logo
Rapido pilots food delivery in Bengaluru; analysts see limited impact

Rapido pilots food delivery in Bengaluru; analysts see limited impact

As mobility platform Rapido begins piloting a food delivery service in Bengaluru, analysts expect limited disruption to India's entrenched food delivery giants.
According to a recent report by Bernstein, the market remains a tight duopoly, with Zomato holding approximately 54 per cent share and rival Swiggy at 46 per cent. While Swiggy has shown stronger year-on-year growth in gross order value (GOV), the US-based asset manager does not foresee Rapido's entry shifting the balance in the near term.
'We don't anticipate material market share impact from Rapido's entry,' said Rahul Malhotra, an analyst at Bernstein, noting that the service remains in its early pilot phase.
Rapido, which provides bike and taxi services, has announced plans to enter the food delivery business with a pilot launch in Bengaluru. The firm, which has raised about $600 million, plans to leverage its rider base (over 3 million) and charge lower take rates of 8–15 per cent. In comparison, Zomato and Swiggy take rates are higher at 18–20 per cent, according to the Bernstein report.
India's food delivery space has previously seen several entrants attempt to grow the restaurant base by offering lower take rates. These include Amazon, Ola, and ONDC. However, most failed to scale due to limited selection, poor customer experience, and operational complexity.
Food delivery remains a challenging business. Online food aggregators must negotiate take rates with approximately 300,000 restaurants. India's market is highly fragmented—only 10 per cent of GOV comes from QSRs (quick service restaurants), with the remainder from smaller restaurants—making scale difficult and favouring incumbents.
The Bernstein report noted that at low contribution margins, the flywheel effect fails. The average delivery cost per order is ₹50–60, so an 8–15 per cent take rate on a ₹400–500 order generates very low profitability, leaving little room for reinvestment or expansion into Tier 2 cities, where penetration is lower but growth potential higher.
Rapido could expand the restaurant pool (currently 300,000–400,000, with potential for over 1 million) by attracting lower AOV (average order value) restaurant outlets in Tier 2 and smaller markets. These outlets have not been viable for Zomato and Swiggy.
'We believe the ability to operate at low take rates will be difficult for Rapido,' said Malhotra in the report. 'Eventually, it will have to increase take rates to sustain.'
The report also noted that Rapido remains an unprofitable business. Notably, Swiggy is an investor and holds a 12–13 per cent stake in the company.
Bernstein continues to favour Zomato as its top pick, citing strong execution and growth in quick commerce. It also rated Swiggy as 'outperform', expecting the company to remain a key player in India's expanding convenience economy.
Swiggy's food delivery GMV grew 18 per cent year-on-year in Q4FY25, compared to 16 per cent for Zomato. Swiggy's GOV growth has trended higher on a year-on-year basis over the past two quarters. Management also saw good traction in the 10-minute delivery service Bolt, which is available in 500 cities and accounts for 12 per cent of total food delivery orders.
Zomato remains stronger on the supply side. Its average monthly restaurant partners stood at around 314,000 in Q4FY25, compared to 252,000 for Swiggy. Bernstein said Rapido would face difficulties negotiating with the over 500,000 restaurants currently associated with the two incumbents.
HSBC, in a recent note, said the unit economics of two-wheeler ride-hailing are on par with food delivery, but warned that customer experience, operational execution, and scaling remain formidable challenges. The bank added that while newer players may tap into lower-margin segments, they are unlikely to meaningfully disrupt the dominance of market leaders.
Separately, Kotak Institutional Equities reportedly said Rapido would need to invest aggressively in discounts and technology to gain a foothold in the food delivery business. With Zomato and Swiggy already deeply embedded in the restaurant and consumer networks, Kotak said the competitive threat posed by Rapido remains minimal. Disclosure: Entities controlled by the Kotak family have a significant holding in Business Standard Pvt Ltd

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Google and Latin America's largest airline LATAM are fighting a court battle over a YouTube video
Why Google and Latin America's largest airline LATAM are fighting a court battle over a YouTube video

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Why Google and Latin America's largest airline LATAM are fighting a court battle over a YouTube video

