Saving seeds amid the smoke
'This beautiful, diverse community of trees and animals is being destroyed as you see it, as you watch it,' she said.
Birchenko, a geneticist at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, was collecting seeds and leaves in Umphang Wildlife Sanctuary with colleagues from Britain and Thailand.
They will study how temperature and moisture affect germination and whether genetics dictate those responses.
That may one day help ensure reforestation is done with trees that can withstand the hotter temperatures and drier conditions caused by climate change.
But in Umphang, a remote region in Thailand's northwest, the scientists confronted the toll that human activity and climate change are already having on forests that are supposed to be pristine and protected.
Birchenko and her colleagues hiked kilometre after kilometre through burned or still-smouldering forest, each footstep stirring up columns of black and grey ash.
They passed thick fallen trees that were smoking or even being licked by dancing flames, and traversed stretches of farmland littered with corn husks, all within the sanctuary's boundaries.
The wildlife for which the sanctuary is famous – hornbills, deer, elephants and even tigers – was nowhere to be seen.
Birchenko (left) collecting Albizia odoratissima leaves in the wildlife sanctuary. — AFP
Instead, there were traces of the fire's effect: a palm-sized cicada, its front neon yellow, its back end charred black; and the nest of a wild fowl, harbouring five scorched eggs.
'My heart is broken,' said Nattanit Yiamthaisong, a PhD student at Chiang Mai University's Forest Restoration and Research Unit (Forru), who is working with Birchenko and her Kew colleague Jan Sala.
'I expected a wildlife sanctuary or national park is a protected area. I'm not expecting a lot of agricultural land like this, a lot of fire along the way.'
The burning in Umphang Wildlife Sanctuary is hardly an outlier.
Wildfires are common in Thailand during the country's spring burning season, when farmers set fields alight to prepare for new crops.
Some communities have permission to live and farm plots inside protected areas because of their long-standing presence on the land.
Traditionally, burning has helped farmers enrich soil, and fire can be a natural part of a forest's ecosystem. Some seeds rely on fire to germinate.
But agricultural burning can quickly spread to adjacent forest – intentionally or by accident.
The risks are heightened by the drier conditions of climate change and growing economic pressure on farmers, who are keen to plant more frequently and across larger areas.
Experts warn that forests subjected to repeated, high-intensity fires have no chance to regenerate naturally, and may never recover.
Sapindus rarak (soapberry) seeds that have been collected for genetic research and seed germination studies. — AFP
Fire data based on satellite images compiled by US space agency Nasa shows hotspots and active fires burning across many protected areas in Thailand recently.
Around tourist hotspot Chiang Mai, firefighting helicopters drop water on local wildfires, at a cost of thousands of dollars per mission.
But remote Umphang is far from the public eye.
Park rangers protect the area, but they are frequently underpaid, poorly resourced and overstretched, local environmentalists say.
It's a long-standing problem in Thailand, whose Department of National Parks has sometimes closed protected areas in a bid to prevent fires from spreading.
The department did not respond to requests for comment.
And the challenge is hardly unique to Thailand. Devastating blazes have ravaged wealthy California, Japan and South Korea in recent months.
Still, it was a sobering sight for Sala, a seed germination expert at Kew.
'The pristine rainforest that we were expecting to see, it's actually not here any more, it's gone,' he said.
'It really shows the importance of conservation, of preserving biodiversity. Everything is being deforested at a very, very high speed.'
Sala and Birchenko work with Kew's Millennium Seed Bank, which holds nearly 2.5 million seeds from over 40,000 wild plant species.
An untouched soapberry tree in the Umphang Wildlife Sanctuary. — AFP
They want to unlock' knowledge from the seed bank and help partners like Forru, which has spent decades working out how to rebuild healthy forests in Thailand.
The partnership will map the genetic structure and diversity of three tree species, predict their resilience to climate change and eventually delineate seed zones in Thailand.
'We hope that some of the population will be more resilient to climate change. And then ... we can make better use of which populations to use for reforestation,' said Sala.
Back in Britain, seeds will be germinated at varying temperatures and moisture levels to find their upper limits.
Genetic analysis will show how populations are related and which mutations may produce more climate-resilient trees.
But first the team needs samples.
The scientists are focusing on three species: albizia odoratissima, Phyllanthus emblica – also known as Indian gooseberry – and Sapindus rarak, a kind of soapberry tree.
