Denmark to tackle deepfakes by giving people copyright to their own features
The Danish government is to clamp down on the creation and dissemination of AI-generated deepfakes by changing copyright law to ensure that everybody has the right to their own body, facial features and voice.
The Danish government said on Thursday it would strengthen protection against digital imitations of people's identities with what it believes to be the first law of its kind in Europe.
Having secured broad cross-party agreement, the department of culture plans to submit a proposal to amend the current law for consultation before the summer recess and then submit the amendment in the autumn.
It defines a deepfake as a very realistic digital representation of a person, including their appearance and voice.
The Danish culture minister, Jakob Engel-Schmidt, said he hoped the bill before parliament would send an 'unequivocal message' that everybody had the right to the way they looked and sounded.
He told the Guardian: 'In the bill we agree and are sending an unequivocal message that everybody has the right to their own body, their own voice and their own facial features, which is apparently not how the current law is protecting people against generative AI.'
He added: 'Human beings can be run through the digital copy machine and be misused for all sorts of purposes and I'm not willing to accept that.'
The move, which is believed to have the backing of nine in 10 MPs, comes amid rapidly developing AI technology that has made it easier than ever to create a convincing fake image, video or sound to mimic the features of another person.
The changes to Danish copyright law will, once approved, theoretically give people in Denmark the right to demand that online platforms remove such content if it is shared without consent.
It will also cover 'realistic, digitally generated imitations' of an artist's performance without consent. Violation of the proposed rules could result in compensation for those affected.
The government said the new rules would not affect parodies and satire, which would still be permitted.
Sign up to TechScape
A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives
after newsletter promotion
'Of course this is new ground we are breaking, and if the platforms are not complying with that, we are willing to take additional steps,' said Engel-Schmidt.
Other European countries, he hopes, will follow Denmark's lead. He plans to use Denmark's forthcoming EU presidency to share its plans with his European counterparts.
If tech platforms do not respond accordingly to the new law, they could be subject to 'severe fines', he said, and it could become a matter for the European Commission. 'That is why I believe the tech platforms will take this very seriously indeed,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
10 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The real Starmer has this week revealed himself: a Corbynista in a Blairite suit
It's the spinelessness of it all that gets me. We knew Keir Starmer was weak. We knew it when he recorded a leadership pitch in 2020 that could have been directed by Ken Loach – only to emerge as some sort of budget Tony Blair impersonator in office. Deep down, we knew what we were getting; no one could have seriously believed the Prime Minister, a self-professed socialist who served so willingly under Jeremy Corbyn wouldn't do exactly this to the country. But did we think the capitulation would happen this quickly and under so little pressure? After 14 years of Conservative calamity, which left a trail of broken promises in its wake, people could have been forgiven for hoping this self-styled beacon of 'stability and moderation' would at least try to fulfil his pledge of a 'government unburdened by doctrine, guided only by a determination to serve your interests'. When he called, on the steps of Downing Street, for a 'return of politics to public service,' and vowed to 'tread more lightly on your lives', things were that bad that voters gave him the benefit of the doubt. After the horror of Covid, the cost of living crisis, the embarrassment of Liz Truss's premiership, and record numbers of illegal immigrants arriving here by boat, they thought to themselves: well, it can't get any worse. 