logo
This US Company Just Successfully Tested a Reusable Hypersonic Rocket Plane

This US Company Just Successfully Tested a Reusable Hypersonic Rocket Plane

WIRED07-05-2025
Stephen Clark, Ars Technica May 7, 2025 5:00 PM Stratolaunch completed two flights of its autonomous Talon-A2 rocket plane earlier this year, as the US aims to gain ground in its race for hypersonic supremacy with China.
Stratolaunch has finally found a use for the world's largest airplane.
Twice in the past five months, the company launched a hypersonic vehicle over the Pacific Ocean, accelerated it to more than five times the speed of sound, and autonomously landed at Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. Stratolaunch used the same vehicle for both flights.
This is the first time anyone in the United States has flown a reusable hypersonic rocket plane since the last flight of the X-15, the iconic rocket-powered aircraft that pushed the envelope of high-altitude, high-speed flight 60 years ago.
Stratolaunch announced the results of its two most recent test flights Monday. In December and again in March, Stratolaunch's Talon-A2 rocket plane launched from the belly of an enormous carrier aircraft over the Pacific Ocean and flew several hundred miles to Vandenberg, a military spaceport about 140 miles northwest of Los Angeles. There, the aircraft touched down on a concrete runway that NASA and the Air Force once considered for Space Shuttle landings. Mach 5 or Bust
Zachary Krevor, president and CEO of Stratolaunch, spoke with Ars on Monday afternoon. He said the Talon test vehicle advances the capability lost with the retirement of the X-15 by flying autonomously. Like the Talon-A, the X-15 released from a carrier jet and ignited a rocket engine to soar into the uppermost layers of the atmosphere. But the X-15 had a pilot in command, while the Talon-A flies on autopilot.
'Why the autonomous flight matters is because hypersonic systems are now pushing the envelope in terms of maneuvering capability, maneuvering beyond what can be done by the human body,' Krevor said. 'Therefore, being able to perform flights with an autonomous, reusable, hypersonic testbed ensures that these flights are exploring the full envelope of capability that represents what's occurring in hypersonic system development today.'
Stratolaunch's Talon-A is a little smaller than a school bus, or about half the size of the X-15.
Stratolaunch's Talon-A2 vehicle lands at Vandenberg Space Force Base, California. Photograph: Stratolaunch
'Demonstrating the reuse of fully recoverable hypersonic test vehicles is an important milestone for MACH-TB,' said George Rumford, director of the Test Resource Management Center, in a statement. 'Lessons learned from this test campaign will help us reduce vehicle turnaround time from months down to weeks.'
Krevor said Talon-A carried multiple experiments on each mission but did not offer any details about the nature of the payloads, citing proprietary reasons and customer agreements.
'We cannot disclose the nature of those payloads, other than to say typical materials, instrumentation, sensors, etc.,' he said. 'The customers were thrilled with their ability to recover the payloads shortly after landing.'
Stratolaunch completed the first powered flight of a Talon-A vehicle last year, when the rocket plane launched over the Pacific Ocean and fired its liquid-fueled Hadley engine—produced by Ursa Major—for about 200 seconds. The Talon-A1 vehicle accelerated to just shy of hypersonic speed, then fell into the sea as planned and was not recovered.
That set the stage for Talon-A2's first flight in December.
Military officials previously stated they set up the MACH-TB program to enable more frequent flight testing of hypersonic weapon technologies, including communication, navigation, guidance, sensors, and seekers. Stratolaunch aims for monthly flights of the Talon-A rocket plane by the end of the year and eventually wants to ramp up to weekly flights.
