US-EU trade war ‘in nobody's interest', says Downing Street
Mr Trump threatened to increase tariffs on EU products last Friday, saying talks with the bloc were 'going nowhere' and suggesting the new rate could come into effect on June 1.
But on Sunday night he said he would delay the tariffs until July 9 to allow for 'serious negotiations'.
In Number 10's first comments since Mr Trump made his threat, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said on Tuesday: 'We've always been clear that a trade war's in nobody's interest.
'And the EU and the US are two of our largest trading partners, which is why we're so focused on improving and strengthening our trading relationships with both the EU and the US.'
The EU is currently subject to US tariffs of 10%, in line with most other nations after Mr Trump climbed down from the sweeping levies he announced on April 2 that had include a 20% charge for the bloc.
Earlier this month, the EU said it would impose its own tariffs on a range of American products, including aircraft, vehicles and alcohol, and begin legal action at the World Trade Organisation if it could not negotiate a solution with Washington.
Although the UK has managed to negotiate some concessions to the tariffs imposed directly on the country, a wider trade war between the US and EU could still harm the British economy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Immigration courts are dismissing cases of those sent to El Salvador, potentially cutting off their return
Before he was sent to an infamous supermax prison in El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act, Andry Hernandez Romero was waiting for an immigration judge to decide whether he would be granted asylum in the United States. And even after his deportation, Hernandez's lawyers fought to keep his asylum claim open as a way of ensuring he didn't disappear from the American legal system. But an immigration judge in San Diego dismissed Hernandez's asylum claim on Tuesday — one of at least 14 such dismissals to take place in recent weeks. This has immigration attorneys concerned that the dismissals are the Trump administration's latest tactic in evading due process to ensure those sent away have no means to return. 'It seems the government's intention in dismissing these cases across the country is to complete the disappearance of people to El Salvador, to end their legal proceedings, and to act as though they weren't here seeking asylum in the first place,' said Lindsay Toczylowski, executive director of Immigrant Defenders Law Center, a nonprofit representing Hernandez and seven other Venezuelans deported to El Salvador. Hernandez, 32, is the lead plaintiff in a high-profile lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union against the Trump administration in Washington, D.C., on behalf of the hundreds of Venezuelans deported to a Salvadoran megaprison under the Alien Enemies Act. That case has been the centerpiece of a legal saga surrounding the deportations — one some legal analysts say has brought the U.S. to the brink of a constitutional crisis. Hernandez, a gay man who worked as a makeup artist for a state TV station in Venezuela, told his lawyers that he had suffered persecution for his sexual orientation and opposition to the government. That alleged persecution formed the basis of his asylum claim, which Hernandez pursued for months from inside the Otay Mesa Detention Center in San Diego. But that process was abruptly cut short on March 15, when President Donald Trump invoked special wartime powers to deport 268 Venezuelan men to El Salvador without court hearings and without notifying their attorneys. A majority of them, like Hernandez, had pending cases in immigration court. In the weeks after the sudden deportations, immigration lawyers around the country scrambled to attend hearings to make sure their cases weren't thrown out. 'We don't want these cases dismissed, because that pulls them out of the court process entirely,' said Michelle Brané, executive director of Together and Free, a nonprofit group coordinating the legal response to the deportations. 'If they are returned to the U.S., this would be a shot at due process.' At first, immigration judges were willing to extend the cases while more information emerged about the removals to El Salvador. But according to attorneys involved in the cases, more immigration judges, including in California and Texas, have been granting the government's requests to dismiss the cases in the last two to three weeks. Together and Free has tracked at least 14 cases nationwide that have been dismissed since April, Brané said. Although the Trump administration has not officially confirmed the identity or location of any of the deported Venezuelans, they are presumed to be held at the Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT, a supermax prison in El Salvador designed to hold gang members and terrorists. The prison is notorious for human rights abuses: As a matter of policy, inmates at CECOT are not allowed contact with the outside world, including lawyers and loved ones. None of the attorneys representing Venezuelan men held there have been able to establish contact with their clients — even in cases where federal judges have explicitly ordered the Trump administration to facilitate such contact. 'They're dismissing this proceeding that exists in the United States while providing absolutely no information on how we can communicate with our clients and under what legal authority they're being held at U.S. government expense in El Salvador,' Toczylowski said. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which presents the government's side in immigration court proceedings, did not respond to a request for comment. The Executive Office for Immigration Review, a branch of the Justice Department that employs immigration judges and runs the immigration court system, also did not respond to a request for comment. Attorneys in Hernandez's case and others stress that the dismissals do not signify the end of the road for the Venezuelans deported to CECOT. Many plan to appeal them to the Board of Immigration Appeals. The immigration judge who dismissed Hernandez's asylum claim allowed for the possibility that the case be reopened if Hernandez returns to the U.S., according to a copy of the dismissal order reviewed by NBC News. Hernandez's loved ones reacted with distress to the news that his asylum case had been dismissed. 'For us, keeping the case open was a beacon of hope that he could return to the U.S.,' Reina Cardenas, Hernandez's childhood friend who has taken the lead in advocating for his release, said in Spanish. 'He didn't leave voluntarily — he was practically kidnapped. And he never got a chance to defend himself.'
