Irish Nationwide provided millions in loans to clients before board approval, High Court hears
IRISH NATIONWIDE BUILDING Society was providing millions of euro in commercial loans and top ups to clients before its board could approve them, including one to a commercial client who already had an exposure of a quarter of a billion euro when they were granted a loan for developing luxury holiday homes in France, the High Court has heard.
The civil case against former INBS chief Michael Fingleton is in its second day before the High Court, where it has been alleged that he negligently mismanaged the building society (INBS) and engaged in property 'gambles' with high net-worth individuals in an informal and speculative manner.
Mr Fingleton (87), who is in ill health after a stroke, ran the building lender from 1971 to 2009, as managing director and chief executive. At its height in 2007, INBS had reported assets of €16 billion but was a high-profile casualty of the financial crisis of 2008.
Liquidators for Irish Banking Resolution Corporation (IBRC) have taken the case against Mr Fingleton, who denies the allegation of negligent mismanagement.
The losses, relating to property loans, had been estimated by the IBRC at €6 billion. However, only €250 million in damages is now being pursued by IBRC relating to five loans made by INBS, allegedly approved by Mr Fingleton, who the court was told was also 'nodding through' top ups and extensions to certain clients.
At the High Court today, Lyndon MacCann SC, for IBRC, said the building society operated 'flawed policies', which were then ignored by the lender and made worse by what he called 'flawed practices'.
Mr MacCann said an expert witness for IBRC will give evidence to the court that the level of 'delegation of power' given to Mr Fingleton 'was hideously flawed'.
Counsel said that in one instance, Mr Fingleton approved a loan of €28M, months before it came before either the board or the credit panel of INBS in January 2009. The loan was for the purchase of two run-down hotels in the French alps despite them not having planning permission for a proposed luxury development. The application for the loan came before the board after it was already approved, it is alleged.
The court heard that Mr Fingleton 'nodded' through loans, top-ups and loan extensions by phone or by 'scribbling' a note on memos that reached him, as he did not have a computer or email.
Advertisement
Mr MacCann said the France loan, referenced 'Ice Mountain', was allegedly approved by Mr Fingleton despite the borrower's company and his daughter already having a combined exposure of 'a third of a billion euro' to INBS and that the company was 'coming in at number seven in a Top of the Pops' – at €260 million – of those lenders with the most exposure to the bank.
The court also heard that a different loan for £71 million was 'topped up' by a further £10 million, with only Mr Fingleton's approval on record for the expanded loan.
In the case of a separate loan valued at €130 million in 2009, after Mr Fingleton had retired, INBS asked the borrower to repay the outlay. However, the borrower told INBS that the loan had been granted on a 'non-recourse basis' which was disputed by the society.
The court was told that the borrower provided INBS with a letter from Mr Fingleton allegedly confirming the non-recourse status of the loan but INBS took legal advice which stated that the loans were of full recourse and that the borrower could indeed be pursued for the money, said counsel.
Mr MacCann described the letter stating the loans were non-recourse was an 'extraordinary document' for Mr Fingleton to write and that a hand-writing expert will feature in the case.
In opening the case yesterday, Mr MacCann said Mr Fingelton 'gambled' with the society's money when he allegedly approved 'speculative, risky' commercial loans, which sometimes had already been greenlit by him before they were taken before the board of directors, on which he also sat.
The return on the loans and interest from INBS was that if the properties could get planning permission, they were to be 'flipped' for a profit, making it a 'joint-venture' for INBS in profit agreements.
The five loans allegedly approved by Mr Fingleton relate to property land development projects between 2006 and 2008 despite them having no zoning or planning permission, counsel said.
It is further alleged that there were no securities in place on the loans and no personal guarantee sought for or provided by the borrowers.
Mr Fingleton was a prominent presence in Irish business during the Celtic Tiger and was reported to have been worth around €75 million in 2006. However, his son has told the courts that his father is reduced to €25,000 in two personal bank accounts and has outstanding judgment debts of more than €10.7 million.
