A New Zealand soldier admits attempted espionage in the country's first spying conviction
Monday's conviction was the first for spying in New Zealand's history. The soldier's name was suppressed, as was what country he sought to pass secrets to.
Military court documents said the man believed he was engaged with a foreign agent in 2019 when he tried to communicate military information including base telephone directories and maps, assessments of security weaknesses, his own identity card and log-in details for a military network. The wording of the charge said his actions were 'likely to prejudice the security or defense of New Zealand.'
He wasn't speaking to a foreign agent, but an undercover New Zealand police officer collecting intelligence on alleged right-wing extremist groups, documents supplied by the military court showed.
The soldier came to law enforcement attention as part of an operation that was established after a March 2019 terrorist attack on two mosques in the city of Christchurch, when an Australian white supremacist opened fire on Muslim worshipers, killing 51.
He was based at Linton Military Camp near the city of Palmerston North.
Officers spoke to the man twice about his involvement in a group, court documents showed, and after the government became aware he had expressed a desire to defect he was contacted by the undercover officer.
When the soldier's hard drive was searched, investigators found a copy of Christchurch gunman Brenton Tarrant's livestreamed video of his massacre and a manifesto document he published online before the killings. Possession of either without permission is a criminal offense in New Zealand and the soldier, who admitted that charge too, joins several others convicted in New Zealand of having or sharing the terrorist's banned material.
In a statement read to the court by his lawyer, the man said the two nationalist groups with which the man was involved were 'no more than groups of friends with similar points of view to my own,' according to Radio New Zealand.
The laywer, Steve Winter, added that his client denied supporting the Christchurch shooter's ideology, RNZ reported.
The soldier also pleaded guilty to accessing a military computer system for dishonest purposes. The amended suite of three charges replaced 17 counts levelled against him earlier in the proceedings.
Each of the three charges he admitted carries a maximum prison term of either seven or 10 years in New Zealand. His sentence was expected to be delivered by a military panel within days after Monday's conviction.
The man was due to stand trial by court martial on the charges before he admitted the offenses.
His was the first charge in a New Zealand military court for espionage or attempted spying. The last time such a case reached the civilian courts before was in 1975, when a public servant was acquitted on charges alleging he had passed information to Russian agents.
A spokesperson for New Zealand's military said they would not comment until the proceedings against the soldier finished.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
4 hours ago
- Sky News
Family 'seriously worried' for parents detained in Iran's 'harshest prison'
The family of a British couple, detained in Iran on espionage charges, says they are "seriously worried" after the pair were moved to the country's "harshest prisons". Lindsay and Craig Foreman were seized in Kerman, in central Iran, in early January while on a round-the-world motorbike trip. Their family say they strongly deny any wrongdoing. Their son, Joe Bennett, told Sky News the pair, from East Sussex, had been separated from the prison where they were staying together and moved to different jails in the Tehran area. "Craig's been moved now to Evin prison... which many people will recognise the name of, renowned as one of the harshest prisons, if not the harshest in Iran. "It heightened our concerns because... the reports are damning... multiple people to a cell, overcrowding. And that's for both my mum and Craig. We're seriously worried for Craig and my mum's welfare, but Craig more so at the moment." In a recent Instagram post, from an account campaigning for the couple's release, the pair were described as "innocent British citizens - hostages, not criminals" and called for the UK government to do more. Mr Bennett, who spoke to his mother three weeks ago, said: "It's been 99 days since they both had a consular visit. These visits are vital to them... the only chance for someone independent to check on their welfare, give them a slice of normality. Without them, we as a family simply don't know if they're safe." "It gives them... reassurance, but also they can be given stuff like clothes, like welfare packs, reading material just to make their days a little bit easier. "We know from speaking to previous detainees that these visits were really, really crucial for the mental health and wellbeing," he added. Mr Bennett described what was "supposed to be the trip of a lifetime... very quickly turned into something of a nightmare". He said: "The family has been rocked by this. They are seasoned travellers. They have a deep love for meeting new people and experiencing cultures. You know, they are meant for one another. "And we all desperately, desperately want them back. We're praying and fighting every day to make sure that they are home as soon as possible." The Foreign Office told Sky News: "We are deeply concerned by reports that two British nationals have been charged with espionage in Iran. We continue to raise this case directly with the Iranian authorities. "We are providing them with consular assistance and remain in close contact with their family members." The UK government advises against all travel to Iran, adding that British and British-Iranian dual nationals are at significant risk of arrest, questioning or detention.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Netanyahu lashes out at Albanese as ‘weak politician who betrayed Israel' as diplomatic row escalates