'Country first, party second,' Starmer vowed and people thought, maybe, just maybe, this respectable lawyer would put the needs of the electorate first. But no. Instead we have ended up with something far worse than the Tories could ever muster. In Starmer, we have not just ended up with a Butlin's Blair but a cut-price Compo; a coward leading a craven cabinet. Until now, I thought lily-livered Labour was best summed up by Starmer's complete inability to say whether he supported the US air strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. Kemi Badenoch was unequivocal in her support of Donald Trump's attempts to ensure we can no longer be nuked by murderous mullahs hellbent on wiping Israel from the map along with any of her allies. So was Nigel Farage. It shouldn't be a difficult question for any politician with the faintest concern for the preservation of western civilization. Still, handwringing Starmer struggled, calling for more negotiation with a regime that once described America as the Great Satan, murders women for removing their hijabs, throws gays off buildings and funds terrorist Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis to kill Jews (and anyone else in their path). So far, so invertebrate, and then, on Friday, Starmer took another step down the yellow brick road by giving an interview to the Left-leaning Observer, in which he expressed ' deep regret' for saying that Britain risked becoming an 'island of strangers ' because of mass migration. Insisting it 'wasn't right' to use 'that particular phrase' in a speech last month, despite No 10 previously insisting that he stood by his words, he said neither he nor his speechwriters had been aware that the remarks could have been interpreted as an echo of the language of Enoch Powell. 'I wouldn't have used those words if I had known they were, or even would be interpreted as, an echo of Powell. I had no idea – and my speechwriters didn't know either. 'But that particular phrase – no, it wasn't right. I'll give you the honest truth – I deeply regret using it.' Have you ever heard such weapons-grade gaslighting? If it wasn't gutless enough to be backtracking on the speech, to then suggest that no one in No 10 considered that it might be a bit Rivers of Bloodish is an insult to anyone with even the most rudimentary understanding of British politics. To make matters worse, Never Here Keir then went on to whine that he 'wasn't in the best state to make a big speech' because he'd just come back from a three-day trip to Ukraine. Boo hoo. Try being Volodymyr Zelenskyy for a week, you big sissy. Good grief. The mea culpa came less than 24 hours after he agreed to water down his controversial welfare reforms to stave off a massive rebellion. On Wednesday, covering for lesser spotted Starmer at PMQs, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner insisted that the Government would not back down on its proposals to cut nearly £5 billion from the welfare bill by limiting access to disability payments. It took less than two days for Sir Keir to cave in, offering compromises that will wipe out at least a third of the savings the Chancellor had banked on making through welfare reform. After the similarly feeble U-turn on the winter fuel allowance cuts, tax rises now look like a certainty come the autumn Budget. So not only is the benefits bill going to continue to rise, working people are once again going to have to pay the price thanks to the inadequacy of our current administration. Almost a third of all income tax revenue and National Insurance contributions are being spent servicing the nation's total welfare budget which has ballooned by £86 billion compared to a decade ago, totalling £296 billion in 2023-24, the last year for available data. But instead of tackling this behemoth on behalf of a nearly bankrupt nation, Starmer has opted to save his own skin. It's not just spineless, it's shameful. We used to believe Britain under Blair was a Left-wing country. But how foolish that seems now, under his successor. Margaret Thatcher had created the conditions for people to work, to save, and to own their homes. People still believed in a 'hand up' and not a 'hand out'. Look at us now, once again expecting the state to solve all our problems. Aspiration, entrepreneurialism, good old fashioned graft; all these courageous qualities have been quashed by pusillanimous, progressive politicians living in a fantasyland where there are no trade-offs, just ever more government spending funded by soaking 'the rich''. And the worst of them all is socialist Starmer – a man with so little backbone he can't even stand up to his own MPs.
