Prolonged closure hurting businesses: IHC directs DC to hold talks with BYC protesters
A single bench of Chief Justice Sardar Sarfraz Dogar, on Monday, heard the petition filed by an owner of a petrol pump at F-6 who is aggrieved due to continuing protest by Baloch outside the press club. He adopted the stance that protests be managed that roads be opened so that business may not suffer.
During the proceeding, the chief justice questioned why is the road blocked?
Advocate General Islamabad Ayyaz Shaukat informed the court that members of the Baloch Youth Council (BYC) were leading the protest.
When questioned by the Chief Justice about whether permission had been granted for the demonstration, the Advocate General admitted that no such permission was given. He said that they disperse them but they return.
The IHC chief justice expressed concerns over the prolonged closure of road by the protestors and asked Deputy Commissioner Irfan Nawaz Memon to negotiate with the protesting people and tell them that they cannot sit here. The bench questioned the administration's approach and emphasised the need for immediate and effective action.
Justice Dogar remarked that the measures taken so far are inadequate, adding that 'you are responsible for protecting the property rights of others as well.'
The deputy commissioner told the court that an alternative location could be offered to the protesters. In response to it, the chief justice ordered him to engage with the demonstrators and ensure the site is cleared. He also directed to submit a progress report on the next hearing, which is scheduled after two weeks, without failure.
Clarifying it, Justice Dogar said that 'when they say 15 days, it does not mean you return after 15 days.' The DC assured the court that action would be taken immediately.
The petitioner's counsel urged the court to expedite its directives, stating that local businesses had come to a standstill. In response to it, the chief justice remarked, 'The direction has been given.'
Later, the bench deferred hearing of the case for two weeks.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
LHC disposes of plea seeking 250 PTI workers recovery
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Wednesday disposed of a petition of PTI leader Akmal Bari seeking recovery of around 250 PTI workers and advised the petitioner to file the petition again with details of the detainees. Earlier, a law officer contended that the petition is not maintainable. How a court could get recover the detainees without their details, he added. The petitioner's counsel, however, said the petitioner was compiling the list of the detainees. The court, therefore, disposed of the petition with direction to file it again with details of all the detainees. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Properties' auction: Bahria Town moves SC against IHC order
ISLAMABAD: M/s Bahria Town (Private) Limited challenged the Islamabad High Court's order, allowing the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to proceed with the auction for its properties, in the Supreme Court. A division bench of IHC, comprising Chief Justice Sardar Mohammad Sarfraz Dogar and Justice Muhammad Asif on August 05, 25 dismissed Bahria Town's petition, through a short-impugned order; 'The injunctive order issued on 15.04.2025 passed in writ petition No. 1368 of 2025 and order dated 04.06.2025 passed in W.P No. 2248 of 2025 are hereby recalled.' M/s Bahria Town (Private) Limited, on Wednesday, through Farooq H Naek, filed an appeal against the IHC order under Article 185(3) of the Constitution. It asked the apex court that a regular bench hear the appeal, as no vires of any law have been challenged or interpretation of any constitutional provision is involved in the case. The petition raised questions whether, in view of the amended proviso to Section 25(b) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, the plea bargain agreement automatically becomes inoperative and unenforceable upon the accused's failure to fulfill the terms and conditions stipulated therein? Whether the NAB authorities can lawfully determine or attribute any liability arising out of a plea bargain agreement in the absence of the accused and without associating the accused in such proceedings? Whether NAB can impose any financial or legal liability upon a person without first preparing and concluding an investigation report in accordance with law? According to the petition, Zain Malik, son-in-law, was accused in three references and investigations of NAB. He later entered into plea bargain agreement with the NAB under Section 25(b) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999. The said plea bargain agreement was duly approved by the Accountability Court, Islamabad, vide orders dated 11.08.2020 and 24.08.2020. Upon the request of Zain Malik, the petitioner/Bahria Town (Private) Limited, mortgaged its eight commercial properties (Media