hires for companies in the accountancy and technology sectors, among others.
But amid a swathe of elections across western Europe, and worsening economic conditions across much of the continent, hiring has slowed significantly.
Hays said: 'Economic and political uncertainty weighed on client and candidate confidence driving lower placement volumes and a material lengthening of our 'time-to-hire'.'
Fees across the group, which it brings in for hiring on behalf of clients, slumped 13% over the six months to December 31, compared to the year before.
In the UK and Ireland, it saw a 17% drop in fees.
The company also has offices in Australia, Japan and the US, among others.
Chief executive Dirk Hahn said the company faces 'considerable headwinds from economic conditions' and called it a 'challenging period'.
He added: 'Our key markets are being driven by powerful, supportive megatrends and remain characterised by significant talent shortages, which we help solve for our clients.
'When client and candidate confidence improves and the cycle recovers, I am confident we will deliver a healthy drop-through of net fees to operating profit.'
Hays said it had made cost cuts equivalent to about £25 million per year over the six-month period through 'operational restructuring and back office efficiency programmes'.
It comes after a swathe of large corporates in the UK criticised recent Government policy of raising taxes for companies.
Labour increased employer national insurance contributions in its October Budget, in a move designed to raise more money in taxes to spend on improvements to public services like the NHS.
But companies have criticised the plans for making it more expensive to hire people.
Adam Vettese, an analyst at the finance firm eToro, said 'low confidence and political uncertainty will have undoubtedly contributed' to Hays' drop in profit.
'Recruitment firms have had to batten down the hatches and being a market leader, Hays has been able to implement a wave of cost-cutting measures in order to weather the storm,' he added.
'Smaller firms in the space have not been so fortunate.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
a few seconds ago
- The Sun
Fury as train fares could soar by inflation-busting 5.8% next year despite services getting WORSE
TRAIN passengers could face a 5.8 per cent fares rise next year, even though punctuality is the worst since 2020. It would see the price of a Liverpool-to-Manchester annual flexi ticket jump by £120.30 to £2,195.10. 2 Increases are usually calculated by adding one percentage point to the Retail Price Index figure for inflation — which yesterday hit 4.8 per cent for July. The RPI is calculated by looking at the prices of 700 products and services but also includes mortgage interest payments and council tax. Fare rises could see a Woking-to-London season ticket soar by £247 to £4,507. Meanwhile, punctuality is at its lowest in more than five years. The Office of Rail and Road found trains reached 66.7 per cent of station stops on time in the year to July 19 — the worst since the year to May 2020. Labour is nationalising operators as contracts expire, with South Western Railway and c2c now under public ownership. Ben Plowden of Campaign for Better Transport said: 'The fundamental question for the Government is how to use its role in setting fares policy to deliver a more affordable network and encourage customers.' Shadow Transport Secretary Richard Holden said: 'Labour's election promises ring hollow as passengers are hit with inflation-busting rises on top of cancelled trains, driver shortages and chaos on the network.' The Department for Transport said an update on fares will be released later this year. Peak rail fares scrapped by John Swinney 2
The Sun
a few seconds ago
- The Sun
Labour want to use you & your home as cash cows – so council spending can keep spiralling and migrants can keep coming
NO one can say that this government is short of ideas. It is just that every single one of them involves one thing: How to extract even more of our money. 3 3 This week alone has seen a bewildering number of proposals dangled before us, many of which revolve around using our homes as cash cows. One day we learned that Rachel Reeves is considering replacing stamp duty and council tax with a new property tax which would be levied annually on our homes, proportionate to their current value. Then it turned out that actually this new tax wouldn't necessarily mean abolishing council tax — it would run alongside it, raising money from any home sold for more than £500,000. If fact, it transpired that we could face rising council tax bills. Angela Rayner reportedly wants them ratcheted up in more prosperous areas in order to subsidise poorer ones. Then came another suggestion: That higher-value homes might lose their exemption from capital gains tax. It could mean anyone selling a family home having to pay 24 per cent of the profit they have made on their property since they bought it, possibly decades ago. The Chancellor seems to have it in her head that Britain is in the midst of a housing crisis caused by greedy Baby Boomers — those born between the mid- 1940s and 1960s. They have monopolised the housing stock, and therefore she is justified in milking them for all they are worth. It is the same mentality that saw the Bolsheviks blaming the middle classes