Local train deaths are alarming, auto closing doors needed: HC
Mumbai. Observing that it is "alarming" that thereare daily deaths due to commuters falling from trains, Bombay High Court on Friday suggested that Mumbai local trains have doors that automatically close to avoid overcrowding.
It mentioned the June 9 Mumbra train-fall incident in which five persons died.
"You (the railways) have to take action so that this should not happen again," said Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne. They were hearing a PIL filed last year by Yatin Jadhav, a regular commuter, to direct the railways to submit a plan to reduce or eliminate fatalities due to untoward incidents.
Asked by the judges what measures were taken by the railways, additional solicitor general Anil Singh said a high-level monitoring committee (HLMC) was already constituted to suggest safety and security measures.
After the Mumbra incident, a multi-disciplinary committee was set up. It is examining the causes of the incident and shall soon suggest remedial measures.
The judges referred to the railways' reply and said what "disturbs" is that in 2024 there were 3,588 deaths in Central Railway and Western Railway, which averages to 10 deaths per day. "So every day 10 Mumbaikars die by falling. And these numbers of deaths are due to falling down from trains, being hit by poles, or gaps between the footboard and the platform," said Justice Marne, adding, "This is an alarming situation.
This is your own data, though you projected that there is a reduction by 46% as compared to 2009."
Singh said HLMC suggested the construction of partitions or walls near tracks to avoid trespass and for fencing between tracks so there is no crossing. "As platforms are becoming overcrowded, we have shifted certain stalls from the stations. There are many measures which we are taking," he added.
Justice Marne said, "Fencing and all is to take care of deaths because of crossing etc."
Justice Marne asked, "What about people falling? Commuters who are on the train are falling." The judges said trains should not be open so that there is no scope for overcrowding. "You should provide automatic doors which close. This is one of the suggestions as a layman. We are not experts in rail safety," the Chief Justice said.
Senior advocate Rohan Shah, for Jadhav, said the June 9 incident happened due to overcrowding. While the railways' reply said trains cannot have closed doors, after the incident the railway minister said trains will have closed doors and "we are owrking towards it". Adjourning the hearing to July 14, the judges directed the railways to submit suggestions of both committees "to avoid untoward incidents in future" and "clearly indicate the timelines with which measures recommended by the committee shall be implemented".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Mumbra train incident: HC suggests automatic doors to prevent overcrowding fatalities
MUMBAI: Eleven days after the Mumbra train incident in which at least five passengers died after falling from overcrowded local trains, the Bombay High Court on Friday termed the state of commuter safety on Mumbai's suburban rail network 'alarming' and recommended the installation of automatic doors to help prevent further fatalities. Thane, India. June 10, 2025: Local trains cross near section at Mumbra Railway Station, where four commuters lost their lives and nine others were injured on June 9, 2025, in Thane, India. The incident occurred when the commuters fell from a train heading to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus. Thane India. June 10, 2025. (Photo by Raju Shinde/HT Photo) (Hindustan Times) A division bench comprising chief justice Alok Aradhe and justice Sandeep Marne was hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by daily commuter Yatin Jadhav, who highlighted the persistent dangers faced by passengers on the city's lifeline. The court noted that approximately ten commuters die every day on Mumbai's local trains, a statistic it said demanded urgent systemic intervention. 'The doors should not be left open. There should be automatic doors,' the bench observed. 'We are not experts, but we are relying on their expertise to arrive at this suggestion.' The petition, filed through senior advocate Rohan Shah and advocate Surabhi Prabhudesai, drew the court's attention to the tragic June 9 incident, in which at least five passengers died and several were injured after falling from overcrowded trains between Mumbra and Diva stations on the Central line. The bench criticised the pace of infrastructure upgrades by the state and rail authorities, observing that despite improvements, fatalities continue unabated. It directed concerned departments to file affidavits detailing the steps being taken to enhance passenger safety. This includes forming an expert committee to independently analyse recurring accidents on the suburban railways and propose preventive measures. The court also ordered officials to take into account the petitioner's suggestions and submit a status report within three weeks, including a clear timeline for implementing proposed safety enhancements. Responding on behalf of the railway authorities, Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh informed the court that a 'zero death mission' is underway. A high-level monitoring committee has already been constituted, and an additional multidisciplinary committee, led by the Senior Divisional Safety Officer of Central Railway, is investigating the June 9 incident to recommend targeted safety protocols. Singh acknowledged the difficulty of executing large-scale upgrades on an active network, noting that most work—such as constructing boundary walls, fencing tracks, and shifting platform stalls to reduce congestion—must be carried out at night to avoid disrupting the city's daily commute. 'The suburban railway is among the most economical and fastest modes of transport in Mumbai. While fatalities have decreased by 46% since 2009, last year alone saw 3,588 deaths. Our mission is zero death, and we are open to all suggestions in the public interest,' Singh told the court. The matter is now scheduled for further hearing on July 14.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Habeas corpus untenable for tracing missing person: Telangana HC
H YDERABAD: The Telangana high court recently dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed by a woman seeking directions to the police to trace her missing father, who is an advocate. The court ruled that a habeas corpus petition is not maintainable merely for locating a missing person. A division bench comprising Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya and Justice BR Madhusudhan Rao observed that the petition failed to establish sufficient grounds for invoking the extraordinary remedy of habeas corpus. The bench clarified that the purpose of a habeas corpus writ is to secure the release of a person from illegal detention, not to trace individuals who are unaccounted for without evidence of unlawful custody. The order was passed in response to a plea by the woman, a resident of Chilkalguda, who claimed her father had been missing for the past year. She alleged that he disappeared while in Kerala, and sought the court's intervention to direct the authorities to trace him. The bench said that the petitioner had previously filed a similar writ petition, which was dismissed for default in April this year due to non-prosecution. Importantly, she had not filed any application to restore the earlier petition. In conclusion, the court held that the present writ was not maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution and dismissed the petition.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Kolkata HC stays Didi's relief to SSC staff sacked by SC
Mamata Banerjee KOLKATA: Calcutta HC Friday stayed till Sept 26 WB govt's interim relief for Group-C and Group-D employees of state-run schools who lost their jobs following a Supreme Court order on April 3. The state had announced monthly interim relief of Rs 25,000 for Group-C employees and Rs 20,000 for Group-D staff. Another section of candidates, who were waitlisted, moved HC for a stay on the scheme, arguing it "frustrated" the SC order. Justice Amrita Sinha held that the people whose jobs were terminated by the SC order could not be provided such support after the apex court had decided the issue of illegal appointments conclusively and opined that the appointments were a result of "fraud". Getting refund of money already disbursed to the beneficiaries would be a problem if the scheme was found to be in violation of law after the final hearing on a state review petition, she reasoned. HC also took note of the fact that the state welfare scheme was announced for a particular group who would not be doing any work. "Paying persons gratuitously, who are not serving the state but are either sitting at home or are engaged elsewhere, does not appeal to the court," Justice Sinha held. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pennsylvania: These Walk In Tubs Are Cheap (See Prices) Walk In Tub Discounts Learn More Undo HC stressed that the state had applied a "pick and choose" method for determining the beneficiaries of the welfare scheme. "There are two sets of candidates. One set comprises appointed candidates whose jobs were terminated and the other waitlisted candidates. Both sets are jobless now," Justice Sinha said, holding that the scheme for a particular group "intended to provide succour to the tainted terminated candidates". Justice Sinha acknowledged the state's legislative competence to draft a welfare scheme but said it should apply equally. "Whether it is proper for the state to create a class of favoured candidates out of a bigger class of unemployed candidates is a matter to be decided after hearing (all) parties."
