Explained: How new rule tweak frees up stock brokers to invest beyond securities
Government eases investment rules for stockbrokers. Amendment to Securities Contracts Regulation Rules gives clarity. Brokers can now invest surplus funds more freely. Earlier rules restricted investments in non-securities businesses. New rules allow investments unless client funds are involved. This empowers brokers to diversify revenue streams. However, exchange circulars need updating for full clarity.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
In a welcome step for the broking industry, the government has amended Rule 8 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957 ( SCRR ), providing long-awaited clarity on what does not constitute 'business' for a stockbroker. The amendment addresses a long-standing industry concern around regulatory restrictions that limited brokers from investing their own surplus funds in non-securities businesses.Rule 8 of the SCRR lays down the eligibility conditions for a person to act as a stockbroker or a member of a recognised stock exchange . Under sub-rules (1)(f) and (3)(f), brokers are prohibited from engaging in any business other than that of securities, unless such business is carried out without any personal financial liability. This essentially prevented brokers from exposing themselves to financial risks unrelated to their core broking activities.Over time, the National Stock Exchange and the Bombay Stock Exchange issued circulars that significantly widened the interpretation of 'business' under Rule 8 of the SCRR. These circulars clarified that even passive investments in group companies (subsidiary or associate) engaged in non-securities businesses (such as NBFCs, real estate or insurance) would be treated as 'business' and would be in violation of Rule 8. This interpretation created a regulatory overhang that discouraged brokers from investing their own profits outside the securities space.In practice, brokers were restricted from investing their retained earnings or surplus capital into group ventures operating outside the securities domain, even where such investments posed no financial risk to the broker or its clients. This created a significant operational constraint. If a broker wished to invest in a non-securities business, it first had to route profits to its parent, typically via dividends or buybacks, incurring additional tax liabilities before the funds could be redeployed by the parent. This structure was inefficient and deterred brokers from pursuing legitimate investment opportunities that could enhance their business offerings and growth.Recognising these industry concerns, the Ministry of Finance released a consultation paper in September 2024 proposing a more nuanced interpretation of Rule 8. It clarified that the original intent of the restriction was to protect client interests and ensure the financial soundness of the brokers, not to place undue limitations on the use of their own capital. Since stockbrokers are already subject to stringent SEBI regulations aimed at safeguarding client funds, further restricting them from investing in group companies engaged in non-securities businesses under the guise of protecting client funds seemed excessive and unwarranted.This position has now been codified through an amendment to Rule 8. It now clarifies that a broker's investment activity will not be treated as 'business', unless it involves client funds, client securities or creates a financial obligation for the broker. This empowers brokers to freely invest their retained earnings and surplus capital in group companies or unrelated ventures, so long as client interests remain unaffected. Brokers can now participate in broader financial services ecosystems such as lending or insurance through subsidiaries, allowing them to diversify revenue streams and build integrated financial platforms.While this amendment to Rule 8 is now effective and offers much-needed regulatory clarity, it is worth noting that the circulars issued by NSE and BSE interpreting the earlier position have not yet been formally withdrawn. This could create some ambiguity for brokers on how the exchanges will align with the amended Rule 8, particularly given that the validity of the NSE circular had been challenged before the Bombay High Court. Until the exchanges formally update their stance, brokers may continue to face uncertainty in practice despite the regulatory intent to liberalise.(The authors Prashanth Ramdas is Partner and Shivaang Maheshwari is Associate at Khaitan & Co. The views expressed are personal.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Explained: How new rule tweak frees up stock brokers to invest beyond securities
Government eases investment rules for stockbrokers. Amendment to Securities Contracts Regulation Rules gives clarity. Brokers can now invest surplus funds more freely. Earlier rules restricted investments in non-securities businesses. New rules allow investments unless client funds are involved. This empowers brokers to diversify revenue streams. However, exchange circulars need updating for full clarity. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads In a welcome step for the broking industry, the government has amended Rule 8 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957 ( SCRR ), providing long-awaited clarity on what does not constitute 'business' for a stockbroker. The amendment addresses a long-standing industry concern around regulatory restrictions that limited brokers from investing their own surplus funds in non-securities 8 of the SCRR lays down the eligibility conditions for a person to act as a stockbroker or a member of a recognised stock exchange . Under sub-rules (1)(f) and (3)(f), brokers are prohibited from engaging in any business other than that of securities, unless such business is carried out without any personal financial liability. This essentially prevented brokers from exposing themselves to financial risks unrelated to their core broking time, the National Stock Exchange and the Bombay Stock Exchange issued circulars that significantly widened the interpretation of 'business' under Rule 8 of the SCRR. These circulars clarified that even passive investments in group companies (subsidiary or associate) engaged in