logo
Apple unveils software redesign while reeling from AI missteps, tech upheaval and Trump's trade war

Apple unveils software redesign while reeling from AI missteps, tech upheaval and Trump's trade war

Boston Globe3 hours ago

Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
MEDIA
Advertisement
Warner Bros. Discovery to split into two companies
Advertisement
A Warner Bros. Discovery office in New York.
Yuki Iwamura/Bloomberg
Another high-profile divorce just shook Hollywood. Warner Bros. Discovery, the film and TV colossus behind HBO and CNN, announced Monday that it would cleave itself into two companies, becoming the latest entertainment conglomerate to unshackle its withering cable networks from its growing streaming services. David Zaslav, CEO of Warner Bros. Discovery, will lead the company's streaming and studios business, which will include streaming service HBO Max and Warner Bros. Motion Picture Group. The cable business, which will include CNN, will be run by Gunnar Wiedenfels, chief financial officer of Warner Bros. Discovery. Warner Bros. Discovery said it expected the transaction to be completed by the middle of next year. Shares of the company increased nearly 10 percent on news of the separation. The decision to split is a major about-face from the conventional wisdom in the industry when Warner Bros. Discovery was created three years ago — that media companies needed to get bigger to compete with streaming giants like Netflix. Following that logic, Disney acquired 21st Century Fox, AT&T bought Time Warner, and Discovery merged with WarnerMedia. US media giants have been looking to jettison their declining cable networks while preserving their faster-growing streaming services. Comcast, the parent company of NBC and Universal Studios, said last year it would separate its traditional TV business into a new company called Versant. — NEW YORK TIMES
Advertisement
AUTOMOTIVE
Waymo halts LA service after cars destroyed during protests
This picture taken on June 8 shows a protester raising a fist while holding a Mexican flag in front of a Waymo vehicle that was set on fire during a demonstration following federal immigration operations in Los Angeles.
BLAKE FAGAN/AFP via Getty Images
Waymo has suspended service of its ride-hailing service in downtown Los Angeles after its vehicles were set on fire during protests against immigration raids in the area. Waymo doesn't believe the protests are related to the company specifically, according to the company. It has removed vehicles from downtown Los Angeles with guidance from the Los Angeles Police Department and won't be serving the area, the company said. At least five Waymo vehicles had been set on fire as of Sunday evening, according to local news station KTLA. The self-driving car service is owned by Google parent Alphabet Inc. E-scooters operated by Lime were also set on fire, according to TechCrunch. 'For the safety of all involved, we implore everyone to refrain from using our vehicles for anything other than their intended purpose,' Lime said in a statement. The company is monitoring the situation and will 'respond accordingly to keep our teams, vehicles and the broader LA community safe.' — BLOOMBERG NEWS
CLEAN ENERGY
Solar bankruptcies indicative of a wider-spread issue
Solar panels on the roofs of homes in Tucson, Ariz.
Rebecca Noble/Bloomberg
The US clean energy industry is starting to buckle under the weight of persistently elevated borrowing costs, President Trump's anti-renewables policies, and high tariffs. The latest domino to fall is residential solar company Sunnova Energy International Inc., which filed for bankruptcy early Monday. Its demise follows the Chapter 11 filing last week of Solar Mosaic LLC, one of the biggest lenders in the rooftop solar market. And it's not just home solar firms running into trouble: Since January, businesses have canceled or delayed more than $14 billion in clean energy and electric vehicle investments, according to a recent analysis by E2, a non-partisan group that advocates for renewables and policies to protect the environment. Clean energy's financing struggles arrive at a critical time for the US power industry. Utilities are rushing to meet growing demand from data centers running artificial intelligence applications. Advocates for solar, wind, and batteries say those resources are faster — and cheaper — to deploy compared with traditional generation sources. But the Trump administration's support for fossil fuels is putting renewables' grip on the market at risk. — BLOOMBERG NEWS
Advertisement
SOCIAL MEDIA
YouTube loosens rules guiding the moderation of videos
The YouTube logo is seen outside the company's corporate headquarters in San Bruno, Calif.
JOSH EDELSON/AFP via Getty Images
For years, YouTube has removed videos with derogatory slurs, misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines and election falsehoods, saying the content violated the platform's rules. But since President Trump's return to the White House, YouTube has encouraged its content moderators to leave up videos with content that may break the platform's rules rather than remove them, as long as the videos are considered to be in the public interest. Those would include discussions of political, social, and cultural issues. The policy shift, which hasn't been publicly disclosed, made YouTube the latest social media platform to back off efforts to police online speech in the wake of Republican pressure to stop moderating content. In January, Meta made a similar move, ending a fact-checking program on social media posts. Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, followed in the footsteps of X, Elon Musk's social platform, and turned responsibility for policing content over to users. But unlike Meta and X, YouTube has not made public statements about relaxing its content moderation. The online video service introduced its new policy in mid-December in training material that was reviewed by The New York Times. For videos considered to be in the public interest, YouTube raised the threshold for the amount of offending content permitted to half a video, from a quarter of a video. The platform also encouraged moderators to leave up those videos, which would include City Council meetings, campaign rallies, and political conversations. — NEW YORK TIMES
Advertisement
ENTERTAINMENT
Tony Awards draw best audience in 6 years for CBS
Host Cynthia Erivo performed during the 78th Tony Awards on June 8 at Radio City Music Hall in New York.
Charles Sykes/Charles Sykes/Invision/AP
The Tony Awards on Sunday lured 4.85 million viewers to CBS, its largest broadcast audience in six years, according to Nielsen's data. CBS said Monday the telecast — hosted by 'Wicked' star Cynthia Erivo — scored a 38 percent increase over last year's 3.53 million viewers. That's the largest audience for the Tonys since 2019, when the telecast that year nabbed 5.4 million viewers and 'Hadestown ' was crowned best new musical. The latest version also had to compete with the second game of the NBA Finals, between the Thunder and Pacers, CBS also said the awards show drew its largest ever streaming audience on Paramount+ but did not disclose streaming viewership numbers, only saying it was up 208 percent from last year. — ASSOCIATED PRESS

