
The attack on education in Gaza is a warning for the world
On January 6, 2025, the American Historical Association (AHA) overwhelmingly voted in favour of a resolution titled 'Resolution to Oppose Scholasticide in Gaza'—a move that explicitly condemned the destruction of Palestinian education by the Israeli military.
Proposed by Historians for Peace and Democracy, the resolution passed with 428 members in favour, 88 against, and four abstentions. It underscored how Israel's military campaign in Gaza, bolstered by over $12.5 billion in U.S. military aid from October 2023 to June 2024, had effectively obliterated Gaza's education system.
UN experts warned as early as April 2024 that Israel's attacks on schools, universities, teachers, and students amounted to a deliberate effort to eradicate Palestinian education—an act defined as scholasticide.
Scholasticide is often an overlooked aspect of imperial warfare, but its consequences are complex and long-lasting.
The term scholasticide refers to the systematic destruction of educational institutions, scholars, and knowledge systems as a means of suppressing a people's cultural and intellectual future. Coined by the Palestinian scholar Karma Nabulsi, the concept has deep historical roots, aligning with broader frameworks of epistemic violence and cultural genocide.
In an interview with Democracy Now, Sherene Seikaly, a professor at UC Santa Barbara and editor of the Journal of Palestine Studies, spoke about the AHA conference, declaring that the victory of the resolution represented a moment of resistance against the ongoing obliteration of Palestinian intellectual life.
'Since October 2023, Israel, armed, aided and abetted by the United States, has destroyed 80% of the schools in the Gaza Strip and every single university. And another thing that I think is often put to the side or marginalised, and we really have to centre as historians, is that almost every single archive, library and bookstore have been bombed and destroyed by Israel. And so, this genocide is really attempting to destroy our capacity to narrate our past and to imagine our future.'
In Gaza, reports confirmed that by December 2024 more than 230 schools had been destroyed, and at least 140,000 students had been left without access to formal education.
The statistics are staggering, with 261 teachers and 95 university professors killed, dozens of universities bombed beyond repair, and nearly half a million students displaced from their learning environments.
This is not collateral damage but an intentional war against Palestinian intellectual survival. Schools and universities are deliberately bombed under the justification that they harbour 'militants,' despite being filled with students and faculty members. This mirrors historical instances of colonial and imperialist regimes targeting education as a means of eradicating resistance, identity, and intellectual autonomy.
Education has always been a battleground in imperialist warfare.
Throughout history, imperialist regimes have deliberately destroyed indigenous education systems to control, assimilate, or eliminate colonised peoples. The term 'epistemic violence' describes how dominant groups erase, suppress, or devalue the knowledge systems of the colonised.
British colonialism in India saw the deliberate dismantling of centuries-old learning institutions in favour of English-language education policies, a system formalised in 1835 under Thomas Macaulay's infamous "Minute on Indian Education", a pivotal document in the history of British colonial education policy in India. Macaulay argued for the promotion of English education in India and for the systematic undermining of local languages and literatures.
Similarly, in the Americas, the Spanish conquest of the sixteenth century led to the wholesale destruction of indigenous libraries, including the systematic burning of Mayan codices in 1562 by Bishop Diego de Landa, who saw them as heretical. Only a few fragments of these rich intellectual traditions survive today.
French colonial rule in Algeria in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries systematically suppressed Arabic-language education, closing Islamic madrasas and replacing them with French-language schools that sought to erase Algerian identity.
Similar policies were enacted in West Africa, where France's policy of assimilation ensured that local histories and languages were effectively erased from curricula. For example, in Senegal, the French colonial government imposed a curriculum that was entirely based on French values and history. This meant that the rich oral traditions, local folklore, and histories of the Senegalese people were excluded from education.
These historical precedents demonstrate how education is not merely a neutral institution but a deeply political one, weaponised to maintain control over subjugated peoples.
