logo
Iran's ‘Gaza' drone bristles with missiles in drills but can it survive in combat?

Iran's ‘Gaza' drone bristles with missiles in drills but can it survive in combat?

The National27-01-2025

Iran's Gaza drone, first revealed in 2021, has been used in military drills, the state-linked Mehr news agency reports, apparently destroying eight targets. The drone, which was brimming with missiles in images released on Sunday, is technically designated the Shahed 149 and has been compared to the US Reaper drone. That American unmanned system is known for combat operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen, capable of carrying a range of guided bombs and highly sophisticated camera and electronic warfare equipment. The Shahed 149 is slightly larger, with a wingspan of 22 metres to the Reaper's 20m, although its take-off weight is lower at 3,100 kilograms to the Reaper's 4,760kg. According to Mehr, the Gaza drone, named in honour of the struggle of the Palestinian people during Israel's war on the enclave, has an 'endurance' or maximum flying time of 35 hours and can carry at least 500kg of weapons for more than 1,000 kilometres. To navigate such a that distance, the drone is believed to use China's BeiDou or Russia's Glonass satellite navigation system, after deals in 2021 and 2022, respectively, between the countries, meaning the Gaza does not need to rely on the commonly used GPS system. Reapers, which have a flight range of 1,850km, have clocked 42 hours of flight time on one mission, carrying 450kg of bombs, and have a maximum payload of 1,700kg that can include external fuel tanks and equipment for electronic warfare – jamming or confusing enemy communications and radars. They can be operated from many thousands of kilometres away using the American GPS navigation system, although the US is working on a dedicated satnav signal known as M-code, because satellite navigation is notoriously easy to jam. Drones such as the Reaper have proven increasingly vulnerable to dense air defences and the Gaza is likely to be similarly at risk in a large-scale war. Iran has a long history of reverse engineering US technology, particularly drones, most famously the Shahed 171 Simorgh, which was based on the stealthy US RQ-170. The RQ-170 was brought down in Iran in 2011, supposedly using electronic warfare, although there are conflicting accounts of its demise. But Iran's reverse engineering, even with intact US drones to work from, has limits. The Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen have captured a number of shot-down Reaper drones – most destroyed but some partially intact – during US efforts to strike their positions and stop their blockade of the Red Sea. Equipment on the drones could have been sent to Iranian engineers for study. US systems, however, contain technology that would take a team of skilled engineers years to perfect and Iranian work would be limited by a lack of access to required microchips, due to sanctions. Nearly 80 per cent of electronic components in Iranian Shahed 136 drones found in Ukraine had been smuggled and were of US origin, components that help with navigation and flight-control systems. Having the right chips from civilian companies is not enough: electronics need to be 'ruggedised' to operate at very low temperatures above 12,000m where it can plummet as low as minus 60°C, cold enough to render most circuits inoperable. Reaper drones have camera systems known as Wide Area Motion Imagery sensors, arrays of cameras capable of capturing high-resolution video of entire cities, processing the vast amounts of imagery and sending it to ground forces through encrypted data links that are hard to intercept. Making a similar system in any quantity would require access to large amounts of high-quality microcircuitry, much of it subject to US and European export controls. Reaper drones have special aspherical lenses that are difficult to manufacture because of requirements for no imperfections that can distort images. They can also carry synthetic aperture radar, which produces photographic quality images at night or through clouds, and Ground Moving Target Indicator technology that can spot people over vast areas. All of this equipment needs to be carefully stabilised due to the vibrations of flight. Iran claims to have this technology, or some domestic variant of it, which if effective could be useful for surveying ocean near its territorial waters. But the capabilities of Iran's home-grown aerial efforts in the Middle East are unknown. In the Ukraine war to date, Kyiv has intercepted more than 90 per cent of Russian Geran drones launched at the country, a variant of the Iranian Shahed 136.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stablecoins Surge Underscores Treasury Market Shift
Stablecoins Surge Underscores Treasury Market Shift

