Marcos siblings at loggerheads over Duterte arrest: What the media is not saying
Manila: Senator Imee Marcos is urging the Office of the Ombudsman to investigate and potentially prosecute Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla and several other top officials allegedly involved in the surrender of former President Rodrigo Duterte to the International Criminal Court (ICC).
The eldest sister of President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr., Imee (full name Maria Imelda Josefa Remedios Romualdez Marcos), currently chairs the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.
President Marcos has signed off the arrest of Duterte in Manila and gave his nod to transfer the former president to The Hague.
On Friday (May 2) she announced that she had officially submitted her committee's report to the Ombudsman, citing evidence that points to possible criminal and administrative violations committed by key government figures.
'During the course of the Senate inquiry, the Committee on Foreign Relations uncovered acts by high-ranking government officials which very likely constitute criminal and administrative offenses,' said Marcos.
'Thus, I am requesting that these officials, all of whom are named in the report, be investigated, and where appropriate, prosecuted and/or sanctioned in accordance with the applicable laws, rules, and regulations,' she added.
President rejects sister's findings
President Marcos has previosly rejected the findings of the Senate report led by Imee which claimed that the arrest of Duterte was "politically motivated" and intended to undermine him and Vice President Sara Duterte.
'Everyone's entitled to their opinion. I disagree,' the President told reporters on April 30. He said Duterte's arrest was neither a political attack nor a breach of Philippine sovereignty.
'We followed every single necessary procedure – the very good basis on which to serve that warrant and to read him his rights… So I'm confident that in further examination, you will find that it is proper and correct,' he told reporters during a late-night press conference at Malacañang.
Marcos cited that the complaints against Duterte were filed in 2017, long before he assumed office in 2022.
'I don't see how that can be political persecution on my part because... it was initiated before I even came into the picture... I was still a civilian then,' he said.
The president said the Philippines did not grant any request from the International Criminal Court (ICC) regarding Duterte's drug war, but Marcos said the country could not ignore the request of the International Criminal Police Organsation (Interpol) to surrender the former president.
For her part, Senator Imee Marcos' report detailed the following officials and their alleged liabilities:
Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla
Marcos stated that Remulla may be liable for usurpation of judicial functions under Article 241 of the Revised Penal Code and may have violated the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act. She also noted there is 'reason to believe' that Remulla committed Grave Misconduct and acts Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service.
Police General Nicolas Torre III
According to the report, there is basis to hold the police general accountable for Arbitrary Detention, Grave Threats under Article 282, and the administrative charges of Grave Misconduct and Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service.
PNP Chief General Rommel Francisco Marbil
Marcos said that based on the hearings, there are "reasonable grounds" to charge the Philippine National Police chief with Arbitrary Detention as well as administrative offenses including Grave Misconduct and Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service.
Interior and Local Government Secretary Juanito Victor Remulla
The DILG secretary, and brother of Justice Secretary Remulla, was also cited by Marcos for possible criminal liability under the Anti-Graft Law and for Arbitrary Detention. She further asserted that he should be held administratively liable for Grave Misconduct and Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service.
Special Envoy on Transnational Crime Markus Lacanilao
Imee alleged that Lacanilao committed Usurpation of Official Functions, gave False Testimony, and committed Perjury in Solemn Affirmation. She also cited him for Grave Misconduct and Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service.
What the media isn't saying
Much of the mainstream coverage has painted the rift as a simple disagreement between siblings.
But behind the scenes, it signals a fracturing of the Marcos-Duterte alliance that helped deliver a landslide victory in 2022.
The arrest was not just a legal move — but part of a calculated strategy seen as a way to weaken Duterte's influence, especially in Mindanao.
Political equation
The Marcoses dominate the vote-rich Ilocos region, while the Dutertes have both Visayas and Mindanao as their political bailiwicks.
Analysts say this internal conflict may also affect candidate alignments for the 2025 Senate and congressional races. Imee is currently running as an independent, apart from the Marcos administration canditates.
In the runup to May 12 mid-term polls, there are 12 lots open for Senator.
A PulseAsia Research survey taken from April 202-24, 2025 shows Imee does not form part of the "Magic 12". She ranks between 14 to 18, just below boxer and former Senator Manny Pacquiao, and directly competing with actor Phillip Salvador, Rep. Rodante Marcoleta and former local government secretary Benhur Abalos.
Imee, who orchestrated the Marcos-Duterte alliance that staged a landslide victory in 2022, is also trying to win the Mindanao votes.
Vice President Sara Duterte, who has endorsed Imee's senatorial campaign, remains a strong potential 2028 presidential contender.
The road ahead
As the May 12 vote approaches, the nuances surrounding the rift within the Marcos family and its implications for the any possibility of a coalition between the top political clans from Mindanao will become more critical.
Whether this division deepens or is patched over may determine not just the fate of the Marcos presidency, but the entire shape of Philippine politics in the post-Duterte era.
In the meantime, the short-term geopolitical and strategic underpinnings of this feud remains.
The current Marcos administration's increasing cooperation with the United States — a major shift from Duterte's China-friendly foreign policy — has not sat well with Duterte loyalists.
