Purple Heart veteran shot in action self-deports after old drug charge resurfaces: ‘Can't believe this is happening in America'
A U.S. Army veteran, awarded the Purple Heart for injuries sustained in combat, has self-deported to South Korea after being informed he could no longer remain in America under President Donald Trump's hardline immigration policies.
Sae Joon Park, 55, a green card holder who has lived in the U.S. since the age of seven, departed on Monday following a removal order stemming from drug possession and failure to appear in court charges from over 15 years ago.
Park attributes these past offenses to years of untreated post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which he developed after being wounded in action in Panama in 1989.
'I can't believe that this is happening in America,' Park told NPR in an interview before his departure. 'That blows me away, like a country that I fought for.'
Having arrived in the U.S. from South Korea in the late 1970s, Park grew up in Los Angeles. Seeking direction, he enlisted in the U.S. Army after high school.
'I wanted direction and [to] better myself and maybe help serve the country,' he explained.
At 20, he was deployed to Panama as part of the 1989 U.S. invasion to topple Manuel Noriega's regime. During a firefight, he was shot.
'I realized I was shot,' he recounted. 'So I'm thinking, 'Oh my God, I'm paralyzed.' And then thinking, 'Oh my God, I'm not just paralyzed. I'm dying right now.'' A bullet was miraculously deflected by his dog tag, saving his life.
Upon his return to the U.S., Park received the Purple Heart. While his physical wounds healed, the psychological trauma persisted.
Unaware at the time that he had PTSD, he did not seek professional help, leading him to turn to drugs to cope. "I had to find some kind of a cure for what I was going through," he told NPR.
For much of his twenties and thirties, Park struggled with a crack cocaine addiction. An arrest for drug possession and a subsequent failure to appear in court led to charges that ultimately derailed his chances of naturalization or relief from deportation.
'I just couldn't stay clean,' he admitted. 'So finally, when the judge told me, 'Don't come back into my court with the dirty urine,' which I knew I would, I got scared and I jumped bail.'
Although the U.S. offers expedited naturalization for veterans, Park was discharged before completing the required 12 months of service, and the Panama invasion was not officially recognized as a period of hostility, leaving him ineligible.
Park served three years in prison starting in 2009, during which he lost his desire for drugs. After his release, he moved to Hawaii, found work, and focused on raising his son and daughter.
Having completed his prison term, he was served with a removal order but was initially allowed to remain in the U.S. with annual check-ins with immigration officials.
However, under the Trump administration, circumstances shifted this month. During a meeting with local Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials in Hawaii, Park was informed he would be detained and deported unless he left voluntarily. He was given an ankle monitor and three weeks to arrange his affairs.
'People were saying, 'You took two bullets for this country. Like you're more American than most of the Americans living in America,'' he told Hawaii News Now.
After spending his final days with friends and family, including his 85-year-old mother, whom he believes he may never see again, Park booked a flight to South Korea – a country he barely remembers from his childhood. Under the watchful eyes of ICE agents at Honolulu airport, he shared tearful goodbyes with his loved ones.
Despite the profound circumstances of his departure from the country he fought for, Park remains resolute. 'Even after everything I went through, I don't regret joining the military or getting shot,' he said. 'It's part of my life, my journey. It's made me who I am today.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
President Trump's Social Security Overhaul Could Hit Retirees Hard in 2025 and Beyond
It might be getting harder to communicate with the Social Security Administration. Future hardships for retirees range from inconvenience to potential reduced benefits. The Social Security surplus is running dry -- but solutions exist. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › If you've been paying attention, you'll have noticed that while President Donald Trump's administration has not canceled Social Security, as some may have feared it would, it has made some changes -- and more changes may be coming. These changes, some of which may seem to be a good thing, are likely to hurt retirees in the long run. They may even affect retirees now, in 2025, especially when it comes to retirement planning. It's hard to plan when you're not sure what's happening next. Here's a look at what has been happening with Social Security and how it might affect you. The Social Security Administration (SSA) said in February that it plans to reduce its workforce of about 57,000 by about 7,000 -- a cut of about 12%. That's concerning because fewer employees may mean fewer people available to help retirees and pre-retirees with their Social Security benefits. The SSA is actually already an extremely efficient organization, even before these layoffs. The percentage of Social Security spending that goes to administration was only 0.5% in 2024 -- down from 1% in 2006 and 1.5% in 1978. It's true that most beneficiaries receive their monthly benefits electronically these days, but close to half a million retirees still receive paper checks. The Trump administration is ending paper checks. This will clearly affect lots of retirees, as many may not be able to easily set up direct deposits. Plenty are in their 90s, after all, and some don't even have bank accounts. Until recently, many retirees have been able to make Social Security transactions, such as changing direct deposit account numbers or applying for benefits, over the phone. Now, many such actions must be done online via a "my Social Security" account with two-factor authentication or in person at an SSA