The case continues at the High Court.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
'New Sophie film may not solve murder but it will get people talking again'
The shocking killing of French beauty Sophie Toscan du Plantier 29 years ago is the unsolved murder that won't go away. The whole country wants to know did eccentric English journalist Ian Bailey, who lived in the west Cork area, brutally take her life or is the killer still out there roaming the countryside here or in France, free as a bird. The truth is after all these years, nobody really knows. Ian Bailey died from a sudden heart attack 18 months ago and went to his grave proclaiming his innocence. So far there has never been any hard evidence such as DNA produced to tie him to the murder and the finger of blame against him is largely based on circumstantial evidence contrived with hearsay. Sophie's heartbroken family are convinced Bailey is the man and that the verdict of a dodgy French court in 2019 which found him guilty of the young mother's murder in absentia, proved that he did it. The problem is a star witness in the whole saga, former Schull postmistress Marie Farrell was never called to give evidence at the French show trial. She initially put Bailey in the frame by telling Gardai she saw him washing blood off his boots at Kealfadda Bridge, not far from the murder scene on the night she died. But years later, she retracted her statement and admitted she lied. A large amount of the evidence given in the French proceedings was hearsay and would never have been admitted in an Irish court of law. For whatever reason, Sophie's family will not listen to any suggestions that someone else aside from Ian Bailey, might have killed her. Now they are annoyed with the respected filmmaker Jim Sheridan, whose new movie on the story, Re-Creation opened in New York last Sunday night and will be screened publicly over the coming weeks. Based in a courtroom setting, the film focuses on what would have happened if an Irish jury deliberated on the case and presents all the current facts known about the murder. It has an all-star Irish cast including Colm Meaney and Aidan Gillen. Sheridan also claims there is some new evidence. Sophie's family are extremely critical of the release of the movie at this moment in time when there are still two parallel Garda investigations into the horrendous crime ongoing. The cops are also working with the FBI and new technology to try and identify some old blood samples taken from the murder scene. Sophie's uncle Jean-Pierre Gazeau said the release of the film is "ethically questionable". While the family fully acknowledge Jim Sheridan's reputation as a gifted and accomplished filmmaker, they regret "he has chosen to apply his talent to a project based on questionable evidence". He also said Bailey is still a person of interest in the case to the Gardai. He fumed: "In particular we await the results of new DNA analysis. We believe it is ethically questionable to interfere with the ongoing Irish Garda search for truth by producing a fictional narrative based on assumptions that might be biased - or whose impartiality remains unclear." What none of us know except those who have seen the movie is whether Sheridan's jury finds Bailey not guilty. Sheridan, like myself, has always held the view that there was never any hard evidence to convict Bailey, that the Garda investigation was flawed and that they never seriously looked at any other suspects. Irish detectives also never got to interview Sophie's late husband Daniel face-to-face at the time, and did not receive much cooperation from the French police. All they got was a written, signed statement from Daniel handed over to them by the French. I, like Sheridan, spoke to Ian Bailey many times over the years and he always denied the murder. Truth be told, I have no idea if he did it or not. He was a strange fish in many ways but that did not mean he was a killer. I met a lot of bad bastards in my time who wouldn't bat an eyelid about taking another life and I honestly don't believe Bailey had it in him. Sheridan has defended the film and made it clear he is not trying to upset Sophie's family. He said: "I am not trying to upset them, I am not trying to do anything to them, but if there is a possibility that Ian Bailey didn't do it and he is pursued and hounded for 25 years , you can't cure one crime by committing another." He also told of his issues with the French trial. "Marie Farrell was not invited to France to give her evidence. Was that a selective trial? Was that a limited information trial, a media trial, or a real trial? "It is outrageous that Gardai didn't get to interview the husband and other people in France. It's clinically insane. Ian Bailey is a convincing scapegoat for everyone." The new Sophie film is inspired by the infamous 1957 movie, 12 Angry Men. It won't solve the murder but it certainly will put it right back in the public eye and have everyone talking about it again. The Gardai, meanwhile, are ploughing away with their investigation and only time will tell if a new suspect other than Ian Bailey emerges from the fallout.