The arrest, critics argue, is symbolic of the broader 'de-Dutertization' of government institutions. The media has largely downplayed this narrative.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
US slaps sanctions on four ICC judges over Israel, US cases
The United States on Thursday imposed sanctions on four judges at the International Criminal Court including over an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as it ramped up pressure to neuter the court of last resort. The four judges in The Hague, all women, will be barred entry to the United States and any property or other interests in the world's largest economy will be blocked -- measures more often taken against policymakers from US adversaries than against judicial officials. "The United States will take whatever actions we deem necessary to protect our sovereignty, that of Israel, and any other US ally from illegitimate actions by the ICC," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement. "I call on the countries that still support the ICC, many of whose freedom was purchased at the price of great American sacrifices, to fight this disgraceful attack on our nation and Israel," Rubio said. The court swiftly hit back, saying in a statement: "These measures are a clear attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution which operates under the mandate from 125 States Parties from all corners of the globe." Marco Rubio Israel's Netanyahu welcomed the move, thanking US President Donald Trump's administration in a social media post. "Thank you President Trump and Secretary of State Rubio for imposing sanctions against the politicised judges of the ICC. You have justly stood up for the right of Israel," he wrote on Friday. War crimes Human Rights Watch urged other nations to speak out and reaffirm the independence of the ICC, set up in 2002 to prosecute individuals responsible for the world's gravest crimes when countries are unwilling or unable to do so themselves. The sanctions "aim to deter the ICC from seeking accountability amid grave crimes committed in Israel and Palestine and as Israeli atrocities mount in Gaza, including with US complicity," said the rights group's international justice director, Liz Evenson. Two of the targeted judges, Beti Hohler of Slovenia and Reine Alapini-Gansou of Benin, took part in proceedings that led to an arrest warrant issued last November for Netanyahu. The court found "reasonable grounds" of criminal responsibility by Netanyahu and former Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant for actions that include the war crime of starvation as a method of war in the massive offensive in Gaza following Hamas's unprecedented October 7, 2023 attack on Israel. Israel, alleging bias, has angrily rejected charges of war crimes as well as a separate allegation of genocide led by South Africa before the International Court of Justice. The two other judges, Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza of Peru and Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, were part of the court proceedings that led to the authorization of an investigation into allegations that US forces committed war crimes during the war in Afghanistan. Return to hard line Neither the United States nor Israel is party to the Rome Statute that established the International Criminal Court. But almost all Western allies of the United States as well as Japan and South Korea, the vast majority of Latin America and much of Africa are parties to the statute and in theory are required to arrest suspects when they land on their soil. Trump in his first term already imposed sanctions on the then ICC chief prosecutor over the Afghanistan investigation. After Trump's defeat in 2020, then president Joe Biden took a more conciliatory approach to the court with case-by-case cooperation. Rubio's predecessor Antony Blinken rescinded the sanctions and, while critical of its stance on Israel, worked with the court in its investigation of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. ICC judges in 2023 issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin over the alleged mass abduction of Ukrainian children during the war. Both Putin and Netanyahu have voiced defiance over the ICC pressure but have also looked to minimize time in countries that are party to the court. The ICC arrest warrants have been especially sensitive in Britain, a close US ally whose Prime Minister Keir Starmer is a former human rights lawyer. Downing Street has said that Britain will fulfil its "legal obligations" without explicitly saying if Netanyahu would be arrested if he visits. Hungary, led by Trump ally Viktor Orban, has parted ways with the rest of the European Union by moving to exit the international court. Orban thumbed his nose at the court by welcoming Netanyahu to visit in April. Agence France-Presse
Gulf Today
13 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Behind a Texas bill, a push to make gold ‘functional money'
Trevor Bach, Tribune News Service More than 50 years after the United States abandoned the gold standard, Texas lawmakers are moving to bring precious metals into everyday use. The new legislation, House Bill 1056, aims to give Texans the ability, likely through a mobile app or debit card system, to use gold and silver they hold in the state's bullion depository to purchase groceries or other standard items. The bill would also recognise gold and silver as legal tender in Texas, with the caveat that the state's recognition must also align with currency laws laid out in the US Constitution. 'In short, this bill makes gold and silver functional money in Texas,' Rep. Mark Dorazio, R-San Antonio, the main driving force behind the effort, said during one 2024 presentation. 'It has to be functional, it has to be practical and it has to be usable.' After picking up major amendments in the Senate aimed at ensuring the legislation complies with existing laws — most notably, the Senate nixed language from an earlier version that sought to establish an entirely new digital currency based on the metals — the proposal cleared both legislative chambers late last week, and was sent to the governor's desk on Sunday. Governor Greg Abbott does not appear to have indicated whether he intends to sign the bill. In a statement, Abbott's press secretary, Andrew Mahaleris, said the governor 'will thoughtfully review any legislation sent to his desk.' Dorazio and state Sen. Bryan Hughes, R-Mineola, who authored a companion bill in that chamber, did not respond to requests for comment. This year's gold and silver legislative push comes roughly a decade after Texas created the country's first state-run precious metals depository — and as Republican lawmakers around the country are pushing more broadly to move away from dependence on fiat currency, or money issued and backed by a central government. To date legislators in at least 11 states, including Utah, Oklahoma, Kansas, Arizona and West Virginia, have introduced bills that declare gold and silver as legal tender, or move for taxation exemptions on the metals, although many of those efforts have failed to become law. State and federal lawmakers, including in Texas, have also been pushing to expand the viability of cryptocurrency, including with government-held reserves. Texas' highest-profile piece of crypto-related legislation this year, Senate Bill 21, which would create a state reserve of bitcoin and potentially other cryptocurrencies controlled by the state comptroller, is now likely to become law after formally advancing through the state legislature on Sunday. 