
French MPs mull bill to bring back village bars and cafes
France had some 200,000 cafes in 1960, often serving as the social centre of gravity for communities around the country.
By 2015, that number had fallen to just 36,000, with most closures in rural areas, according to a 2017 report from the France Boissons industry body and the CREDOC consumer studies agency.
Centrist lawmaker Guillaume Kasbarian has proposed a bill to bring back cafes and bars to remote countryside areas.
"Reopening cafes means bringing French villages back to life," Kasbarian said last week, arguing it would reknit social ties, boost local economies and create jobs.
Under French law, a Type IV alcohol licence allows consumption of alcoholic beverages, including those containing more than 18 percent alcohol such as spirits.
But no new such permit can be created, and aspiring bar managers must often wait until another type-4 bar closes permanently to acquire their licence from them, in what Kasbarian says is a long and complicated process.
The new legislation would allow cafe owners in rural municipalities with less than 3,500 inhabitants that do not already have a type-4 bar to request a brand-new permit instead of waiting for an old one to become free.
It is difficult to estimate how many villages could benefit from such a law, but 31,000 out of 35,000 rural municipalities have less than 3,500 inhabitants, according to the association of French mayors.
Detractors of the bill fear a rise in alcohol consumption in areas where social services to help people fight addiction are not readily available.
They have questioned why the law needs to allow the consumption of spirits in villages, and why a Type III licence that allows the selling of beer and wine is not sufficient.
Supporters have said the measure is important to draw residents out of isolation, and that hard liquor is available for sale at nearby supermarkets anyway.
Alcohol causes 49,000 deaths each year, according to the French health ministry's website.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

LeMonde
3 hours ago
- LeMonde
Attack on Iran derails France's plans to recognize a Palestinian state
Emmanuel Macron wanted to make history. He aimed to be at the forefront of a "political solution" to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict by launching an international "momentum" centered on France's recognition of a Palestinian state, as he put it. The date for this "path to peace" was set for Wednesday, June 18. In New York, from the United Nations headquarters, the French president, together with Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, was to revive the two-state solution, which has fallen out of favor for many years. But all of Macron's ambitions were dashed on Friday morning. Israeli strikes in Iran destroyed nuclear and military sites belonging to the regime and, in Israeli terms, "decapitated" the Iranian general staff, disrupting the geopolitical calendar. The United Nations conference was postponed indefinitely. Officially, for "logistical" and "security" reasons, Macron said at a press conference held at the Elysée on evening. "The crown prince, like the president of the Palestinian Authority, told me that they were not in a logistical, physical, security, or political position to travel to New York," he said. Macron insisted this was "pure realism."


France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
France says supports Harvard, welcomes foreign students
"We stand with universities facing the threat of government control, restriction to their funding, constraints on their curricula or research projects," Jean-Noel Barrot said during a commencement address at the high-profile HEC business school in Paris. "We stand with Harvard faculty, with Harvard students, facing unjustified stress and anxiety right now," he added in English. "Should US courts uphold decisions to ban international students, France will offer (them) a safe place to complete their degrees," he said. Universities and research facilities in the United States have come under increasing political and financial pressure under Trump, including with threats of massive federal funding cuts. Harvard has been at the forefront of Trump's campaign against top American universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and "viewpoint diversity". A US court last week put a temporary stay on Trump's latest effort to stop foreign students from enrolling at Harvard. A White House proclamation a day earlier had sought to bar most new international students at Harvard from entering the country, and said existing foreign enrollees risked having their visas terminated. The US government has already cut around $3.2 billion of federal grants and contracts benefiting Harvard and pledged to exclude the institution from any future federal funding. France and the European Union are seeking to encourage disgruntled researchers to relocate from the United States to Europe. European Commission head Ursula von der Leyen said last month that the EU would launch a new incentives package worth 500 million euros ($580 million) to make the 27-nation bloc "a magnet for researchers". French President Emmanuel Macron in April unveiled plans for a funding programme to help national universities and other research bodies cover the cost of bringing foreign scientists to the country. © 2025 AFP

LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
Philip Gordon, former Kamala Harris adviser: 'Netanyahu called Trump's bluff' by striking Iran
Philip Gordon, former national security adviser to Vice President Kamala Harris, is a committed Europhile and fluent French speaker who was considered for a key position in her future administration, had the Democrats won. In April, Gordon joined the Brookings Institution think tank. He spoke with Le Monde about the early months of Donald Trump's second term. The Trump administration seemed to be pursuing negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program, but then Trump expressed support for Israeli military strikes. Did he just run out of patience with Iran? I am skeptical of the notion that Trump masterfully lulled Iran into complacency with diplomacy and then decided to enforce his "redline" with military force. Trump desperately wanted a nuclear deal with Iran and publicly and privately told Israel not to strike. But a confident Netanyahu called Trump's bluff, told him Israel needed to act, and Trump felt no choice but to go along. He now has to act as if this was his call, but in so doing finds himself having to defend Israel in a war he did not want but could not prevent.