Call-outs for specialist prison squad increase 44% in two years
'More violent incidents'
The NTRG, which is also sent into young offender institutions and immigration removal centres, is a highly trained unit used to dealing with serious incidents such as prisoner barricades, hostage taking and violent disturbances.In April the team was deployed to Lowdham Grange prison after reports that one inmate threatened to take another hostage.Geoff Willetts, from the POA national executive committee, said: "There seems to be an increasing need for this group [NTRG] to be deployed due to frequent callouts to address rising prison violence and an ever increasing prison population."Concerns about prison safety were highlighted by the latest Ministry of Justice (MoJ) figures, which show the number of staff assaulted in adult prisons across England and Wales hit a new peak last year.
The government said a trial into the use of tasers would be launched this summer for specialised officers dealing with serious incidents in prisons.A recent landmark review by Former Lord Chancellor David Gauke recommended some prisoners could be released after serving just a third of their sentence in a bid to ease prison overcrowding.
One former prison officer in Kent, who wanted to remain anonymous, told BBC South East about the volatility in some jails."I've been assaulted myself and I've witnessed colleagues having their life changed because of an assault that wasn't even directed at them," he said.David, not his real name, said the service had been impacted by the loss of a lot of experienced staff over the last decade."I think the biggest tool the prison service got rid of was experience. And unfortunately, you just can't buy experience," he said."You can't get people that come through the gates fresh out of college and expect them to have the same experience as someone that's been in the job for 20 years and knows how to deal with someone."
Steve Gillan, the POA's general secretary, said: "Our members need better training and a return to basics of putting security and discipline first and foremost."We need proper protective equipment and better staffing levels to deal with overcrowded prisons."There is no doubt that there's been a major increase in incidents at height. "Prison officers cannot deal with these without the correct equipment and training, that's why NTRG staff are brought in to deal with such situations."
The MoJ said a large proportion of recent NTRG callouts are for incidents at height, which are recorded for any incident taking place above ground level, but are not necessarily violent or confrontational.Former prison governor John Podmore said protests at height and incidents at height tend to be caused by prisoners who are angry or frustrated."At the moment it's highly likely and logical that such incidents would be on the increase because there are a lot of prisoners who aren't getting out of their cell or getting access to education, employment and training," he said."In these scenarios frustrations will be on the increase, prison staff are very often less able, because they're new in the job, to deal with such incidents, and that's why they can manifest themselves in protests at height."One of the reasons can be prisoners who're in debt because they've been taking drugs and they want to get out of the prison, so if they go on a rooftop protest, there's a very high likelihood they'd be moved out of the prison and for the time being moved away from their debt."
President of the Prison Governors' Association Tom Wheatley said the NTRG deployments showed the pressure on the prison system. "They're very full, not all prisoners are in the places they are supposed to be, they've become frustrated and they protest," he said."NTRG come out to incidents at height, prisoners climbing over the railings on the wings, so they're at threat of falling or jumping."As frustration rises so does the amount of time those specially trained staff are deployed."They [NTRG) have particular training and skills, they can safely rescue prisoners at height and if there's a large scale disturbance they come in as part of the team that comes in to deal with that."The government recently said more than 1,000 inmates would be released early to free up spaces, as ministers grapple with an overcrowding crisis.Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said a £4.7bn investment would fund more prisons.
