Georgia tort reform aims to change practices in judicial 'hell hole'
That ranking of the Peach State was jokingly referred to by attorney Blair Cash of the Moseley Marciniak Law Firm, a South Carolina-based practice that focuses much of its work on defending trucking companies.
Cash, who is based in Georgia, made the comment in a webinar Friday to review a package of tort reforms approved by the Georgia legislature earlier this year and signed in late April by Gov. Brian Kemp.
While Cash was enthusiastic about the Georgia tort reform on the webinar, he was careful not to promise too much out of it. 'I really think it is an attempt to just level the playing field a bit, because as has been talked about, Georgia was the number one judicial hell hold for a couple of years,' he said. 'I think now we've fallen back to number three.'
The tort reform is not trucking-specific. Rather, it is an attempt to reform certain practices that have been allowed to develop over the years in the state's courts and which the Georgia trucking bar saw as being risks to the state's motor carriers.
The key legislation is known as SB 85, from Senate Bill 85. But SB 85 had a companion piece of legislation that also was approved and signed by Gov. Kemp, SB 86, which seeks to bring transparency to privately-funded lawsuits, where a plaintiff that lacks the resources to pursue litigation takes funding from an outside source that would then get a piece of whatever settlement or award was reached in the case.
According to both Cash and several law firms that have posted online commentary, SB 85 has numerous provisions, some of which are more procedural to an outsider looking in–like the discovery process being halted while a defendant's request for a dismissal is pending–and others that can more easily be understood by the side of the legal divide that has people behind the wheel and who would be the target of a lawsuit.
The end of the 'seat belt gag rule' is one of those provisions.
'In previous years in Georgia, they've all failed to change the state's draconian seat belt admissibility rule,' Cash said. That draconian rule boiled down to this: 'seat belt usage had been not admissible at all,' he said.
Cash cited an actual case where a person sitting on a seated lawn mower riding in the back of a truck–so not belted in–suffered 'horrible' injuries when the truck experienced a tire blowout. The man was left a quadriplegic, Cash said. But his lack of seat belt usage was not admissible in the resulting litigation.
He said now being able to introduce the seat belt situation of a person injured in an accident may be permissible under the new law. But Cash added that it is not automatic.
It may be preferable, Cash said, not to introduce evidence of seat belt non-usage if the crash in question is a rear end accident resulting in impact 'so insignificant that it doesn't even engage the seat belt.' It can come more into play in crashes where the issue is 'injury causation and what the plaintiffs' injuries would have been had they been wearing their seat belt,' Cash said.
The part of SB 86 that Cash said would be 'the most interesting to see' is the rule on so-called phantom damages.
As the Kennedys law firm said in an online commentary about SB86, the phantom damages provision of SB 86 'allows defendants to present evidence of the actual amounts paid by health insurers for medical care, limiting reliance on inflated billed amounts. Medical expense recovery is now capped at the reasonable value of necessary care, which may be demonstrated through both billed charges and actual payments, regardless of insurance involvement.'
Under the current system that would be changed, the impact of insurance reimbursement against a doctor's charges could not be introduced.
But with the shift, Cash said, juries will 'get to hear both numbers now, so they get to hear the big number (offered by plaintiffs) but they still hear the number of what is actually necessary to satisfy those charges,' Cash said.
He added that he preferred the term 'truth and damages' rather than 'phantom damages.'
One unintended consequence of the law, Cash said, is that it may be preferable from a trial lawyer's perspective if a client has no health insurance. The offsetting impact of insurance payment by definition couldn't come in to play. Cash added that SB 86 is silent on handling that situation.
Other parts of SB86 discussed by Cash and by attorneys in their online commentaries include these provisions:
The 'anchoring' of non-economic damages: Cash cited where an attorney might make an argument along the lines of 'if LeBron James makes this much money, is the client's suffering worth less than that?' As Kennedys said in its commentary, 'this tactic can introduce arbitrary inflated figures that influence juries and contribute to nuclear verdicts.' Under the new law, if that sort of figure isn't discussed earlier in the testimony, it can't suddenly be introduced during a closing argument.
