Third of renters 'could be forced out by rent hikes' despite landmark reforms
As many as a third of renters could be forced out by rent hikes despite landmark legislation to protect their rights, research shows.
Labour 's significant Renters' Rights Bill, which is currently passing through Parliament, will ban landlords from evicting renters for no reason from their homes.
But despite Section 21 evictions being abolished, campaigners have raised concerns that landlords would still be able to use unfair rent hikes to push people out of their homes.
Polling by the Renters Reform Coalition (RRC) has found 34% of renters, and 29% of renters with children, said they would "definitely" be forced to move home by a rent increase of £110 per month.
Analysis by the campaign group suggests the average rent increase recommended at first-tier rent tribunals is more than double this at over £240 per month.
RRC said the government recognises 'unreasonable rent increases' and had promised to 'empower' renters to challenge them through tribunals.
But its polling showed more than half of renters (54%) were unaware that rent tribunals exist and only 14% said they were 'very likely' to use one to challenge a rent increase in future - even after the government has made changes to improve the process.
The RRC is calling on the government to introduce a cap on in-tenancy rent increases so renters can remain in their homes.
The Renters' Rights Bill is in its final stages of the House of Lords and so is due to become law soon. Peers have attempted to amend the legislation to limit rent increases.
Tom Darling, Director at the RRC, praised the 'long overdue' Bill to improve renters' rights but said 'the rent rise eviction loophole is a serious gap in the legislation'.
'Even after section 21 is abolished, our research suggests as many as a third of renters will still face being pushed out of their homes and communities by rent increases, and landlords will be able to use rent hikes they know tenants cannot afford to threaten or intimidate,' he said.
"The government's proposed solution will not address this - our analysis shows rent tribunals will do nothing to protect the large proportion of renters who already cannot afford average market rents, even if they were willing to take their landlord to a tribunal in the first place.'
A Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesman said: 'Our landmark Renters' Rights Bill will ensure that landlords are only be able to increase rents once a year to the market rate, and tenants will be able to challenge unreasonable rent increases through the First-tier Tribunal.
'This will prevent unscrupulous landlords using rent increases as a backdoor means of eviction, while ensuring rents can be increased to a fair rate.'
The Government has been clear it does not support rent caps. Officials say heavy-handed controls tend to mean higher rents at the start of a tenancy. It was also highlighted that MHCLG secured a £39billion investment for affordable housing at the Spending Review.
::: The RRC commissioned polling from More in Common, who surveyed 1,076 private renters through three separate polls between April 25 - May 5.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
19 minutes ago
- The Guardian
High court asylum hotels ruling leaves Cooper scrambling for alternatives
Yvette Cooper, thanks to Tuesday's high court ruling, is facing potentially explosive decisions over where to house asylum seekers if courts rule that they must leave hotels. The Home Office, usually under Conservative ministers, has been struggling for five years to find an alternative to hotels so they can house a growing number of asylum seekers reaching these shores. Labour has said that it expects to empty the 200-odd hotels housing asylum seekers by 2029. Ministers may be forced to rip up that plan and move at a rapid pace because of the ruling's implications. If councils take to the high court to complain about the use of a hotel for housing asylum seekers – and many will be under immense political pressure from the public to do so – it could force officials to find alternative housing for thousands of people. Legal sources believe that there will be similar grounds to launch applications for interim injunctions from a number of councils. This case has centred on an alleged breach of planning laws by owners of the Bell hotel, who it was claimed did not get permission to switch use from a hotel to hostel-style accommodation. Other hotel owners are thought to be in similar positions to Somani Hotels Limited, which originally housed families in the Bell, but faced a legal challenge after the asylum seekers were switched to single men. Ominously for the government, the Reform UK deputy leader, Richard Tice, said his party would look at pursuing similar cases regarding hotels within the 10 council areas it controls, which include both North and West Northamptonshire councils, Doncaster, and Kent and Staffordshire county councils. And the high court rulings can require a rapid response. Epping's application for an interim was launched on 12 August. By 4pm on 12 September, all asylum seekers will have to be removed from The Bell hotel. There may yet be a lifeline for the government. They could convince the court of appeal to overturn the decision. The fact that the Home Office was not allowed to intervene in a case which was directly related to the home secretary's duties to house asylum seekers could well be seized upon by government lawyers. If they fail to overturn the decision, they will face the same dilemma as successive Tory home secretaries going back to Priti Patel, who promised and failed to find alternatives to hotels to house asylum seekers. The number of asylum hotels soared to 400 under successive Tory home secretaries because of a shortage of housing, a growing backlog in asylum applications, and a failure to establish large accommodation sites in buildings such as disused military barracks. Since coming to power, Labour has increased the speed at which applications are processed, by using more 'dispersal accommodation' such as flats and housing in the community. Questions will no doubt be asked inside the department as to why it took the Home Office until Monday to try to intervene in the case. If it had done so last week, when the case came to court, it would have stood a better chance of preventing the injunction. The political implications of the ruling will continue to unsettle Cooper and No 10. Yet again, the government has been caught flat-footed on an immigration-related issue, as it struggles with soaring numbers of small boats crossing the Channel. Anti-asylum seeker protesters will see this as a victory in response to their demonstrations across the country this summer. Reform UK and its leader, Nigel Farage, currently leading in most polls, will be buoyed by the prospect of further embarrassment for the government.
