logo
Indiana Senate gives Medicaid bill final approval

Indiana Senate gives Medicaid bill final approval

Chicago Tribune18-04-2025
Indiana Gov. Mike Braun will receive the Senate Medicaid bill in the coming days as the Senate gave final approval to the bill Thursday.
The Senate voted 37-10, with all Republicans present voting in favor of the bill and all Democrats voting against it, Thursday on the Medicaid bill to affirm the amendments made by the House.
Senate Bill 2 — authored by Sen. Ryan Mishler, R-Mishawaka — places restrictions on Medicaid, including work requirements, with 11 exemptions, on an insurance program for Hoosiers with a medium income and between ages 19 to 64.
The bill requires the office to establish performance standards for hospitals that create eligibility requirements and action for when hospitals do not comply with standards.
The House Public Health Committee amended the bill to remove a 500,000 cap on the Medicaid program. The House Ways and Means Committee amended the bill further to allow an Indiana resident enrolled in or attending an accredited educational program full-time to be eligible for the plan.
The House Ways and Means Committee also amended the bill further to allow the secretary of Indiana's Family and Social Services office to advertise or market participation in the Medicaid program. The office can also reimburse medical providers at the appropriate Medicaid fee schedule rate for some medical claims prior to the beginning of benefits.
When the state first established the Healthy Indiana Plan, the Indiana Medicaid program, in 2006, there were 40,000 people on the program, Mishler said. Before COVID-19, there were around 390,000 people on HIP, and currently there are more than 700,000 people on the program, Mishler said.
Overall, Medicaid has grown by $5 billion in the last 4 years, Mishler said, and the rate of growth is greater than the state's revenue increase. In the upcoming 2-year budget the legislature is working on, Mishler said the majority of new revenue will cover Medicaid costs.
Sen. Shelli Yoder, D-Bloomington, said while she's pleased the program cap was removed from the bill, her 'continued concerns' were the increases in administrative costs as the bill calls for more eligibility checks and the work requirements.
The Kaiser Family Foundation found that 73.1% of people on Medicaid in Indiana have jobs, and the remaining 26.9% are either caregivers, in school, too medically frail to work, or have trouble finding a job, Yoder said.
Ultimately, Yoder said the bill makes Indiana's Medicaid program 'more complicated' which will result in people who qualify for coverage getting kicked off the program. Then, when they need healthcare, those individuals who were kicked off the program will go to emergency rooms for care, which increases the state's healthcare costs, she said.
'While the language has changed, the goals haven't wavered,' Yoder said. 'We don't want to punish people for being sick.'
Sen. Mike Bohacek, R-Michiana Shores, said he supported Senate Bill 2 because it will ensure 'that those folks that are on the program are eligible.'
'When the pandemic happened, we expanded Medicaid and we let a whole lot of folks on it. A lot of those folks, many of them, weren't qualified and weren't eligible but we did it anyway because it was the right thing to do because we had a health emergency. Those times are over, and now it's time to get back to where we were before,' Bohacek said.
Sen. Fady Qaddoura, D-Indianapolis, said the bill kills Medicaid expansion in Indiana because it will give state control over the program and limits elements of the Affordable Care Act.
While the bill was amended to remove the cap, Qaddoura said the program is still capped because it states that FSSA 'shall limit enrollment in the plan to the number of individuals that ensures that financial participation does not exceed the level of state appropriations or other funding for the plan.'
'The solution is not to reduce eligibility. The solution is not to reduce appropriations. The solution is not to withdraw from the Medicaid expansion, but rather the solution is to look at the population and find alternative policies,' Qaddoura said.
Sen. Chris Garten, R-Charlestown, said Medicaid is 23% of the state's budget. He said Indiana's Medicaid program 'exploded because of COVID,' when non-eligible people joined the program.
'Every dollar that goes to somebody that's not eligible is taking away a dollar from a poor, disabled Hoosier who otherwise should be getting that dollar and receiving benefits,' Garten said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Medicaid cuts' disproportionate toll
Medicaid cuts' disproportionate toll