Alphabet's Google has reportedly launched a legal battle against Chile-based LATAM Airlines in a U.S. federal court in San Jose, California, seeking to block Brazilian courts from forcing the removal of a YouTube video in the United States. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The video, which alleges that a LATAM employee sexually abused a child, has sparked a heated dispute over jurisdictional reach, Reuters reported. Google's lawsuit argues that LATAM is attempting to bypass U.S. constitutional protections for free speech by leveraging Brazilian courts to demand the video's global removal. "LATAM is trying to sidestep U.S. law," the filing stated, accusing the airline of overreaching its authority. LATAM Airlines did not immediately respond to Reuters' inquiries regarding Google's claims. Jose Castaneda, a Google spokesperson, emphasized the company's stance, stating, "Google has consistently upheld the principle that a country's courts can govern content within its borders but should not dictate what is accessible in other nations." What is the Google vs LATAM case about At the heart of the current dispute is a 2018 YouTube video uploaded by Raymond Moreira, a Florida resident and U.S. citizen. The video features his 6-year-old son describing alleged sexual abuse by a LATAM employee during a trip as an unaccompanied minor. In 2020, Moreira sued LATAM in Florida over the incident, reaching a confidential settlement. LATAM responded by filing a lawsuit in Brazil in 2018, seeking to compel Google, YouTube's parent company, to remove the video. Brazil's highest court is set to decide next week whether it can mandate a worldwide takedown. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Google's Thursday filing in California asks the court to affirm that LATAM cannot enforce such a removal in the U.S. What Google vs LATAM case shows The case mirrors a February lawsuit in Florida, where Trump Media and Rumble, two right-wing social media platforms, challenged a Brazilian judge's order to delete U.S.-based accounts linked to a supporter of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. A federal judge in that case ruled that the platforms were not required to comply with the Brazilian directive in the U.S. This case highlights ongoing tensions over global content regulation. In a similar 2018 case, Canada's Supreme Court ordered Google to remove certain search results worldwide, but a California judge blocked its enforcement in the U.S. in 2017, underscoring the challenges of reconciling national laws with global digital platforms.

Hyphenating US-Pak: Doing business with gunmen
Hyphenating US-Pak: Doing business with gunmen