Arabian Post

time4 days ago

  • Arabian Post

Stablecoins Surge Underscores Treasury Market Shift

Stablecoins are processing roughly $33 trillion in yearly volume—around 20 times that of PayPal and three times Visa—while amassing $128 billion in U.S. Treasuries, placing these issuers among the top 20 holders of American debt and ahead of major nations such as Germany and Saudi Arabia. Data from Andreessen Horowitz's crypto arm shows that over 1 percent of the total U.S. dollar supply is now tokenised on blockchains. Major institutions, including Citi, project that by 2030 stablecoins could accumulate up to $3.7 trillion in Treasury holdings. While Ethereum and Tron currently underpin most of this infrastructure, emerging platforms such as Solana, Arbitrum and Base are gaining traction. Notably, on-chain data reveals that transactional activity in stablecoins appears largely decoupled from broader cryptocurrency trading volumes, indicative of growing real-world adoption. Today, these assets enable sub-second, sub-cent payments—positioning them as serious contenders to onboard the next billion users into the crypto economy. Market analysts warn that growing stablecoin-backed Treasury holdings may shift demand dynamics for U.S. government debt. One study from academia found that by the end of the first quarter of 2025, Tether held roughly $98.5 billion in Treasury bills—equating to 1.6 percent of total outstanding bills. The research estimates that this level of demand has directly driven down one-month Treasury yields by approximately 24 basis points, indicating that stablecoin issuance is already influencing funding costs and potentially easing liquidity pressures. ADVERTISEMENT Coinciding with this shift is a legislative push in Washington. A bill nearing Congressional approval would require issuers to fully back stablecoins with liquid assets, such as U.S. dollars and short-term Treasuries, and mandate monthly disclosures. Proponents suggest such regulation would reinforce investor trust, legitimize the sector and bolster U.S. debt demand. According to Reuters, Tether and Circle already hold a combined $166 billion in Treasuries—amounts that may increase further under binding legal frameworks. Financial authorities have offered mixed views. Moody's warns that large-scale liquidation driven by plunging confidence in stablecoin issuers could destabilise Treasury prices and spill over into broader fixed-income markets. Conversely, policymakers hope that expanded stablecoin activity could facilitate smoother funding for the Treasury, especially if issuers pivot toward demand for short-term debt like bills. Macro strategies are duly noted. Vanguard's rates chief suggests that sustained demand from digital currency custodians might spur the Treasury to favour issuing bills over long-term bonds, which could rebalance maturity profiles. Meanwhile, Bitwise's investment head argues that this growing digital demand could reinforce the dollar's position as the global reserve currency. Infrastructure diversification within stablecoins is evolving. Ethereum and Tron continue to dominate, but high-throughput chains like Solana, Arbitrum and Google-backed Base are attracting developers and users aiming to benefit from faster, cheaper payments. The presence of real-world transactions—such as merchant and remittance use cases—underscores that stablecoins are transcending crypto-speculative flows, with sub-cent fees and near-instant settlement now commonplace features. Emerging risks centre on financial-system vulnerability. The Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee cautioned that a significant diversion of deposits into stablecoins could dampen demand for Treasuries and potentially curb lending by commercial banks. Money-market managers remain vigilant, with some estimating that stablecoins must scale further before triggering systemic instability. Proponents counter that regulated stablecoins may alleviate pressures in the Treasury issuance process, with digital platforms absorbing demand in lieu of traditional buyers. Early legislative frameworks could incentivise these issuers to prefer bills over longer-duration instruments, helping to smooth fiscal financing. Stablecoins are redefining the interface between digital currency networks and the time‑tested Treasury market, leaving policymakers to navigate a complex balance between innovation, stability and monetary control.

