Vandegrift High School students stage walkout after Leander ISD budget cuts eliminate IB program
AUSTIN (KXAN) — A group of students walked out of Vandegrift High School on Thursday morning holding signs that read things like, 'empower students, empower the future,' and 'our education is our future, not a budget line,' while chanting messages they want school district leaders to hear.
Earlier this month, Leander Independent School District Superintendent Bruce Gearing announced budget cuts equating to nearly $17 million as the district faces a higher-than-approved deficit in its budget this school year.
PREVIOUS COVERAGE: Facing deficit, Leander ISD announces teacher cuts
The cuts included eliminating the district's use of the International Baccalaureate (IB) Program.
Students at Vandegrift held the walkout to express their frustration with the decision to end the program, saying Leander ISD is prioritizing buying property and building new schools over investing in the students already within the district, and that the district did not speak with anyone who's part of the program before making the decision.
Voters in May of 2023 passed an almost $763 million bond package aimed at upgrades to campus security measures, renovations to school facilities and technology improvements.
KXAN has reached out to Leander ISD to ask for a response to Thursday morning's walkout at Vandegrift. We will update this story if we receive a response.
Gearing said in an early-February press release the reason for the cuts boiled down to a lack of increased school funding from the state since 2019, despite rising operational costs and high inflation rates. The state also cut Leander ISD's funding for instructional material, limiting resources for textbooks and classroom materials, per the release.
The change led the district to use a 'reduced growth' enrollment projection, leading to less revenue than anticipated and a reduction in staffing positions, according to the district.
Gearing said in the release that leaders 'solicited feedback for insight and ideas to reduce expenditures and increase revenue,' during meetings with district and campus leadership teams.
You can read more about the budget cuts in KXAN's previous coverage.
Many of the students who participated in the walkout were sophomores who were set to begin the IB program next school year. They said around 100 students — including those from other programs, like football, robotics and theatre — participated in the demonstration to show support.
The students said the argument the district provided for deciding to cut IB was that Advanced Placement, or AP, classes offer the same opportunities, but students disagree.
'IB allows us to truly push past what we already know and think not only on a local scale but a global level,' sophomore Sasha told KXAN Thursday morning.
IB is a prestigious, internationally recognized program. Leander ISD's website said that students in both IB and AP classes are exposed to college-level curriculum and may earn college credits through the classes.
However, the programs differ. 'The IB DP and AP are different in that IB is a whole-curricular program that encompasses six different subject areas as well as a theory of knowledge course, an extended essay, and a creativity, activity, service component. AP is course-specific, each course is independent of any other AP course offered, and AP courses are offered at all LISD high schools,' the LISD website states.
Vandegrift and Leander High School were the only high schools in the district to offer the IB programs.
Sophomore Kevin told KXAN he transferred from Cedar Park High School to be part of the program, leaving behind peers he's come to know over the last 10 years of his education. He said the program is 'awesome' and it's beneficial not only for the students involved in it, but also the whole school as well as the district, because it improves overall education and boosts enrollment rates.
'When it was removed, I couldn't believe it, I was in shock. We created a group chat to fight for what was right,' Kevin said. 'It is unfair that they can decide in a split second that they can remove what we've worked so hard to fight for.'
Serena, a sophomore who moved to Texas from Canada last year, said she's been planning to participate in IB for six years now. She said she aspires to be a genetic engineer, and the program would have helped her get ahead before getting to college, now she's rethinking her plans.
'We got five days to redo our four-year plans, which was upsetting because we've been planning for so long,' Serena said.
'The day the message came out, I was furious,' Sasha told KXAN. 'I didn't understand why, there was no compromise.'
Students plan to attend the board meeting Thursday evening and are posting on social media about the program.
The message Sasha wants Leander ISD leaders to hear: 'Believe that we are enough and that we deserve the opportunities we get. Removing programs, specifically IB, isn't removing just money, it's removing students' opportunities.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Some Texas lawmakers demand in-state tuition protections for undocumented students
AUSTIN (KXAN) — A group of Texas lawmakers called on higher education leaders in the state to protect undocumented students' access to in-state tuition, after the state agreed to end the practice earlier this week. On Wednesday, the Justice Department sued the state over the 2001 Texas Dream Act, which allowed those students to receive in-state tuition if they met certain qualifications. The lawsuit alleged this act violated federal law, and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton quickly responded that his office would not contest the suit—causing the law to be repealed through a default judgment. RELATED | Justice Department sues Texas over in-state tuition for undocumented students In a letter sent on Friday, more than a dozen Democratic state representatives called on the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to create a 'provisional classification' that could allow students who previously qualified under the law to enroll this fall 'at the rate they reasonably expected.' The letter later said, in part, 'It is especially cruel and short-sighted to apply this policy change retroactively just weeks before the start of the 2025-2026 academic year. These students made plans, accepted offers, and committed to their futures in good faith.' The lawmakers urged the board to use its rulemaking authority to create this classification — for example, 'first-generation resident tuition' — at least temporarily. They called for the board to release guidance to institutions that would 'preserve tuition equity for students during the transition period.' The lawmakers also noted the move would not override statute but would provide 'a critical bridge' until the Legislature could address the matter during the next legislative session in two years. Earlier this year, during the most recent legislative session, lawmakers considered bills to repeal the Dream Act and heard hours of testimony on it, but it was left pending and failed to pass. In 2001, the Dream Act had bipartisan support and was signed into law by Republican former Governor Rick Perry. RELATED | Texas' undocumented college students no longer qualify for in-state tuition In its lawsuit, the DOJ argues that a 1996 federal law, known as the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA), preempts the Dream Act. Attorney General Pam Bondi called it a 'blatant violation' of the federal law. 