'Bitcoin doesn't need Texas,' Brian Morgenstern, a policy adviser for the Texas Blockchain Council, the state's leading crypto lobbying group, recently argued in an interview with The News. 'Texas and the United States need bitcoin, because it's this modern phenomenon that is an outstanding asset.' The anti-fiat movement generally argues that alternative currencies offer a hedge against inflation and a greater degree of autonomy, because standard-issue currency is theoretically vulnerable to government manipulation. While such concerns have been lingering for decades, more recently they've taken on a more heated pitch. Many see an inflection point amid rising inflation, ballooning federal debt, and a US dollar that recently slid to its lowest value in three years — all of which raise questions about the currency's central role in global finance. 'How am I supposed to buy groceries?' While several states have pushed for the legalisation of gold and silver, those efforts still left the metals functionally unusable, Dorazio has argued, because they didn't include a mechanism for making purchases. 'How am I supposed to go to the grocery store and buy groceries? How am I supposed to put gas in my car with a gold bar?' he said last year. 'Today it's an impossibility. You just can't do it.' HB 1056 aims to solve that problem by enabling the state comptroller to 'establish or authorise one or more electronic systems' for consumers and vendors to make and receive payments with their precious metals held in the state depository. The comptroller would also have the ability to contract the work to third parties and charge associated fees. The current version of the bill focuses on laying the groundwork for such a system without mandating that anyone — including merchants — actually take part. But setting up a functional Texas metals transaction operation would still likely cost tens of millions of dollars and likely prove extremely logistically challenging, including by requiring potential reconfigurations of the state's bullion depository in order to ensure the assets can be accounted for. In addition to many elected Texas Democrats and residents — some who were bewildered as the measure advanced through the legislature — fiscal watchdogs have opposed the bill because of the associated costs. Meanwhile, banking groups that include the Texas Bankers Association and Independent Bankers Association of Texas (IBAT), have raised objections over its lack of consumer protections.
Arabian Post
16 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Musk's ‘Debt Slavery' Warning Intensifies GOP Spending Bill Debate
Elon Musk has launched a scathing attack on President Donald Trump's proposed $4 trillion tax and spending bill, branding it the 'Debt Slavery Bill' and urging Americans to pressure lawmakers to reject it. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO's criticism comes as the U.S. national debt approaches $37 trillion, with the Congressional Budget Office projecting the bill would add approximately $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. Musk's denunciation marks a sharp reversal from his previous role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency under Trump. In a series of posts on his social media platform, X, Musk described the bill as a 'disgusting abomination' and warned that its passage would plunge the nation into 'debt slavery.' He called on his 220 million followers to contact their representatives, stating, 'Bankrupting America is NOT ok!' The legislation, officially titled the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' was narrowly approved by the House on May 22 and is now under consideration in the Senate. It includes permanent tax cuts estimated to reduce federal revenues by $3.7 trillion, offset by $1.5 trillion in spending cuts and nearly $300 billion in additional defense and border security funding. The bill also proposes significant reductions to Medicaid and food assistance programs, introducing new work requirements for recipients. ADVERTISEMENT Critics argue that the bill's fiscal measures disproportionately benefit the wealthy while placing undue burdens on low-income Americans. Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky has voiced strong opposition, labeling the debt ceiling increase as 'the greatest in U.S. history' and asserting that the GOP now owns the resulting fiscal consequences. Similarly, Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri has expressed concerns over the proposed Medicaid cuts, calling them 'morally wrong and politically suicidal.' Supporters of the bill, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, contend that the tax cuts will stimulate economic growth sufficient to offset the deficit increases. They argue that the legislation is necessary to maintain America's competitive edge and bolster national security. However, the CBO's analysis contradicts these claims, indicating that the bill would significantly exacerbate the national debt without delivering the promised economic benefits. Musk's opposition is not solely based on fiscal concerns. The bill's elimination of electric vehicle tax credits could adversely affect Tesla's bottom line, potentially costing the company billions. Additionally, the withdrawal of Musk's ally Jared Isaacman as a nominee for NASA administrator has further strained relations between Musk and the Trump administration. The controversy surrounding the bill has intensified as the Senate deliberates its provisions. Several Republican senators have expressed reservations, and the bill's passage is far from certain. Musk's vocal opposition has galvanized public discourse, with many Americans taking to social media to echo his concerns and urge their representatives to reconsider their support.