'These flights are setting the stage now to increase the cadence of hypersonic flight testing in this country,' Krevor said. 'The ability to have a fully reusable hypersonic flight architecture enables a very high cadence of flight along with a lot of responsiveness. The DoD can call Stratolaunch if there's a priority program, and we can have a hypersonic flight next week, assuming the readiness of all the other technologies and payloads.'
Pentagon officials in 2022 set a goal of growing US capacity for hypersonic testing from 12 to 50 flight tests per year. Krevor believes Stratolaunch will play a key part in making that happen. Catching Up
So, why is hypersonic flight testing important?
The Pentagon seeks to close what it views as a technological gap with China, which US officials acknowledge has become the world's leader in hypersonic missile development. Hypersonic weapons are more difficult than conventional missiles for aerial defense systems to detect, track, and destroy. Unlike ballistic missiles, hypersonic weapons ride at the top of the atmosphere, enhancing their maneuverability and ability to evade interceptors.
Hypersonic flight is an unforgiving environment. Temperatures outside the Talon-A vehicle can reach up to 2,000° Fahrenheit (1,100° Celsius) as the plane plows through air molecules, Krevor said. He declined to disclose the duration, top speed, and maximum altitude of the December and March test flights but said the rocket plane performed a series of 'high-G' maneuvers on the journey from its drop location to Vandenberg.
Talon-A2 suspended underneath Stratolaunch's carrier aircraft. Photograph: Stratolaunch/Brandon Lim
Engineers know less about the conditions of the hypersonic flight regime (in excess of Mach 5) than they do about lower-speed supersonic flight or spaceflight. The only vehicles that regularly fly at hypersonic speeds are missiles, rockets, and spacecraft reentering the atmosphere. They spend just a short time flying in the hypersonic environment as they transition to and from space.
There are two things you should know about hypersonic missiles. First, rockets have flown at hypersonic speeds since 1949, so when officials talk about hypersonic missiles, they are referring to vehicles that operate in the hypersonic flight environment, instead of just transiting through it.
Second, hypersonic vehicles come in a couple of variations. One is a glide vehicle, which is accelerated by a conventional rocket to hypersonic speed, then steers itself toward its destination or target using aerodynamic forces. The other is a cruiser that can sustain itself in hypersonic flight using exotic propulsion, such as scramjet engines.
The military recently tested an intermediate-range hypersonic weapon, known by the Army as Dark Eagle and by the Navy as Conventional Prompt Strike, using the glide vehicle architecture. The Army's version could be operational later this year. Meanwhile, the Air Force is working on a scramjet-powered hypersonic cruise missile, but it likely won't be ready for combat for a few more years.
Not only must a vehicle operate in the extreme hypersonic flight regime, but any operational hypersonic weapon must be 'affordable' and 'manufactured at high rate,' two Pentagon officials wrote in prepared testimony to the House Armed Services Committee last year.
'Our goal is to enable the nation's industrial base to manufacture hypersonic systems at a cost comparable to traditional weapon systems and at the capacity necessary to achieve a decisive advantage for the warfighter on the battlefield,' the officials wrote.
A test launch of the US Navy's Conventional Prompt Strike weapon occurred April 25 at Cape Canaveral, Florida. Photograph: Kyle Ryan/ US Defense Department
The Pentagon has spent about $12 billion on hypersonic weapons development and testing since 2018. None of the weapons are operational yet.
All of these initiatives aim to match China's hypersonic capabilities. US officials believe China's first hypersonic weapon, using the glide vehicle architecture, became operational in 2019. Russia's government claimed it deployed a hypersonic weapon named Avangard the same year. China began testing a scramjet-powered hypersonic cruise missile in 2018. Paving the Way
