Suffolk's district council leaders oppose one unitary authority
What is the local government reorganisation and devolution?
The government announced in its Devolution White Paper in December it was shaking up local councils and devolving power to new mayors across the country. Councils would be scrapped and replaced by one, two or three authorities, which would provide all services, including social services and education.The current system in Suffolk where the county council provides the bulk of services including social services, education, roads and waste disposal.The county's five district councils (Babergh, East Suffolk, Ipswich, Mid Suffolk and West Suffolk) provide waste collection, planning and building services, and leisure facilities.Suffolk and Norfolk have been fast tracked for devolution, which means they are having to reorganise quickly. The government wants to see interim plans - on how to reorganise and bring devolution to the county - by 21 March. The government has said any unitary authority must, at a minimum, cover a population of 500,000. For Suffolk, with a population of about 800,000, this would mean it could not have more than one new unitary authority. A combined authority would also be formed across Norfolk and Suffolk which would be led by a directly elected mayor and manage services like transport and employment skills.
More unitary councils 'could cost taxpayers hundreds of millions'
A report by the report published by the County Council Network (CCN) last week said "replacing the two-tier system with a new wave of councils... could save at least £1.8bn over five years". It added those savings would reduce "dramatically if county and district authorities are replaced with multiple smaller councils – potentially costing local taxpayers hundreds of millions".
Rout, the county council's cabinet member for devolution, local government reform said: "This latest analysis shows splitting Suffolk into three will actually cost money, not save it. "It's clear that having a single council for Suffolk will free up more money to reinvest in frontline public services that benefit residents."If truly sustainable and effective councils are to be created, then one council for Suffolk is the only viable option."The District Council Network (DCN) has said it was "sceptical" about the levels of savings claimed in the CCN report. The DCN's chairman Sam Chapman-Allen said: "There is no way that £1.8bn can be found by merging councils without ravaging the services local people most value to find savings."
The leaders of Suffolk's five district councils argue that one unitary would be too big, and cite new DCN research which showed "there's absolutely no correlation between population size and the performance or financial stability of unitary councils".The Green leader of Babergh District Council Deborah Saw said: "The key to local government is in the word 'local'."This is why we strongly believe two or three unitary councils will deliver the best for Suffolk's communities. "There is simply no evidence that bigger councils give you better services."Each council will be deciding on their interim plans and submitting them by the government's deadline of 21 March. The plans will be reviewed and negotiations amongst all councils will continue until final plans will be put forward in September.
Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Starmer has lost 10 ministers after rent hike row departure
Keir Starmer has recorded another unwanted distinction after a tenth minister quit the government. Rushanara Ali resigned as homelessness minister last night saying she did not want to be a 'distraction'. She had faced claims she ejected tenants from one of her properties, before putting it back on the market for an extra £700 a month rent. In a letter to the PM, Ms Ali insisted that she had followed 'all relevant legal requirements' and took her 'responsibilities and duties seriously'. The departure heaps more woe on Sir Keir, who has seen a significantly faster rate of attrition than his predecessors. Since Labour won the general election in July 2024, the premier has lost 10 ministers. They include former Transport Secretary Louise Haigh and international development minister Annelise Dodds - previously a close ally of Sir Keir. In contrast, Rishi Sunak lost nine Government members in the first 13 months - two of whom were ministerial aides. The equivalent figure for Boris Johnson was six and Theresa May three, not including reshuffles. Liz Truss's premiership lasted only a month and a half, during which there were three departures. Ms Ali's resignation came after it emerged that she had hiked rent on a property she owns by hundreds of pounds just weeks after the previous tenants' contract ended. The MP has repeatedly cast herself as a voice for hard-up tenants, and spoke out against private renters 'being exploited and discriminated against'. And she championed the Renters' Rights Bill, currently going through Parliament, which will ban landlords who evict tenants from re-listing a property for a higher rent until at least six months after the occupants have left. Her actions would have been illegal under this law. In a round of broadcast interviews this morning, energy minister Miatta Fahnbulleh said Ms Ali had 'not broken any rules or any laws' when asked by Sky News if the allegations about her colleague were a 'good look'. Ms Fahnbulleh added: 'She's chosen to resign, and that is a personal decision for her. What we care about as a Government is that we are levelling the playing field for renters. 