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP lawmakers uneasy about package to codify DOGE cuts ahead of House vote this week
GOP lawmakers uneasy about package to codify DOGE cuts ahead of House vote this week

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

GOP lawmakers uneasy about package to codify DOGE cuts ahead of House vote this week

Multiple Republican lawmakers are voicing concerns about backing a high-profile measure later this week to codify Elon Musk's DOGE cuts – raising questions about whether it can pass the House at all. Two Republicans – Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada and Nicole Malliotakis of New York – separately told CNN they have concerns with the White House's push to defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. 'Still mulling,' Amodei said when asked if he would support the package of cuts. 'The impact on local PBS stations appears to be significant.' Other Republicans have heartburn about how it could cut the Bush-era program, PEPFAR, devoted to fighting HIV and AIDS globally. 'If it cuts PEPFAR like they're saying it is, that's not good,' GOP Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska told CNN last week. House GOP leaders plan to put the package of cuts, totaling $9.4 billion, on the floor as soon as Thursday, according to two people familiar with the plans. But Speaker Mike Johnson will need near unanimity in his conference for the package to pass the House, where he can only lose three votes. Johnson said on Monday that he's 'working on' getting enough votes for the Department of Government Efficiency spending cuts package he hopes to bring to the floor this week. 'The only concern I heard initially was some wanted a little more specificity and detail on what was in the package,' Johnson continued. Asked how he would persuade members that wanted more specificity in the package, Johnson replied, 'I'm gathering up all their questions and we'll try to get them all answered. I mean, that's what we do in every piece of legislation.' If it can survive the House, it will face major obstacles in the Senate. Sen. Susan Collins of Maine told CNN on Monday that she has major misgivings about the global health cuts, including PEPFAR. 'I think we can change it. We're still figuring out what the set rules are,' Collins said. The White House sent its long-awaited spending cuts request to Congress as it seeks to formalize a slew of DOGE slashes to federal funding. The $9.4 billion package – known as 'rescissions' on Capitol Hill – would claw back previously appropriated government funding. The move to cancel the funding through Congress would insulate the administration from legal challenges related to its cuts to federal funding. Johnson said on Monday, 'We'd like to do multiple rescissions packages, and this first one I'm sure will be successful.' This initial request, however, is far more limited in scope than the more than $1 trillion in spending cuts that DOGE has promised. The lengthy time it took the White House to send over a first round of cuts underscores the uphill battle for even a Republican-led Congress to codify DOGE's work. CNN's Molly English contributed to this report.