The Pentagon's emphasis on hypersonic weapons is relatively new. After the X-15's final flight in 1968, the government lacked any major hypersonic flight test programs for several decades. NASA flew the autonomous X-43 test vehicle to hypersonic speed two times in 2004, and the Air Force demonstrated an air-breathing scramjet engine at Mach 5.1 with the X-51 Waverider aircraft in 2013. While some of the X-43 and X-51 test flights failed, they provided early-stage data on hypersonic propulsion systems that could power high-speed aircraft and missiles.
But these were expensive government-led programs. Together, they cost nearly $1 billion in 2025 dollars, with only a handful of flight tests to show for it. The military now wants to lean heavier on commercial industry.
Since its founding 14 years ago, Stratolaunch has pivoted its mission from the airborne launch of satellites to hypersonic testing. Stratolaunch was one of the first US launch companies to capitalize on the US military's growing interest in hypersonic technology. Rocket Lab now flies a suborbital version of its Electron satellite launcher to carry hypersonic experiments. ABL Space Systems, now known as Long Wall, last year announced it was walking away from the space launch business entirely to focus on hypersonic testing.
The military's MACH-TB program offers a lucrative source of revenue for these rocket companies. Through its subsidiary Dynetics, the defense contractor Leidos manages the first phase of the MACH-TB program, which aims to develop and demonstrate commercial hypersonic test vehicles.
In January, the Pentagon awarded a nearly $1.5 billion contract to Kratos Defense & Security Solutions for MACH-TB 2.0, which will transition the program from flight demonstrations to hypersonic test services. Stratolaunch and Rocket Lab will launch hypersonic experiments under MACH-TB 2.0, while a range of government, commercial, and academic institutions will develop the materials and technologies to be tested.
Quilty Space, a space industry research firm, estimates the market for hypersonic testing is worth between $6 billion and $7 billion.
This illustration from the Government Accountability Office compares the trajectory of a ballistic missile with those of a hypersonic glide vehicle and a hypersonic cruise missile. Illustration: GAO
It has taken a long time for Stratolaunch to find its footing. At one time, Stratolaunch partnered with SpaceX to use an air-launched version of the Falcon 9 rocket to deliver satellites to orbit. When that partnership fell through, Stratolaunch worked with Orbital Sciences, now part of Northrop Grumman, to design an air-launched rocket.
Stratolaunch's founder, Microsoft billionaire Paul Allen, died in 2018, putting the company's future in doubt. Stratolaunch flew its huge carrier aircraft, named Roc , for the first time in April 2019 but ceased operations the following month. Cerberus Capital Management, a private equity firm, purchased Stratolaunch from Allen's heirs later that year and redirected the company's mission from space launch to hypersonic flight testing.
Through it all, Stratolaunch continued flying Roc , a twin-fuselage airplane with a wingspan of 385 feet (117 meters). For a time, it appeared Roc might share a fate with Howard Hughes' 'Spruce Goose' flying boat, which held the record as the airplane with the widest wingspan, until Roc (officially designated the Scaled Composites Model 351) took off for the first time in 2019. The Spruce Goose flew just once after its business prospects faded in the aftermath of World War II.
Now, the Pentagon's hunger for hypersonic weapons seems likely to feed Stratolaunch's coffers for some time to come.
The company is building a second rocket plane, Talon-A3, scheduled to enter service in the fourth quarter of this year. It will launch from a Boeing 747 carrier aircraft that Stratolaunch acquired from Virgin Orbit after it went bankrupt in 2023. The longer range of the 747 will allow Stratolaunch to stage hypersonic tests from other locations beyond the West Coast.
This story originally appeared on Ars Technica.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I'm a Mechanic: 6 Electric Vehicles I Would Buy and Why They Are Worth It
I'm a Mechanic: 6 Electric Vehicles I Would Buy and Why They Are Worth It