'So we absolutely recognise that across the country. I hear stories all the time of people who are not getting a fair deal as a tenant. 'In the end, if you're a renter, you want security in the thing that is your home and so that is what the Renters' Rights Bill is trying to do. I think that is absolutely right.' Tory leader Kemi Badenoch had led the calls for Ms Ali to be sacked, telling the Daily Mail: 'I warned that Labour's Renters' Rights Bill was a mess. Now we find out the minister responsible is doing the opposite of the what the Bill proposed – the homelessness minister is making people homeless. 'Rushanara Ali's hypocrisy is shameful.' Conservative Party chairman Kevin Hollinrake added: 'I think it shows staggering hypocrisy. Rushanara Ali has been somebody who's obviously a government minister in charge of homelessness. She's spoken out about exploiting tenants, about providing more protections to tenants. 'You can't say those things, then do the opposite in practice, as a landlord.' He said the conduct appeared to be 'unethical, not illegal' but 'we can't just say one thing and do another'. Ms Ali is the third Labour minister to have resigned over a personal matter. Tulip Siddiq resigned as City minister in mid-January, 26 days after the Mail revealed she was facing a major corruption probe in Bangladesh, which she denies. Louise Haigh stepped down as Transport Secretary in November last year following media revelations that she had pleaded guilty to a fraud charge a decade ago. Ms Ali is alleged to have told four tenants to move out of the £900,000 four-bedroom home in east London, only to relist the property at a rent of £4,000 a month – a £700 increase – amid suggestions she failed to find a buyer for the property. Laura Jackson, a 33-year-old self-employed restaurant owner, was one of those who rented out the house – roughly a mile from the Olympic Park – in March 2024 at £3,300 a month. She then received an email in November telling her the lease would not be renewed this year, and that she and her housemates would need to move out, giving them four months notice, taking them to March. The current occupants are said to have moved in 'four to five months' ago on the increased terms.
Wales Online
17 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Swansea politician 'incandescent' at west Wales colleagues' St Helen's objections
Swansea politician 'incandescent' at west Wales colleagues' St Helen's objections 'I'm absolutely astounded that they've done this," said the Labour MP Harris said she was 'absolutely astounded' by her west Wales colleagues' intervention (Image: ITV News) Neath and Swansea East MP Carolyn Harris says she is "incandescent" with rage after a cross-party group of politicians from Carmarthenshire called on the Welsh Government to intervene in the Ospreys' planned redevelopment of St Helen's. Earlier this week, the region were granted permission by Swansea Council's planning committee for redevelopment work to start at the famous old ground, which they are hoping to move into before the end of the year as they leave their current home at the Stadium. However, the following day, three Carmarthenshire politicians - Plaid Cymru MP Ann Davies, MS Cefin Campbell and Labour MP Nia Griffith - voiced concerns over the plans, while the planning committee also heard an objection from the Scarlets Supporters' Trust. Sign up to Inside Welsh rugby on Substack to get exclusive news stories and insight from behind the scenes in Welsh rugby. The politicians raised their fears over the potential impact the redevelopment could have on regional rugby in west Wales, with Davies claiming that it "would clearly pose a threat to the viability of Parc y Scarlets". As a result, they have asked for the Welsh Government to step in on the matter and call it in. However, Harris - who is also deputy leader of Welsh Labour - has hit out at her west Wales colleagues' intervention, branding it as "absolutely astounding" and "not appropriate" in a furious interview with ITV News. "I see no reason why any politician decides to interfere in the business of, not only a different constituency, but a different region with a different local authority," she said. "I'm absolutely astounded that they've done this." Article continues below Asked if she was given any prior warning to their intervention, the MP replied: "I wasn't, which has made things a lot worse. As a politician, if I ventured into somebody else's constituency or patch, it's common courtesy to inform the person that you intend to be on their territory. "To actually come on to our turf and try to do something as underhand as this, is absolutely