Politico

time5 hours ago

  • Politico

Medicaid cuts' disproportionate toll

Driving the Day ADVOCATES WORRY — Medicaid cuts in President Donald Trump's tax and spending law could disproportionately harm Black women and children who depend on the program, advocates warn. And the looming changes in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act could worsen already disparate health outcomes among Black Americans, POLITICO's Cheyanne M. Daniels reports. Although Black people represent about 14 percent of the U.S. population, they account for more than 20 percent of Medicaid enrollees, according to Pew Research Center — and almost 60 percent of all Black children are enrolled in Medicaid, according to a recent analysis from the NAACP and other advocacy organizations. Why it matters: Advocates say the enacted megabill's Medicaid cuts could limit resources in schools with high percentages of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, exacerbate maternal mortality rates and leave Black families without critical care. 'States right now are having to make decisions on what services they're going to cut ... and their allocation of funding toward this population,' said Patrice Willoughby, chief of policy and legislative affairs for the NAACP. 'It is unconscionable that Congress would leave American children, which are the future of the country, without the supports that they need and the interventions that they need to contribute meaningfully to develop to their fullest potential.' Background: Medicaid — which is the fourth largest federal funding source for K-12 schools, according to a 2025 report by the School Superintendents Association — supports more than $7.5 billion of school-based health services each year for low-income students, including screenings for learning disabilities. Thirty-seven percent of Black students attend high-poverty schools, according to a 2023 analysis by the National Center for Education Statistics. Through Medicaid, high-poverty schools are also able to provide medical care. They can also provide insight into whether a student needs additional screening for a more accurate diagnosis. But one report from a coalition of education groups earlier this year found that the Medicaid cuts could force schools to reduce the number of school nurses, limit access to early intervention programs or impact funding for special education programs for those with learning disabilities. Zooming out: Advocates say the cuts are part of a broader pattern of the American medical system inadequately serving Black patients. 'These cuts really are continuing a pattern of forcing Black families to take care of ourselves without the proper support,' said Brittany Packnett, an equity strategist who co-founded Campaign Zero, a police reform initiative, and supported Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential campaign. In a statement to POLITICO, HHS said the claims 'misrepresent' the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. 'The OBBB is a decisive step toward building a stronger, more resilient healthcare system,' an HHS spokesperson said. 'This legislation modernizes Medicaid to deliver greater efficiency and long-term sustainability, while expanding access to high-quality care for those most in need, in every community across the nation.' A spokesperson for the White House also dismissed the worries of advocates, arguing they were coming from supporters of Trump's defeated 2024 opponent. Even so: It remains to be seen what the long-term impacts of the cuts will be. Many of the cuts aren't set to go into effect for years, and Congress has a track record of approving reductions and changing eligibility rules, only to later extend deadlines or revise the law entirely. WELCOME TO TUESDAY PULSE. HHS is tracking its Make America Healthy Again wins with a new online tool. Send your tips, scoops and feedback to khooper@ and sgardner@ and follow along @kelhoops and @sophie_gardnerj. In Congress FIRST IN PULSE: MEGABILL HOSPITAL IMPACTS — Liberal nonprofit Protect Our Care is teaming with Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) to unveil a new report today that details how hospitals could be impacted by the GOP's recently enacted One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Why it matters: The megabill includes more than $1 trillion in health care cuts, mostly to Medicaid. The new law will take a $340 billion bite out of hospital budgets over a decade to pay for tax cuts and other Trump priorities — though hospitals and their lobbyists and allies on Capitol Hill are gearing up to use the next two and a half years to persuade lawmakers to rescind the provisions, most of which don't go into effect until 2028. As part of that effort, Protect Our Care is working with Murphy to relaunch its 'Hospital Crisis Watch' tracker, which monitors the impact of the megabill on hospitals and care facilities across the country, including whether they're closing or making cuts. The findings: The group highlights its findings in a report out today, shared first with POLITICO, that found more than 330 hospitals are at immediate risk of closing or scaling back their services, and more than 750 hospitals are at risk of closing in the years to come because of the new law. An estimated 477,000 health workers will lose their jobs because of the Medicaid cuts, according to the report. What's next: Murphy and Protect Our Care will present the report during a virtual press conference today at 11 a.m. At the Agencies DEFUNDING MRNA TECHNOLOGY — NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya agrees with HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision last week to defund research into the mRNA technology that produced Covid-19 vaccines in record time, he told POLITICO in an interview. Vaccine experts argued the move would put at risk America's leading position in vaccine development and potential cures for diseases from cancer to diabetes by pulling the government's $500 million. But Bhattacharya said Kennedy's critics have the story backward. Here's some of Bhattacharya's conversation with our Axel Springer colleague Tim Röhn, edited for length and clarity. Paul Offit, the leading vaccine expert, told me the mRNA funding cuts were 'politicization of science.' Is he right? No, he's not right. In my view, the key question for any vaccine platform that we fund and support is: How acceptable is it to the public? If you have the very best science in the world, but the public doesn't trust it, then it's useless as a vaccine platform. Your boss, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., called the Covid vaccines in December 2021 'the deadliest vaccine ever made.' Couldn't statements like this be the reason for the public distrust? Secretary Kennedy's statement before he was appointed reflects the distrust of the population, rather than the cause of it. More important were the disastrous and unscientific vaccine mandates and exaggerated claims of Covid vaccine efficacy by high public health officials in power at the time. Aren't we potentially slowing our response to the next pandemic by not investing in mRNA? We have other new technologies that we're working on. Why marry yourself to a single platform when the platform has lost trust with the public? We're not saying we're not going to do vaccinations. We're saying that we're moving to a different platform that is more promising. Public Health A DECLARATION IN TEXAS — Texas's measles outbreak has ended, the state health department said Monday, Sophie reports. The outbreak, which spurred nationwide fears about a resurgence of the disease, infected at least 762 people and caused two deaths in school-age children. A third person, from a New Mexico county near the outbreak's Texas epicenter, tested positive for measles after his death. New cases haven't been reported in more than 42 days in any of the counties that had ongoing transmission, the health department said in a statement. That's twice the disease's maximum incubation period, or the longest time it can take between exposure to the virus and illness onset. Even so: The department noted it would continue watching the situation closely. 'The end of this outbreak does not mean the threat of measles is over,' the department said. 'Since there are ongoing outbreaks of measles in North America and around the world, it is likely that there will be additional cases of measles this year in Texas.' Zooming out: As of Aug. 5, the CDC has recorded 1,356 measles cases this year — more than any year since 1992. Public health experts point to waning measles, mumps and rubella vaccination rates as a factor in the high measles case count. Some blame Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — who has spent much of his career questioning vaccine safety — for sowing distrust in the MMR vaccine. WHAT WE'RE READING The Wall Street Journal's Brianna Abbott reports on a new reality for terminal cancer. For Undark, Joanne Kenen reports on how proposed NASA cuts could affect public health research.

