logo
Student Loan Wage Garnishment Resumes For Defaulted Borrowers After 5-Year Pause

Student Loan Wage Garnishment Resumes For Defaulted Borrowers After 5-Year Pause

Forbes05-05-2025

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 12: The headquarters of the Department of Education are shown March 12, 2025 ... More in Washington, DC. The Department of Education announced yesterday that it will reduce its staff by nearly 50 percent, leaving the department with 2,183 workers, a reduction from 4,133 when U.S. President Donald Trump took office for his second term. (Photo by)
After a five-year hiatus, the federal government has officially restarted student loan wage garnishment and other collection tactics for defaulted federal loans as of May 5. Millions of borrowers who fell into default during the payment pause are now at risk of seeing part of their paychecks seized to repay their debt. This move ends an unprecedented reprieve that began in March 2020, when collections were paused amid the pandemic. Now, with the collections officially switched back on, borrowers and experts are assessing what the return of garnishment means and how to mitigate its impact.
Wage garnishment and other involuntary collection efforts, like tax refund offsets and Social Security benefit reductions, for defaulted federal student loans have been on hold since March 2020. This pause was part of emergency pandemic relief measures, protecting borrowers from having wages seized during economic uncertainty. As of May 5, 2025, that protection is ending. The U.S. Department of Education's Office of Federal Student Aid has confirmed it will resume collections on defaulted loans starting May 5, starting with the impacting millions of borrowers in default.
The Education Department warned borrowers in late April that the Treasury Offset Program would restart on May 5, which would allow it to withhold payments such as tax refunds and Social Security benefits to cover delinquent debt. The government can again seize federal tax refunds and garnish wages to collect defaulted student debt. Notices for wage garnishment will begin later this summer, after which employers could be instructed to withhold a portion of take-home pay for those who haven't made payment arrangements. One observer described the return of collections as inevitable: "They were always going to start collecting these defaulted loans again — it was just a matter of when the switch was going to get flipped," Betsy Mayotte, president of The Institute of Student Loan Advisors told NPR.
Federal Student Aid officials say resuming collections is necessary to enforce the law and recoup taxpayer funds. However, according to Reuters, borrower advocates have condemned the abrupt return to punitive measures
Student loan wage garnishment is one of the government's most powerful tools to collect defaulted student debt and notably doesn't require a court order. By law, the Education Department can direct employers to withhold up to 15% of a borrower's disposable pay to repay defaulted loans. For example, if a borrower takes home $500 a week, about $75 could be taken out of each paycheck and applied toward the student loan debt. This automatic deduction process is called administrative wage garnishment.
Alongside garnishing wages, the government has other aggressive collection methods back at its disposal. It can intercept federal tax refunds (through the Treasury Offset Program) and even reduce Social Security benefits for seniors who defaulted on student loans. Unlike a typical debt collection, these actions happen without a lawsuit; the government can enforce repayment once a loan defaults.
Before garnishment begins, borrowers in default will receive an official notice and have a window to respond. Federal law requires loan holders to send a 30-day advance notice before initiating wage garnishment. That notice allows the borrower to appeal or make arrangements to avoid the paycheck hit. As previously reported, the garnishment notice sets a response deadline of 30 days from the date of the letter forbes.com. To stop garnishment, the borrower must enter a repayment agreement or successfully challenge the action by that deadline. If no action is taken, after 30 days, the loan holder can instruct the employer to start withholding 15% of wages. In practice, borrowers could start seeing smaller paychecks as soon as mid-to-late summer 2025.
A new study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York now estimates that close to 10 million student loan borrowers became past due on their student loan bills after the pandemic payment pause ended. These borrowers represent some of the most vulnerable student loan holders. A 2019 study by The Institute for College Access & Success found that 65% of borrowers who defaulted had incomes below 200% of the federal poverty line. In other words, a large majority of people facing default were already low-income, and having up to 15% of their pay garnished can be financially devastating.
Demographically, women are likely to bear the brunt of the resumed collections. Women hold roughly two-thirds of all student loan debt, and research suggests they are slightly more likely than men to have experienced default on a student loan. Women also, on average, earn less than men, which makes any reduction in take-home pay due to garnishment especially punishing. In a previous Forbes post, I noted that women, particularly women of color, could be hit hardest by the return of student loan wage garnishment. This is because the gender pay gap and other economic disparities leave women borrowers with less cushion to absorb a sudden cut in net income.
Borrower advocacy groups have sharply criticized the decision to restart collections at this time, pointing to the economic pressures many Americans still face. "The announcement comes as Americans are navigating unprecedented economic uncertainty," noted the Student Borrower Protection Center in Reuters, highlighting rising costs in other areas of life. In short, the resumption of garnishment will hit a financially fragile population, those struggling even before losing a chunk of their pay to student loans.
The return of student loan wage garnishment is a wake-up call for anyone with a federal student loan in default. Ignoring the problem will worsen, but options exist to get out of default and avoid having 15% of your pay taken. As I emphasized in earlier Forbes posts, those who don't take action are the ones who will feel the pain. Taking action, whether by entering a repayment plan or rehabilitating your loans, can protect your paycheck and put you back on the path to good standing. With the proper steps, borrowers can mitigate the impact of this policy change, even as the era of extraordinary federal leniency ends.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Donald Trump soured on some of his own judges
Why Donald Trump soured on some of his own judges