WWE's First Crossover With AAA Locks Down 4.1M Viewers In 24 Hours As Company's First Full In-Ring YouTube Broadcast
WWE's First Crossover With AAA Locks Down 4.1M Viewers In 24 Hours As Company's First Full In-Ring YouTube Broadcast

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

WWE's First Crossover With AAA Locks Down 4.1M Viewers In 24 Hours As Company's First Full In-Ring YouTube Broadcast

The WWE set a new audience record with its first AAA crossover event since acquiring the leading Mexican lucha libre promotion in April. Worlds Collide drew the largest live audience on a YouTube broadcast in WWE history, per the company. Advertisement More from Deadline The average live viewership wasn't disclosed, though the company did say that the June 7 event at the Kia Forum in Los Angeles peaked at 764,389 live concurrent viewers across the WWE and WWE Espańol YouTube channels during the main event between El Hijo del Vikingo and Chad Gable. Additionally, Saturday's broadcast has raked in more than 4.1M viewers on YouTube in the first 24 hours. Worlds Collide marked the first full in-ring show that the WWE has streamed live on YouTube. The company's main channel boasts more than 109M subscribers, making it one of the most powerful on the platform. Advertisement This is a strong start for the collaboration between the WWE and AAA. It also illustrates the power of YouTube. YouTube consistently ranks as the top streamer in the U.S., far outpacing its competitors, including Netflix, in terms of monthly average usage time. It is also on pace to surpass even Disney's revenue by the end of the year to become the top global player in media, per one veteran Wall Street Analyst. The positive performance here potentially opens the door for more YouTube broadcasting opportunities within the WWE as it continues to expand its brand and leverage a vast array of properties from its main events to weekly offerings. Best of Deadline Sign up for Deadline's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

DoorDash accused of purposely misleading its customers
DoorDash accused of purposely misleading its customers

Miami Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

DoorDash accused of purposely misleading its customers

DoorDash (DASH) was founded in 2013 by a small group of Stanford students with the idea of helping small businesses with food delivery. Tony Xu, Andy Fang, Stanley Tang, and Evan Moore were so humble when they launched the business, which was originally called Palo Alto Delivery, that they made food deliveries themselves. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter After getting $120,000 in funding from Y Combinator in trade for a 7% stake in the business, the company renamed itself DoorDash in 2013 and started on a road that would eventually lead to enormous success. While DoorDash wasn't the only food delivery business of its type when it launched - Uber Eats was also in the space - it eventually eclipsed it, becoming the largest food delivery provider by 2019. Related: DoorDash tries controversial method to deliver your meal Today, DoorDash holds the largest market share of 67%, compared to Uber Eats' 23%, per Statistica. The company has also expanded outside the food delivery space, offering everything from flowers to beauty products to pet food. Basically, if you can walk into a store and buy it, DoorDash is willing to bring it to you. But now DoorDash is facing new claims that it purposely misleads its customers, which could have a serious effect on its reputation as a company if proven true. The Competition Bureau announced that it filed a lawsuit against DoorDash and its Canadian subsidiary on Monday for a practice it calls "drip pricing." Drip pricing is a pricing technique in which firms advertise only part of a product's price and reveal other charges later as the customer goes through the buying process, per the Federal Trade Commission's description. More Restaurants: Beloved Mexican restaurant closing iconic location after 63 yearsMajor restaurant chain quietly closes several locationsIconic restaurant closing its doors after 32 years The lawsuit alleges that DoorDash misleads its customers by advertising lower prices that are very different by the time the customer makes it to checkout and fees are tacked on. "The company has been engaging in the alleged conduct for close to a decade, acquiring nearly $1 billion in mandatory fees from consumers," the Competition Bureau said in a statement. The lawsuit also alleges that DoorDash makes certain fees appear as if they are taxes, when they are not. Related: Domino's Pizza suffers a startling loss as customers switch gears It also also asks DoorDash to "stop the deceptive price and discount advertising; stop portraying fees as taxes; pay a penalty; and issue restitution to affected consumers who purchased food and other items through DoorDash's platform." DoorDash gave a statement to TheStreet, saying,"Transparency with customers is a top priority at DoorDash. All fees on DoorDash, which support the high-quality operations of our platform, are clearly labeled and disclosed to consumers through the ordering process - including a final review before payment. To be crystal clear, DoorDash does not hide fees from consumers or mislead them in any way." "This application is a misguided and excessive attempt to target one of Canada's leading local commerce platforms. It unfairly singles out DoorDash, and we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against these claims." Live Nation/Ticketmaster is another business that's been accused of deceptive pricing, leading to public outcry. It's faced multiple allegations of tacking on fees that could drive up the cost of a ticket significantly. Its Dynamic Pricing model also allowed people to resell tickets for dramatically higher prices, which many felt was a way of aiding scalpers. The issue was further spotlighted after complaints around ticketing breakdown for Taylor Swift's Eras tour, and many fans sued the company because of the way the event was handled. The Justice Department sued Ticketmaster in May of 2024, swearing to break up what it called a "monopoly" across the live concert industry. This case is currently ongoing. In the meantime, on May 8, 2025, Ticketmaster announced a new model called All In Pricing that would include all fees (not not taxes). Related: Jim Cramer says these hot new stocks are ones to watch The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store