The three grow across different climates in Thailand, are not endangered and have traditionally been used by local communities, who can help locate them.
Still, much of the search unfolds something like an Easter egg hunt, with the team traipsing through forest, scanning their surroundings for the leaf patterns of their target trees.
'Ma Sak?' shouts Sala, using the local name for Sapindus rarak, whose fruits were once used as a natural detergent.
It's up to Forru nursery and field technician Thongyod Chiangkanta, a former park ranger and plant identification expert, to confirm.
Ideally seeds are collected from fruit on the tree, but the branches may be dozens of feet in the air.
A low-tech solution is at hand – a red string with a weight attached to one end is hurled towards the canopy and looped over some branches.
Shaking it sends down a hail of fruit, along with leaves for Birchenko to analyse.
Separate leaf and branch samples are carefully pressed to join the more than seven million specimens at Kew's herbarium.
The teams will collect thousands of seeds in all, carefully cutting open samples at each stop to ensure they are not rotten or infested.
They take no more than a quarter of what is available, leaving enough for natural growth from the 'soil seed bank' that surrounds each tree.
Each successful collection is a relief after months of preparation, but the harsh reality of the forest's precarious future hangs over the team.
'It's this excitement of finding the trees ... and at the same time really sad because you know that 5m next to the tree there's a wildfire, there's degraded area, and I assume that in the next years these trees are going to be gone,' said Sala.
The team is collecting at seven locations across Thailand, gathering specimens that are 'a capsule of genetic diversity that we have preserved for the future,' said Birchenko.
'We are doing something, but we are doing so little and potentially also so late.' — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 days ago
- The Star
Tiny terror meets its match
Major pest: Aedes mosquitoes are the primary vectors of chikungunya.— AFP Scientists battling the country's largest chikungunya epidemic are releasing swarms of giant cannibal mosquitoes whose larvae devour the smaller insects spreading the debilitating disease. These so-called 'elephant mosquitoes', measuring nearly 2cm in length, are voracious predators. Public health experts hope these unusual allies will become unlikely heroes in stopping the painful, fast-moving virus in the southern province of Guangdong. With more than 6,000 infections reported in just three weeks in Foshan alone, authorities are also reviving familiar tactics from the Covid-19 playbook, including mass polymerase chain reaction testing, isolation of infected residents and neighbourhood-wide disinfection campaigns. Yet it's the unconventional methods – giant mosquitoes – that underscore the desperation of officials confronting an unprecedented outbreak. The larvae of these so-called elephant mosquitoes, also known as Toxorhynchites splendens, is released by a research team from Sun Yat-sen University's Zhongshan School of Medicine in Guangdong. They don't bite humans but prey on Aedes mosquitoes – the primary vectors of chikungunya, dengue, Zika and yellow fever. Foshan, a sprawling city in central Guangdong, is deploying another tool: a local variety of fish that eats mosquito eggs and larvae. More than 5,000 of the fish have been released into city ponds and rivers. The city has designated 53 hospitals for chikungunya treatment, offering more than 3,600 beds equipped with mosquito nets and plans to expand capacity, according to state broadcaster CCTV. In nearby Guangzhou, officials published a risk map of all 120 communities and launched a week-long campaign involving mosquito spraying twice a day. One larva of the elephant mosquito can consume up to 100 Aedes, according to Zhang Dongjing, associate professor and technical director of a 'mosquito factory' linked to Sun Yat-sen University. — Bloomberg
New Straits Times
3 days ago
- New Straits Times
Scientists slam US energy paper for misusing climate data
WASHINGTON: Top scientists told AFP Thursday their research cited in a flagship climate report by the US Department of Energy (DoE) was misused to downplay the role of human activity in global warming. The document released July 29 outlines the Trump administration's rationale for revoking a foundational scientific ruling that underpins the government's authority to combat climate change. The paper was written by a working group including John Christy and Judith Curry, who have both in the past been linked to The Heartland Institute, an advocacy group that frequently pushes back against the scientific consensus on climate change. It "completely misrepresents my work," Benjamin Santer, atmospheric scientist and honorary professor in the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia in Britain, told AFP. Santer said a section of the report on "stratospheric cooling" contradicted his findings while citing his research on climate "fingerprinting," a scientific method that seeks to separate human and natural climate change, as evidence for its analysis. AFP and other media, including NOTUS, a US digital news website affiliated with the nonprofit Allbritton Journalism Institute, found inaccurate citations, flawed analysis and editorial errors across the document. This is the third time since January, when Donald Trump took office, that scientists have told AFP a government agency has misrepresented academic work to defend their policies. Previous instances included made up citations in the government's "Make America Healthy Again" report, which the administration then rushed to edit. "I am concerned that a government agency has published a report, which is intended to inform the public and guide policy, without undergoing a rigorous peer?review process, while misinterpreting many studies that have been peer?reviewed," Bor-Ting Jong, an assistant professor at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands, told AFP. Jong said the paper made false statements about the climate model her team examined and used different terminology that led to a flawed analysis of her findings. On Bluesky, the budding social media platform favored by academics, other researchers in atmospheric and extreme weather fields also deplored that the DoE document cherry-picked data and omitted or plainly distorted their academic findings. James Rae, a climate researcher at the University of St Andrews in Scotland, who said his work is also misrepresented in the report, told AFP the shift in how the department uses scientific research "is really chilling." "DoE was at the forefront of science for decades. Whereas this report reads like an undergraduate exercise in misrepresenting climate science," he said. Contacted by AFP, a DoE spokesperson said the report was reviewed internally by a group of scientific researchers and policy experts from the Office of Science and National Labs. The public will now have the opportunity to comment on the document before it is finalised for the Federal Register.