Benjamin Netanyahu has launched an extraordinary broadside against Anthony Albanese, labelling Australia's prime minister 'weak' in a social media post, hours after local Jewish groups called for calm in diplomatic relations. 'History will remember Albanese for what he is: A weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews,' read a post on X from the account of Israel's prime minister, on Tuesday evening Australian time. Albanese's office was approached for comment. It came shortly after Australia's peak Jewish group urged composure on Tuesday as Israel's foreign minister warned of 'additional measures' against Australia amid a diplomatic 'tit-for-tat' over visa cancellations. 'There are real-life consequences here and we want to see the countries work through any issues before things get out of hand,' said Alex Ryvchin, the co-chief executive of the Executive Council of Australia Jewry. The Israeli foreign minister, Gideon Sa'ar, accused the Albanese government of 'choosing to fuel' antisemitism after cancelling the visa of the far-right Israeli politician Simcha Rothman ahead of his planned speaking tour in Sydney and Melbourne later this week. Sa'ar also announced he would revoke the visas of Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority, in a move labelled 'unjustified' and 'undermining international efforts towards peace and a two-state solution' by Australia's foreign minister, Penny Wong. The escalating diplomatic row followed Australia's decision earlier this month to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN general assembly in September after new commitments by the Palestinian Authority. The opposition leader, Sussan Ley, said while the prime minister deserved respect it was a 'two-way street' and accused Albanese of making 'bad decisions'. 'It is up to Anthony Albanese to explain how he is going to repair this relationship which is now in tatters as a result of his failures of leadership,' she said. Rothman's visa was cancelled by the home affairs department on Monday, citing 'an unacceptable risk' to order in Australia and concern the member of Netanyahu's governing coalition would make 'inflammatory statements to promote his controversial views and ideologies'. In a Hebrew-language video message shortly after his statement, Sa'ar warned Australia was 'persecuting Israel' and his government would 'take additional measures'. But Jewish groups in Australia called for cooler heads to prevail in light of the countries' 'extensive economic, scientific and cultural ties'. Ryvchin said both countries should end the 'diplomatic tit-for-tat that erodes the goodwill and cooperation built up over decades'. 'Calm heads need to take control of the situation otherwise there will be a risk to some $2bn dollars in bilateral trade, extensive investment in Australian start-ups, vital security cooperation and the Israeli-made medicine and medical technology that we all rely on,' he said. The Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council said while it did not agree with many of Rothman's views, it found the decision to cancel his visa to be a 'disturbing precedent'. 'It is very disappointing that Australia and Israel have regressed from a close friendship to unproductive diplomatic jousting, which of course was started by unwarranted and hostile actions by the Australian government,' the council said in a statement. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The president of the Zionist Federation of Australia, Jeremy Leibler, told the Jewish Independent website on Tuesday that Rothman's views were 'out of step with mainstream Israeli opinion and with the values of most Australian Jews'. But he criticised the decision to ban him, saying: 'It is one thing to disagree strongly with an elected representative of a democracy and ally, it is quite another to deny them entry on that basis. Australia ought not to set such a precedent.' The progressive Jewish Council of Australia supported the decision but questioned why Rothman had been granted a visa in the first place. 'As with Russia, members of Israel's ruling coalition parties should already be subject to sanctions by the Australian government, including Rothman,' its spokesperson, Bart Shteinman, said. 'Israel's aggressive decision to retaliate to Rothman's visa refusal by expelling Australian diplomats to the Palestinian Authority is a major escalation in hostilities against Australia. 