Non-bifurcated trial:The current system could involve three steps, Cash said: the actual trial, apportionment of the damages, and then deciding what the damages should be. Each step could involve the same testimony heard multiple times. Bifurcation, according to the Kennedys law firm, would involve just two phases. But it is not mandated; it is an option that can be requested by either party.
The companion legislation, SB87, does not make illegal the practice of outsiders funding lawsuits.
The law goes into effect January 1, which Cash said would give those funding entities time to comply with what he said were 'onerous:' registration requirements.
'It has the goal of increasing transparency around third party litigation financing and trying to lift back the veil over some of these agreements which we've known existed for a long time,' Cash said. Some judges in the past would require such disclosure, he added, but it was not unanimous.
The registration rules are 'not simply a rubber stamp,' Cash said. 'There are some very serious registration requirements that they have to complete.'
More articles by John Kingston
California deal with 16 states would end key parts of Advanced Clean Fleets rule
New Jersey, feds take opposite paths on independent contractor rules
State of Freight takeaways: Freight crash may turn into sudden revival
The post Georgia tort reform aims to change practices in judicial 'hell hole' appeared first on FreightWaves.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Holding cash in case a bear market hits? Here's where and when to invest if stocks plunge.
Deploying cash during a bear market can be difficult as fear sets in. It's smart to have a plan — don't enter the market all at once, and don't panic. Experts suggest buying quality dividend stocks and large-cap tech if a bear market comes around. If you've been building up a big cash reserve over the last few years, you're not alone. You're also probably not alone in wishing you'd had the money in stocks. Cash has generated meaningful yields since 2022 after the Federal Reserve went on a rate-hike spree, drawing record amounts into money market funds. The total value in money market funds — highly liquid, cash-equivalent assets that generate yield from short-term bonds — is at a record $7.3 trillion. About $2.1 trillion is held by retail investors. Even stock-investing icon Warren Buffett holds a record cash position worth nearly $350 billion as of March. But stocks have ripped higher in the meantime. The S&P 500 is up 80% since its October 2022 low. It's been difficult to know when to get into the market, though. With the stock market consistently hitting new highs and valuations historically elevated in recent years, you might have been waiting for a good opportunity to put that cash to work in equities, waiting for a dip to buy. If you missed the April plunge, you might still be doing so. It's not necessarily a bad approach. Goldman Sachs said this week that the chance of a stock-market pullback has jumped. In fact, stocks are so expensive that Vanguard said this mont that its ideal portfolio over the next 10 years is a very conservative allocation of 70% bonds and 30% stocks. The cheaper the entry point, the better the returns. But timing the market is tricky and something market pros usually advise against trying. No one knows how long a bull rally can go or how long an eventual pullback will last. That's why the best course of action is probably to dollar-cost-average, continuing to put money into the market at set intervals, whether the market is up or down. However, if you are resolved to waiting for a significant decline to enter the market, it's a good idea to have a plan set in place before that moment arrives. When and what to buy Though bear markets in recent years have been short-lived, the average bear market going back to 1932 has seen a 35.1% drawdown that lasts a year and a half, according to investment bank Stifel. So take it slow, says brokerage firm Charles Schwab. "Instead of going all in at once, one might consider buying small chunks at a time," Charles Schwab said in an August 6 post. But not too slow, said Hank Smith, the director and head of investment strategy at Haverford Trust. There's no way to tell when the bottom is in, so you want to start taking advantage of the pullback once it hits 10% correction territory, he said. It may hurt if the market ends up falling further than 10%, Smith said, but being indecisive about when to get in can result in missed opportunities. Remember the 19.9% decline in the S&P 500 from February to April? The pain was over in the blink of an eye, with the index back at all-time highs before the end of June — and the rally has been furious, with the market up 30% since April lows. So if the market does continue to drop, it's time to get even more aggressive, Smith said. "Let's say that correction morphs into a bear market of 20%, and now you're kicking yourself that you put any in at down 10%. You can't do that," Smith told Business Insider. "You have to say, 'Ok, this is another opportunity to tranche in again,' and probably with more than you did at down 10%." As for areas of the market to buy, it's difficult to know which sectors and themes will get beaten up the most. But Schwab said it's good to take a diversified approach and start buying all corners of the market. "Interestingly enough, traders can diversify their