logo
Lauren Ruggiero Leaving As SVP Scripted At MTV Entertainment Studios Amid Paramount Layoffs

Lauren Ruggiero Leaving As SVP Scripted At MTV Entertainment Studios Amid Paramount Layoffs

Yahoo11-06-2025
EXCLUSIVE: Veteran scripted executive Lauren Ruggiero, SVP Scripted Series at MTV Entertainment Studios, is departing as part of the Tuesday round of companywide layoffs impacting 3.5% of parent Paramount Global's workforce, Deadline has learned.
Ruggiero has been at Paramount for a decade. She started at Paramount Network where she was promoted to VP and subsequently SVP, Scripted Original Series, before migrating to MTV Entertainment Studios, the studio behind Paramount Network's mega hit Yellowstone, on which Ruggiero served as executive in charge of production during its early seasons.
More from Deadline
CBS Studios' EVP Casting Deborah Aquila Departs Amid Paramount Layoffs; CBS' SVP Late Night Nick Bernstein Exits As 'After Midnight' Ends
Paramount Cutting Another 3.5% Of Its Domestic Workforce, Citing Linear TV Declines And Broader Economy
Paramount Global CFO Naveen Chopra Is Departing
During her tenure, Ruggiero has been a top lieutenant of Keith Cox, now President of scripted for MTV Entertainment Studios and Showtime. The departure of a high-level programming executive like Ruggiero comes amid speculation about the future of MTV Entertainment Studios as a standalone entity should Skydance's acquisition of Paramount get regulatory approval.
A popular executive among the creative community, Ruggiero led scripted development and oversaw scripted programming from development through production at Paramount Network and then MTVE Studios. In addition to Yellowstone, she worked on other MTVE Studios series from Taylor Sheridan, including 1883 and Tulsa King.
Ruggiero is among dozens of executives leaving Paramount this week as part of the latest layoffs that also impacted five members of CBS Studios' casting department, including Deborah Aquila, EVP and head of casting for streaming series.
'As we navigate the continued industry-wide linear declines and dynamic macro-economic environment, while prioritizing investments in our growing streaming business, we are taking the hard, but necessary steps to further streamline our organization starting this week,' Paramount co-CEOs George Cheeks, Chris McCarthy and Brian Robbins wrote in a staff memo this morning about the staff cuts.
Best of Deadline
List Of Hollywood & Media Layoffs From Paramount To Warner Bros Discovery To CNN & More
Sean 'Diddy' Combs Sex-Trafficking Trial Updates: Cassie Ventura's Testimony, $10M Hotel Settlement, Drugs, Violence, & The Feds
A Full Timeline Of Blake Lively & Justin Baldoni's 'It Ends With Us' Feud In Court, Online & In The Media
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Netflix Could Lose ‘Stranger Things' Creators After Season 5 To Paramount+
Netflix Could Lose ‘Stranger Things' Creators After Season 5 To Paramount+

