Minerals Council South Africa inputs not reflected in MRD Bill
The Mineral Resources Development Bill (MRD) does not reflect inputs from the Minerals Council South Africa.
These were given during brief, high-level engagements with the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources.
So says its CEO Mzila Mthenjane.
'The draft bill is not altogether optimal. We did have engagements with the department, but we cannot see where our inputs were taken into consideration,' says Mthenjane.
'What we were exposed to in our two engagements was very high level, and we were not given any access to the underlying wording of what we were shown and how it was being amended,' he says.
Empowerment requirements
Giving an example, Mthenjane points to oft-repeated public comments by Minister Gwede Mantashe that prospecting companies were excluded from the same empowerment requirements for holders of mining rights.
'We raised this point over and over in our engagements with the department that the amendments must specifically exclude prospecting companies from empowerment requirements.
Exploration is the highest risk part of the mineral value chain and imposes an unnecessary burden on prospectors who must sink every rand into drilling and data interpretation.
'Yet in this draft bill, none of that is included,' he says.
The Minerals Council continues to review the Bill and will further engage the department to co-create a regulatory environment that will attract and support investment in exploration, mine development and the sustainability of existing mines to unlock the potential of South Africa's mineral resources for economic growth and job creation.
All rights reserved. © 2022. Bizcommunity.com Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
8 hours ago
- Zawya
South Africa: Revamping the Mineral Resources Bill
In order to make sure that the Mineral Resources Development Bill (MRDP) encourages investment, industry growth, and job creation in South Africa, the Minerals Council South Africa has stated that it will work closely with the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources (DMPR). Public comment on the draft Bill closed on 13 August 2025. 'The regulatory environment must be conducive to encouraging investment in exploration, mine development and sustain(ing) existing mining operations so that the industry can grow, create jobs and generate the wealth it is capable of delivering for the benefit of all South Africans,' says Mzila Mthenjane, CEO of the Minerals Council. 'Our key point of departure in engagements with the department is to have pragmatic conversations that address elements of the Bill that discourage investment and growth of the industry, which we all agree has untapped potential that is not being realised,' he says. Eliminating ambiguity It's crucial to the Minerals Council that the Bill creates certainty, predictability and a competitive regulatory environment, while eliminating ambiguity in what will become the Act to ensure we build on the successes we have had to date. The Minerals Council indicated that its members are committed to the transformation of the industry, which can be further broadened by a flourishing mining sector, creating new opportunities for all role players and newcomers. The Minerals Council has no objection to the inclusion of artisanal mining in the Bill, provided it can be done in an environmentally responsible, safe and healthy manner, with clear, identifiable obligations and responsibilities attributable to artisanal mining. Thus, the Minerals Council is advocating for a fit-for-purpose regulatory framework for artisanal mining. 'We welcome the criminalisation of illegal mining in the Bill, which addresses the long-held concerns of the Minerals Council. 'We have made recommendations for more effective penalties to be imposed to serve as a deterrent in the long run. 'In addition, the streamlining of the appeals process is positive,' said the council in a statement. Encouraging investment The Minerals Council says that its overarching concern with the Bill is that, in its current form, it does not encourage investment in the industry for growth. It adds that the Bill's reliance on regulations that have yet to be published for public scrutiny makes it impossible to fully engage the DMPR in detail on key elements of the Bill. In its engagement with the DMPR, the council will focus on key elements of the Bill, including the beneficiation, empowerment, tailings, and mine closure provisions, which rely heavily on unpublished regulations and, in their current form, are potentially disruptive to mining operations and potential investment. The council believes that the government must look at incentivising beneficiation, developing transport and water infrastructure and cost-competitive electricity rather than imposing prescriptive obligations and penalising non-compliance with the Act and its regulations. It has also stressed that the Bill must build on successes achieved in transformation and empowerment in the industry. The mining industry has significantly transformed, a point that Minister Gwede Mantashe has repeatedly noted on public platforms, stating that mining is one of the most transformed sectors in the economy. The Minerals Council said that it is looking forward to the engagement with the DMPR, and it will play its role in enabling the process to run its course to develop an optimal regulatory framework to grow and sustain the mining industry for the benefit of all stakeholders. All rights reserved. © 2022. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (
Zawya
8 hours ago
- Zawya
South Africa vows relentless fight against plastic pollution amid global treaty setback
The Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) session in Geneva, which aimed to deliver a binding global treaty on plastic pollution, ended without agreement on a global plastics treaty due to divisions between nations and procedural shortcomings. In a statement, the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment said talks collapsed due to deep divisions between nations and the absence of a clear process to resolve the deadlock. The department said South Africa is disappointed by the outcome and concerned about the procedural failings that stalled progress, but its resolve remains unshaken. The country remains committed to advancing domestic and international action to combat plastic pollution and create a practical, sustainable regulatory framework. Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment Minister, Dr Dion George, has engaged with industry, business, and civil society to drive progress on the circular economy and will continue advocating for solutions at the G20 Ministerial Meeting scheduled to take place in Cape Town in October. 'While the lack of agreement is frustrating, South Africa will not waver in our fight to end plastic pollution and create a fair, practical regulatory environment. We will keep driving action at home and pressing for solutions abroad,' the minister said. South Africa is already moving to ban microbeads and phase out single-use plastics. These steps reflect a proactive strategy to reduce environmental and health risks. During the INC, the Minister met with South African industry, business, and civil society to strengthen partnerships for a circular economy. 'Collaboration with all stakeholders is vital. We must build a system where sustainable practices are the norm, not the exception," George said. South Africa opposed rigid caps on plastic production, calling instead for market-driven solutions backed by incentives to push business toward sustainability. The country is also acting to close gaps in controls on imported plastics, ensuring they meet strict health and environmental standards. The minister warned about toxic chemicals in plastics and the spread of microplastics into food systems and human bodies. 'It is unacceptable that microplastics are found everywhere, including in our bodies. We will act decisively to protect public health,' he said. South Africa's extended producer responsibility regulations and the 'polluter pays' principle are already holding producers to account for the full life cycle of their products. 'Our EPR framework is a cornerstone of our strategy, and we will keep strengthening it,' the minister said. The fight against plastic pollution continues. In October 2025, South Africa will host the G20 Environment and Climate Sustainability Ministerial in Cape Town, where plastics, waste, and chemicals will remain high on the agenda. South Africa will keep working at home and with global partners to secure a meaningful, inclusive plastics treaty that protects our planet and future generations. All rights reserved. © 2022. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (
Zawya
9 hours ago
- Zawya
South Africa: Sars battles $29bln tax debt with tougher enforcement and tech-driven strategies
The size and growth of Sars' staggering R513bn in unpaid taxes drives home the pressing need for both stronger enforcement and taxpayer co-operation. This is according to Geo Kilian, tax attorney at Hobbs Sinclair Advisory. 'A tax debt of this magnitude is not just a number on a balance sheet — it's a direct threat to public finances and the delivery of essential services,' says Kilian. 'When over half a trillion rand is outstanding, Sars has no choice but to act decisively.' The debt, disclosed by Sars Deputy Commissioner Johnstone Makhubu at the 12th Annual Tax Indaba in Johannesburg, has grown sharply from around R415bn last year. The primary culprits are VAT and PAYE — 'trust monies' collected by businesses and employers on Sars's behalf — along with interest and penalties that can escalate significantly in cases of suspected fraud. 'VAT and PAYE are not optional extras,' Kilian notes. 'These are amounts collected in trust. When they are withheld or misappropriated, it crosses into a very serious compliance breach that Sars will pursue aggressively.' Escalating enforcement and outsourcing recovery Sars' multi-pronged plan blends traditional methods with new approaches. Portions of complex and aged debts are being outsourced to around 15 external collection agencies, while internal teams focus on high-impact recoveries. Legal action is also being intensified — moving from third-party appointments to civil judgments, writs of execution, and, where necessary, personal liability claims against directors. 'We're seeing a definite shift in tone,' says Kilian. 'Sars is moving away from leniency towards a far more assertive posture. If you're deliberately avoiding your obligations, expect to face judgments, asset seizures, and personal liability.' Still, Sars offers relief options for taxpayers in genuine distress, including compromises under Section 200 of the Tax Administration Act and structured deferrals. 'The door is open for those acting in good faith,' Kilian explains. 'If you can demonstrate hardship, there are legal mechanisms to restructure or reduce your debt. But you have to engage — ignoring the problem will only make it worse.' Balancing write-offs with deterrence While some debts are ultimately unrecoverable — such as those from liquidated companies, fraudulent entities, or deceased individuals — Sars is cautious about excessive write-offs. 'There's a fine balance,' Kilian warns. 'Write off too much, and you risk encouraging default as a strategic choice. That's why Sars is exhausting legal remedies first, even in hard-to-collect cases.' Tech targets South Africa's tax gap The agency is also betting on technology to curb future debt accumulation. Investments in AI and data analytics allow Sars to cross-reference filings and bank data in real time, identifying discrepancies without prior notice. New VAT rules for low-value e-commerce imports will also ensure that digital and cross-border transactions contribute their fair share. 'Sars is no longer just a reactive collector,' Kilian says. 'With AI-driven insights, it's moving towards proactive detection. That's a game-changer for compliance.' Recovering even part of the R513bn would significantly strengthen the fiscus. But challenges remain — from economic pressures and 'Stalingrad' litigation tactics to administrative delays. 'Compliance is ultimately a partnership between the State and taxpayers,' Kilian concludes. 'Sars can enforce and innovate, but long-term stability depends on a culture of voluntary compliance. That's the real prize.' All rights reserved. © 2022. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (
