Failure to resolve Gaza crisis starkly exposes UN flaws
The Gaza tragedy also lays bare the imminent collapse of the multilateral system. Multilateralism has given way to unilateralism that breeds protectionist policies.
The failure to punish the perpetrators of the genocide in Gaza has made the UN an object of ridicule.
The tragedy in Gaza exposes not only Israel's total disregard for human life and disrespect for humanitarian law, but also exposes the ineffectiveness of the UN as a multilateral institution, most blatantly due to the paralysis in the Security Council.
This impasse has been building for decades.
However, the tragedy in Gaza is not merely the failure of five powerful states with veto powers, or the P5. The other members of the UN (188 of them) must also be held accountable.
There are mechanisms within the UN system that would allow the UN General Assembly (UNGA) to act on a threat to international peace — as in today's Gaza. These include the Uniting for Peace Resolution (Resolution 377.V) when the Security Council is unable to act due to a veto by a permanent member.
This resolution allows the UNGA to recommend collective measures and it has been used a few times, including to address the Korean crisis in 1950 and Congo in 1960.
Blaming the five permanent members for its failure to resolve the Gaza problem does not absolve the members of the UNGA from their responsibility.
They, too, must find ways to solve the problem, including mechanisms outside the UN system.
The US veto against all UN resolutions on Israel's actions in Gaza gives Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a free hand to "finish the job against Hamas".
America siding with Israel should be a wake-up call for the Global South. They must realise that the UN is almost powerless when an armed conflict involves an ally of a state with veto power.
UN Security Council resolutions calling for a ceasefire or an end to the starvation in Gaza has been vetoed by the US not once or twice but multiple times.
Many other UN members are also responsible for the inaction. They have been content to issue only statements while avoiding the hard choices, such as cutting diplomatic and economic ties with Israel and other complicit powers.
Under the UN Charter, UNGA resolutions are non-binding and have only moral authority.
The impasse in the Security Council exposes a gap between the UN's moral promise and its political reality.
The writer is honorary professor at Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia.
He can be reached at bahamzah8@hotmail. com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Hizbollah says govt 'handing' Lebanon to Israel with disarmament bid
BEIRUT: Hizbollah chief Naim Qassem yesterday accused Lebanon's government of "handing" the country to Israel by pushing for the group's disarmament, warning it would fight to keep its weapons. Qassem spoke in a televised address after meeting Iran's top security chief Ali Larijani, whose country has long backed the Lebanese group. Hizbollah emerged badly weakened from last year's war with Israel, and under US pressure the Lebanese government has ordered the army to devise a plan to disarm the group by the end of the year. Iran, whose so-called "axis of resistance" includes Hizbollah, has also suffered a series of setbacks, most recently in the war with Israel that saw the United States strike its nuclear sites. "The government is implementing an American-Israeli order to end the resistance, even if it leads to civil war and internal strife," Qassem said. "The resistance will not surrender its weapons while aggression continues, occupation persists, and we will fight it... if necessary to confront this American-Israeli project no matter the cost," he said. Qassem urged the government "not to hand over the country to an insatiable Israeli aggressor or an American tyrant with limitless greed". He also said the government would "bear responsibility for any internal explosion and any destruction of Lebanon", accusing it of "leading the country to ruin". Hizbollah and its ally Amal would not be organising any street protests at this time, he said, while threatening to do so in future. Before the war with Israel, Hizbollah was believed to be better armed than the Lebanese military. It long maintained it had to keep its arsenal to defend Lebanon from attack, but critics accused it of using its weapons for political leverage. Iran's Supreme National Security Council chief Larijani was in Beirut this week, where he met Qassem as well as with President Joseph Aoun. Iran has expressed its opposition to the government's disarmament plan, and has vowed to continue to provide support. Aoun told Larijani that he rejected any interference in the country's internal affairs, branding as "unconstructive" Iran's statements on plans to disarm Hizbollah.
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
South Korea criticises Japanese officials' visit to Tokyo war shrine
SEOUL: The South Korean government expressed 'deep disappointment and regret' over Japanese officials visiting a Tokyo war shrine on Friday and said future relations must be built on Japan showing remorse for past wrongs, its foreign ministry said. Japan marked the 80th anniversary of its World War Two defeat on Friday, with at least one cabinet minister joining thousands of visitors at Yasukuni Shrine, which South Korea said in a statement 'glorifies Japan's war of aggression and enshrines war criminals.' The South Korean government urged the leaders of Japan to face history and demonstrate 'humble reflection and sincere remorse' for Japan's past history, the ministry statement said. 'This is an important foundation for the development of future-oriented relations between the two countries based on mutual trust,' it said. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung is due to visit Japan on August 23-24 and hold a summit with Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. Lee has in the past been critical of efforts by administrations in Seoul to improve ties with Japan, which occupied the Korean peninsula from 1910 to 1945. He has since vowed to continue efforts to strengthen cooperation with Japan and the United States - REUTERS
Rakyat Post
4 hours ago
- Rakyat Post
BDS Condemns Sarawak Tribune's Report On Al-Jazeera Journalist
Subscribe to our FREE A coalition of Malaysian non-government organisations (NGO) promoting freedom, justice, and equality for Palestinians through strategies of boycotts, divestment, and sanctions published a press statement yesterday (14 August) addressing the public apology made by East Malaysian newspaper Sarawak Tribune over its report about the death of Al-Jazeera journalist Anas Al-Sharif in Gaza at the hands of Israeli forces. In its statement, Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) Malaysia described Sarawak Tribune's apology as 'hollow'. 'Nowhere in the so-called apology is an explicit retraction of its headline which trumpets and repeats the utter falsehood promoted by Zionists that Al Sharif was a militant. 'The report was from a wire agency but the headline was entirely of ST's making. ST is fully responsible for it,' the coalition said. They also highlighted a page in the same Sarawak Tribune issue which was almost entirely dedicated to a report on Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 'Those who would try to argue that a forced closure of a newspaper is an assault on press freedom should ask themselves whether a newspaper whose conduct has demonstrated that it is not in the least outraged by the wanton murder of journalists deserves the protection of freedom of the press,' BDS added. The coalition has called on the Home Ministry and the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) to close down the Sarawak Tribune. Al-Jazeera journalist Anas Al-Sharif, along with four other members of the media lost their lives in what was reportedly a targeted attack by Israeli forces on a camp that housed journalists in Gaza last Sunday (10 August). In its report on the attack, Sarawak Tribune used the headline: Militant Using Press Cover Eliminated. This sparked public outrage, and many accused against the newspaper of pushing Zionist propaganda, although the paper later published a public apology and denied the allegations. Local NGO Penang4Palestine also expressed their anger over the matter, saying that the report and headline has tainted the reputation of local media and urging them to make an additional public apology. READ MORE: Share your thoughts with us via TRP's . Get more stories like this to your inbox by signing up for our newsletter.