office. Those who are not that technologically adept or who live far from an SSA office will clearly be inconvenienced. I'm including this non-change because Trump has spoken a lot about how he wants to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits. This is a tricky issue because while retirees would love to not face any taxes on their benefits, those taxes do generate revenue for Social Security. Without that revenue, the already-challenged program may see its surplus run dry even sooner than expected. Interestingly, Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" does not have the tax cancelation in it, which is a good thing for Social Security in the long run. Still, it might get added, as Congress is still shaping what actually gets passed. This spring, there were reputable reports that as many as 47 Social Security offices were being targeted for closure -- with an Associated Press report linking to a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) list of federal real estate closures and listing 26 offices slated to close in 2025. Obviously, if offices are closed, many retirees will have to travel farther to visit the office closest to them or simply may not be able to access a nearby office. But in late March, the SSA issued a notice saying that "Recent reports in the media that the Social Security Administration (SSA) is permanently closing local field offices are false." It added, "We have not permanently closed any local field offices this year." Still, this status quo may change. Here's the biggest way that retirees could be hurt by the Trump administration when it comes to Social Security: The program long ran a surplus, taking in more than it had to pay out, but with more people living longer and retiring early these days, the surplus is being used up and is estimated to run dry in 2034 -- only eight years away -- if nothing is done to strengthen the program. So far, there's little indication that the folks in charge in Washington want to strengthen it. (There are multiple ways to fix this problem, though.) So, if nothing is done, beginning around 2034, beneficiaries will only receive 81% of what they're due. With the average monthly retirement benefit of $2,002 as of May, a 19% cut would shrink that benefit to $1,622, reducing it by $380. Social Security's future right now is unclear, with various parties wanting to make various big changes. If you're anywhere near retiring, you may want to pay close attention to this issue. If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. President Trump's Social Security Overhaul Could Hit Retirees Hard in 2025 and Beyond was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Most nabbed in L.A. raids were men with no criminal conviction, picked up off the street
As Los Angeles became the epicenter of President Trump's crackdown on undocumented immigrants, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem flew to the city and held a news conference, saying the government's objective was to "bring in criminals that have been out on our street far too long." But data from the days leading up to that June 12 appearance suggest a majority of those who were arrested were not convicted criminals. Most were working-age men, nearly half Mexican. From June 1 to 10, Immigration and Customs Enforcement data show that early in the crackdown 722 were arrested in the Los Angeles region. The figures were obtained by the Deportation Data Project, a repository of enforcement data at UC Berkeley Law. A Times analysis found that 69% of those arrested during that period had no criminal conviction and 58% had never been charged with a crime. The median age of someone arrested was 38, and that person was likely to be a man. Nearly 48% were Mexican, 16% were from Guatemala and 8% from El Salvador. "They're not going after drug kingpins, they're chasing hardworking people through swap meets and Home Depot parking lots," Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass told The Times. "You can see the impact of these random raids everywhere in our city — families are scared to go eat at restaurants, kids are scared their parents aren't going to return from the store — the fear is there because they've seen videos of people being shoved into unmarked vans by masked men refusing to identify themselves." While the Trump administration has been pounding the point that they are targeting the "worst of the worst," several data sets released by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in recent days show that percentage of people picked up without a criminal conviction is growing as sweeps become the norm in Los Angeles. The data cover a seven-county area from San Luis Obispo in the north to Orange County in the south. Experts told The Times the data confirm what many advocates and officials say: that most of the arrests carried out are on the street. Many were executed in open air locations, like car washes, Home Depot parking lots and street vending spots. Immigrant advocates and local officials say the lack of named targets shows the federal agents are simply racially profiling, allegations that Los Angeles officials are using to lay the groundwork for a lawsuit. Department of Homeland Security officials say the efforts are targeted. 