Hunting mountain lions with dogs will remain legal in Arizona after commission vote
Hunting mountain lions and other predators with dogs will remain legal in Arizona, after the Arizona Game and Fish Commission denied efforts by wildlife groups to ban the practice.
The decision April 11 followed close to three hours of public comment at a commission meeting, where hunters who use dogs to legally pursue and sometimes kill predators like bears and mountain lions argued for the wildlife management benefits of hound hunting and defended the GPS technology they use to track their dogs while hunting.
Others spoke against hunting with hounds, saying the GPS devices and dogs were an unfair advantage for hunters and might harm endangered species like ocelots and jaguars.
Commissioner Jeff Buchanan commended members of the public on both sides of the petition issue for having the courage to speak their minds at the meeting.
'Continue to follow your heart, continue to get involved, and continue to speak up for what you think is right,' Buchanan told people at the commission meeting.
The petition, submitted by the Tucson-based Center for Biological Diversity and five other groups, would have banned dog packs for hunting mammals but not birds.
In the petition, the Center stated concerns about hunting dogs' negative impacts on endangered species, like jaguars, ocelots, and Mexican gray wolves, including health effects from the physical stress during pursuit and the abandonment of habitat and offspring. Though hunting endangered species is illegal, hunting dogs sometimes pursue and corner those species while a hunter is seeking legal game.
'This isn't just about protecting these individual animals, it's about making Arizona viable for the recovery of these animals just as they're getting a stronghold in our state,' Russ McSpadden, the Center's Southwest conservation advocate, told commissioners.
The petition also argued that GPS tracking collars worn by hunting dogs are an unfair tool when hunting big game, and can reduce supervision over dogs.
Wildlife issues: Hounds in jaguar country: Petition ignites debate over future of hunting dogs in Arizona
Commissioners voted unanimously to deny the petition, following the recommendations of Arizona Game and Fish Department staff.
Jim Heffelfinger, wildlife science coordinator for the Game and Fish Department, told commissioners that department staff did not believe the center had presented information that supported the claims in their petition.
'The allegations that hunting with dogs disrupts ecosystem balance, represents a public safety hazard, represents a risk to non-target and protected wildlife, and violates Arizona laws and regulations are not supported by the information in the petitions or any known scientific literature,' Heffelfinger said.
Heffelfinger said hounds are an important tool for managing and tracking mountain lion and bear populations. Dogs also help hunters get closer to mountain lions, enabling them to only kill cats of the sex they are allowed to shoot, Heffelfinger said. In areas without hunting dogs, Heffelfinger said more female mountain lions get shot by accident, working against conservation goals.
Rabies: Arizona counties warn of 31% rise in cases, urge caution around wildlife
Commonly used for hunting mountain lions and black bears in Arizona, hunting dogs have a long tradition in the state. Hunting some animals with packs of dogs is legal, with a season designated for 'pursuit-only,' in which the dogs trap an animal in a tree but hunters do not kill it, and regular hunting seasons in which hunters kill the pursued animal.
Hunters at the commission meeting said the GPS dog collars make their hunts safer for dogs. They said most hunters stay as close to their dogs as possible when hunting, even if they can track them from a distance using GPS collars. They repeatedly asked commission members to consider conservation science over what they saw as emotional pleas from petition supporters, and some brought their children to read statements about the tradition of hunting with hounds. Some hunters emphasized their deep attachments to their dogs.
'My dogs sleep in my bed every night, and they love to get out,' said one hunter, Zach May. 'They get better medical care than I provide for myself.'
In a statement after the commission's decision, McSpadden indicated that the debate over dog hunting may not be over. McSpadden said commissioners were 'out of touch' with Arizonans who love the endangered species that hunting dogs purportedly harm, and that the center would continue working on the issue.
'Commissioners could've aligned state rules with ethical hunting standards and the Endangered Species Act, but instead they chose to allow this harmful practice to continue. We'll keep fighting for these commonsense protections for Arizona's endangered wildlife,' McSpadden said.
