A Republican effort to set deadlines to plug orphan wells in Texas hits resistance
But they don't agree on the specifics of how to solve it.
And an early attempt by a Republican lawmaker hit a major roadblock Wednesday when a Texas Senate panel told him to rethink his approach to solving the problem.
State Sen. Mayes Middleton of Galveston introduced a bill that sets deadlines to plug the more than 150,000 inactive wells in Texas during the next 15 years. It also gives regulators more authority over oil and gas companies to enforce plugging requirements and directs them to submit annual reports.
During the hearing, industry leaders said they could comply with Middleton's proposal — at great costs — but suggested additional flexibility. Meanwhile, environmental policy experts and activists said the proposed timeline to plug wells was too lenient.
Members of the Senate Committee on Natural Resources were skeptical of both sides of the debate. And they repeatedly questioned whether new deadlines to plug wells would hurt smaller oil and gas operators.
['Should we be worried?': Another well blowout in West Texas has a town smelling of rotten eggs]
Middelton defended his bill.
He told the committee his proposal considered the financial strains it could put on smaller operators.
'But at the end of the day, we've got way too many inactive wells. What are we going to do about that?' he said.
The committee was not convinced by Middleton's assurances.
'There are certainly concerns you heard from (the oil and gas) industry and members of the committee,' said state Sen. Brian Birdwell, R-Granbury, who chairs the committee. 'So I would entertain that you…continue to develop the situation, see what you might put in front of us in the coming weeks that is something we can move forward with.'
Inactive wells do not produce oil or natural gas. They are considered 'orphaned' when they have no clear owner or if the company in charge of them is bankrupt. In an annual report detailing its oil field cleanup efforts, the Texas Railroad Commission estimated roughly 8,300, or 5% of all inactive wells, are orphaned. In 2024, the Railroad Commission plugged a little more than a thousand of them, costing taxpayers $34 million.
The commission is the state agency tasked with regulating the oil and gas industry and has been charged with overseeing the blowouts.
Orphaned wells have become a conduit for water previously used for fracking, typically stored in deep underground rock formations, to burst onto the surface. Left ignored, these wells threaten groundwater resources and public health. The brine that leaks or shoots uncontrolled flows of water upward contains a colorless, odorless, incredibly toxic gas known as Hydrogen Sulfide or H2S. Water has blown through at least eight wells since October 2024, according to ranchers in the West Texas region.
Last fall, the commission, in a letter, said it could no longer keep up with the growing cost of plugging them. It asked lawmakers for an additional $100 million just to keep up — about 44% of its entire two-year budget.
Under existing law, oil and gas companies can request what the commission calls an extension to lengthen a well's inactive status indefinitely, which means they won't have to plug it. Operators can obtain extensions for individual wells or a blanket renewal for every inactive well in their portfolio.
Middleton's bill would change that. Oil and gas companies would be required to plug wells that have been inactive for at least 15 years.
The legislation also allows the commission to grant exceptions so long as the operators that request one submit a plan to plug the well. The commission can evaluate different factors, including the number of the operator's inactive wells, how long they've been inactive, and a plan to plug them before deciding. Called compliance plans, operators have until 2040 to fulfill it. The commission can also consider risks to public safety and the environment when evaluating wells that just turned 15. This is not the case under the law now.
Industry leaders representing operators statewide mostly assured lawmakers their members could comply. But it would hurt their bottom line.
Karr Ingham, an economist and president of the Texas Alliance of Energy Producers, said any bill setting limits would lead to damaging expenses. He said 20-25% of an operator's inventory can consist of inactive wells.
'We want to make sure that this bill is as workable…for our folks as it could be,' he said.
Michael Lozano, who leads government affairs and communications for the Permian Basin Petroleum Association, said lawmakers should consider giving operators more time to prepare. Finding companies to plug the wells, he said, could be a challenge for them.
Environmental policy experts and landowners said the legislature should give operators shorter time frames to plug inactive and dried-up wells before they become problematic.
Virginia Palacios, executive director of Commission Shift Action, a nonprofit group that lobbies at the Capitol for stronger oil and gas industry policies, told The Texas Tribune she was excited a bill had been proposed, adding it needed stronger language. An ideal deadline would give operators 10 years to plug their inactive wells.
'It's sort of like a soft touch on an industry that has been running a Wild West strategy on inactive walls for a long time,' she said.
Schuyler Wight, a West Texas rancher whose land is dotted with wells, some of which are leaking, did not support the bill. It is common in West Texas for oil and gas producers to operate on privately owned ranches. Wight said the Railroad Commission should make plans to plug wells public and alert the landowner when an operator conducts testing and if they are following through with plugging.
Todd Staples, president of the Texas Oil and Gas Association, an industry trade group, applauded the bill, saying the group supports it. In an emailed statement, he said $55 million in fees paid by operators are given annually to state-managed plugging programs.
He said he does not support shorter time frames to plug the wells because operators need a 'phase-in' period to comply with the law.
At the hearing on Wednesday, he appeared confident that operators could bear the brunt of any costs imposed by Middleton's bill.