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

I'm a Mechanic: 6 Electric Vehicles I Would Buy and Why They Are Worth It

Thinking about buying an electric vehicle (EV)? They're a good option if you want to save money on gas and maintenance and reduce your carbon footprint, but not all EVs are built the same. Be Aware: Find Out: According to car experts, some models stand out for their reliability, performance and long-term value. To help narrow down your search, here are EVs they recommend and why they're worth a closer look. And while you're on the hunt for an electric, make sure you avoid these rides. Tesla Model 3 MSRP: $44,130 to $56,630 'Tesla tops the list for me. Model 3 is the best of them all. They are futuristic styled. They have all the features one would want in a vehicle, especially in the electronics aspect. They have good battery life and battery distance,' Chris Pyle, auto expert with JustAnswer, the expert on-demand platform, wrote in an email. It also retains its value as long as you trade them in before the battery starts to wear out, he noted. But that could take years. According to Insurify, the average lifespan of a Tesla battery is between $300,000 to $500,000 miles, or 15 to 20 years of use. 'Tesla's battery system is unique, and in many ways, it's superior to what other brands offer,' added Melanie Musson, an auto expert with Its placement and weight is another pro, Musson pointed out, which can help the Model 3 maintain balance on the road and handle corners well. Trending Now: Lucid Air MSRP: $71,400 to $250,500 According to Pyle, the Lucid Air, a luxury sedan that first launched in the 2022 model year, is often seen at the top of lists. Its recent launch and price also mean it's a rarity on the road. Pyle has never seen or talked to anyone who's driven one, but he said it looks great. 'The distance to empty is at the higher range. Downfall though, is that the car is very expensive and when it breaks, finding a shop near you will be next to impossible, but EVs rarely go to the shop,' he wrote. Ford F-150 Lightning MSRP: $56,975 to $87,190 Want something tough but environmentally friendly? Musson recommends the Ford F-150 Lightning. 'Drivers who are looking for something that can handle off-road situations praise the Lightning for its toughness,' Musson wrote. It's powerful yet quiet, and comes with top-of-the-line features. 'It's a good mix of rugged traditional truck capabilities and luxurious modern electric mechanics,' Musson added. 'The Lightning holds its value well, which is not something many EVs have been able to do.' Hyundai Ioniq 6, Kia EV4 and Kia Niro EV Ioniq 6 MSRP: $39,095 and $52,345 Kia EV4 MSRP: $37,000 to $50,000 Kia Niro EV MSRP: $40,0995 and $45,523 When it comes to budget-friendly EVs with solid range and reliability, Hyundai and Kia are hard to ignore. 'Although I think the Ioniq is ugly, Kia and Hyundai are putting in the work to make affordable vehicles that have what you need, most of what you want and the longevity and low repair costs you expect,' Pyle claimed. He also pointed out that both brands choose to focus on longevity, low repair costs and repeat customers rather than a wow moment with sleek designs. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025 6 Hybrid Vehicles To Stay Away From in Retirement This article originally appeared on I'm a Mechanic: 6 Electric Vehicles I Would Buy and Why They Are Worth It

Kentucky data centers bring high-paying jobs and more tax income. Welcome them.
Kentucky data centers bring high-paying jobs and more tax income. Welcome them.

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Kentucky data centers bring high-paying jobs and more tax income. Welcome them.