non-securities businesses (such as NBFCs, real estate or insurance) would be treated as 'business' and would be in violation of Rule 8. This interpretation created a regulatory overhang that discouraged brokers from investing their own profits outside the securities practice, brokers were restricted from investing their retained earnings or surplus capital into group ventures operating outside the securities domain, even where such investments posed no financial risk to the broker or its clients. This created a significant operational constraint. If a broker wished to invest in a non-securities business, it first had to route profits to its parent, typically via dividends or buybacks, incurring additional tax liabilities before the funds could be redeployed by the parent. This structure was inefficient and deterred brokers from pursuing legitimate investment opportunities that could enhance their business offerings and these industry concerns, the Ministry of Finance released a consultation paper in September 2024 proposing a more nuanced interpretation of Rule 8. It clarified that the original intent of the restriction was to protect client interests and ensure the financial soundness of the brokers, not to place undue limitations on the use of their own capital. Since stockbrokers are already subject to stringent SEBI regulations aimed at safeguarding client funds, further restricting them from investing in group companies engaged in non-securities businesses under the guise of protecting client funds seemed excessive and position has now been codified through an amendment to Rule 8. It now clarifies that a broker's investment activity will not be treated as 'business', unless it involves client funds, client securities or creates a financial obligation for the broker. This empowers brokers to freely invest their retained earnings and surplus capital in group companies or unrelated ventures, so long as client interests remain unaffected. Brokers can now participate in broader financial services ecosystems such as lending or insurance through subsidiaries, allowing them to diversify revenue streams and build integrated financial this amendment to Rule 8 is now effective and offers much-needed regulatory clarity, it is worth noting that the circulars issued by NSE and BSE interpreting the earlier position have not yet been formally withdrawn. This could create some ambiguity for brokers on how the exchanges will align with the amended Rule 8, particularly given that the validity of the NSE circular had been challenged before the Bombay High Court. Until the exchanges formally update their stance, brokers may continue to face uncertainty in practice despite the regulatory intent to liberalise.(The authors Prashanth Ramdas is Partner and Shivaang Maheshwari is Associate at Khaitan & Co. The views expressed are personal.)
Hindustan Times
9 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Farmers first: Rules framed to check wily loan sharks
MUMBAI: Given Maharashtra's history of suicides among farmers – approximately 2700 to 2800 each year for the last seven to eight years – and growing complaints of extra interest rates being levied on farm loans followed by land grabs, the state government has devised a method to keep private money lenders in check. The state's co-operation department has made it mandatory for the 12,000-odd private money lenders to display the details of their licence numbers and the interest charged on loans on a board outside their offices or shops, and has warned of strict action should they fail to comply. There are more than 12,000 private money lenders registered under Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act 2014, who disburse a corpus of annual lending to farmers and people from the lower strata adding up to ₹1000 crore, annually. Loans are given for both agricultural and non-agricultural reasons, such as construction of houses, marriages of children etc, at varying interest rates. Money lent to farmers at 9% interest comes with mortgaged land while without mortgage the loan is disbursed at 12% interest rate. According to the Act, non-farmers, such as labourers and small business holders, are charged 3% more than the rate applicable to farmers, which stands at 15% to 18% for mortgaged and non-mortgaged loans respectively. Despite defined rules, the state government has routinely received complaints of exploitation of farmers by private money lenders, who purportedly loot them taking advantage of their illiteracy. Therefore, the co-operation department has issued the circular for money lenders to follow on June 2. 'The money lenders have been mandated to display the lending rates and licence numbers outside their offices on specified sized boards no later than June 15. The deputy district registrars (DDR) of the co-operation department have been asked to take action against the violations by the lenders,' said Praveen Darade, principal secretary, co-operation department. DDRs have been asked to submit reports of compliance by the lenders in their district with photographic evidence. 'The DDR will not renew the licences, which is mandatory every year, unless lenders adhere to the rules,' said another official from the department. Money lenders who fail to comply by the rules or unregistered money lenders in business will face action. 'The lending by anybody not holding a licence is illegal and will attract action under the Act. We have been getting complaints of land grabbing by such entities when farmers fail to repay their loans. Since the Act came into force in 2014, the government has given over 750 hectares of farm land back to the farmers grabbed by the lenders,' said another officer from the department. The state government is also tweaking its order to delegate power at lower levels for effective action against the illegal lenders. 'All districts have committees comprising collector, superintendent of police (SP) and DDR constituted to take stock of the complaints against the illegal lenders. Since the collectors and SPs are overburdened, we are asking them to delegate powers to their deputies such as additional collectors or additional SPs, and make them a part of the committees. It would help us in effective and speedy action against the illegal leaders,' the officer added.