'It's a duty to landowners, it's a duty to the legislature, and it's a duty to the industry,' Staples said. 'Once these wells have reached beyond that point, they are plugged,' Staples said.
Disclosure: Permian Basin Petroleum Association and Texas Alliance of Energy Producers have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
We can't wait to welcome you to the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival, Texas' breakout ideas and politics event happening Nov. 13–15 in downtown Austin. Step inside the conversations shaping the future of education, the economy, health care, energy, technology, public safety, culture, the arts and so much more.
Hear from our CEO, Sonal Shah, on TribFest 2025.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
25 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
California Gov. Newsom signs legislation calling for special election on redrawn congressional map
SACRAMENTO, Calif — California voters will decide in November whether to approve a redrawn congressional map designed to help Democrats win five more U.S. House seats next year, after Texas Republicans advanced their own redrawn map to pad their House majority by the same number of seats at President Donald Trump's urging. California lawmakers voted mostly along party lines Thursday to approve legislation calling for the special election. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has led the campaign in favor of the map, then quickly signed it — the latest step in a tit-for-tat gerrymandering battle. 'We don't want this fight and we didn't choose this fight, but with our democracy on the line, we will not run away from this fight,' Democratic Assemblyman Marc Berman said. Republicans, who have filed a lawsuit and called for a federal investigation into the plan, promised to keep fighting it. California Assemblyman James Gallagher, the Republican minority leader, said Trump was 'wrong' to push for new Republican seats elsewhere, contending the president was just responding to Democratic gerrymandering in other states. But he warned that Newsom's approach, which the governor has dubbed 'fight fire with fire,' was dangerous. 'You move forward fighting fire with fire and what happens?' Gallagher asked. 'You burn it all down.' In Texas, the Republican-controlled state Senate was scheduled to vote on a map Thursday night. After that, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's signature will be all that is needed to make the map official. It's part of Trump's effort to stave off an expected loss of the GOP's majority in the U.S. House in the 2026 midterm elections. What states are doing in the battle over congressional maps as Texas pursues plan President Donald Trump soughtOn a national level, the partisan makeup of existing districts puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. The incumbent president's party usually loses congressional seats in the midterms. The president has pushed other Republican-controlled states including Indiana and Missouri to also revise their maps to add more winnable GOP seats. Ohio Republicans were also already scheduled to revise their maps to make them more partisan. The U.S. Supreme Court has said the Constitution does not outlaw partisan gerrymandering, only using race to redraw district lines. Texas Republicans embraced that when their House of Representatives passed its revision Wednesday. 'The underlying goal of this plan is straight forward: improve Republican political performance,' state Rep. Todd Hunter, the Republican who wrote the bill revising Texas' maps, said. On Thursday, California Democrats noted Hunter's comments and said they had to take extreme steps to counter the Republican move. 'What do we do, just sit back and do nothing? Or do we fight back?' Democratic state Sen. Lena Gonzalez said. 'This is how we fight back and protect our democracy.' Republicans and some Democrats championed the 2008 ballot measure that established California's nonpartisan redistricting commission, along with the 2010 one that extended its role to drawing congressional maps. Democrats have sought a national commission that would draw lines for all states but have been unable to pass legislation creating that system. Trump's midterm redistricting ploy has shifted Democrats. That was clear in California, where Newsom was one of the members of his party who backed the initial redistricting commission ballot measures, and where Assemblyman Joshua Lowenthal, whose father, Rep. Alan Lowenthal, was another Democratic champion of a nonpartisan commission, presided over the state Assembly's passage of the redistricting package. Newsom on Thursday contended his state was still setting a model. 'We'll be the first state in U.S. history, in the most democratic way, to submit to the people of our state the ability to determine their own maps,' Newsom said before signing the legislation. Former President Barack Obama, who's also backed a nationwide nonpartisan approach, has also backed Newsom's bid to redraw the California map, saying it was a necessary step to stave off the GOP's Texas move. 'I think that approach is a smart, measured approach,' Obama said Tuesday during a fundraiser for the Democratic Party's main redistricting arm, noting that California voters will still have the final say on the map. Bipartisan group led by ex-Obama officials 'rolling the dice' on new remapping plan for Illinois legislatureThe California map would last only through 2030, after which the state's commission would draw up a new map for the normal, once-a-decade redistricting to adjust district lines after the decennial U.S. Census. Democrats are also mulling reopening Maryland's and New York's maps for mid-decade redraws. However, more Democratic-run states have commission systems like California's or other redistricting limits than Republican ones do, leaving the GOP with a freer hand to swiftly redraw maps. New York, for example, can't draw new maps until 2028, and even then, only with voter approval. In Texas, outnumbered Democrats turned to unusual steps to try to delay passage, leaving the state to delay a vote by 15 days. Upon their return, they were assigned round-the-clock police monitoring. California Republicans didn't take such dramatic steps but complained bitterly about Democrats muscling the package through the Statehouse and harming what GOP State Sen. Tony Strickland called the state's 'gold-standard' nonpartisan approach. 'What you're striving for is predetermined elections,' Strickland said. 'You're taking the voice away from Californians.'