Kentuckians, like all Americans, are driving ever-growing demand for data stored in the 'cloud,' and Kentucky is now poised to attract the billion-dollar data centers that make the cloud possible. New data centers are under construction across the country, but whether they locate here is up to local communities and public utilities. When you consider the benefits of construction projects, high-paying tech jobs and new property taxes, Kentucky communities should welcome them. America's tech industry is number one when it comes to investing in our communities and future. In 2023, three of America's top four capital investment leaders spent $86 billion to build new data centers — far more than our energy, telecom, pharma or manufacturing sectors. Kentucky must consider its demand for cloud storage The exploding demand should come as no surprise: each of us using a smartphone or computer look to the cloud to store our photos, videos, music, documents and messages — and since we rarely delete old items, our storage needs just keep growing. Nearly every business in Kentucky uses the cloud, too, for hosting applications and customer interfaces. U.S. tech is building data centers to serve our needs — not their own internal needs. Moreover, AI innovation requires even more data centers, and America needs AI to grow our economy, increase productivity and get ahead of China. But data centers can be located anywhere in the country. That's why Kentuckians using cloud storage and computing right now are relying on servers located outside the commonwealth, without worrying about capacity or transmission. Given that data centers can be anywhere, they locate where they are welcomed by local communities and where utilities have power to spare. Opinion | Kentucky makes dumb choices about data centers. You may foot the power bill. Data centers pay substantial property taxes in the communities they support But a warm welcome isn't enough to attract a billion-dollar investment — if the data servers, AI chips and related equipment are subject to costly state sales tax. In fact, no hyperscale data center has been located in a state that imposes sales tax on servers and equipment: enterprise data centers typically upgrade all their servers in each data center every 4-5 years, so sales tax would add millions to their costs. Fortunately, Kentucky recently extended its sales tax exemptions to treat data center equipment the same way it treats business machinery bought by Kentucky farmers, ranchers, manufacturers and miners. Taxpayers rightly don't complain about subsidies or 'tax breaks' when a local manufacturer doesn't have to pay sales tax on new machinery or when a farmer doesn't have to pay sales tax on a new harvester. By the same token, sales tax exemptions for business machinery in every industry should be broadly supported since that's how new investment happens. The operators of hyperscale data centers don't typically ask for any taxpayer-funded improvements or economic development grants. In fact, data centers generate new payroll and income taxes and pay substantial property taxes in the communities they support – $895 million in Loudoun County, Virginia county last year. These are taxes that will not be paid if data centers stay away from Kentucky. Opinion | Joe Creason Park tennis complex, Oldham County data center show secretive pattern KY needs data centers to create jobs and pay property taxes While data centers pay directly for new utility connections and substations, residents and regulators rightly question how new, large data centers may affect electricity rates. For that, look to the experience in states where utilities serve lots of data centers. Northern Virginia has more data centers than any place in the world, and a state audit last year found that ratepayers are not footing the bill for data centers and that the state has the tools to continue to ensure ratepayer protection. This year, a leading Missouri utility said, 'Because of their large volume electricity use, these large load customers, including data centers, absorb a greater share of the fixed costs of operating grid infrastructure (power plants, poles and wires), thus lowering rates for all customers.' Opinion | Data center will slash Oldham County property values while LG&E gets rich Kentucky stands at a pivotal moment with the chance to attract significant investment and high-tech jobs through data center development. By welcoming them, a Kentucky community could add 160 high-tech jobs that pay six-figures for local high school and trade school grads. On top of that, a community will add millions in local property taxes for decades to come. More data centers are surely coming to America, so Kentucky communities should consider embracing this great opportunity for high-tech economic development. Agree or disagree? Submit a letter to the editor. Steve DelBianco is president & CEO of NetChoice, a national trade association for America's leading tech companies, dedicated to protecting free enterprise and free expression online. This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: Data centers in KY are a win for us – and the tech industry | Opinion Sign in to access your portfolio

From ‘AI washing' to ‘sloppers,' 5 AI slang terms you need to know
From ‘AI washing' to ‘sloppers,' 5 AI slang terms you need to know