House, Rawalpindi; Agricultural Land, Islamabad; Bahria Town Corporate Office-I and II, Rawalpindi; Rubaish Marquee, Islamabad; Arena Cinema, Rawalpindi; Bahria Town International Academy, Rawalpindi; and Safari Club, Rawalpindi) through Memorandum of Title Deeds in favour of NAB as security for the liability of Zain Malik. Out of the eight properties, NAB released two properties (Media House and Agricultural Land) upon payment of two installments by Zain Malik, while six properties still remained mortgaged in favour of the NAB. Zain Malik failed to make further payments in accordance with the terms of the plea bargain agreement which were duly approved by the Accountability Court, Islamabad. As a consequence of this non-compliance, the plea bargain agreement automatically became inoperative with respect to the rights and obligations of the parties. It said that despite amended Section 25(i) of National Accountability (Second Amendment) Act, 2022, the NAB vide letter dated 6-2-2024 called upon Zain Malik to appear in person and justify the reason of delay of payment of outstanding installments in compliance of plea bargain agreement and orders of Accountability Court I, Islamabad. The petitioner being aggrieved by the actions of the NAB, approached the Accountability Court (AC), Islamabad, seeking cancellation and withdrawal of the impugned notices and letter. However, the AC the application on 19-03-25. The petitioner then challenged the Accountability Court's order before the IHC, which on 15-04-25 passed restraining order. However, the IHC on August 5, 25 dismissed the petition through short impugned order. Farooq H Naek contended that the IHC order infringing upon the petitioner's proprietary rights and violating the applicable statutory and constitutional provisions. It shows that it has been passed in a mechanical manner and the Honourable High Court, Islamabad has ignored all the material attached with the writ petition and the relevant law regarding the subject matter, he added. It said that the courts below ignored the fact that the NAB is unlawfully attempting to impose its illegal demand upon the petitioner without any legal justification, while acting beyond its legal authority and disregarding the law and constitutional guarantees under the constitution. It prayed that leave to appeal against the impugned order dated 05.08.2025, passed by IHC may very kindly be granted. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
PARTLY FACETIOUS: Towards overcoming hurdles to FBR reforms
'The Prime Minister has ordered that all hurdles to Federal Board of Revenue reforms be removed.' 'He can order all he wants, but…' 'Hey, if you are referring to his powers as enshrined in the constitution then stop right there.' 'No, no and again no. Why do you always take what I say in a way that reflects negatively on our system.' 'Referring to the powers of a PM as enshrined in the constitution reflects negatively on our system!?' 'I know well what you meant, so just stop it. A system that works is worth two in the bush that never worked, is what I say.' 'That makes sense in a way — the expression is a bird in hand is worth two in the bush. I am just curious: did you mean two birds, and if so which birds?' 'No I did not mean birds, I meant a system in place is worth an ideal system that remains in the bush and if with your limited IQ you must understand that…' 'Yes I do anyway going back to PM's order to remove hurdles to FBR's reforms, I reckon that unless the FBR is willing to undertake massive reforms, structural reforms, nothing will change – and by structural reforms I am referring to substantive changes or more precisely a shift from the 75 to 80 percent reliance on indirect taxes as remains evident today, whose incidence on the poor is greater than on the rich, to taxing the influential and the…' 'The FBR is going after sales tax evasion by large companies and…' 'Sales tax is also an indirect tax and it's paid for by the end consumer, so if the FBR succeeds in ensuring that all due sales tax is collected as imposed by the FBR then two negative elements need to be highlighted. First that this would fuel inflation considerably which would further raise the poverty levels that today stand at 44.2 percent and second and equally importantly this indicates that income tax collections from those who are not salaried as their tax is cut at source…' 'Yeah, yeah, yeah.' 'And that means?' 'That means move on, the FBR under its chairman continues to focus on total collections as opposed to actual reforms and…' 'That's against the PM's directive, isn't it? Off with the Chairman I say and…' 'Nah.' 'Nah what: that the PM's directive has not been flouted because he too is focused on total collections or that the Chairman is not likely to be removed because…' 'Eureka — I begin to see some glimmer of hope in your ability to understand the ground realities.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