A bill that would change the law to explicitly allow hunting dogs was introduced in the Legislature this session. House Bill 2552 passed through committees, but has not made it out of the House yet.
Austin Corona covers environmental issues for The Arizona Republic and azcentral. Send tips or questions to austin.corona@arizonarepublic.com
Environmental coverage on azcentral.com and in The Arizona Republic is supported by a grant from the Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust.
Sign up for AZ Climate, our weekly environment newsletter, and follow The Republic environmental reporting team at environment.azcentral.com and @azcenvironment on Facebook and Instagram.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Hunting predators with packs of dogs will remain legal in Arizona
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

27 minutes ago
Trump clears path for Nippon investment in US Steel, so long as it fits gov't terms
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order paving the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel, so long as the Japanese company complies with a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. Trump's order didn't detail the terms of the national security agreement. But the iconic American steelmaker and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a ' golden share" — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected against cutbacks in steel production. 'We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership," the two companies said. "This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, the statement said. 'The partnership is expected to be finalized promptly,' the statement said. U.S. Steel rose $2.66, or 5%, to $54.85 in afterhours trading Friday. Nippon Steel's original bid to buy the Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel in late 2023 had been valued at $55 per share. The companies offered few details on how the golden share would work, what other provisions are in the national security agreement and how specifically the $11 billion would be spent. White House spokesman Kush Desai said the order 'ensures U.S. Steel will remain in the great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and be safeguarded as a critical element of America's national and economic security.' James Brower, a Morrison Foerster lawyer who represents clients in national security-related matters, said such agreements with the government typically are not disclosed to the public, particularly by the government. They can become public, but it's almost always disclosed by a party in the transaction, such as a company — like U.S. Steel — that is publicly held, Brower said. The mechanics of how a golden share would work will depend on the national security agreement, but in such agreements it isn't unusual to give the government approval rights over specific activities, Brower said. U.S. Steel made no filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday. Nippon Steel originally offered nearly $15 billion to purchase U.S. Steel in an acquisition that had been delayed on national security concerns starting during Joe Biden's presidency. As it sought to win over American officials, Nippon Steel gradually increased the amount of money it was pledging to invest into U.S. Steel. American officials now value the transaction at $28 billion, including the purchase bid and a new electric arc furnace — a more modern steel mill that melts down scrap — that they say Nippon Steel will build in the U.S. after 2028. Nippon Steel had pledged to maintain U.S. Steel's headquarters in Pittsburgh, put U.S. Steel under a board with a majority of American citizens and keep plants operating. It also said it would protect the interests of U.S. Steel in trade matters and it wouldn't import steel slabs that would compete with U.S. Steel's blast furnaces in Pennsylvania and Indiana. Trump opposed the purchase while campaigning for the White House, and using his authority Biden blocked the transaction on his way out of the White House. But Trump expressed openness to working out an arrangement once he returned to the White House in January. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment. Trump said then that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans,' although Nippon Steel has never backed off its stated intention of buying and controlling U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. 'We have a golden share, which I control,' Trump said. Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.' The proposed merger had been under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, during the Trump and Biden administrations. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part CFIUS by the closing date of the transaction. Trump reserves the authority to issue further actions regarding the investment as part of the order he signed on Friday.