Fast Company

time30 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

From ‘AI washing' to ‘sloppers,' 5 AI slang terms you need to know

While Sam Altman, Elon Musk, and other AI industry leaders can't stop singing the praises of the technology, a growing number of average Americans are forming a different opinion. According to YouGov data from July, Americans are increasingly likely to believe that AI will be bad for humans. Specifically, 43% of Americans say they fear AI will end the human race (up 6% since March), and 47% believe that AI will have a net adverse effect on society (up 7% since March). With this rise in AI pessimism, there has been a surge in new slurs and slang terms that capture the negative connotations people increasingly associate with AI—and the individuals who use it. Here's a guide to the five terms you need to know: 'AI washing,' 'clanker,' 'Groksucker,' 'slop,' and 'slopper.' AI washing No, AI hasn't suddenly found a way to do your laundry while you do art. If you hear someone talking about 'AI washing,' they are referring to a deceptive marketing practice where companies exaggerate the role AI plays in their product or service. This deceptive marketing practice gets its name from ' green washing,' where a company falsely or misleadingly touts its environmentally friendly policies. Any company can be guilty of AI washing if it misstates the role AI plays in its products. Companies in industries that are more prone to doing this are those in the technology and finance sectors, which is why the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has publicly warned against the practice. 'AI washing, whether it's by financial intermediaries such as investment advisers and broker dealers, or by companies raising money from the public, that AI washing may violate the securities laws,' former chairman of the SEC Gary Gensler warned in 2024. The current Trump administration also seems to be cracking down on AI washing as well, according to Holland & Knight's SECond Opinions Blog. If someone is said to be an 'AI washer,' it means they are being accused of offering a product that doesn't rely on AI as much as they say it does. Clanker This is the newest AI slur on this list, and its use has exploded in recent months. As Fast Company previously reported, 'clanker' is a derogatory term for robots. The term comes from the fictional Star Wars universe, where droids are often treated as second-class citizens at best. But increasingly, the term is being adopted not just to describe our real-world AI-powered robots, but AI systems that threaten our jobs or remove human connections from our lives. One system often referred to as a 'clanker' is the AI chatbot that people are now forced to talk to when they call a customer support line. 'I called my bank to ask about my balance, but had to talk to a clanker instead of a human.' Groksucker While 'clanker' is a slur aimed at bots and AI systems, several slurs have arisen to define humans who are overly engaged with certain AI systems, particularly generative AI chatbots. Perhaps the most visceral one in this category is 'Groksucker' (you can figure out for yourself what other word the term mimics). The term gets its name from Elon Musk's xAI chatbot Grok. And Grok itself says the term describes 'people who frequently interact with me, Grok, in a way some find repetitive or annoying,' adding that the term is tied 'to concerns about AI overuse or privacy on X.' While 'Groksucker' is generally limited to describing a subsection of Grok users, another term exists for those who are overreliant on the most popular chatbot, ChatGPT. But more on that below. Slop If there is one term that has become synonymous with AI-generated content, it is ' slop.' Slop refers to low-quality, high-output content generated by AI tools that are increasingly overrunning our feeds. Slop is Shrimp Jesus proliferating on Facebook and Instagram. Slop is YouTube videos with completely AI-generated scripts, images, and thumbnails that crowd out high-quality human-made creators. Slop is articles written by a machine instead of a person. And slop is what is causing the dead internet theory to transition from fringe conspiracy to prophetic foresight. Slop is everywhere now, and it's only going to get worse. Sloppers This list wouldn't be complete without including a slang term that has recently been adopted to describe people who are overreliant on the world's most popular AI chatbot, ChatGPT. That word is 'sloppers.' The slur gained popularity after a TikTok posted by user intrnetbf went viral last month. In the video, the user said his friend came up with the term 'sloppers' to describe 'people who are using ChatGPT to do everything for them.' If someone is a 'slopper,' it means that they have offloaded most of their cognitive processes to ChatGPT. This cognitive offloading involves asking ChatGPT for guidance on various tasks a person should be mentally well-equipped to handle on their own, such as planning what to do for the evening, how to respond to a text message from a family member, or whether to make a significant life change, like quitting a job. Technological slurs can change how the public viewds a product While many reading this may find some of the above AI slang humorous (and even fitting), the fact that these terms are entering the public lexicon is likely to alarm some companies operating in the AI space. When the public adopts new derogatory names for products, technologies, and the people who use them, it usually signals that popular perception isn't heading in a positive direction. This can trigger a snowball effect, where people en masse reject the technology. The 'glasshole' backlash against Google Glass is a well-known example of this. Artificial intelligence is, of course, a much larger and more transformative force than Google Glass—and it's unlikely to disappear despite the increasing slurs directed at it. However, this emerging slang does indicate—as YouGov's polling also shows—that the public is increasingly wary of the technology, and isn't afraid to voice it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store