The Herald Scotland
31 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
First Minister doubles down on independence strategy
'I'm simply saying that in 2011 when the SNP won a majority of seats in the Scottish Parliament that led to a referendum in 2014. 'And that precedent is one that we want independence to happen on.' This follows news of a group of SNP activists accusing the party of 'ignoring the internal democracy' by refusing to table a proposal for an alternative independence strategy at the next party conference in October. READ MORE: The proposal asked the party to 'prioritise obtaining a mandate from the sovereign Scottish people to deliver independence.' It said: 'This will be possible by achieving a majority of the popular vote on the sum of the Independence Supporting Parties' List Votes in the 2026 Scottish parliamentary election." It was supported by 43 local party branches. Speaking to STV News on Monday, Mr Swinney said of the alternative plan 'I don't agree with it and I don't think it will work 'We had that in 2016 and 2021 and it didn't break the log jam and the issue is having a route which results in Scotland becoming independent.' Building on this today, Mr Swinney said that supporters had to consider the current level of support for independence in the country. 'I'm simply saying to people in Scotland: if the issues you are concerned about: your energy costs, the existence of child poverty, or the challenges we face about business activity, if you want to fix those things then independence is the way to do that but you have to give me the authority to do that. 'So I appeal to those 52-54% of people who believe in independence: make this a priority at the 2026 election and we can make this a reality. Mr Swinney said that his party leading in the polls is not enough for him. (Image: PA) Mr Swinney compared the current election to that of 2011, the first Holyrood election to return a majority for the party, which led to the independence referendum in 2014. 'In January of 2010 we were miles behind in the opinion polls of an overall majority. Today, nine months out from the election we are ahead in the opinion polls. 'When I took over as SNP leader, we were behind in the opinion polls and no one gave us a chance of survival. I've got the SNP back in to lead commandingly in the opinion polls. 'But that's not good enough for me…I've set out what we've got to do to take the party to win Scottish independence and I am going to give it every single fibre of my being between now and the election to make sure it happens.'
South Wales Guardian
44 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Swinney has ‘no intention' of reshuffling Scottish cabinet before May election
More than 20 SNP MSPs are set to leave Holyrood when voters north of the border go to the poll next year. Mr Swinney's deputy First Minister Kate Forbes is among them, along with Finance Secretary Shona Robison, Transport Secretary Fiona Hyslop and Rural Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon. However, Mr Swinney made clear he has no plans to reshape his top team in the light of the planned departures. Speaking at an event in Edinburgh organised by the think tank Enlighten, Mr Swinney said: 'I have no intention of reshuffling my team before the election.' While he spoke about his 'regret' about fellow MSPs leaving Holyrood, including 'close colleagues, friends and confidantes', he said he had reshuffled his cabinet team after government minister Mairi McAllan returned to work earlier this year following her maternity leave. She was given the newly created post of housing secretary, with Mr Swinney tasking her with tackling the housing 'emergency' in Scotland. Asked if the impending departure of senior members of his government would bring about a reshuffle ahead of May's Scottish elections, the SNP leader said he had 'decided, actively and purposefully' that he had people in his cabinet with 'experience and expertise in a number of roles that would help me to deliver to government's programme before the election'. And he argued that if he was to 'put in a whole host of new faces' then 'it would take a while to get things back up to the level of delivery' So he insisted: 'I have no plans to reshuffle the government.' His comments came as he spoke of his 'regret' over SNP MSPs leaving Holyrood, with the First Minister saying he 'very much' regretted Ms Forbes' decision to quit the Scottish Parliament. She announced earlier this month she would not be running for election next year, saying she did not want to 'miss any more of the precious early years of family life'. Meanwhile, former first ministers Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf are also stepping down. Mr Swinney said: 'Some of my colleagues are stepping down because they have done a very long shift.' While he said he was the 'longest serving' parliamentarian at Holyrood, having been first voted in as an MP 28 years ago before being elected as an MSP in the first devolved elections, he noted a number of those quitting had also been first elected in 1999. However, he added some MSPs were leaving because of the 'tough' nature of politics. 'We have to acknowledge that for many, I think particularly younger women, the climate is horrendous,' Mr Swinney said. He continued: 'The social media endurance is hard to bear for some people, and it makes public service look frankly unattractive at times.' In these circumstances, he said, he tries to 'support my colleagues, understand and be an ally'. But the SNP leader added: 'Ultimately, I can not protect people from what is thrown at them, and some of the behaviours are appalling, so that affects a number of people as well.'