A MoJ spokesperson said: "This government inherited prisons in crisis and the Lord Chancellor has taken immediate action to ensure we can lock up dangerous offenders, protect the public and make prisons safer for our hard-working staff."We have a zero-tolerance approach to violence which is why we are investing more into our specialist teams responding to serious incidents and providing staff with the tools they need to keep themselves safe."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Proposal for new Kent council map dubbed 'appalling'
A proposal for the reorganisation of local government in Kent has been branded "appalling and disrespectful" by one Council has put forward an outline for four unitary authorities to replace itself, Kent County Council (KCC) and the 12 district and borough councils - part of a major national shake-up announced by Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner last year. It comes after KCC said its preferred option was for only three unitary authorities at a meeting last Vince Maple, leader of Medway's authority, described Labour's option as the way forward and best matching outlined plans for an England-wide overhaul. He said: "Whilst I appreciate there are currently different options, I wholeheartedly support the proposed model."This is the perfect opportunity to take a fresh look at the map of the county and get it right."However, other politicians did not agree, some even accusing the authority of trying to "break" them apart, according to the Local Democracy Reporting of Tonbridge and Malling council, Matt Boughton called the announcement "appalling and disrespectful" on social even within Medway there was a conflict of leader George Perfect said his group "vehemently disagreed" with the proposals, describing them as "not consistent with the aims and objectives as laid out by the government".Independent Group councillor Michael Pearce also expressed dissatisfaction online, suggesting the proposal "looks and smells a lot like gerrymandering". Currently under the two-tier system, the county has 12 district and borough councils, which split responsibility for public services with the overarching map which Medway Council is suggesting would see the creation of a North authority, including Medway, Sittingbourne, the Isle of Sheppey, Gravesend, Northfleet and West council would stretch from Royal Tunbridge Wells up to Longfield and Istead Rise, encompassing Tonbridge, Sevenoaks and Snodland, and reaching to the boundary of Mid authority is the largest in terms of geographical area, and includes Maidstone, Bearsted, Staplehurst, Cranbrook, Hawkhurst and also includes Faversham and Ashford and stretches down to Dungeness and across to East council covers Canterbury, Whitstable, Herne Bay, Margate, Broadstairs, Ramsgate, Deal, Dover and for how the boundaries of the new authorities are due at the end of November, and Maple encouraged residents to make their views known.
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Review, Frankly: Sturgeon psychodrama suddenly makes sense
Macmillan, £28 THERE is a classic episode of Whatever Happened to the Likely Lads? in which Bob and Terry are desperate to avoid the England score. Welcome to the world of the Frankly reviewer. The past week has been spent trying to shut out what people are saying about the memoirs of Scotland's first woman First Minister. Wait till the book arrives, said the better angel on my shoulder. Give it the considered judgment readers deserve as they ponder shelling out £28 (now half that on Amazon). So I did. And the conclusion? Just as the England match turned out to be called off, meaning Bob and Terry missed nothing, so it is with Frankly - up to a point. Something becomes blindingly clear in these 464 pages, and the former FM is going to hate it being pointed out. Sturgeon opens with an account of her Ayrshire childhood that is almost comically dull. 'A quirk of the door numbering meant that, although we moved half a street away, the change in our address was slight: 56 to 55 Broomlands Road,' she tells us. From an early age, she considers herself extraordinary. 'I had - at the risk of sounding daft - a very strong sense of 'destiny'.' A bit like Harry Potter, one might say, though for some reason she doesn't make the comparison. As she gets older, a pattern of thinking emerges. Nothing is ever Nicola's fault, or not for long. Time and again, she will take a criticism, consider the possibility of being wrong, then reject the notion entirely. On her parents buying their council house, for example: 'I ended the right to buy in Scotland and was accused of hypocrisy. It was an easy attack to make, but it was wide of the mark. For one thing, I wasn't responsible for the decisions my parents took.' No, but she benefited from those decisions. This inability to see the bigger picture is a constant. That and self-doubt. Not that it lingers for long. She fears voters in Govan find her unlikable, yet boasts about being cheered at airports after the 2015 election. Read more One can hardly fail to sympathise as she battles her way up the ranks, routinely encountering misogyny as she goes. It was tough - it still is. Yet she doesn't do herself any favours. You expect her to go in, studs up, against opposition politicians. Labour's Jim Murphy was 'boorish and cocky'; Tony Benn 'appeared to barely know where he was', etc. This is nothing compared to what she says about her own side. Jim Sillars and Alex Neil get it in the neck for 'hurling criticism from the sidelines'. Kenny MacAskill announces Megrahi's early release 'like he was reading a bedtime story'. Even when she is being nice she finds a way to ruin it. Referencing a successful campaign to save a shipyard, she writes: 'I went to a mass meeting at Govan and was presented with a big bunch of flowers from the unions. There might have been a touch of unconscious sexism in the gesture, but it still meant a lot to me.' Who thinks like that? There is, of course, no