Forbes

time4 hours ago

  • Forbes

Netflix Could Lose ‘Stranger Things' Creators After Season 5 To Paramount+

The world of streaming can be competitive to the point of being cutthroat, and there's a development brewing between Netflix and Paramount that may not go well for the former. Variety reports that Stranger Things creators/showrunners the Duffer Brothers are in 'advanced negotiations' to make movies and shows for Paramount. An existing connection there is that Cindy Holland, Paramount's new streaming head, was the exec who originally greenlit Stranger Things at Netflix, and the rest is history. It wouldn't just be an instant departure. Despite working hard on finishing Stranger Things , the Duffer Brothers have two new series coming in 2026, The Boroughs and Something Very Bad is Going To Happen. There's also an animated Stranger Things feature coming. Rumors of Stranger Things spin-offs have been circulating for a while, and one of those still seems to be in place. But long-term, losing the architects of one of Netflix's most popular series of all time would be less than ideal for them, and it would be a big boon for Paramount+, a service anchored on legacy series and piles of new shows from Yellowstone's Taylor Sheridan like Tulsa King and Landman . Stranger Things will end with season 5 this year with a somewhat ridiculous airing schedule of four episodes airing on November 26, three episode on Christmas Day and the last episode on New Year's Day, as somehow Netflix remains allergic to a true week-to-week offering, opting for these odd breaks instead (currently, Wednesday season 2 is on hiatus until its second half airs in September). We have seen plenty of departures like this before. A recent high profile one was Mike Flanagan, who made such Netflix classics like The Haunting of Hill House and Midnight Mass . Now he's over at Amazon doing Carrie and The Dark Tower series. Netflix is clearly looking for its next Stranger Things -sized hit. That show and Squid Game end this year, though fortunately it does have Wednesday to run for the foreseeable future. It does, however, remain the clear, unequivocal powerhouse in the streaming industry. A recent report said Netflix earns more than all its major streaming rivals combined, and its revenue is surging. Even with big shows ending, it keeps producing consistent hits and retaining subscribers. Paramount+, however, has been on the up after adding a number of well-watched series and distancing itself from a service it was once compared to, Peacock, which is losing boatloads of money. Grabbing the Duffer Brothers for new projects would be a big get for Paramount, but this deal is not done yet. Follow me on Twitter , YouTube , and Instagram . Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy .

Column: Nominations for Jeff Awards bittersweet as Paramount in Aurora faces financial challenges
Column: Nominations for Jeff Awards bittersweet as Paramount in Aurora faces financial challenges

Chicago Tribune

time5 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Column: Nominations for Jeff Awards bittersweet as Paramount in Aurora faces financial challenges

There's something to be said about the timing of the news coming out of the Paramount this week. A total of 26 nominations for Chicago's prestigious Equity Joseph Jefferson Awards went to Aurora's downtown theater, besting any venue in Chicago, including the Goodman and Court theaters, which came in with 21 each. Paramount venues picked up those two-dozen-plus nominations for six shows, with 'Cats' earning 10, followed by the holiday regional premiere of 'Frozen' garnering eight. The announcement came as a much-needed shot in the arm for the Paramount, which laid off 17 of its staff and cancelled the highly acclaimed BOLD Series because of possible reductions in discussed financial support from the city of Aurora. The mood was dark last week. Understandably. No one was jumping up and down, including the mayor, who is convinced the city's debt must be addressed aggressively, and that too much money was going to the Aurora Civic Center Authority, which oversees the downtown theater and its other performance venues, including Stolp Island and Copley theaters. 