portfolios with as few as 12 stocks, targeting stocks in all major sectors," the firm said. "Although diversification doesn't eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses, it can help increase the chances of capturing better-performing assets and avoid the risk of losing overall portfolio value to any single business, industry, or sector." Quality dividend stocks can also provide a good buffer to market losses, Merrill and Bank of America Private Bank said in a 2024 report. Smith said that economically sensitive sectors usually make for some of the best opportunities coming out of a recessionary bear market, as they dip during downturns and rebound when the economy recovers. Funds like the Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and the Invesco Dorsey Wright Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) offer exposure to cyclical stocks. But he also said large-cap tech stocks are likely to drop the most because of how high their valuations are. If that's the case, it will likely be a good chance to add exposure to them, he said. "That's very common in high-growth stocks to have big sell-offs in what is a longer-term bull trend," Smith said. "That is where an investor with a lot of cash waiting for a significant decline in the market should look to." Read the original article on Business Insider Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
These three ‘golden' visa destinations have become hotspots for wealthy Americans
America's elite are increasingly seeking 'golden' visas. Canada-based Mohamed Bennis, an associate vice president at Arton Capital, told Fox News Digital that many are realizing 'true wealth' is measured by 'freedom of movement.' Advertisement 'Many Americans are realizing that a second residency or citizenship is the ultimate insurance policy against uncertainty,' said Bennis. 'It provides them with almost unmatched mobility, flexibility and security in a world that is becoming increasingly unpredictable.' He added, 'Just as gold has historically been a best-in-class investment as a store of value, these visas are also premium assets that provide their holders — and their families — with both tangible and intangible benefits for the long term.' Arton Capital advises high-net-worth individuals on the process of investing in citizenship or residency all around the world. Political divisions, said Bennis, have influenced wealthy Americans to weigh their options. They're not necessarily moving their primary residences — but they might be acquiring the freedom to have another option. Advertisement 4 'Many Americans are realizing that a second residency or citizenship is the ultimate insurance policy against uncertainty,' Mohamed Bennis, associate vice president at Arton Capital, said about people pursuing 'golden' visas. acnaleksy – '[Golden visas] can open doors to privileges that money just can't buy: freedom of movement, security for your family and access to opportunities around the world,' he said. He said that Malta, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Portugal are becoming increasingly popular for Americans seeking residency or citizenship through investment. 'Each option offers its own distinct benefits. All three open the door to new cultures, safer environments and the ability to live life on your own terms.' Advertisement 4 'Malta has recently transitioned from a citizenship-by-investment model to a citizenship-by-merit framework,' he said, making visas to this area more accessible. aapsky – 'Malta and Portugal offer access to world-class healthcare and education within the EU, often at lower costs than in the U.S. — while the UAE offers a high standard of living, zero income tax and a thriving international community,' he said. Portugal's investment program requires prospective visa holders to invest about $500,000 in qualifying investment, venture capital funds, and scientific or technological research. 'Approval is granted to applicants based on their skills and innovation.' Advertisement About $250,000 can be invested in cultural heritage preservation, or in creating at least 10 full-time jobs in Portugal, according to the country's site. 4 According to Portugal's website, about $250,000 can be invested in cultural heritage preservation, or in creating at least 10 full-time jobs in the country. SeanPavonePhoto – Bennis said Malta's program enables more people to access the visas by lowering the barriers. 'Malta has recently transitioned from a citizenship-by-investment model to a citizenship-by-merit framework,' he said. 4 Bennis said the United Arab Emirates offers a 'modern crossroads' between the East and the West that draws in the wealthy. marekkijevsky – 'This has meant that approval is granted to applicants based on their skills and innovation, rather than just the size of their economic contribution,' he said. The UAE has remained a top destination for American clients. Bennis said the emirates offer a 'modern crossroads' between the East and the West that's particularly attractive. 'Its golden visa popularized the 'citizenship by merit' trend that countries such as Malta are now adopting,' he said. Advertisement 'It grants long-term residency rights, typically 5 or 10 years, and is available to investors, skilled professionals, entrepreneurs, even outstanding students.' Bennis added, 'The countries with the most smooth and streamlined processes are often the most popular.'
