
Sinn Fein TD denies having Special Criminal Court debate 'tactical wee'
A Sinn Féin TD has denied taking a "tactical wee" in order to miss his opportunity to call a Dáil vote on the Special Criminal Courts.
Matt Carthy was absent from the Dáil chamber on Wednesday afternoon when a debate on the Special Criminal Court was passed without a vote. Sinn Féin traditionally voted against the non-jury court when the legislation came up for renewal every year.
However, for the last number of years, it has abstained from the vote as new reforms were under consideration. On Wednesday, the debate ended more an hour earlier than expected as there were no more speakers in the Dáil chamber.
Ceann Comhairle Verona Murphy stated that she had to call a vote on Sinn Féin's amendment but there was a "difficulty in that Deputy Carthy has stepped out". Junior Minister at the Department of Justice Niall Collins, who had declined an opportunity to speak and conclude the debate, stated that "that is the way it goes".
A vote on the amendment was not called and those present in the Dáil Chamber then agreed to pass the legislation underpinning the Special Criminal Court without a vote. Mr Carthy returned and asked if he could move his amendment and that he was absent as he "had to take a call".
However, the Ceann Comhairle told him that she "did not know if you were coming back" and that it was too late. Speaking on the Leinster House plinth on Thursday, Mr Carthy admitted that he had actually gone to the toilet and missed the end of the debate.
However, he denied that it was a "tactical wee", a reference to the Australian children's TV show Bluey. He said: "It was just one of those occasions. There was a very long debate. I was there for the vast majority of it.
"There was a number of groups left to speak, including several independent TDs, a number of government speakers, and the Minister of State, Niall Collins, was to give a closing address. I stepped out to answer nature's call, to be quite frank about it. While I wasn't there, the minister saw an opportunity and didn't take his opportunity to give a closing address.
"The independents who were due to speak weren't present, and therefore he was able to ensure the passage of the legislation without any vote. I thought it was petty to be honest, but that is politics."
He added: "No, [it wasn't a tactical wee]. It was a tactical position on the part of the Minister of State. It was what we call an old fashioned political stroke."
Government sources, however, denied that there was any "stroke", arguing that there was also a Sinn Féin speaking slot that Mr Carthy and other TDs were not present for. They also suggested that he "effectively got rid of opposition speaking time" as the Sinn Féin slot was skipped and independent TDs missed their slots that were pushed forward as a result.
Join our Dublin Live breaking news service on WhatsApp. Click this link to receive your daily dose of Dublin Live content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice .
For all the latest news from Dublin and surrounding areas visit our homepage.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
2 days ago
- Irish Examiner
The Mick Clifford Podcast: Is the Wild West era of social media over?
For the first time, new regulations aimed at protecting Irish children online have been enacted – the 'Wild West' era of social media is over. At least, that's according to the Government, which this week announced the beginning of the Online Safety Code. It's taken the law over 20 years to catch up with social media – and in the meantime, a whole generation of children has been exposed to violence, pornography, self-harm content and misogyny, with only some minor attempts at protecting them from Big Tech. But Ireland's Online Safety Code is part of a wider effort, including Europe's Digital Services Act, the UK's Digital Services Act and new Australian rules around social media, which include under-16s being banned from opening YouTube accounts. The measures have been widely welcomed in Ireland but have become the subject of huge debate in the UK. So – what are the rules, what are the penalties, and crucially, do they have enough teeth? Irish Examiner journalist Sean Murray joins Deirdre O'Shaughnessy on this week's episode of The Mick Clifford Podcast. Read More Will tech giants finally take online safety for children seriously? Meta's ban on political ads will mean less transparency and more slop for users Social media aimed at kids is driven by profit, not safety


Extra.ie
3 days ago
- Extra.ie
Australia outlaws YouTube for teens as media ban widens
Australia has announced that YouTube is going to be added to the sites covered by their unique social media ban for teenagers. The video-sharing site was originally exempt from the ban but that decision has now been reversed with the possibility of a legal challenge now on the way. Due to a survey which found that 37% of minors reported harmful content on the site, the worst showing for a social media platform, Australia decided to comply with their internet regulator's urges. Australian PM Anthony Albanese confirmed the ban extension. Pic:Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese stated: 'I'm calling time on it.' He went on to highlight that Australian children were being negatively affected by online platforms and reminded social media platforms of the responsibility that they have to keep users safe.. The PM added: 'I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs.' The ban will broaden to include YouTube from December onwards. YouTube has hit back at