Telegraph
10 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Left-wingers who defend ‘sex work' are virtue-signalling hypocrites
For a good few years now, 'sex-positive' Left-wing activists have been vigorously attempting to 'destigmatise' prostitution – or, to use their preferred euphemism, 'sex work' – by arguing that it's a perfectly normal and legitimate form of employment. Indeed, they insist, it's really no different from any other job. Hence their noble mantra, 'Sex work is work.' They will doubtless have been delighted, therefore, to read the comments this week from Dame Emma Thompson, the impeccably progressive actress. During an audience Q&A in London the other evening, Dame Emma reflected on Good Luck to You, Leo Grande, the 2022 film in which she played a sexually repressed middle-aged woman who hires a young gigolo, played by Daryl McCormack. Mr McCormack, she recalled, had researched his role by interviewing numerous prostitutes. 'And the thing he learnt most,' said Dame Emma, 'was they were just like accountants. Sex workers are doing a job.' This sort of talk is of course wonderfully enlightened and well-meaning. Even so, I'm afraid that I'm not entirely convinced by it. Because if, as Left-wingers tirelessly claim, 'sex work' is just another job, no less worthy than any other, would they be happy to see it promoted by careers advisers in their daughters' schools? 'Good morning, Jacintha, do take a seat. I was so sorry to see that you didn't get the A-level results you needed for that degree in accountancy. But don't despair, because I have an alternative career path to suggest. The hours are long and demanding, it requires a wide range of people skills, and the work is very much 'hands-on'. But it can be extremely well-paid, and I think it would suit you down to the ground…' Such a scenario may sound a touch improbable. But don't rule it out. A lot of schools these days seem to be on-board with the 'sex-positive' ethos, too. On Monday the Conservative peer Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne wrote to Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, complaining that sex education has become far too explicit. Schoolchildren as young as 10, she went on in disgust, should not be 'exposed to concepts like [...] rainbow kisses'. (If you aren't familiar with this term, please don't google it, or it'll ruin your breakfast, lunch, dinner, and every other meal for the next fortnight.)
Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Chris Kamara shares disappointment after only FIVE people turned up for Soccer Saturday reunion - with Matt Le Tissier among former pundits who skipped get-together
Chris Kamara has hinted at his disappointment after only five people turned up to a planned Soccer Saturday reunion dinner. During his 24 years on the programme until he left in 2022, Kamara became one of the most beloved faces on Sky Sports, working alongside the likes of Jeff Stelling, Matt Le Tissier, Phil Thompson, Charlie Nicholas, Paul Merson, Tony Cottee and Alan McInally as they delivered goals, drama and laughter to millions of viewers on Saturday afternoons. But many of those familiar faces were missing at this week's reunion. Among those who did attend were Stelling, who fronted Soccer Saturday for a quarter of a century before leaving Sky at the end of the 2022-23 season, Bianca Westwood, who departed in 2023, and Nicholas, affectionately known as 'Champagne Charlie', who was let go in 2020 during Sky's revamp of their football coverage. Long-serving producer Alan Condo also attended. Sharing a photo from the dinner, Kamara wrote: 'Soccer Saturday reunion dinner. Only 5 turned up but still a fabulous night. - Condo (producer) - Champagne Charlie - Bianca and of course the Unbelievable Jeff Stelling.' His message suggested he had hoped for a bigger turnout, although he remained upbeat about the evening. Fellow former Soccer Saturday star Matt Le Tissier was not in attendance at the latest reunion Those missing from the dinner included Le Tissier, Thompson, Cottee, McInally and Merson, all of whom have previously joined Kamara and Stelling at other reunions since leaving Sky. While there is no indication of any ill feeling, the low turnout was a reminder of how much has changed since Soccer Saturday's heyday, when the panel exchanged banter, punctuated by goal updates and regular gaffes. Le Tissier, who was among those missing from the dinner, was let go by Sky in August 2020 alongside fellow Soccer Saturday panellists Charlie Nicholas and Phil Thompson as part of a shake-up of the broadcaster's football coverage. The Southampton legend later claimed his dismissal was linked to his controversial opinions, including his refusal to wear a Black Lives Matter badge and his posts on social media questioning Covid-19 restrictions and vaccine campaigns. Kamara, 67, stepped down from the show in 2022 after being diagnosed with speech apraxia but has since appeared on Amazon Prime's Premier League coverage among other media roles. Earlier this month, he told Mail Sport: 'There is no downside to being me at the moment, everybody is so nice. It makes me feel humble, and I'm always surprised at how lovely people are towards me. 'My speech has improved, and I'm enjoying life and what is remaining of it.' Stelling and Westwood now work for talkSPORT.