In the event of epistemic violence and culture erasure, many scholars are rejecting neutrality. Edward Said reminds us that the major task of the intellectual is to 'reveal the disparity between the so-called two sides, which appear rhetorically and ideologically to be in perfect balance but are not in fact. To reveal that there is an oppressed and an oppressor, a victim and a victimiser, and unless we recognise that, we are nowhere'.
Imperial regimes have always targeted centres of knowledge production. When a people's intellectual foundation is destroyed, so is their ability to resist, rebuild, and reclaim their autonomy.
In the face of cultural genocide and epistemic erasure, we must focus on restoring and revitalising traditional knowledge systems, which are systematically undermined by colonial powers.
This involves not only protecting local languages and cultural practices but also integrating traditional knowledge into contemporary education frameworks. Oral traditions and other community-based knowledge sharing practices should be given due appreciation and funding alongside the formal education systems that have historically marginalised them.
Leveraging modern technology also presents an opportunity for historically oppressed communities to bypass traditional barriers to education and knowledge preservation. Digital platforms can serve as modern archives for indigenous knowledge, providing access to resources that have been denied or distorted in mainstream educational systems.
Decolonising education is a critical step, which requires dismantling curricula that have long been rooted in Western, colonial ideologies. This isn't just about adding indigenous perspectives but rethinking the very foundation of what is considered valuable knowledge.
By shifting from a Eurocentric model to one that equally honours local epistemologies, we must challenge who holds the authority over knowledge, ensuring that threatened communities themselves are the driving force behind initiatives for change.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
US slams UN conference on Israel-Palestinian issue, warns of consequences
PARIS: U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is discouraging governments around the world from attending a U.N. conference next week on a possible two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians, according to a U.S. cable seen by Reuters. The diplomatic demarche, sent on Tuesday, says countries that take 'anti-Israel actions' following the conference will be viewed as acting in opposition to U.S. foreign policy interests and could face diplomatic consequences from Washington. The demarche, which was not previously reported, runs squarely against the diplomacy of two close allies France and Saudi Arabia, who are co-hosting the gathering next week in New York that aims to lay out the parameters for a roadmap to a Palestinian state, while ensuring Israel's security. 'We are urging governments not to participate in the conference, which we view as counterproductive to ongoing, life-saving efforts to end the war in Gaza and free hostages,' read the cable. President Emmanuel Macron has suggested France could recognise a Palestinian state in Israeli-occupied territories at the conference. French officials say they have been working to avoid a clash with the U.S., Israel's staunchest major ally. UN conference on two-state solution to Mideast conflict set for June 'The United States opposes any steps that would unilaterally recognise a conjectural Palestinian state, which adds significant legal and political obstacles to the eventual resolution of the conflict and could coerce Israel during a war, thereby supporting its enemies,' the cable read. The United States for decades backed a two-state solution between the Israelis and the Palestinians that would create a state for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza alongside Israel. Trump, in his first term, was relatively tepid in his approach to a two-state solution, a longtime pillar of U.S. Middle East policy. The Republican president has given little sign of where he stands on the issue in his second term. But on Tuesday, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, a long-time vocal supporter of Israel, said he did not think an independent Palestinian state remained a U.S. foreign policy goal. Gaza war 'Unilaterally recognizing a Palestinian state would effectively render Oct. 7 Palestinian Independence Day,' the cable read, referring to when Palestinian Hamas carried out a cross-border attack from Gaza on Israel in 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking about 250 hostages. Hamas' attack triggered Israel's air and ground war in Gaza in which almost 55,000 Palestinians have been killed, most of the 2.3 million population displaced and the enclave widely reduced to rubble. If Macron went ahead, France, home to Europe's largest Jewish and Muslim communities, would become the first Western heavyweight to recognise a Palestinian state. This could lend greater momentum to a movement hitherto dominated by smaller nations generally more critical of Israel. Macron's stance has shifted amid Israel's intensified Gaza offensive and escalating violence against Palestinians by Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank, and there is a growing sense of urgency in Paris to act now before the idea of a two-state solution vanishes forever. The U.S. cable said Washington had worked tirelessly with Egypt and Qatar to reach a ceasefire in Gaza, free the hostages and end the conflict. 'This conference undermines these delicate negotiations and emboldens Hamas at a time when the terrorist group has rejected proposals by the negotiators that Israel has accepted.' This week Britain and Canada, also G7 allies of the United States, were joined by other countries in placing sanctions on two Israeli far-right government ministers to pressure Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to bring the Gaza war to an end. 'The United States opposes the implied support of the conference for potential actions including boycotts and sanctions on Israel as well as other punitive measures,' the cable read. Israel has repeatedly criticised the conference, saying it rewards Hamas for the attack on Israel, and it has lobbied France against recognising a Palestinian state. 'Nothing surprises me anymore, but I don't see how many countries could step back on their participation,' said a European diplomat, who asked for anonymity due to the subject's sensitivity. 'This is bullying, and of a stupid type.' The U.S. State Department and the French Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment.


Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Israeli strike kills one in Lebanon's south: ministry
BEIRUT: One person was killed on Wednesday in an Israeli strike on a village in southern Lebanon, the health ministry reported, the latest deadly attack despite a November ceasefire. 'The raid carried out by an enemy Israeli drone on the town of Beit Lif, in the Bint Jbeil district, resulted in one martyr and three people injured,' read a statement from the ministry. The official National News Agency said the strike targeted a house's courtyard in the town, adding that a missile hit the homeowner's car. Israeli gunfire, airstrikes kill 60 in Gaza, many near aid site, medics say Israel has regularly bombed its northern neighbour since the November ceasefire that sought to end more than a year of hostilities with group Hezbollah including two months of full-blown war. The agreement required Hezbollah fighters to withdraw north of the Litani river, about 30 kilometres (20 miles) from the Israeli border, and dismantle all military infrastructure to its south. It also required Israel to withdraw all of its troops from Lebanon, but it has kept them in five positions it deems 'strategic'.


Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Trump says he's less confident about nuclear deal with Iran
WASHINGTON: U.S. President Donald Trump said he was less confident that Iran will agree to stop uranium enrichment in a nuclear deal with Washington, according to an interview released on Wednesday. 'I don't know,' Trump told the 'Pod Force One' podcast on Monday when asked if he thought he could get Iran to agree to shut down its nuclear program. 'I don't know. I did think so, and I'm getting more and more — less confident about it.' Trump has been seeking a new nuclear deal to place limits on Iran's disputed uranium enrichment activities and has threatened the Islamic Republic with bombing if no agreement is reached. He told reporters at the White House on Monday that he had discussed Iran with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday and said talks with Iranians were 'tough.' In the podcast interview, Trump said the Iranians seem to be using delaying tactics. 'I'm less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago. Something happened to them, but I am much less confident of a deal being made,' he said. Trump repeated that Washington would not allow Tehran to develop nuclear bombs - by enriching uranium to high levels of fissile purity - whether or not a deal is reached. Iran says new round of US talks planned for Sunday 'But it would be nicer to do it without warfare, without people dying, it's so much nicer to do it. But I don't think I see the same level of enthusiasm for them to make a deal.' Iran has long said it has no plans to develop nuclear weapon and is only interested in atomic power generation and other peaceful projects. Russia said on Wednesday it stood ready to remove highly enriched uranium from Iran and convert it into civilian reactor fuel as a potential way to narrow U.S.-Iranian differences. Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov, who oversees arms control and U.S. relations, told Russian media that efforts to reach a solution should be redoubled and that Moscow was willing to help in practical ways. 'We are ready to provide assistance to both Washington and Tehran, not only politically, not only in the form of ideas that could be of use in the negotiation process, but also practically: for example, through the export of excess nuclear material produced by Iran and its subsequent adaptation to the production of fuel for reactors,' Ryabkov said. He did not make clear whether the nuclear fuel would then be returned to Iran for use in its civil nuclear energy programme, which Moscow has helped develop. During his first White House term, Trump withdrew the U.S. from a 2015 deal between Iran and world powers that placed limits on Tehran's uranium enrichment drive in exchange for relief from international sanctions.