Drive Health Named Preferred Vendor by the Association for Community Affiliated Plans
Drive Health Named Preferred Vendor by the Association for Community Affiliated Plans

Business Wire

time6 hours ago

  • Business Wire

Drive Health Named Preferred Vendor by the Association for Community Affiliated Plans

PHOENIX--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Today, digital health startup Drive Health announces that it has been named a Preferred Vendor by the Association for Community Affiliated Plans (ACAP). ACAP is the national trade association representing not-for-profit Safety Net Health Plans who serve their members through Medicare, Medicaid, and more. With its new designation as a Preferred Vendor, Drive Health solidifies its unwavering dedication to member welfare and the optimization of the healthcare industry. Drive will use its resources and its team's extensive knowledge of the public sector to support ACAP's mission: to equitably improve the health and well-being of people with limited resources or significant health needs. This partnership comes at a particularly crucial time, as challenges like regulatory headwinds, industry-wide labor shortages, and rising acuity of member populations require increased attention and resources. Drive Health's mission is to create healthier communities through revolutionary technology and approachable artificial intelligence. Founded in 2022, Drive Health's flagship product, Avery, a Personalized Agentic Caregiver, empowers clinicians to focus on direct members with the highest needs by automating routine tasks – helping plans deliver more personalized care, ultimately delivering higher patient satisfaction and improved outcomes. Under the partnership, Drive Health will share its mission with ACAP's network of health plans through numerous platforms, including ACAP's newsletter, its CEO Summit, and its educational webinar series. These mediums will give Drive Health's team the chance to speak in further detail about the impact artificial intelligence has on the healthcare industry, and how ACAP members can leverage emerging technology to address workforce challenges and optimize member outcomes. James Stringham, CSO at Drive Health and former ACAP Board Member and Plan CEO, will host a webinar alongside Chief Nursing Officer Dr. Leeza Constantoulakis and Co-Founder Kevin Longoria in September. 'Partnering with ACAP was an absolute no-brainer for us. Drive Health is well equipped to deliver nonprofit organizations and members alike the tools to harness emerging technology. We're dedicated to ensuring equitable healthcare outcomes for all, and we will utilize our expertise to help position and differentiate member health plans," said James Stringham, CSO at Drive Health and former ACAP Board Member and Plan CEO. 'ACAP is delighted to welcome Drive Health as a Preferred Vendor,' said ACAP CEO Margaret A. Murray. 'Our member plans look forward to learning more about the ways Drive combines hands-on health care experience with innovative technology to offset potential financial and clinical challenges.' ACAP's 85 member Safety Net Health Plans provide coverage for more than 30 million people through Medicare, CHIP, Medicaid, and other public healthcare programs across the United States. Drive Health's team of seasoned industry experts looks forward to helping ensure equitable, high-quality care for all. About Drive Health Drive Health makes healthcare simple and accessible – anytime, anywhere, for everyone. Its mission is to ease the burden on healthcare providers, build trust with consumers, and simplify healthcare through secure, AI-enabled solutions. For more information, visit