New Straits Times
3 days ago
- New Straits Times
'Silent killer': The science of tracing climate deaths in heatwaves
A HEATWAVE scorching Europe had barely subsided in early July when scientists published estimates that 2,300 people may have died across a dozen major cities during the extreme, climate-fuelled episode. The figure was supposed to "grab some attention" and sound a timely warning in the hope of avoiding more needless deaths, said Friederike Otto, one of the scientists involved in the research. "We are still relatively early in the summer, so this will not have been the last heatwave. "There is a lot that people and communities can do to save lives," Otto, a climate scientist at Imperial College London, said. Heat can claim tens of thousands of lives during European summers but it usually takes months, even years, to count the cost of this "silent killer". Otto and colleagues published their partial estimate just a week after temperatures peaked in western Europe. While the underlying methods were not new, the scientists said it was the first study to link heatwave deaths to climate change so soon after the event in question. Early mortality estimates could be misunderstood as official statistics but "from a public health perspective the benefits of providing timely evidence outweigh these risks," Raquel Nunes from the University of Warwick told AFP. "This approach could have transformative potential for both public understanding and policy prioritisation" of heatwaves, said Nunes, an expert on global warming and health who was not involved in the study. Science can show, with increasing speed and confidence, that human-caused climate change is making heatwaves hotter and more frequent. Unlike floods and fires, heat kills quietly, with prolonged exposure causing heat stroke, organ failure, and death. The sick and elderly are particularly vulnerable, but so are younger people exercising or toiling outdoors. But every summer, heat kills and Otto ,a pioneer in the field of attribution science, started wondering if the message was getting through. "We have done attribution studies of extreme weather events and attribution studies of heatwaves for a decade. "But as a society, we are not prepared for these heatwaves," she said. "People think it's 30°C instead of 27°C. What's the big deal? And we know it's a big deal." When the mercury started climbing in Europe earlier this summer, scientists tweaked their approach. Joining forces, Imperial College London and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine chose to spotlight the lethality, not just the intensity, of the heat between June 23 and July 2. Combining historic weather and published mortality data, they assessed that climate change made the heatwave between 1°C and 4°C hotter across 12 cities, depending on location, and that 2,300 people had likely perished. But in a notable first, they estimated that 65 per cent of these deaths — around 1,500 people across cities, including London, Paris, and Athens — would not have occurred in a world without global warming. "That's a much stronger message," said Otto. "It brings it much closer to home what climate change actually means and makes it much more real and human than when you say this heatwave would have been 2°C colder." The study was just a snapshot of the wider heatwave that hit during western Europe's hottest June on record and sent temperatures soaring to 46°C in Spain and Portugal. The true toll was likely much higher, the authors said, noting that heat deaths are widely undercounted. Since then Turkey, Greece and Bulgaria have suffered fresh heatwaves and deadly wildfires. Though breaking new ground, the study has not been subject to peer review, a rigorous assessment process that can take more than a year. Otto said waiting until after summer to publish — when "no one's talking about heatwaves, no one is thinking about keeping people safe" — would defeat the purpose. "I think it's especially important, in this context, to get the message out there very quickly."
