Government to ban 'appalling' non-disclosure agreements that 'silence' victims of abuse at work
Accusers of Harvey Weinstein, the former film producer and now convicted sex offender, are among many in recent years who had to breach such agreements in order to speak out about what they had endured.
As Labour seeks to boost workers' protections, its ministers have suggested an extra section in the forthcoming Employment Rights Bill that would void NDAs designed to stop employees from going public about harassment or discrimination.
The government said this would allow victims to come forward about their situation rather than remain "stuck in unwanted situations, through fear or desperation".
Zelda Perkins, Weinstein's former assistant and founder of Can't Buy My Silence UK, said the changes would mark a "huge milestone" in combatting the "abuse of power".
She added: "This victory belongs to the people who broke their NDAs, who risked everything to speak the truth when they were told they couldn't. Without their courage, none of this would be happening."
Deputy prime minister Angela Rayner said the government had "heard the calls from victims of harassment and discrimination" and was taking action to prevent people from having to "suffer in silence".
An NDA is a broad term that describes any agreement that restricts what a signatory can say about something, originally intended to protect commercially sensitive information.
But "many high profile cases" have revealed NDAs being manipulated to prevent people "speaking out about horrific experiences in the workplace", the government said.
The updated bill, if passed, would also mean witnesses can also publicly support without the threat of being sued.
Announcing the amendments, employment minister Justin Madders said: "The misuse of NDAs to silence victims of harassment or discrimination is an appalling practice that this government has been determined to end."
The bill is currently in the House of Lords, where it will be debated on 14 July, before going on to be discussed by MPs as well.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
' I want an apology,' says veteran forced to leave military for being gay
Kevin Jones, a former RAF sergeant from Newport, served his country with distinction - but was forced out of the RAF because of who he is. He says veterans like him, who were driven out of the military for their sexuality, need "their day in court and answers, just like the postmasters." Kevin spoke against a backdrop of secrecy, document shredding, suspected official cover-ups and personal illness. Kevin's unblemished service record included service aboard the Nimrod MRA2, conducting anti-submarine and anti-ship operations. The Lliswerry boy joined up in 1992, driven by a sense of service, purpose and the hope of starting anew. As a gay man, he thought life would be easier if he moved away to find freedom away from his own doorstep, a common delusion of gay men and women in those days, he recalls. He reflected: 'Life doesn't work that way.' I tried… Newport's new crisp bottomless brunch 'We owe it to Zach': calls for focus on veterans at risk of cancer After leaving Newport to live openly as a gay man, Kevin entered an institution where honesty was dangerous, because homosexuality was officially banned in the armed forces until the year 2000. Though he maintained a spotless record and served without incident for years, Kevin says his private life eventually became a target, a few years into his service. A letter from a former partner landed on his base commander's desk and suddenly his career was in jeopardy. Kevin recalls: 'I was summoned in Number Ones, full service dress. I had to walk through the tearooms, so everyone knew something was going on.' Confronted by his wing commander, with an incriminating letter from a former partner, Kevin made a bold decision to bluff and bluster his way out of trouble. He demanded his officer 'lose' the letter - a code for dealing with things in the old 'don't ask, don't tell', way. This tacit understanding of gay relationships had no fixed rules and left people at the mercy of fortune. On this occasion, is gamble was successful - for the time being. Kevin endured three more years of pressure and suspicion and riding his luck. Then one day, the RAF's Special Investigations Branch turned up at his house in plain clothes, an ominous sign of trouble: 'They were without a warrant, claiming authority from the procurator fiscal's office. My then partner denied them entry,' Kevin recalls. From then on, the pressure just grew and Kevin eventually left, 'under a cloud,' as he puts it. He continued: 'I am now ill and face a battle against an aggressive form of prostate cancer. I want my medals, an explanation and an apology. There is a compensation scheme and money would be nice, but recognition of how they ended my career in serving my country is what I want most of all. 