Women dropping out of Missouri workforce is an economic red alert. Here's how to fix it
Women dropping out of Missouri workforce is an economic red alert. Here's how to fix it

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Women dropping out of Missouri workforce is an economic red alert. Here's how to fix it

(). A recent drop in women's workforce participation is a blinking red light for women and our economy. For nearly a decade, women have driven the growth in overall prime-age labor force participation – strengthening local economies and contributing billions to GDP. The McKinsey Global Institute estimates that continuing to advance women's equality could add trillions to global GDP, boosting incomes and living standards worldwide – for men and women alike. Yet right now this progress is threatened by a multigenerational caregiving crisis—spanning both child care and elder care. Since January, over 200,000 women have exited the labor force. Experts attribute this largely to reduced workplace flexibility and persistently limited child care access. Misty Heggeness of the University of Kansas reports labor force participation for women ages 25–44 with children under five dropped from 69.7% to 66.9%. At United WE, our research confirms the toll: women are three times more likely than men to leave the workforce due to child care challenges. Sixty percent of women entrepreneurs say this barrier makes running their businesses harder, and millions live in child care deserts. But the caregiving squeeze doesn't stop there. The recent AARP and National Alliance for Caregiving 'Caregiving in the U.S. 2025' report finds that 63 million Americans—nearly one in four adults—now provide ongoing care for an adult or a child with a complex medical condition or disability, a staggering 45% increase since 2015. Many juggle both roles: one in three caregivers, and almost half of those under 50 are part of the 'sandwich generation,' caring for both kids and aging relatives. This crisis disproportionately affects women, but its consequences are felt in every corner of our economy. A study by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation found states lose an average of $1 billion in economic activity each and every year due to breakdowns in child care access. One expert put it bluntly: 'The economy's basically telling half its talent to stay home.' The good news is that solutions are within reach, and even in deeply divided times, Republicans and Democrats are making common cause to make child care more affordable and accessible. In Kansas, bipartisan action under Gov. Laura Kelly's leadership is poised to create more child care slots in the next two years than the state did in the last 15 – giving thousands of parents the ability to return to work or expand their businesses. In Missouri, where more than 41% of counties do not have an accredited child care facility, legislation to help businesses offset the cost of child care won support from both parties. And a bipartisan commission appointed by Gov. Mike Kehoe is working on recommendations to streamline regulations so providers can open and operate more easily while protecting the health and safety of kids. And at the federal level, despite a polarized Congress, progress has quietly continued. The recent tax bill tripled the employer-provided child care credit, offering new incentives for businesses to support working parents. Now, parallel action is emerging for elder care—still slow, but gaining traction. Promising policy proposals include caregiver tax credits and support services, though much more is needed to meet the escalating demand. At United WE, we believe the path forward lies in research, solutions and results. That's our model for change—and it works. Today, as we approach the 105th anniversary of the 19th Amendment granting women the right to participate in our democracy, the time is now to break down this barrier to women's full participation in our economy. Suffragist J. Ellen Foster told delegates at the 1892 Republican National Convention: 'We are here to help you – and we are here to stay.' Women have more than delivered on that promise. Today, for the sake of our economy and our communities, it's time policymakers and employers to do their part as well. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store