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
GOP Rep. Ashley Hinson met with boos at Iowa town hall
Constituents in Iowa's Second District on Wednesday met GOP Rep. Ashley Hinson with boos, jeers and laughs during a town hall in Decorah, Iowa, on Wednesday. The crowd's jeers began during Hinson's prepared remarks at the beginning of the town hall. "I think it's important to note that when we look at last year, when we look at the election, I think Americans overwhelmingly rejected the status quo for the country. We were seeing an open border, high inflation, we were seeing men and women in Iowa and in our country feel like their voices were not heard," Hinson told the crowd, which booed after she mentioned high inflation. 'The president is, I believe, fighting for you and fighting for me," Hinson added. The crowd responded with jeers and people shouting "No!" The crowd's reaction comes as several other Republican lawmakers have faced hostile crowds at town halls this year. Near the start of President Donald Trump's second term, GOP members of Congress in Texas, Kansas and North Carolina were met with boos and jeers when talking about Trump and his advisor Elon Musk's decisions to slash the federal workforce. And earlier this week, Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb., was also grilled by constituents at a town hall in his district. In her prepared remarks on Wednesday, Hinson told the crowd that she was "proud" to vote for the sweeping Trump agenda bill — dubbed the "Big Beautiful Bill" — in the House last week, which seeks to extend the president's 2017 tax cuts, beef up spending for the military and border security, eliminate taxes on tips and overtime work and slash funding for Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. After touting her vote for the legislation, Hinson was met with major boos and jeers, forcing her to pause her speech. "This is your time,' she told the crowd in response to their boos, adding, 'I'm here to clean up lots of the misinformation out there today." The crowd laughed as she responded to their negative reactions. Multiple times during the question and answer portion of the town hall, the crowd booed or laughed when the congresswoman mentioned her support for Trump. One question in particular riled up the crowd, when a constituent asked about "corruption in Washington," specifically citing the Trump administration's decision to accept a luxury jet as a gift from Qatar and Trump's decision to host a dinner for those who spent millions of dollars on his meme coin. Attendees cheered while the man asked his question, including his insinuation that, 'There's lots of reasons why somebody like you might be silent. You might be scared to say something. You might actually like to see the corruption ... or you might not care about it." "Can you help me understand why you are silent about this corruption?" he added. 'I think it's really unfair to imply that I like to see corruption in Washington D.C.," Hinson answered while the crowd clamored. 'I'm here answering your questions in public because I care about transparency and accountability and doing things the right way, she added, later telling the man who asked the question, 'I'm answering your question. You may not like my answer and that's your right to not like my answer." Several members of the crowd also shouted that Hinson was a "fraud" later in the town hall, after a man asking a question accused the president and his cabinet of "breaking laws by ignoring federal judge's orders." 'When are you going to do the responsibility that you were elected for by holding the executive branch accountable up to and including impeachment?' the man asked Hinson. "Judges need to follow the law. I don't think this country needs another impeachment charade," Hinson answered, to which the crowd shouted, "No." As she alleged "egregious abuses" by several federal judges who have paused or halted certain presidential executive actions and pledged to work with presidents of either party to achieve common goals, members of the crowd clamored and shouted, "You are a fraud." A spokesperson for Hinson's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the town hall.
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Trump kisses former Fox News host while swearing her in as new top prosecutor
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video President Donald Trump kissed a former Fox News personality and called her an 'incredible woman' as he swore her in as Washington DC's top prosecutor. Trump gave Judge Jeanine Pirro a quick peck on the side of her head during a ceremony in the Oval Office on Wednesday inducting her as the interim US attorney for the nation's capital. Pirro, who has long been a political ally to Trump, smiled and grasped him by the hands. 'She's an incredible person, an incredible woman,' Trump said from the podium, adding that 'it's a big deal'. The president said that Pirro has been a 'tireless warrior'. Taking the podium, Pirro vowed to take on violence and boost safety in DC. 'Violence will be addressed directly with the appropriate punishment, and this city will again become a shining city on the hill in an America that President Trump has promised to make great again and will make safe again,' she said. Pirro referenced the murder of two Israeli embassy staff members outside the Capital Jewish Museum and said that 'this will not go without just accounting'. 'My voice should be heard loud and clear,' she said. 'No more, no more tolerance of hatred. No more mercy for criminals.' Pirro joined Fox News in 2006 and hosted Justice with Judge Jeanine for 11 years. She then co-hosted The Five until Trump tapped her for her new role this month. She is replacing Ed Martin, who was the president's previous pick. Martin served as DC's interim top prosecutor but lost support from Republicans in part because he defended January 6 rioters. Fox News Media stated that Pirro is 'a longtime beloved host across FOX News Media who contributed greatly to our success throughout her 14-year tenure' and 'we wish her all the best in her new role in Washington'. More Trending Pirro served as an assistant district attorney and district attorney in Westchester County in New York, and became the first female judge in Westchester County Court. Trump said he has 'no doubt' that Pirro will be an 'exceptional' US attorney. 'She will restore public safety in our nation's capital, break up vicious street gangs and criminal networks, and ensure equal justice under the law,' he said. 'You'll see very, very big improvements in the DC area, that I can promise you.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page.