astounding." When asked about her strong language, Harris said: "It reflects my anger. I am upset, I cannot tell you. "I am incandescent that anyone thinks it is appropriate to interfere in the process and the workings of one constituency or in this case, one region, one local authority which has has nothing to do with them, in defence of an argument. "I understand the argument, what I don't understand is why interfere in that process. It is not appropriate and I am really cross that they've done this. I have tried to contact one [of the MPs] and I have not had any success." She added: "I think the WRU need to take responsibility for the fact that we are in this position. "But the blame for what happened over the last 24 hours with the planning permission lies solely with the politicians who thought they would take things into their own hands and try to undermine a fair process, which is absolutely nothing to do with them." It comes after Ospreys chief Lance Bradley admitted he was "quite surprised" by the concerns raised by the group of politicians, as he offered a confident response to their claims and stressed the benefits that a redeveloped St Helen's could bring not just for rugby but for the wider community. "I'm flattered that he should think that we should have such a huge impact on our friends in Llanelli," said Bradley, "The fact is St Helen's isn't a new stadium, St Helen's is actually a very old stadium where Wales played their first international game, and we're very conscious of the fact that when we move there it's the redevelopment of an iconic ground. "It isn't something new, and we will be fully respecting the heritage of the place and the history of the place to provide a top-class facility not just for the Ospreys but for Swansea RFC, Swansea University and a big part of the plans and something Swansea Council were very keen on is the community use as well. So I can't see it will have an impact on Parc y Scarlets." He added: "We haven't been tipped a wink at all. There is a process going on with the WRU that all the clubs are involved in and as far as I'm aware we've all had the same amount of information, the same opportunities to input what we think, so that's certainly not the case. "Were we surprised? Yes, we were a bit surprised because this isn't something that suddenly got announced yesterday, this is something we announced we were planning over a year ago. Article continues below "So it was slightly surprising that some of the MPs and Senedd members from Carmarthenshire should wait until now to raise a concern. But that's their right to do that if that's what they want to do."
Glasgow Times
37 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Energy bill discounts of £250 a year included in new plans
Families living near new pylons would get a £125 discount on their energy bills every six months for a decade under Government plans to get electricity infrastructure built. New transmission cables and pylons are needed across the country to upgrade ageing electricity networks, connect up new wind and solar farms, nuclear power plants and large scale battery storage, and reinforce the grid to cope with the planned rise in electric heat pumps and car charging in homes. The Government says around twice as much new transmission network infrastructure will be needed by 2030 as has been built in the past decade. But building new pylons and cables through the British countryside has faced a backlash, with homeowners and campaigners concerned about the visual impact and disruption to local areas and beauty spots. (Image: John Kelly) The Government hopes cash benefits to local people will reduce opposition and planning delays to the infrastructure needed to deliver the clean energy plans. Households within 500 metres (a third of a mile) of new or upgraded electricity transmission infrastructure could receive a discount of up to £250 via their electricity bill every year for 10 years, totalling £2,500. The discounts, which would be assigned to the home, and applied to the occupant, could be provided in instalments of £125 every six months. Recommended Reading: Minister for energy consumers Miatta Fahnbulleh said: 'As we build the infrastructure we need to deliver homegrown, affordable energy, communities must be given a stake. 'That is why we are teaming up with communities hosting new pylons to ensure they receive direct, tangible benefits. 'We are on the side of those who want Britain to get back to what it does best: building for the future, driving innovation and putting communities first.' Shadow energy minister Andrew Bowie said it was 'right that communities get some payback for pylons – with this scheme following initiatives started by the last Conservative government'. But he added that the public should 'be in no doubt' that more communities would see pylons built nearby 'as a consequence of Labour's net zero by 2050 zealotry'. Mr Bowie said the Government was now having to 'scramble to try and build the infrastructure needed to support their mad green projects' and urged more investment in nuclear power rather than solar.
