Southeast Asia ‘Is Not Such a Safe Haven'
Geopolitical uncertainty looms large and in charge over supply chain professionals' heads this year—and alternative sourcing comes with its own challenges.
Inspectorio's newly released State of Supply Chain Report 2025 shows that, even as supply chain professionals see opportunity for growth in other areas of their business, they feel keeping up with U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff regime has to be the top priority.
More from Sourcing Journal
Port Fees on Chinese Ships Would 'Distort Competition,' But Who Benefits?
Retailers Grow Concerned Over Proposed Port Fees for Chinese Ships
China, Hong Kong Cry Foul on Panama Ports Deal
The supply chain management software company's data shows that 95 percent of all executives surveyed indicated that tariffs are a primary disruptor to their businesses.
Daniel Smith, vice president of product marketing at Inspectorio, said, in previous years, sustainability and compliance have emerged as key focus points for supply chain industry professionals. The shift in prioritization marked a deviation from what the industry has expressed concern over in recent years.
'To see the rise of geopolitical strife, and especially tariffs, in the minds of the market as a really important topic that's overshadowing everything else, was a huge shift,' Smith said. 'It's extremely pressing. If you have slim margins as it is, and then you get a tariff placed on [a] piece of your product or material in your product or the finished good itself, that can really erase your margin.'
More than one in five executives indicated that, in response to that threat, their company has looked to diversify their supplier base, and 36 percent of executives said they are looking to either relocate production or shift sourcing to low-risk regions.
So far, the winner for alternative sourcing as some brands and retailers shift away from China has been Southeast Asia. Among respondents evaluating alternative locations for sourcing, about four in 10 executives indicated they've turned their interest there.
Mark Burstein, SVP Americas at Inspectorio, said companies have shown a particular interest in Vietnam, Bangladesh and Cambodia. That's likely in part because those nations have existing manufacturing infrastructure suited to handle some degree of scale.
But that's now becoming an issue, Burstein said, noting that, for brands and retailers looking to enter Vietnam, in particular, factories may not have the availability to create and ship finished goods their way.
'Everyone jumped into Vietnam, and they just don't have the capacity, so it's not like you're going to find a bunch of factories with available capacity,' he said.
And, even if companies can strike deals with manufacturers throughout Southeast Asia, it doesn't mean they've found a fireproof solution; Vietnam, Cambodia, Bangladesh and a slew of other countries could still be subject to new tariff requirements from the Trump administration, Burstein noted.
'Southeast Asia is not such a safe haven—it's [just] a safe haven to get out of China,' he said.
The alternatives don't seem popular among respondents; just over 20 percent said they would look to shift toward South Asia, while nearly 13 percent have an eye on Eastern Europe and about 7 percent are looking toward Latin America. Africa seems to be on the fringes of respondents' considerations on sourcing, with just over 5 percent saying they have prioritized it as an alternate sourcing location.
For Burstein, that feels like it could be a mistake. He recently lobbied legislators to renew the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) later this year, alongside the American Apparel and Footwear Association (AAFA). That's partly because he believes it could be a viable option for brands looking for a quick exit from China and a new set of long-term manufacturing partners.
But despite the opportunity in Africa, companies don't seem to be biting. That's partially because the continent would need a high degree of further investment to make scalable sourcing viable—and the looming expiration of AGOA could be driving some of the trepidation about sourcing from Africa.
What's more, Smith noted, some of the existing investment in the continent has come from Chinese companies, which could spell trouble if Trump continues to show an interest in bringing the hammer down on China. Effectively, the continent faces the plight of every other region vying for new business: businesses have no way of knowing whether tariffs will soon hit African nations.
'China has been investing heavily in Africa for quite a while,' Smith said. 'If you switch some sourcing over to Africa, you might think you're in the clear, but we know that this administration is using tariffs as a weapon. They have certain outcomes that they're wanting; they want certain nations to feel the pain. There's no reason why they wouldn't say, 'Okay, I see you're importing that from Africa, but that factory was owned by a Chinese company…and we're not cool with that, so we're going to slap the tariff on you anyway.''