Axios
25 minutes ago
- Axios
Newsom signs California redistricting measures in response to Texas bill
California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed two redistricting bills into law on Thursday evening after a Democratic-controlled Legislature passed them earlier in the day. Why it matters: The legislation is in direct response to Texas' Republican-controlled House passing a new congressional map at the urging of President Trump, and the consequences of both could prove pivotal in the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential election.


Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
The House Is on Fire and Democrats Are Debating Paint Colors
In less than seven months, we have watched America slip into fascism with zero meaningful resistance. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has become a weapon aimed at anyone who dares dissent. Elected officials who speak out are targeted. Law firms are shaken down into submission. TV networks have been brought to their knees through threats. In Florida, they built what can only be called a concentration camp. Washington D.C., a city where nearly half the population is Black, has been stripped of its autonomy and placed under federal control. This isn't dystopian fiction. This is happening right now, while Democratic leadership stands paralyzed. Fascism isn't coming to America; it is already here, meeting no resistance from those sworn to uphold the Constitution. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries speak to reporters alongside other House and Senate Appropriation Democratic committee members in the Ohio Clock Corridor of the U.S. Capitol Building on July... Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries speak to reporters alongside other House and Senate Appropriation Democratic committee members in the Ohio Clock Corridor of the U.S. Capitol Building on July 22, 2025, in Washington, D.C. MoreOver the past several weeks, I have had dozens of conversations with sitting members of Congress, donors, organizers, and voters desperate to get involved. The overwhelming sentiment isn't frustration anymore. It's anger. Pure, unbridled anger at Democratic leadership's paralysis. I understand Democrats don't control the House or Senate, but they are not powerless. They can use the bully pulpit to force issues into public consciousness and use every tool to delay harmful legislation. They can coordinate with state attorneys general winning court battles. They can mobilize their base and dominate the narrative. Instead, Hakeem Jeffries admitted at a February press briefing, "I'm trying to figure out what leverage we actually have." The House minority leader is publicly admitting he doesn't know how to fight back. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump has weaponized federal agencies, frozen billions in federal grants, and launched attacks on academic freedom. He's using the federal government to crush dissent, while Democrats issue strongly worded letters. We know from 2024 that some Democrats know how to undermine a sitting president. We watched them coordinate a campaign that forced President Joe Biden to step aside. George Clooney wrote an opinion piece asking Biden to end his campaign. Donors threatened to withhold funds. Where is that energy now? Where is Clooney's passionate op-ed about fascism taking root? Where are the donors threatening to withhold funds unless Democrats fight? All the planning and coordination aimed at undermining President Joe Biden has evaporated when facing an actual authoritarian. While Schumer and Jeffries still believe decorum will win the day, the Trump administration has taken a jackhammer to our Constitution. These men, and Democrats overall, have been unable to meet the moment, and millions of Americans looking for leadership feel abandoned. Back in March, CNN polling found that 73 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents said the party's caucus in Congress was doing too little to oppose Trump. That's not only a poll result; that's a scream for help from a base watching their representatives sleepwalk through a self-coup. This is a base screaming for someone to stand up and fight back. Waiting, hoping judges will keep Trump in check, or that the 2026 midterms will save us, is dangerously naive. Courts are being stacked. Election systems are being dismantled. By 2026, the damage may be irreversible. Since Democrats only have a concept of a plan, let me offer advice. First, if the Democratic leadership in Congress isn't equipped or unwilling to lead, they need to get out of the way. Memes and social media posts aren't enough to fight a convicted criminal wielding presidential power like a weapon. Second, Ken Martin needs to resign as DNC chair. We don't need someone who thinks the answer to authoritarianism is better fundraising emails. We don't need another X post. We don't need another strongly worded statement. We need leaders who understand that when fascism comes knocking, you don't politely ask it to leave. You bar the door. You sound the alarm. You fight with everything you have. We need someone who has faced voter suppression and won. We need Stacey Abrams. Abrams doesn't just understand voting rights; she knows how to mobilize communities Democrats have taken for granted. She knows how to fight back when the rules are rigged against you. We need someone who has been in the trenches, felt the boot of oppression, and fought back anyway. The world is watching America fail. Our allies are making contingency plans for a post-democratic United States. Authoritarian regimes are taking notes on how quickly democracy can crumble when its defenders refuse to fight. Every day Democrats delay, every moment they prioritize civility over survival, Trump's fascist infrastructure becomes more entrenched. If Democratic leadership cannot find the courage to meet this moment, if they cannot transform their fear into fury, then they are failing millions of Americans who still believe democracy is worth saving. They are failing history itself. The house is on fire, and Democratic leadership is debating what color to paint the kitchen. Either grab a hose or get out of the way because if we lose this fight, there won't be a democracy left to save. Christopher Bouzy is an American tech entrepreneur who founded the non-partisan research firm Bot Sentinel and the social media network Spoutible. His ventures leverage innovative technologies to create safer digital spaces and promote authentic online discourse. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.