for every ill and sending them off to the gulags after the Russian Revolution. Is Labour's National Insurance hike a tax on working people? Last year's Budget already meted out punishment for buy to let investors, who were whacked with a two per cent rise in stamp duty. Now Reeves is coming for owner-occupiers too. But it shouldn't take her too much to realise that her proposals would make the housing crisis even worse. If you levy CGT on the sales of family homes, it will act as a huge disincentive for people to sell up and downsize. Why bother, when much of the capital you hoped to release would be gobbled up by the taxman? Punitive taxes on property ownership are just a wealth tax by another name, but they would hit millions of pensioners who are asset-rich but cash-poor. Just because a house has rocketed in value since it was bought in the 1970s doesn't mean that its owner feels wealthy. It is still the same house, whatever it is worth. The real reason for the housing crisis is low rates of house building combined with high rates of migration. 'PUNISHING HOMEOWNERS' When you are building fewer than 200,000 new homes a year but allowing the population to swell by 700,000 a year, it is a recipe for acute shortage. You can't solve that by punishing homeowners. As for council tax, Reeves seems to think that homeowners are getting a free ride. True, it is wrong that in one case a £36million mansion in Kensington was found to have a lower council tax bill than a flat out near Heathrow airport. But overall, council taxpayers have been stung in recent years. According to the Taxpayers' Alliance, the average bill rose by 79 per cent in real terms, ie adjusted for inflation, between 1993/94 and 2023/24. The odd absurdity in the council tax system should not be used as an excuse to push up bills for millions of homeowners. Over the years we have faced higher and higher bills for an ever-lousier service. The more we pay, the more our bins seem to go unemptied and deeper the potholes on our streets. Councils like to blame rising social care costs for their poor finances, but that is only part of the story. 3 Other important factors are poor investments in commercial property made by many councils, and the soaring cost of over-generous local government pension schemes. Freedom of information requests to 300 councils last year revealed that a quarter of what we pay in council tax is disappearing straight into council workers' pension funds. In one case, Basingstoke and Deane Council was found to be paying more into staff pensions than it was raising in council tax. Another reason we are paying more but getting less is lousy productivity. Astonishingly, some councils think the way to right this is to move workers to a four-day week — which they foolishly think will magically lead to them producing more. I have a better idea. Shift unproductive workers on to a zero-hour week. That might just help encourage the rest to put in a bit more effort. 'FLAPPING AROUND' The Government is flapping around for ways of raising extra revenue because Labour backbenchers have made it impossible to cut public spending. Reeves' plan to trim a modest £5billion from the benefits bill was quickly reversed when Keir Starmer realised he could suffer the humiliation of a Commons defeat. That has put an end to Reeves' efforts to balance the books with a combination of spending cuts as well as tax rises. Now, we are just getting the tax rises instead. We are being hammered because Labour MPs refuse to believe there is any such thing as wasteful public spending. Sadly, there is — and it permeates every area of government. But clearly the current government isn't going to do anything about it.
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
Investment fund sues Marex over alleged use of confidential information for trading position
LONDON, Aug 20 (Reuters) - An investment fund has filed a lawsuit in London against commodities broker and financial group Marex , alleging it used confidential information from the fund to support its own trading position, according to a court filing. London-based Marex Group plc declined to comment on the legal action. A court filing on August 7 by lawyers for Ocean Freight Trident Offshore Master Fund Limited against Marex said exact damages would be specified in the future, but would be at least 10 million pounds. The court document said the fund, registered in the Cayman Islands, opened an account with Marex in April 2024 and deposited $30 million, adding $12 million to the account between June and November. Marex liquidated the fund's entire positions in November 2024, the lawsuit said, without giving details of the positions. "In doing so as it did, the defendant purported to exercise its powers for the improper and collateral purpose of supporting its own proprietary trading position, adopted with the benefit of information that was confidential," the court filing said. John Hahn is chief investment officer and president of the manager of the fund, Ocean Freight Capital Management LLC, which is based in the U.S., it added. LinkedIn shows Hahn is based in Los Angeles and runs Ocean Freight Exchange, an AI platform for the shipping industry. Hahn previously worked for commodity traders Noble Group and Louis Dreyfus Company, LinkedIn showed. Hahn did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