'Under federal law, schools cannot provide benefits to illegal aliens that they do not provide to U.S. citizens,' Bondi said. 'The Justice Department will relentlessly fight to vindicate federal law and ensure that U.S. citizens are not treated like second-class citizens anywhere in the country.' Legal experts talked to KXAN this week about whether the move by the Trump administration and Paxton's quick agreement allowed for any way for opponents of the change to challenge the decision. Josh Blackman, associate professor of law at South Texas College of Law, said the decision appears effectively final. Barbara Hines, an immigration law professor who helped craft the initial Texas Dream Act, did not share Blackman's assessment that it was the end of the road for the law. She said that in previous lawsuits related to the Dream Act or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, other parties have been allowed to intervene. RELATED | Law professors react: Texas will no longer provide in-state tuition to undocumented students According to the Texas Higher Education Commissioner, around 19,000 students will be affected by the change. The lawmakers' letter argued that the state stands to lose talent, which could affect the workforce and the economy. It said, 'This is not just a moral failure, it's a strategic and economic blunder that will be felt for generations to come.' Economic factors proved to be a driving force behind the Dream Act's passage in 2001. According to a 2015 report by The Texas Tribune, former Governor Perry said at the time, '[Texas] had a choice to make economically: Are you going to put these people in a position of having to rely upon government to take care of themselves, or are you going to let them be educated and be contributing members of society, obviously working towards their citizenship.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Roughly 1,100 applications submitted by former federal workers amid Austin hiring campaign
AUSTIN (KXAN) — President Donald Trump's promise to cut federal workforce is starting to show in the latest jobs report from the U.S. Department of Labor, which indicated 22,000 fewer federal government jobs in the last month alone. In response to the president's letting go of some federal workforce, the city of Austin re-launched a recruitment effort its used in the past called the Get Hired campaign — this time aimed at those federal workers. 'We value public servants': Austin targeting federal staff let go by Trump administration The city said between March 21 and May 23, the duration of that campaign, the city received roughly 1,100 applications from former federal employees. Of those folks, 30 now work for the city, according to the city's human resource director, Susan Sinz. 'It is good to see that with that previous federal experience, how much we benefit from that….they understand customer service, I think they understand citizen engagement and they really understand how to be a servant leader and in our community that's what we're looking for,' Sinz said. On average, the city has 100 vacancies at any given time, though that includes everything — lifeguards, librarians, police officers — and those vacancies fluctuate greatly based on season. The city employs roughly 17,000 people, Sinz noted. Though that program targeting federal employees wrapped up late last month, Sinz hopes those folks will continue to keep their sights set on our city. 'We are excited to have them explore employment here at the city of Austin and really wish them a super long career here,' she said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Tesla robotaxi service reportedly launching next week in Austin
AUSTIN (KXAN) — In less than a week, people might see Tesla robotaxis riding around Austin. The company reportedly planned to launch its autonomous vehicle ride hailing service Thursday, June 12. Still, a federal agency has several questions about the safety of the vehicles. Last month, Tesla CEO Elon Musk discussed plans with CNBC to launch the service in Austin. How is Austin working with Tesla on its robotaxi rollout? 'We want to deliberately take it slow,' Musk said. 'I mean, we could start with 1,000 [robotaxis] 10,000 on day one, but I don't think that would be prudent. So we will start with probably 10 for a week, then increase it to 20, 30, 40.' Musk himself mentioned testing already started. Just last week, he posted on X that, 'for the past several days, Tesla has been testing self-driving Model Y cars (no one in driver's seat) on Austin public streets with no incidents.' The service is reportedly already available for some employees. In April, Tesla's AI account posted a video on X claiming that 'supervised ride hailing service is live for an early set of employees in Austin and [the] San Francisco Bay Area.' Still, some questions remain unanswered. In a letter sent to Tesla in May, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration asked the company to explain how it plans to operate safely. Questions focused on things like: Crash reporting Complying with traffic safey laws Automated responses to emergencies NHTSA asked how the robotaxis will safely operate in low-visibility, like sun glare, fog, rain or snow. Those conditions are tied to previous accidents involving the company's driver-assistance software. KXAN reached out to see if NHTSA heard back. The agency told us its investigation remains open and that Tesla's response must be submitted by June 19. NHTSA said any updates will be posted in the investigation file online. The letter said Tesla may be fined up to $27,874 per day if the agency does not receive a prompt response, with a maximum fine of $139,356,994. Back in December 2024, KXAN confirmed Tesla was in talks with the city of Austin over its autonomous vehicle technology. A spokesperson for the Transportation and Public Works Department said Tesla reached out to the city's autonomous vehicle task force. 'The City treats each AV company that expresses interest in Austin the same, offering training opportunities and providing uniform information,' the transportation spokesperson said in an email to KXAN. KXAN received an updated statement from the department regarding those discussions. We are working with Tesla, as we work with all AV companies looking to deploy in Austin. The city treats each AV company that expresses interest in Austin the same, offering training opportunities and providing information about City right-of-way and procedures. Additionally, Austin Police recently participated in a training with Tesla vehicles that was hosted by the Texas Department of Public Safety.' City of Austin Transportation and Public Works Department KXAN reached out to Tesla directly for comment. We'll update this story if we get a response. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