doubt who really gets her goat. So much has been written about the political partnership with Alex Salmond, but a lot of it fails to get to the heart of the matter. This memoir does, albeit unintentionally. What leaps from the pages is the howling dysfunctionality of the relationship. The Salmond-Sturgeon psychodrama made Blair and Brown look like Terry and June. There was one fundamental difference between the Labour rivals and the SNP pair, however. Reader, I do believe she cared for Salmond far more than she realised, particularly at the start, and this influenced her later behaviour. There is no suggestion that the relationship was anything other than platonic. What happened subsequently was no ordinary falling out between politicians. This was intensely personal. Complicated. At least it was on her part. How else to explain writing which reads at times like a bad Mills and Boon parody? He fixes her with a stare and 'works his political magic'. They go on the campaign trail together, singing along in the car to Dolly Parton. He takes a helicopter back to HQ after an election victory: 'Alex disembarked and strode purposefully to the lectern. It was like a scene from The West Wing.' They part on the eve of the independence referendum: 'We hugged and wished each other luck. We knew that by the time we were next together, for better or worse, the world would have changed.' Revealing choice of words there, 'for better or worse', because as the years pass, their relationship begins to sound like a marriage, one that she was rapidly outgrowing. Her 'IRL' (in real life) husband, Peter Murrell, barely figures in the book, save for when she is brushing off Salmond's advice not to have hubby as the party's chief executive. Remind us how that one worked out? With critics, her instinct is to lash out. She chooses her battles carefully, however. I doubt her claim that Salmond leaked details of the allegations against him to the Daily Record would have made it past a lawyer had the former FM been alive. For a political memoir, Frankly is remarkably light on policy. The most glaring example of this is the three paragraphs she spends on Scotland's drugs deaths, compared to the six pages lavished on The Queen. Look under F in the index and you will find naff all on ferries. Covid ends up a blizzard of questions but no answers. Education gets a glance. On the double rapist Isla Bryson, Sturgeon asks if she could have handled things differently, before concluding it would not have changed anything. Remember, it's never Nicola's fault. If you are looking for an insightful analysis of the Sturgeon years you won't find it here. She, at least, ends the memoir on a high, telling us: 'I've learned to dance in the rain.' Deep as a puddle to the end. Alison Rowat is a features writer and columnist at The Herald
The Independent
8 hours ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves to take aim at environmental protections in bid to speed up infrastructure projects, say reports
Rachel Reeves is preparing to strip back environmental protections in an attempt to accelerate infrastructure building and boost the economy, according to reports. The chancellor is considering major reforms that would make it more difficult for wildlife concerns to hold up developments, according to The Times. Treasury officials are said to be drafting another planning reform bill, the publication reported. The move reportedly involves tearing up parts of European environmental rules, which developers have argued slow down crucial projects. While Labour ministers have previously insisted their current planning overhaul would balance growth with nature, Ms Reeves is understood to believe that the government must go further. The Planning and Infrastructure Bill going through Parliament overrides existing habitat and nature protections, which, if passed, would allow developers to make general environmental improvements and pay into a nature restoration fund that improves habitats on other sites. But Ms Reeves is considering more contentious reforms that are likely to trigger further backlash from environmental groups, according to The Times. Among the changes under discussion are plans for a smaller, UK-only list of protected species, which would give less weight to wildlife considered rare across Europe but relatively common in Britain, The Times said. Ms Reeves is also reportedly considering abolishing the EU 'precautionary principle' that forces developers to prove projects will have no impact on protected natural sites. Instead, a new test would assess the risks and benefits of building. The chancellor is also exploring limits on legal challenges from environmental campaigners. Speaking to the House of Lords economic affairs committee last month, Ms Reeves said: 'The reason that HS2 is not coming to my city of Leeds anymore anytime soon, is because I'm afraid, as a country, we've cared more about the bats than we have about the commuter times for people in Leeds and West Yorkshire, and we've got to change that, 'Because I care more about a young family getting on the housing ladder than I do about protecting some snails, and I care more about my energy bills and my constituents than I do about the views of people from their windows.' High-profile examples of costly protections include the £100m Buckinghamshire 'bat tunnel' built to protect wildlife from HS2 trains and the so-called 'fish disco' at Hinkley Point C nuclear plant, which uses sound to deter fish from cooling system intakes. The existing Planning and Infrastructure Bill already proposes a 'nature restoration fund' under which developers could offset environmental damage by paying for conservation schemes elsewhere. But the bill has faced criticism from both environmental groups and developers, who fear it will fail to speed up construction. Paul Miner of the countryside charity CPRE told The Times that targeting habitats regulations would 'take us backwards rather than forwards on nature recovery'.