Germany plans to tax Google, Facebook
Germany plans to tax Google, Facebook

Gulf Today

time31-05-2025

  • Gulf Today

Germany plans to tax Google, Facebook

Germany's Culture Ministry is planning to bring a law to tax the American online giants like Alphabet of Google and Meta of Facebook. The rate of taxation is to be 10 per cent. The grounds on which taxation is to be imposed are interesting and even new. German Culture Minister Wolfram Weimer told the magazine, Stern, 'These corporations do billions in business in Germany with extremely high profit margins and benefit enormously from the country's media and cultural output as well as its infrastructure – but they pay hardly any taxes, invest too little, and give far too little back to the country.' There is more than an element of truth in Weimer's statement. Google and Facebook thrive much from the media content that populates their platforms, which is one of the reasons that millions of Net users throng them, to get the news in a jiffy as it were. Both Google and Facebook do not create an iota of their own content. They thrive on what they take from others, either directly or through their own users. Australia overcame the problem by giving in to the demand of newspapers and other old media, that Google should pay them for using their content. Weimer is stating the fact that the online platforms are using cultural output of the country – whether it be music, films, art – and they do not do anything to sustain the cultural events. Similarly, the Internet penetration in the country and the infrastructure that sustains it is what enables millions of Germans to use Google and Facebook, and it is on the large number of users that these online companies earn their revenues. It is but reasonable that the online companies should be made to pay taxes of some kind. Weimer has even suggested voluntary contribution on the part of Google and Facebook. But this may be impracticable. No company will be willing to make voluntary contribution in lieu of taxes. The American online platforms have an advantage over national players because they have worldwide footprint because of the investments they made in the search engines reaching the ends of the globe as it were. They are indeed reaping benefits from it. But do they have an obligation to the regions and countries in which they operate? Google and Facebook can argue that they have built the cyber bridges to connect the different places, and they are allowing a free use of it. The owners of these platforms would not let these sites remain free if they were not earning enough revenue in billions of dollars. If they did not make money, they would have imposed some user-charges from the thousands of millions who use them around the globe. They can say that they have boosted other businesses through the space they have opened up for other businesses. These arguments do not however discredit the demand for tax payments from national governments. That these online payers use national airwaves is a fact. It can be argued that it is the telecom companies in these countries which have the right to charge these companies. But the search engines with enormous Cloud or memory power which sustain these platforms do cost enough money, but the revenue generated by advertisers outstrips the investment and costs of maintenance. National governments have a legitimate right to demand tax from the online platforms because they operate within the sovereign territory of a country. Facebook and the Google do not have the solidity of an iPhone, but they are at the same time cyber-products. They can be treated as taxable products or services. The rate of taxation should remain flexible enough so that the thriving business of connecting people is not affected or dampened.

Musk says to remain 'friend and advisor' to Trump
Musk says to remain 'friend and advisor' to Trump

Al Etihad

time30-05-2025

  • Al Etihad

Musk says to remain 'friend and advisor' to Trump

30 May 2025 23:03 Washington (AFP)Billionaire Elon Musk said on Friday he would remain a "friend and advisor" to Donald Trump, as the US president hosted an Oval Office farewell for the man who led his turbulent cost-cutting drive."I look forward to continuing to be a friend and advisor to the president," Musk told reporters after Trump handed a golden key as a gift to the departing leader of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).Musk, clad in a black T-shirt and jacket and wearing a baseball cap as he stood next to the seated Trump, said he would keep supporting the team that is "relentlessly pursuing a trillion dollars in waste" in reductions that will "benefit the American taxpayer." He complained about how he has been portrayed, saying: "We became, like, essentially the DOGE bogeyman, where any cut anywhere would be ascribed to DOGE."Musk, the world's richest person, has said he is stepping back from his role at the White House to focus on his companies, which include Tesla, SpaceX and social media platform was immediately asked about the report. He did not reply directly and instead denounced The New York Times over its previous coverage of Russian interference in the 2016 election before moving to the next under Musk's guidance has slashed billions of dollars in government spending, much of it already approved by Congress, including eviscerating the main US agency delivering foreign aid."We're totally committed to making the DOGE cuts permanent and stopping much more of the waste in the months that come," Trump said that Musk "is really not leaving" as DOGE is working on further priorities such as "modernization" of the tax-collecting Internal Revenue Service, whose ranks have been said of Musk: "I have a feeling it's his baby, and I think he's going to be doing a lot of things." Pointing to Musk's Starlink satellite internet service, Trump said: "Frankly, I don't think he gets credit for what it's done, but he's a very good person."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store