35 minutes ago
Why thousands of NCAA athletes might wait over a year for share of $2.8 billion settlement
The attorney who negotiated the $2.8 billion legal settlement for the NCAA said Friday that thousands of former athletes due to receive damages could have to wait months or maybe more than a year to get paid while appeals play out. Rakesh Kilaru, who served as the NCAA's lead counsel for the House settlement that was approved last week, told The Associated Press an appeal on Title IX grounds filed this week will hold up payments due to around 390,000 athletes who signed on to the class-action settlement. He said he has seen appeals take up to 18 months in the California-based federal court where this case is playing out, though that isn't necessarily what he expects. 'I will say that we, and I'm sure the plaintiffs, are going to push,' Kilaru said. A schedule filed this week calls for briefs related to the appeal to be filed by Oct. 3. Kilaru doesn't expect anyone on the defendant or plaintiff side to file for extensions in the case 'because every day the appeal goes on is a day damages don't go to the student-athletes.' He said while the appeal is ongoing, the NCAA will pay the money into a fund that will be ready to go when needed. The other critical parts of the settlement -- the part that allows each school to share up to $20.5 million in revenue with current players and set up an enforcement arm to regulate it -- are in effect regardless of appeals. 'I think everyone thought it was important and good for this new structure to start working because it does have a lot of benefits for students,' Kilaru said. 'But it's very common for damages to be delayed in this way for the simple reason that you don't want to make payments to people that you can't recover' if the appeal is successful. A group of eight female athletes filed the appeal. Their attorney, Ashlyn Hare, said they supported settlement of the case 'but not an inaccurate one that violates federal law.' "The calculation of past damages is based on an error that ignores Title IX and deprives female athletes of $1.1 billion,' Hare said. Kilaru agreed with plaintiff attorneys who have argued that Title IX violations are outside the scope of the lawsuit. Other objections to the settlement came from athletes who said they were damaged by roster limits set by the terms. One attorney representing a group of those objectors, Steven Molo, said they were reviewing Wilken's decision and exploring options.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump clears path for Nippon Steel investment in US Steel that gives feds a ‘golden share'
President Donald Trump on Friday signed an executive order paving the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel, so long as the Japanese company complies with a 'national security agreement' submitted by the federal government. Trump's order didn't detail the terms of the national security agreement. But U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel said in a joint statement that the agreement stipulates that approximately $11 billion in new investments will be made by 2028 and includes giving the U.S. government a 'golden share' — essentially veto power to ensure the country's national security interests are protected. 'We thank President Trump and his Administration for their bold leadership and strong support for our historic partnership,' the two companies said. 'This partnership will bring a massive investment that will support our communities and families for generations to come. We look forward to putting our commitments into action to make American steelmaking and manufacturing great again.' President Donald Trump signed an executive order to pave the way for a Nippon Steel investment in U.S. Steel. AP The companies have completed a U.S. Department of Justice review and received all necessary regulatory approvals, the statement said. 'The partnership is expected to be finalized promptly,' the statement said. The companies offered few details on how the golden share would work and what investments would be made. Trump said Thursday that he would as president have 'total control' of what U.S. Steel did as part of the investment. Trump said then that the deal would preserve '51% ownership by Americans.' The Japan-based steelmaker had been offering nearly $15 billion to purchase the Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel in a merger that had been delayed on national security concerns starting during Joe Biden's presidency. Trump opposed the purchase while campaigning for the White House, yet he expressed optimism in working out an arrangement once in office. 'We have a golden share, which I control,' said Trump, although it was unclear what he meant by suggesting that the federal government would determine what U.S. Steel does as a company. Trump added that he was 'a little concerned' about what presidents other than him would do with their golden share, 'but that gives you total control.' Still, Nippon Steel has never said it was backing off its bid to buy and control U.S. Steel as a wholly owned subsidiary. The proposed merger had been under review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, during the Trump and Biden administrations. The order signed Friday by Trump said the CFIUS review provided 'credible evidence' that Nippon Steel 'might take action that threatens to impair the national security of the United States,' but such risks might be 'adequately mitigated' by approving the proposed national security agreement. The agreement states that nearly $11 billion will be invested by 2028, which will also give the federal government the authority to ensure the country's national security interests are protected. AP The order doesn't detail the perceived national security risk and only provides a timeline for the national security agreement. The White House declined to provide details on the terms of the agreement. The order said the draft agreement was submitted to U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel on Friday. The two companies must successfully execute the agreement as decided by the Treasury Department and other federal agencies that are part CFIUS by the closing date of the transaction. Trump reserves the authority to issue further actions regarding the investment as part of the order he signed on Friday.