'If it needed any further demonstration, Israel is not interested in maintaining a relationship with the Australian government and cares little what strong words or statements it issues.' The department cited Rothman's previous statements as part of its decision to revoke the visa they approved on 8 August. These included his claim in May that children within Gaza are 'enemies' who should not be allowed to flee into Israel as 'you don't let them conquer your country with refugees'. In another example cited, Rothman was reported to have said the idea of a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine had 'poisoned the minds of the entire world' and was the 'first step toward the destruction of the state of Israel'. The department said that if it was publicly known that Rothman had entered Australia with the government's permission, it 'may encourage others to feel emboldened to voice any anti-Islamic sentiments'. The right-leaning Australian Jewish Association, who invited Rothman and organised the speaking tour, said it would host an online event with Rothman on Sunday evening, stating, the 'show will go on'. Sa'ar's decision to revoke the visas of three Australian diplomats – who are based in East Jerusalem and work in the West Bank – is expected to complicate Australia's work with the Palestinian Authority. The foreign affairs department is working to remove the affected representatives. The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know. If you have something to share on this subject you can contact us confidentially using the following methods. Secure Messaging in the Guardian app The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'. SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post If you can safely use the tor network without being observed or monitored you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform. Finally, our guide at lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Four-day work week? Six weeks of holidays? Australians have a choice about how to bank productivity gains
One of the ideas that has captured many peoples' attention amid the flurry of proposals ahead of the economic roundtable is the Australian Council of Trade Unions' vision of a four-day working week. The peak union body argued that working less could actually be productivity enhancing, although the studies behind those claims aren't too rigorous. While many Australians would certainly welcome a three-day weekend, Jim Chalmers has made it clear that working towards a national four-day working week is not on the government's agenda, while reaffirming Labor's commitment to flexible work. Employer groups have been scathing, and it's not likely to be a big discussion point on day two of the three-day roundtable. Clearly not on board with the treasurer's 'open hearts and open minds' approach to this week's talkfest, the Australian Industry Group's chief executive, Innes Willox, called the four-day working week idea 'another populist, anti-productivity thought bubble'. Willox calculated that at the current dismal rate of productivity growth it would take 26 years to get to the point where we could drop a day's work without going backwards economically. But as the ACTU secretary, Sally McManus, explained to the Conversation's Michelle Grattan: the labour movement doesn't expect a revolution in the working week to happen overnight. 'To be clear, we weren't asking for a change to the workplace laws for the government to do something,' McManus said. 'We were raising this in the context of a discussion both around productivity and around AI as an important part of the distribution of the benefits of productivity growth or, for that matter, productivity growth out of less jobs, out of AI.' The longer arc of Australian history has been towards shorter working weeks and longer holidays. But that progress stopped a few decades back, settling on the current set-up of a 38-hour full-time job, two-day weekend and four weeks' paid leave. But there has been progress in other ways (assuming 'progress' is working less – many believe hard work is an end in and of itself). For example, since the turn of the century, the share of full-time employed Australians who say they work longer than 50 hours weekly has gone from 25% to 15%. Meanwhile, part-time work has flourished, fed in particular by a surge in women entering the jobs market. (Which means households overall are probably working harder.) Since the turn of the century, the female employment to working-age population ratio has climbed from 50% to over 60%, according to data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. (The equivalent workforce participation rate for men is just under 68% and hasn't moved much over 25 years.) Of course, the working from home phenomenon that emerged with Covid has been a revolution for many, particularly working families. Thankfully, employers are on board and hybrid work looks set to stay. But to many Australians juggling work and other commitments, time still feels like the greatest luxury. In which case, why shouldn't the reward for lifting productivity growth be fewer working hours for the same pay? Some fascinating research earlier this year by Rusha Das, an economist at the Productivity Commission, showed we would have a three-day working week today if we had collectively decided in 1980 to spend all the productivity gains of the following decades on leisure time instead of higher incomes. Das calculated that Australians used only a quarter of the productivity 'dividend' from the past 40-plus years to work less, while we banked the remaining three-quarters as higher income. 'We have largely traded it for higher incomes, and more and better stuff,' she said. One of the great things about a more efficient and dynamic economy is that it can give us more choices about what we want to do – how much more we want to buy, how much more we want to work and how much more we want to devote to family, hobbies or helping others. This may be getting ahead of ourselves – we have to raise our economic speed limit before we decide how much faster we want to drive. But we'd be mad to limit our thinking to the notion higher productivity is all about generating more income. The ACTU's four-day work week proposal is a good reminder of that.