Vox

time13 minutes ago

  • Vox

Why Donald Trump soured on some of his own judges

Late last month, approximately 1 billion news cycles ago, an obscure federal court made President Donald Trump very, very mad. The US Court of International Trade ruled unanimously on May 28 that the massive tariffs Trump imposed after taking office again are illegal. That ruling was suspended the next day by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the tariffs will be allowed to remain in effect pending a ruling (arguments are scheduled for late July). But the appellate court's decision didn't soothe Trump. He took to Truth Social on May 29 to post a 510-word screed attacking the judges on the Court of International Trade, before turning his ire toward a more surprising candidate — Leonard Leo, the most important person in the conservative legal movement. 'I was new to Washington, and it was suggested that I use The Federalist Society as a recommending source on Judges,' Trump wrote, reminiscing about his first term. 'I did so, openly and freely, but then realized that they were under the thumb of a real 'sleazebag' named Leonard Leo, a bad person who, in his own way, probably hates America, and obviously has his own separate ambitions.' This breakup surprised many commentators. But not David French. 'If you're familiar with how the conservative legal movement has interacted with MAGA, you have seen this coming for a while,' French, a New York Times columnist, lawyer, and onetime member of the Federalist Society, told Today, Explained co-host Sean Rameswaram. 'You knew this was coming after 2020. Because in 2020, after Trump had really stocked the federal judiciary with an awful lot of FedSoc judges and justices…none of them, zero of them, helped him try to steal the election.' French spoke with Today, Explained about the origins of the (other) big, beautiful breakup and what it means for the Trump administration and the future of the federal judiciary. Below is an excerpt of the conversation, edited for length and clarity. There's much more in the full podcast, so listen to Today, Explained wherever you get podcasts, including Apple Podcasts, Pandora, and Spotify. Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Federalist Society? I am not now, but I have been a member of the Federalist Society. I was a member of the Federalist Society either all three years of law school or the first two years of law school. But it was also a very different time. I think the Federalist Society at the law school at that time, when we would have meetings, maybe 10 or 12 people would show up. Things have changed. One of the most conspicuous changes is that FedSoc has become an enemy of the president of the United States. From [2020] forward, you began to see this drifting apart between FedSoc and MAGA. When Trump comes back into office and he doubles down on being Donald Trump, all of this became very, very predictable. Because if the Trump administration's argument dovetailed with their originalist legal philosophy, they would rule for it. But if it was just simply Trump's lawless demands, they were going to reject it. And Trump is baffled by this distinction. He's baffled by it because congressional Republicans haven't drawn this line at all. When Trump's demands conflict with conservative principles, they will yield to Trump's demands every time. And the judges and justices have taken the opposite tack to such an extent that Republican-nominated judges have ruled against Trump about 72 percent of the time, which is remarkably close to about the 80 percent or so of the time that Democratic-appointed judges have ruled against Trump. You mentioned a whole host of issues where FedSoc judges have perhaps not given Trump what he wanted. Does the one that finally tips Trump off to go for it on Truth Social surprise you? It doesn't, because what really set him off was striking down tariffs. To the extent that Trump loves a policy, he loves tariffs. The Court of International Trade struck it down, and it was pointed out to him that one of the judges on the Court of International Trade that struck down the tariffs was appointed by him. He had been ranting about judges in general. Now he got specific with Leonard Leo; he got specific with the FedSoc. People like me who'd been watching this for a very long time were not wondering if this was going to happen. We were just wondering what was going to be the tipping point: Was it going to be a Supreme Court case? Was it going to be an appellate court? It turns out it was the Court of International Trade that brought us to this moment. Leonard Leo did not author a decision from this court. Why is he mad at Leonard Leo? Leonard Leo has long been a key figure in the Federalist Society and was very much a part of the first Trump administration, working closely with the administration to put forward judges. For a long time, Trump looked at his judicial nominations and waved them like a flag to the American conservative public saying, look what I did. But the more the American conservative public started loving Trump as Trump, versus Trump as what policy wins he could deliver, the less he started waving these other ideological flags, and the more it became all about him. And so this meant that this marriage was going to be temporary almost from the beginning, unless FedSoc capitulated. And if you know anything about FedSoc and the people who belong to it, and the people who've come up as judges, I knew they weren't going to capitulate. It's a very different culture from political conservatism. Do you think Donald Trump didn't realize that? I don't think he realized that at all. He's had this entire history politically of when Republicans disagree with him, they either fall in line or they're steamrolled. And so it's so interesting to me that he actually began that Truth Social rant that lacerated Leonard Leo and the FedSoc with this question: What's going on? Why is this happening? And I totally understand his bafflement. Because all of the political people had surrendered, or almost all of them. And so when he turns around and these judges and justices just keep ruling against him, you can understand why he would take that as, 'What's going on here? I don't get this. I don't understand this. I've been assured that these were good judges.' And so that's where you get to that real tension. Do you think this rift with the Federalist Society will affect how he appoints judges going forward? The short answer to that question is yes. The longer answer to that question is heck yes. A lot of people were worried about this because they were thinking, Okay, Trump 1.0: He has General Mattis as his secretary of defense. Trump 2.0: He has Pete Hegseth. You can do this all day long. The Trump 1.0 early nominations — sound, serious, establishment conservatives. Trump 2.0 — often MAGA crazies. The question was, 'Is this same pattern going to establish itself in Trump 2.0 on judges?' And then he appointed to the Third Circuit Emil Bove, this DOJ enforcer of his who was responsible for the effort to dismiss the Eric Adams case. He's nominated him for the Third Circuit, and a lot of people are now saying, 'Oh, now that's your harbinger right there.'