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

Hyphenating US-Pak: Doing business with gunmen

Howdy, phenomenal pardners! Michael Kurilla (left) & Asif Munir, Florida, 2023 The Trump regime's reported invitation to Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir to attend the 250th US Army Day celebrations in Washington tomorrow has stirred various vectors of speculation. Chief among them: Potential reset in US-Pakistan relations. Pakistan's prospective utility within an emergent Trump doctrine that views bilateral ties primarily through an economic lens. Revival of a counterterrorism partnership between Islamabad/Rawalpindi and Washington. Implications of such a warming of US-Pakistan ties on US-India relations. In New Delhi, this apparent shift in Washington's posture has come as a surprise. What is even more startling is the timing - coming on the heels of India's retaliation against Pakistan for its involvement in the Pahalgam terrorist attacks on civilians. A significant part of Trump's appeal among Indians, both in India and the diaspora, stemmed from his tough stance on terrorism. During Trump 1.0, he publicly called out Pakistan's duplicity in his very first tweet of 2018, accusing it of 'lies and deceit' while receiving billions in US aid. He subsequently cut $300 mn in aid to Pakistan, a move that built on the Obama administration's earlier decision to withhold one-third of all military assistance to the country. During Trump 2.0, consistent with his recalibrated approach toward various global actors, the US president has markedly diverged from his earlier stance, Pakistan being no exception. In February, the Trump regime departed from its broader aid-cutting policy to authorise $397 mn in security assistance to Pakistan. This was specifically aimed at supporting a US-backed programme for maintenance and technical support of Pakistan's F-16 fighter the assistance explicitly stated that it was not to be used for operations against India, reopening of funding channels to Pakistan signalled a broader trend of policy reversal. In March, Trump publicly thanked Pakistan for its assistance in the arrest of Mohammad Sharifullah, a suspect linked to multiple terrorist attacks, including the 2021 Abbey Gate bombing in recently, Trump's consistent attempts to place Pakistan on equal footing with India, particularly following the India-Pak military escalation in May, appear driven by strategic reinforcing this shift, US Centcom chief Michael Kurilla referred to Pakistan as a 'phenomenal partner' in counterterrorism efforts. Similarly, Paul Kapur, Trump's incoming assistant secretary of state for South and Central Asian affairs, affirmed that the US would 'pursue security cooperation where it is beneficial to US interests while seeking opportunities for bilateral collaboration in trade and investment'. Together, these moves reflect a deliberate and coordinated strategy for renewed strategic engagement with apparent rapprochement between the US and Pakistan may be driven largely by Trump's personal inclinations, and a possible desire to secure future economic deals. For Pakistan, warming ties with Washington represent a strategic gain, however temporary. Any signs of improving relations between Islamabad/Rawalpindi and Washington stand in sharp political contrast to the stance of former PM Imran Khan and his supporters in Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI).Khan had accused the US of orchestrating the fall of his government, and maintained that he would never have agreed to American demands for military bases in his country. If PTI continues to remain a significant political force, any future US requests for enhanced military presence - even under the guise of counterterrorism - are likely to face resistance. Conversely, if Trump intensifies efforts to strike an economic deal with Pakistan, the resulting political reverberations within the country could become even more tough posture during his first term - marked by launching a trade war with China, pursuing a 'maximum pressure' strategy against Iran culminating in the killing of Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, and publicly calling out countries like Pakistan for sponsoring terrorism - is now giving way to a policy of modus vivendi, driven by an outsized prioritisation of US interests, particularly economic US-China economic deal reportedly 'finalised' on June 11 underscores this clear shift in US diplomacy - one that increasingly sidelines concerns of Washington's allies, partners and friends. While this approach may serve immediate US interests, especially in economic terms, it risks prompting a strategic recalibration by other nations in how they engage with the the shadow of recent military escalation between India and Pakistan, Pakistan's detente with the US may present an opportunity for Trump. But the strain this reset places on India-US relations could prove detrimental to both countries in the long run. The divergence between New Delhi and Washington is now most pronounced on the issue of Pakistan and, more broadly, on India has strongly reaffirmed its zero-tolerance stance against terrorism following the Pahalgam attack, the Trump regime appears increasingly willing to engage Pakistan as a counterterrorism partner. In doing so, Trump seems to be prioritising unilateral US interests over shared strategic concerns that have long underpinned the India-US partnership. Unlike his first term, when Trump's South Asia policy broadly aligned with the US-India strategic convergence, his bilateral bets in his second gig risk further destabilising an already fragile region. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. How a nudge from Cyrus Mistry helped TCS unlock a USD1 billion opportunity Explainer: The RBI's LAF corridor and its role in rate transmission Is Zomato under siege? Quick commerce may be the next telecom Operation Sindoor, Turkey, Bangladesh played out as India hosted global airlines after 42 years Coal on one hand and green on the other; this company balances both Stock Radar: Bandhan Bank stocks break out from 1-month consolidation; what should traders do? Check target & stop loss Combination of strong brand & higher margins equals long-term investment: 5 stocks with an upside potential of up to 23% Two Trades for Today: A PSU energy major for 7.5% rise, a large-cap refinery stock for close to 6% upmove These mid-cap stocks with 'Strong Buy' & 'Buy' recos can rally over 25%, according to analysts

Nothing Phone (3) will be company's first-ever flagship to be manufactured in India
Nothing Phone (3) will be company's first-ever flagship to be manufactured in India

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Nothing Phone (3) will be company's first-ever flagship to be manufactured in India

Nothing has confirmed that its upcoming flagship smartphone, the Phone (3), will be manufactured in India . The Phone (3) will be the company's first-ever flagship phone to be produced at Nothing's existing manufacturing facility in Chennai. This facility currently employs over 500 people, with 95% of the workforce being women. This decision is part of the London-based phone maker's strategy to boost its presence in the Indian market. The company wants to use India's position as a developing hub for manufacturing and technological innovation. This move also signifies a stronger focus on local production as Nothing expands its manufacturing capabilities in the producing key products locally, Nothing intends to enhance efficiency, reduce lead times, and respond more quickly to market demand. What Nothing said about making Phone (3) in India Commenting on the development, Akis Evangelidis , co-founder and India President of Nothing, said, 'India has been an important market for us ever since the very beginning of Nothing. Every one of our smartphones has been manufactured here — and Phone (3) proudly joins that list. As we accelerate our growth here, we're doubling down on our investment in local manufacturing , talent, and innovation — fully aligned with the Make in India vision. Phone (3) marks a major milestone: our first true flagship, delivering the very best of Nothing. We can't wait for our Indian users to experience it.' Apart from this, Nothing is also expanding its post-sales support in India. The company now runs five exclusive service centers in Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai, Hyderabad, and Chennai, plus 20 priority desks (with 10 more on the way) and over 330 authorized service centers nationwide. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo With these efforts, the company plans to improve customer experience and provide timely support across regions. Meanwhile, Nothing's retail footprint has grown from 2,000 stores at the start of last year to 10,000 at present, that can help the company to boost its postion in India's smartphone market.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store