the decision, stating that it is used by nearly three-quarters of Australians aged 13 to 15 and should not be classified as social media because its main activity is hosting videos. A YouTube spokesperson wrote: 'Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media.' Platforms that were already covered by the ban, such as Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok, were unhappy with YouTube's exemption last year and complained that it has key similarities to their products, including letting users interact and recommending content through an algorithm based on activity. Originally, the government had exempted YouTube due to its popularity with teachers but now all accounts for under-16s will be outlawed, with parents and teachers allowed to show videos on it to minors. YouTube have hit back at the decision. Pic:Angela Falkenberg, President of the Australian Primary Principals Association, stated: 'Teachers are always curators of any resource for appropriateness (and) will be judicious.' Adam Marre, Chief Information Security Officer at cybersecurity firm Arctic Wolf, added that social media platforms like YouTube have been flooded with misinformation due to the rise in Artificial Intelligence. He said: 'The Australian government's move to regulate YouTube is an important step in pushing back against the unchecked power of big tech and protecting kids.' The decision now brings a potential legal challenge from Alphabet, the company that owns YouTube, after they already threatened to withdraw some Google services from Australia in 2021 to avoid a law forcing it to pay news outlets for content appearing in searches. Last week, YouTube told Reuters that it had written to the government urging it 'to uphold the integrity of the legislative process'. Australian media then said YouTube threatened a court challenge, but YouTube did not confirm that. Communications Minister Anika Wells told Australian parliament: 'I will not be intimidated by legal threats when this is a genuine fight for the well-being of Australian kids.' The Australian government is due to receive a report in the near future on tests of age-checking products, with the results set to influence the enforcement of the ban introduced last November. Currently, social media platforms that fail to take the 'reasonable steps' to keep out Australians younger than 16 will face a fine of up to A$49.5million (€27.9million).


RTÉ News
3 days ago
- RTÉ News
Australia widens teen social media ban to YouTube, scraps exemption
Australia said it will add YouTube to sites covered by its world-first ban on social media for teenagers, reversing an earlier decision to exempt the Alphabet-owned video-sharing site and potentially setting up a legal challenge. The decision came after the internet regulator urged the government last month to overturn the YouTube carve-out, citing a survey that found 37% of minors reported harmful content on the site, the worst showing for a social media platform. "I'm calling time on it," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a statement, highlighting that Australian children were being negatively affected by online platforms, and reminding social media of their social responsibility. "I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs." The decision broadens the ban set to take effect in December. YouTube said it is used by nearly three-quarters of Australians aged 13 to 15, and should not be classified as social media because its main activity is hosting videos. "Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media," a YouTube spokesperson said by email. Since the government said last year it would exempt YouTube due to its popularity with teachers, platforms covered by the ban, such as Meta's Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok, have complained. They said YouTube has key similarities to their products, including letting users interact and recommending content through an algorithm based on activity. The ban outlaws YouTube accounts for those younger than 16, allowing parents and teachers to show videos on it to minors. "Teachers are always curators of any resource for appropriateness (and) will be judicious," said Angela Falkenberg, president of the Australian Primary Principals Association, which supports the ban. Artificial intelligence has supercharged the spread of misinformation on social media platforms such as YouTube, said Adam Marre, chief information security officer at cyber security firm Arctic Wolf. "The Australian government's move to regulate YouTube is an important step in pushing back against the unchecked power of big tech and protecting kids," he added in an email. The reversal sets up a fresh dispute with Alphabet, which threatened to withdraw some Google services from Australia in 2021 to avoid a law forcing it to pay news outlets for content appearing in searches. Last week, YouTube told Reuters it had written to the government urging it "to uphold the integrity of the legislative process". Australian media said YouTube threatened a court challenge, but YouTube did not confirm that. "I will not be intimidated by legal threats when this is a genuine fight for the well-being of Australian kids, "Communications Minister Anika Wells told parliament today. The law passed in November only requires "reasonable steps" by social media platforms to keep out Australians younger than 16, or face a fine of up to A$49.5 million (€27.9m). The government, which is due to receive a report this month on tests of age-checking products, has said those results will influence enforcement of the ban.