The Irish Sun
9 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Moment cops dig up Channel migrant dinghies hidden deep under French beach in blow to smugglers
CHANNEL migrant smugglers are hiding boats deep under French beaches, police have revealed. A haul of nautical equipment was found by officers buried along the beach at the resort of Wimereux. 4 A French cop works to uncover a migrant dinghy buried beneath the sands of a beach in the resort of Wimereux Credit: Police Nationale 4 The dinghy that was dug up by French cops Credit: Police Nationale 4 Cops also found other equipment for the dinghy, including pumps, fuel and an outboard motor to propel the migrants to England Credit: Police Nationale The find included an inflatable dinghy, an outboard motor, lifejackets and oars. The gangs are stowing their boats underground at night and directing migrants to dig them up, inflate them and A French officer told The Sun: 'The equipment was all neatly packaged and ready for use when the migrants arrived. 'This follows lots of cars being driven by the smugglers being intercepted, so that the boats can be confiscated. READ MORE ON MIGRANT CRISIS 'They now seem to be hiding the boats late at night, leaving them there for a while, and then telling their clients where to find them.' Migrants are paying up to £1,300 for a perilous passage to Britain on the dug-up boats. They can be packed with 80 people — but are designed to carry 20. Pictures taken by Calais police show a French officer using a shovel to dig up a boat from the sands at Wimereux last week. Most read in The Sun Huge numbers of migrants are now reaching England's south coast, lured by the promise of free hotels , healthcare and little prospect of being deported. A record 1,194 arrived on a single day last month while French officers stopped just 184 out of 1,378. 4 Starmer 'loses control' as over 1,000 migrants cross Channel in biggest daily total of 2025 – as French cops watch on The 42 per cent increase has heaped pressure on Figures also show French police have intercepted just 38 per cent of migrants in small boats this year. That's down from 45 per cent in 2024, despite a £480million UK handout for extra officers and surveillance equipment on beaches. In the year to April, there were 33 boats with more than 80 people on board, compared with 11 in 2024 and one in 2023, figures from French and UK Home Office show. The Sun revealed yesterday that £4.7billion a year was now being spent to keep migrants in hotels.
RTÉ News
11 hours ago
- RTÉ News
High Court dismisses challenge against Clare wind farm
The High Court has dismissed objectors' judicial review challenge against the green light for a 579 ft high eight turbine wind farm for lands in south east Clare. Over 300 people from the area lodged objections against the Fahy Beg wind farm proposal and Clare County Council refused planning permission to RWE Renewables Ireland Ltd for the 38.4 MW wind-farm on lands 1.5km from Bridgetown, and 3.5km from O'Briensbridge in south-east Clare in May 2023. As part of the proposal, the wind-farm developers are to establish a Community Benefit Fund which will distribute up to €3.12m over the first 15 years of the wind farm. Documents lodged with the application state that the provision of the Community Benefit Fund "will have a significant long-term, positive effect on the socio-economic profile of the study area and wider area". The council refused across five grounds including that the planned wind farm would depreciate the price of property as it would be visually over-bearing on those properties. However, RWE Renewables Ireland appealed and An Bord Pléanála overturned the council refusal to grant planning permission in March 2024. In response, the Fahybeg Windfarm Opposition Group and Sean Conway launched High Court judicial review proceedings seeking to have the appeals board decision quashed for the wind farm which is to be located on a site 14km north of Limerick city. However, Mr Justice Richard Humphreys - who presides over the Planning and Environment Division of the High Court - has dismissed all grounds of the judicial review challenge. The applicants claimed that the decision should be quashed as the planned wind farm would materially contravene the Development Plan due to the loss of part of Ballymoloney Woods. Mr Justice Humphreys stated that on the basis of the applicants' analysis, the felling of any tree necessarily constitutes a material contravention of the Development Plan. Mr Justice Humphreys stated that this approach represented an "excessively literalist and absolutist interpretation" of development plan objectives. Mr Justice Humphreys stated that the application failed to engage with the specifics of the individual trees which are actually being felled, pointing 0.4 of a hectare or 0.2% of the total amount of long established woodland is being removed. He said: "There is no absolute prohibition on the removal of trees, contrary to the applicants' complaints, and a reasonably informed reader would not read such a preclusion into the Development Plan when same is read objectively and holistically." Mr Justice Humphreys also dismissed the objectors' claim that planning permission should be quashed due to the impact that the wind farm would have on property prices in the area. He said that there is no substantive evidence presented that would conclusively indicate a depreciation in property values directly attributable to the wind farm's presence at this particular location. Mr Justice Humphreys made no order in relation to costs.