'DHS enforcement operations are highly targeted, and officers do their due diligence," said DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. "We know who we are targeting ahead of time. If and when we do encounter individuals subject to arrest, our law enforcement is trained to ask a series of well-determined questions to determine status and removability.' Nationally, the number of people arrested without criminal convictions has jumped significantly and many of those with convictions are nonviolent offenders, according to nonpublic data obtained by the Cato Institute that covers the 2025 fiscal year beginning in Oct. 1 and ending June 15. "ICE is not primarily detaining people who are public safety threats," said David Bier, director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank. "Serious violent offenders are a very small minority, just 7% of the people that it's taking into custody." ICE has not released data on criminal records of detainees booked into its custody. But Cato's nonpublic data showed about 9 out of 10 had never been convicted of a violent or property crime and 30% have no criminal record. The most frequent crimes are immigration and traffic offenses. "That's important because the Department of Homeland Security has made such a big deal about its deportation efforts being focused on people with serious criminal histories," he said. He also analyzed the UC Berkeley Law data that reflects ICE arrests and found that nationally, five times the number of immigrants without criminal convictions were arrested in the last fiscal year compared with the same period in 2017. He called the figure "staggering." For June alone, he noted that the agency arrested 6,000 people without criminal convictions. McLaughlin said Monday that "75% of those arrests under this Administration have been of illegal aliens with criminal convictions or pending charges." The public data reveal that figure is 70% over the course of Trump's second term, but lower in recent weeks. That data show ICE has booked 204,297 people into detention facilities over the last fiscal year. The figure is considered a good approximation for arrests. Of those, a week before Trump took office for the second time, 38% of those booked had not been convicted of a crime. Five months into his term, that number had grown to 63%. Cato's nonpublic data show that the top criminal conviction is immigration followed by a traffic offenses, assaults and drug charges. Bier pins the shift to White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, who in May reportedly directed top ICE officials to go beyond target lists and begin arresting people at Home Depots or 7-Eleven convenience stores. The wider sweeps are stressing the capacity of the detention system, where detainees have reported moldy food, dirty towels and no changes of clothes for more than a week at a time. A week before Trump took office, there were about 39,000 people held in detention. By June 15, that figure had grown 42% to 56,397. "It's nearing a historical high," said Austin Kocher, an assistant professor at Syracuse University who tracks immigration data. And that figure could grow. The administration has asked Congress to fund 100,000 detention beds. Times staff writer Andrea Castillo and data and graphics journalists Lorena Elebee and Sean Greene contributed to this report. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Left-wing Democrat stuns former governor in NY mayor primary
A young left-wing candidate, Zohran Mamdani, is poised to become the Democratic nominee for New York mayor after delivering a stunning political upset. The 33-year-old socialist declared victory in the city's Democratic primary on Tuesday, defeating his main rival and political veteran Andrew Cuomo who previously served as state governor. "Tonight we made history," Mamdani said in his victory speech. If elected, he would be the first Muslim and Indian American to lead the nation's largest city. Cuomo, 67, was attempting to pull off a comeback after resigning from office in 2021 over a sexual harassment scandal. He congratulated his opponent for a "really smart and great campaign". The primary in staunchly liberal New York is likely to determine who becomes mayor in November's election. The contest was being watched as a litmus test for the Democratic Party as it seeks to hone its messaging after election losses last November that saw President Donald Trump's Republicans win the White House and both chambers in Congress. Results on Tuesday night showed Mamdani with a commanding lead, but falling short of the 50% threshold needed to win outright. Who is Zohran Mamdani? Cuomo's concession was unexpected because counting looks likely to continue next week under the ranked choice system, which allowed New Yorkers to pick up to five candidates in order of preference. The former governor's loss marks the "biggest upset in modern NYC history," Trip Yang, a political strategist, told the BBC. "A massive win for Zohran Mamdani that shows that when Donald Trump is President, New York Democrats want to see their leaders fight with enthusiasm and courage, and that's what Zohran showed voters." In an interview with the New York Times, Cuomo said he was still examining whether he would run in the general election in November on the independent line. "I said he won the primary election," Cuomo told the outlet. "I said I wanted to look at the numbers and the ranked-choice voting to decide about what to do in the future, because I'm also on an independent line." Cuomo was seen as a moderate and the establishment favourite, known across the country after his governorship during the Covid pandemic. Mamdani is a millennial outsider who was fairly unknown until recently. Born in Uganda, his family moved to New York City when he was seven. He has posted one campaign video entirely in Urdu and mixed in Bollywood film clips. In another, he speaks Spanish. Mamdani's strong support of Palestinians and criticism of Israel put him at odds with most of the Democratic establishment. He went viral during his campaign for videos where he questioned NYC voters who swung for Trump in the November election. He asked what issues led them to cast their ballots for the Republican president and what it would take for them to swing Democrat. Mamdani's platform includes free public buses, universal childcare, freezing rent in subsidised units, and city-run grocery stores - all paid for by new taxes on the rich. "This is a city where one in four of its people are living in poverty, a city where 500,000 kids go to sleep hungry every night," he told the BBC at a recent event. "And ultimately, it's a city that is in danger of losing that which it makes it so special." Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and Senator Bernie Sanders, also democratic socialists, endorsed Mamdani during his campaign. Follow the twists and turns of Trump's second term with North America correspondent Anthony Zurcher's weekly US Politics Unspun newsletter. Readers in the UK can sign up here. Those outside the UK can sign up here.