Disorder breaks out at New Jersey immigration detention center
Disorder breaks out at New Jersey immigration detention center

Hamilton Spectator

time17 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Disorder breaks out at New Jersey immigration detention center

NEWARK, N.J. (AP) — Protesters outside a New Jersey federal immigration detention center locked arms and pushed against barricades as vehicles passed through gates, inmates inside relayed word that meals had been delayed, and Newark's mayor cited reports of a possible uprising and escape as disorder broke out at the facility. Much is still unclear about what unfolded at the Delaney Hall facility in Newark, where Immigrations and Customs Enforcement opened a 1,000-bed facility this year as part of President Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration. Photos and video from outside the facility Thursday show protesters pushing against the gates amid word that detainees inside were upset about delayed meals. Amy Torres, executive director of New Jersey Alliance for Immigrant Justice, said some officers sprayed pepper spray and tackled and dragged protesters away from the facility. She said some protesters had minor injuries, but no one was hit by the vehicles. An attorney for someone detained at the facility told told that people inside became violent after meals were delayed. 'It's about the food, and some of the detainees were getting aggressive and it turned violent,' attorney Mustafa Cetin said. 'Based on what he told me it was an outer wall, not very strong, and they were able to push it down.' Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, a Democrat who's been critical of Trump's immigration crackdown, early Friday called for an end to this 'chaos and not allow this operation to continue unchecked.' 'We are concerned about reports of what has transpired at Delaney Hall this evening, ranging from withholding food and poor treatment, to uprising and escaped detainees,' he said. It's unclear whether there have been any escapes. Messages seeking comment were left with ICE, the Department of Homeland Security and local police. Delaney Hall has been the cite of clashes this year between Democratic officials who say the facility needs more oversight and the administration and those who run the facility. Baraka was arrested May 9 , handcuffed and charged with trespassing. The charge was later dropped and Democratic Rep. LaMonica McIver was later charged with assaulting federal officers stemming from a skirmish that happened outside the facility. She has denied the charges said she was doing her job as a lawmaker conducting oversight. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Disorder breaks out at New Jersey immigration detention center
Disorder breaks out at New Jersey immigration detention center

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Disorder breaks out at New Jersey immigration detention center

NEWARK, N.J. (AP) — Protesters outside a New Jersey federal immigration detention center locked arms and pushed against barricades as vehicles passed through gates, inmates inside relayed word that meals had been delayed, and Newark's mayor cited reports of a possible uprising and escape as disorder broke out at the facility. Much is still unclear about what unfolded at the Delaney Hall facility in Newark, where Immigrations and Customs Enforcement opened a 1,000-bed facility this year as part of President Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration. Photos and video from outside the facility Thursday show protesters pushing against the gates amid word that detainees inside were upset about delayed meals. Amy Torres, executive director of New Jersey Alliance for Immigrant Justice, said some officers sprayed pepper spray and tackled and dragged protesters away from the facility. She said some protesters had minor injuries, but no one was hit by the vehicles. An attorney for someone detained at the facility told told that people inside became violent after meals were delayed. 'It's about the food, and some of the detainees were getting aggressive and it turned violent,' attorney Mustafa Cetin said. 'Based on what he told me it was an outer wall, not very strong, and they were able to push it down.' Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, a Democrat who's been critical of Trump's immigration crackdown, early Friday called for an end to this 'chaos and not allow this operation to continue unchecked.' 'We are concerned about reports of what has transpired at Delaney Hall this evening, ranging from withholding food and poor treatment, to uprising and escaped detainees,' he said. It's unclear whether there have been any escapes. Messages seeking comment were left with ICE, the Department of Homeland Security and local police. Delaney Hall has been the cite of clashes this year between Democratic officials who say the facility needs more oversight and the administration and those who run the facility. Baraka was arrested May 9, handcuffed and charged with trespassing. The charge was later dropped and Democratic Rep. LaMonica McIver was later charged with assaulting federal officers stemming from a skirmish that happened outside the facility. She has denied the charges said she was doing her job as a lawmaker conducting oversight.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store