'They have lost all of my files. I found out that this is common and I don't know how many files they shredded. Why did they do this to me and why are they getting away with doing this to so many? Why did they shred all those files and where is my recognition of my service?' In recent years, the Ministry of Defence has acknowledged the loss of files. It has confirmed veterans, subject to investigation for homosexuality, may not be able to access their records. In 2010, the MOD confirmed many files were destroyed following an order from the Defence Police Chiefs' Forum. In many cases, inserts were left in empty folders to confirm investigations had taken place, but records were missing. In 2023, the LGBT Veterans Independent Review documented widespread destruction of records and its impact on its victims. The MOD has fully responded to this story and has expressed contrition.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Cars seized by police for being driven without insurance or licence to be reused
Cars seized for being driven without insurance or a licence are being given a new purpose. The vehicles, confiscated by Cumbria Police under Section 165 of the Road Traffic Act, have been donated to Carlisle College to support students on mechanics and related courses. Inspector Jack Stabler, of Cumbria Police's Roads Policing Unit, said: "It's a great way to ensure these vehicles are put to a positive use, helping young people working towards mechanical qualifications. "It's a project we have run in the past and we're delighted to be able to revive it once more." Six vehicles will be delivered each academic term, with the first arriving on Thursday, July 10. The scheme is funded by police, fire, and crime commissioner David Allen, with transport support provided by Egertons. Officers from the Roads Policing Unit, police vehicle examiners, and Mr Allen will visit the college in September to meet the students who will be working on the vehicles. Mr Allen said: "I'm delighted to see these cars which have been driven with no insurance or driver's licences being used to positively impact our young people. "Driving irresponsibly causes so much harm, you can be assured that I take this incredibly seriously and will do all I can as your commissioner to ensure all communities feel safe. "This is about sending a message to those who break the law: actions have consequences." The hands-on experience will help students develop technical skills and improve their employability within the automotive sector.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Police arrest scores more Palestine Action supporters
Police in several British cities on Saturday arrested scores of people for supporting Palestine Action, following a second consecutive weekend of protests over the government's decision to ban the activist group using anti-terror laws. Campaign group Defend Our Juries, which had announced the rallies "to defy" the ban, said 86 people had been arrested across five different cities. They included four vicars, a lawyer, a civil servant, a social worker, a mechanical engineer and the daughter of a Polish resistance fighter, as well as veterans of the 1960s civil rights movement, the group added. "We will not be deterred from opposing genocide, nor from defending those who refuse to be bystanders," the group said in a statement, referring to accusations levelled against Israel over its war in Gaza. The protesters were also taking a stand "against the corruption of democracy and the rule of law", it added. In London, the Metropolitan Police said its officers had made 41 arrests for "showing support for a proscribed organisation". Another person was arrested for common assault, the force added. Footage showed police moving in on a small group of protesters displaying signs supporting Palestine Action. They had gathered at lunchtime at the steps of the Mahatma Gandhi statue in Parliament Square. Greater Manchester Police arrested 16 people, while officers in the Welsh capital Cardiff detained 13, all for the same offence under the 2000 Terrorism Act, both forces confirmed. "South Wales Police supports the right for people to make their voices heard through protest providing it is done lawfully," said a police statement. - Support now a crime - The other arrests occurred in the Northern Irish city Londonderry -- also known as Derry -- and Leeds, in northern England, according to Defend Our Juries. They come a week after 29 similar arrests at protests staged last Saturday, mainly in London. Since the Palestine Action ban kicked in on July 5, police have warned that expressing support for the group was now a crime, after a last-ditch High Court challenge failed to stop its proscription becoming law. The government announced plans for the ban under the 2000 Terrorism Act days after the group's activists claimed to be behind a break-in at an air force base in southern England. Two aircraft there were sprayed with red paint, causing an estimated £7 million ($9.55 million) in damage. Four people charged in relation to the incident remain in custody. Palestine Action has condemned its outlawing -- which makes it a criminal offence to belong to or support the group, punishable by up to 14 years in prison -- as an attack on free speech. jj/jj