'Surreal' and 'devastating' were a couple of the words used by staff who were impacted most by the staff cuts and cancellation of the BOLD Series. And residents reacted, as well. At Tuesday's City Council meeting, multiple aldermen made it a point of letting the mayor know many constituents were not happy. 'Upset is an understatement,' said Jonathan Nunez, who represents the 4th Ward. And, as is always the case, particularly when social media is involved, there's lots of information and misinformation flying around. Suddenly, headlines and online chatter about Aurora, which has enjoyed plenty of positive news over the years, thanks in large part to the success of the Paramount, were not so sunny. But Laesch did what he could to offset the negative by putting out a YouTube video of him strolling along the riverwalk in Aurora, stopping at the box office and letting viewers know he was purchasing tickets to the Broadway Series at the Paramount. The mayor also focused on the 'growing relationship' between the city and Paramount, and offered suggestions on ways to raise revenue for ACCA, such as adjusting ticket prices, cross promotions with restaurants and more corporate sponsorships and outings. He repeated that need for a strong working relationship at Tuesday's City Council meeting, where multiple council members expressed concerns about the city possibly drastically reducing discussed financial support to the Paramount. Why not provide 'a soft landing to assist them,' asked 6th Ward Ald. Mike Saville. If Aurora doesn't offer the quantity and quality of shows as in the past, warned Patty Smith, who represents the 8th Ward, 'the cuts are going to come back at us.' But Laesch remained adamant, noting the unpopular but tough position he stepped into as mayor, declaring 'we don't have the money to hand out,' and that the only solution is to 'work together to move forward.' Later, Ald. Ted Mesiacos, 3rd Ward, who sits on the City Council Finance Committee, expressed frustration that he and other aldermen were not brought into discussions between the mayor and the Paramount that led to the drastic announcement that the BOLD Series was being cancelled. No one on the council has seen the city's projected budget numbers — the City Council will receive a financial update on Aug. 26 – nor has anyone from ACCA talked to the council about the challenges the Paramount is facing and what it needs to get through them, he said. Calling for discernment and patience, Mesiacos insisted 'we need numbers from both sides' so that conversations can continue. 'Once we get concrete data, we will look at it,' he said. 'I only wish we would have had it before the decision was made to cut the BOLD Series. I would have loved to figure out how to save it.' Referring to the Paramount's impact in Aurora, Mesiacos continued, 'We have a V-8 engine. If you take out a piston, it's not going to work as well.' The fact two shows from the Copley Theatre's BOLD series – 'Peter and the Starcatcher' and 'The 25th Annual Putnam County Spelling Bee' – received Jeff nods had to have been bittersweet for many. But the good news is that the Broadway Series, which has made the Paramount the number one subscription theater in the country, will continue, although it only stands to reason there will be changes in the way some of the shows will be presented. Two of its shows which brought in the most nominations were certainly grand spectacles that came with a higher price tag. But as one Paramount fan from Normal, Illinois, noted in an email I received this week, the quality of these downtown Aurora shows, including Stolp Island Theatre's 'Million Dollar Quartet,' which got three Jeff nominations, rival anything he and his family have seen on New York or London stages. Which is why they are willing to drive more than two hours to this city, where, as he pointed out, they spend money staying in Aurora hotels and eating at Aurora restaurants. That Aurora did so well against the best theaters in Chicago can't help but add at least a little fuel to the fiery emotions swirling around the Paramount right now. More than anything, however, these nominations have helped with morale at a time when it was very much needed, said Paramount CEO Tim Rater. 'It gives recognition to the creative artists for all the efforts' they put toward their craft, he added. 'We really are lucky to work with people who are so talented.'