Time of India
14 hours ago
- Time of India
After collector rate, conversion charges set to see steep hike in Chandigarh
Chandigarh: A steep hike in conversion charges will soon be made effective, with the UT deputy commissioner office submitting the proposal to the Chandigarh administration for the revision of charges for the conversion of leasehold residential property to freehold, based on the increased collector rates. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The charges differ across categories, but officials state that the increase will be at least double the existing rates. The conversion charges were fixed as per the 2017 notification and collector rates. As per the latest proposal, the conversion rates will be revised annually in line with the annual collector rate revision. Nishant Kumar Yadav, deputy commissioner and estate officer, said, "We submitted the proposal for the revision of the conversion rates in furtherance of the 2017 notification. These will be based on the revised collector rates. As and when the collector rate is further revised, conversion charges shall also be revised/updated on the said revised collector rates in the future." The last revision in conversion charges was done on the basis of the UT notification dated October 24, 2017. The Chandigarh Conversion of Residential Leasehold Land Tenure into Freehold Land Tenure, Rules, 1996, govern the conversion modalities. Collector rates were increased 2 to 4 times with effect from April 1, 2025. Previously, the collector rate revision was done three and a half years ago, in 2021. The collector rate is the lowest rate at which a property is registered. The conversion from leasehold to freehold is permitted in the residential property segment after the payment of the conversion charges. The conversion charges are based on the collector rates. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now It is a percentage of the collector rate, which differs depending upon plot size and zone (sectors). For properties measuring between 0 to 50 sq m, there are no conversion charges. It is 7.5% of the collector rate for properties between 51 to 150 sq m. For properties ranging between 151 to 250 sq m, the rate is 10% of the collector rate. For 250 to 350 sq m residential properties, it is 15%. Properties with an area ranging between 351 sq m to 500 sq m have a conversion rate of 20% of the collector rate. For properties having an area ranging from 500 sq m to 1000 sq m, it is 22.5%. For residential properties above 1000 sq m, the conversion charges applicable are 25% of the notified land rate. For instance, for a 150 sq m residential property in Sector 15, the revised conversion rate will be around Rs 19 lakh, while the previous rate was Rs 10 lakh. The final charges to be paid are calculated based on a specific formula for each category of property. The conversion charges for the Milk Colony Dhanas will also be notified now. "The conversion rates for other residential sites were revised vide notification dated 24.10.2017; however, the notification was silent about the conversion rates for Milk Colony Dhanas. Now, the conversion rates in respect of sites of Milk Colony Dhanas can also be calculated on the same pattern as for other residential sectors of Chandigarh," states the estate office letter to the administration. **BOX 1** **CONVERSION RATES are Based on OLD/NEW COLLECTOR RATES** **Residential Urban Area | 2017 Collector Rates | 2025 Collector Rates** Sector 1 to 12 | Rs 93,587 per sq m | Rs 2,13,606 per sq m Sector 14 to 37 | Rs 88,908 per sq m | Rs 1,76,530 per sq m Sector 38 onward | Rs 84,227 per sq m | Rs 1,53,327 per sq m