That kind of strategy isn't totally out of the question; Trump has already proposed a port tax on container shippers with ties to China—whether because they have China-operated ships, China-built ships or orders with Chinese shipbuilders for future ships. The proposal hasn't been finalized, and has faced heavy backlash from the industry because of the gargantuan cost increases it could see logistics companies paying, but Trump proposed it in a play to bring some shipbuilding to the United States. If the president maintains similar aspirations for U.S. apparel manufacturing, locales with factories associated with China could be susceptible to a similar blueprint.
Those kind of additional tariffs on any alternative sourcing destination could leave brands and retailers feeling defeated, paying higher prices for goods and passing those costs on to the end consumer. But, as the arena stands today, Burstein said he has yet to see movement from some companies whose sourcing strategies could leave them in limbo. In essence, nowhere's safe, but China certainly isn't.
'People are just waiting to see what happens, because things change every day—even sometimes, every hour, they're changing,' he said. 'People don't want to make a rash decision.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court lets Trump administration keep collecting tariffs while challenges continue
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal appeals court agreed Tuesday to let the government keep collecting President Donald Trump's sweeping import taxes while challenges to his signature trade policy continue on appeal. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit extends a similar ruling it made after another federal court struck down the tariffs May 28, saying Trump had overstepped his authority. Noting that the challenges to Trump's tariffs raise "issues of exceptional importance,'' the appeals court said it would expedite the case and hear arguments July 31. The case involves 10% tariffs the president imposed on almost every country in April and bigger ones he imposed and then suspended on countries with which the United States runs trade deficits. It also involves tariffs Trump plastered on imports from China, Canada and Mexico to pressure them to do more to stop the illegal flow of immigrants and synthetic opioids across the U.S. border. In declaring the tariffs, Trump had invoked emergency powers under a 1977 law. But a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled he had exceeded his power. The tariffs upended global trade, paralyzed businesses and spooked financial markets. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil prices down, markets assess US-China trade talks outcome
By Katya Golubkova TOKYO (Reuters) -Oil prices fell in early trade on Wednesday as markets were assessing the outcome of U.S.-China trade talks, yet to be reviewed by President Donald Trump, with weak oil demand from China and OPEC+ production increases weighing on the market. Brent crude futures lost 24 cents, or 0.36%, to trade at $66.63 a barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude fell 21 cents, or 0.32%, to $64.77 at 0119 GMT. U.S. and Chinese officials agreed on a framework to put their trade truce back on track and resolve China's export restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Tuesday at the conclusion of two days of intense negotiations in London. Trump will be briefed on the outcome before approving it, Lutnick added. "In terms of what it means for crude oil, I think it removes some downside risks, particularly to the Chinese economy and steadies the ship for the U.S. economy - both of which should be supportive for crude oil demand and the price," said Tony Sycamore, a market analyst for IG. Oil import data from China earlier this week and ongoing production increases from OPEC+, which includes the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies such as Russia, were adding to the downside. OPEC+ plans to increase oil production by 411,000 barrels per day for July as it looks to unwind production cuts for a fourth straight month. Meanwhile, China's customs data showed this week the country, the world's biggest oil importer, brought in 46.60 million tonnes of crude oil in May, down 3% from the previous month, with imports of oil products falling by 12.9%. Later on Wednesday, markets will be focusing on the weekly U.S. oil inventories report from the Energy Information Administration, the statistical arm of the U.S. Department of Energy. Analysts polled by Reuters expect U.S. crude oil stockpiles fell by 2 million barrels in the week to June 6, while distillate and gasoline inventories likely rose. Their estimates are for a bigger decline in crude stocks than figures from American Petroleum Institute showed. The API reported on Tuesday that crude stocks fell by 370,000 barrels last week, sources said on condition of anonymity. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CP NewsAlert: Court rules Trump's tariffs can stay in effect while appeal proceeds
WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs on most countries around the world can remain in place while a federal appeals court decides on their future. The U.S. Court of International Trade ruled the duties were unlawful last month. More to come. Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data