Why Paramount's $7.7 Billion UFC Gamble Will Pay Off
Why Paramount's $7.7 Billion UFC Gamble Will Pay Off

Forbes

time6 hours ago

  • Forbes

Why Paramount's $7.7 Billion UFC Gamble Will Pay Off

I n his first week as the new owner and CEO of Paramount Skydance, David Ellison has wasted no time differentiating himself from the previous ownership group. With a $1.5 billion dollar deal for South Park and a blockbuster $7.7 deal to land UFC for the next seven years, he has already committed billions in just his first week on the job, and may not be done writing big checks. But considering the company has struggled with profitability in recent years, recording an operating loss of $5.27 billion in 2024, it's reasonable to wonder how Paramount plans to recoup the value for the $1.1 billion per year it will pay on average to the UFC, and whether in an effort to outbid competitors like Amazon and Netflix it paid too high a price. 'On a standalone basis we struggle to see how Paramount earns back their investment,' MoffettNathanson analyst Robert Fishman wrote in a research note this week. 'However, this deal does cement Paramount's willingness to once again invest serious capital into the business in an effort to scale long-term.' Under the previous ownership of National Amusements, led by Shari Redstone, Paramount looked in recent years to shore up its balance sheet by selling or licensing some of its most valuable assets. In 2021, it sold the skyscraper that served as CBS' New York headquarters for $760 million and later that year unloaded the CBS Studio Center in Los Angeles for $1.85 billion. Two years later, Paramount sold the publishing company Simon & Schuster for $1.62 billion, and explored further sales for cable channel BET and streaming service Showtime that never materialized. Two of the company's flagship shows, Yellowstone and South Park , were licensed to other streaming services for a cash influx. The 42-year-old Ellison—son of the world's second richest person, billionaire Oracle founder Larry Ellison—has already made it clear his intention to reverse that trend. On Wednesday, he told reporters that Paramount was no longer shopping BET and plans to keep the company's assets intact for now. As he told the Wall Street Journal this week: 'You can't cut to grow.' Still, the money has to come from somewhere—other than the $290 billion net worth of his father. The younger Ellison has promised $2 billion in cuts, and significant layoffs are expected to occur before the end of the year. In the short-term it will be a tight squeeze, with the company's streaming efforts being bankrolled by its linear broadcast channels. 'Certainly for the first half of this [UFC] deal, CBS is paying for it,' says Patrick Crakes, a media analyst and former Fox Sports executive who worked closely with UFC during its time on the network. 'Will it make a lot of money back? I don't know, but I don't think that was the point. Paramount has increased its value with this deal by being viable. And this makes it more viable and important and must-see. So I would look for them to invest more in this area, not less.' Crakes knows firsthand what effects a deal like this can have on a network. In 1993 he had just been promoted out of the mail room at Fox, and was asked to load slides into the carousel for a presentation the network was making to the NFL, whose television rights were up for renegotiation. Fox eventually won the NFC package away from incumbent CBS by paying $400 million per year, seen at the time as vastly overpaying for football, considering CBS' previous $265 million deal. During Crakes' 23 years at Fox, he says he can only recall the NFL turning a direct accounting profit once. But because of the value and legitimacy the league brought to Rupert Murdoch's then-nascent network, it was able to negotiate for better signal strength, channel position, and eventually build up a local station affiliate network that became enormously profitable for the company. While the UFC is clearly not on the level of the NFL, it does have a rabid fanbase that has proven it will follow the sport to new platforms. In his MoffettNathanson report, Fishman estimates that UFC could attract six million new subscribers to Paramount+, comparable to its first two years on ESPN+, with the potential for more because of the elimination of the pay-per-view model on its biggest events. Those numbers are a drop in the Octagon spit bucket compared to Paramount's ultimate strategy, says Crakes. He, like nearly all media analysts, remains convinced that the current array of streaming services will eventually be bundled or consolidated into fewer digital offerings in the future. And that future is coming quickly. Just this week, ESPN and Fox announced a new streaming bundle, in the wake of the abandoned Venu Sports venture those two networks announced with Warner Bros. Discovery last year. By beefing up its content offerings, Paramount hopes to create a package that becomes not only indispensable for inclusion in future bundles, but also increases the share of revenue it can command. In other words, much like the cable bundles of 20 years ago, media companies are back to jockeying for carriage fees. Because live sports will drive most of that value, there's almost no price too high to corner the market on an entire sport like MMA. Mark Shapiro, president and COO of UFC parent company TKO Holdings, says he has been hearing the rumblings that the sports rights bubble will burst since 2005 when he ran programming at ESPN, but has found eager bidders each time he has taken out rights packages. 'The crash is just not there, it's not true,' Shapiro tells Forbes . 'You've got multiple platforms, varying strategies, linear and non-linear, they all need premium content and sports is the last bastion of unifying content.' With the addition of year-round UFC programming to Paramount's strong seasonal sports offerings on CBS—including the NFL, The Masters and March Madness—plus entertainment brands like Yellowstone creator Taylor Sheridan and the Star Trek universe, suddenly Paramount looks far more attractive as an acquisition or merger candidate. Or, given the backing of the Ellisons, Paramount could be the one doing the acquiring—especially given the makeup of Ellison's new board of directors, which includes private equity veterans from Redbird Capital as well as Silver Lake's Justin Hamill, who served for six years as the head of M&A at global law firm Latham & Watkins. 'This is repositioning an old stodgy media brand into a tech-first, personalized content brand, one that could be an acquirer instead of a target,' says Chris Bevilacqua, a 30-year broadcast veteran and cofounder of Bevilacqua Helfant Ventures. 'The question is, really, are they going to be one of those 4-5 services at the end of the movie?' That desire to compete against the biggest companies in the industry, and win, is one reason why UFC CEO Dana White was sold on getting Paramount in his corner. 'They know exactly what they're doing,' White told Forbes earlier this week. 'The Ellisons are brilliant businessmen and they have a whole game plan behind this thing, so I love being in business with them for the next seven years." More From Forbes Forbes Dana White On How UFC Landed Its Blockbuster $7.7 Billion Streaming Deal With Paramount By Matt Craig Forbes South Park's Creators Are Now Billionaires By Matt Craig Forbes How This Hollywood Producer Turned Brad Pitt Into A $40 Million 'F1' Ad By Matt Craig Forbes Can Netflix Become The Netflix Of Gaming? By Matt Craig

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store