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows Tax Cuts Promised by Trump Administration Across 50 States
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan Washington-based think tank, has produced a map forecasting the effects of President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act on taxes across the United States, broken down to the county level. The White House's website reposted the map, noting that the Tax Foundation said Trump's package would "reduce federal taxes on average for individual taxpayers in every state" and create almost 1 million jobs. Newsweek contacted the Tax Foundation for comment on Saturday outside regular office hours. Why It Matters Trump signed his One Big Beautiful Bill, the centerpiece of his economic agenda, into law on July 4 after it narrowly passed both the House and Senate. The Congressional Budget Office has said the legislation will add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. national debt, a forecast that contributed to a falling out between Trump and his previous close confidant Elon Musk. The One Big Beautiful Bill included sweeping tax cuts, reduced spending on Medicaid, and additional funding for the military and border security. It also raised the U.S. debt ceiling by $5 trillion. What To Know On Wednesday, the Tax Foundation published a study forecasting the effects of the One Big Beautiful Bill on taxes paid by the average American on a county-by-county basis between 2026 and 2035. This was accompanied by a map showing the breakdown by county over this period. Two days later, the White House published a news release welcoming the study, which included a screenshot of the Tax Foundation's map taken for 2026. According to the Tax Foundation, the average tax cut per American for 2026 will be $3,752 because of Trump's spending package. This is forecast to fall to $2,505 in 2030 as some measures expire before increasing again to $3,301 in 2035. A map produced by the Tax Foundation showing the effects of President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill in 2026 on a county-by-county basis. A map produced by the Tax Foundation showing the effects of President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill in 2026 on a county-by-county basis. Tax Foundation The states forecast to see the largest tax cuts in 2926 are Wyoming ($5,375), Washington ($5,372) and Massachusetts ($5,139). By contrast, the smallest cuts are expected in West Virginia and Mississippi—at $2,503 and $2,401, respectively. In its report, the Tax Foundation described the One Big Beautiful Bill as "the most significant legislative changes to federal tax policy since the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act," which was passed in Trump's first term. The president's One Big Beautiful Bill contained a number of tax cuts, including extending corporation and income taxes he imposed in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. It also raises the cap on state and local tax deductions over the next five years to $40,000 for those making less than $500,000 per year, reduces tax on tips and overtime pay, and phases out some of former President Joe Biden's energy tax credits. The Tax Foundation also projected that the One Big Beautiful Bill would produce about 938,000 jobs "over the long run," including 132,000 in California and 81,000 in Texas. What People Are Saying White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said in the news release: "President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill is the largest, most consequential tax cut on the middle class ever. Now, the Tax Foundation—the leading nonpartisan tax policy nonprofit—confirms that. Between lower inflation, massive investments, and historic tax cuts, all Americans are reaping the benefits of the Trump Economy—and the Golden Age has just begun." What Happens Next While supporters of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill may be buoyed by the Tax Foundation's report, which suggests it will result in widespread tax reductions and job creation, critics are likely to continue raising concerns about its effects on the national debt and Medicaid cuts.
