
Minister plays down American review of AUKUS deal
A US review of a deal to provide Australia with nuclear submarines is routine, the defence minister says, despite calls for a backup plan in case the Trump administration scraps AUKUS.
The Pentagon on Thursday announced a review of the three-nation pact that would give Australia nuclear submarines, to see if the agreement lined up with President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda.
But Defence Minister Richard Marles has downplayed the significance of the review, saying it's standard procedure.
"We engaged with the United Kingdom when they did their review, which is perfectly natural, and of course, when we did the defence strategic review, we also went to both the United States and the United Kingdom and sought their views," the acting prime minister told ABC Radio on Monday.
"It's a pretty natural process that we all engage in each other's reviews.
"We'll engage with the reviews and the (US) Department of Defense about how AUKUS is tracking in Australia."
The AUKUS deal is set to be raised when Prime Minister Anthony Albanese meets with Mr Trump for a one-on-one meeting on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada on Tuesday.
The American review has prompted calls for the federal government to consider a contingency plan in the event the submarine deal is called off.
One-time coalition deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce said the US review was a concern.
"You should have a contingency plan, as soon as the United States said 'we're reviewing AUKUS', alarm bells should have rung everywhere," he told Seven's Sunrise program.
"We absolutely should have a contingency plan, but I haven't heard of any contingency plan."
Under the $368 billion program, Australia will buy at least three Virginia-class submarines from the US sometime in the early 2030s.
A new class of nuclear submarines will be built in Adelaide to be delivered in the 2040s.
Former Australian ambassador to the US Arthur Sinodinos said he was confident AUKUS would survive.
"There's a lot of bipartisan support for the deal, from day one in the (US) Congress, both Republican and Democrat," he told the Seven Network.
"Trump himself would see that we're pulling our weight, we're going to spend $370 billion."
Mr Sinodinos, who was ambassador when the deal was announced in 2021 under then-prime minister Scott Morrison, said if the US backed away from the agreement, that would play into the hands of China.
"If we look at any stage like we're second guessing ourselves, or we're not committed to really doing this ... the Chinese will say, 'well, look at the end of the day, they're all paper tigers'," he said.
"The Americans see that by having more subs actually built in the region, and being serviced in the region, that enhances their capacity to do things in the region.
"We don't need a plan B."
A US review of a deal to provide Australia with nuclear submarines is routine, the defence minister says, despite calls for a backup plan in case the Trump administration scraps AUKUS.
The Pentagon on Thursday announced a review of the three-nation pact that would give Australia nuclear submarines, to see if the agreement lined up with President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda.
But Defence Minister Richard Marles has downplayed the significance of the review, saying it's standard procedure.
"We engaged with the United Kingdom when they did their review, which is perfectly natural, and of course, when we did the defence strategic review, we also went to both the United States and the United Kingdom and sought their views," the acting prime minister told ABC Radio on Monday.
"It's a pretty natural process that we all engage in each other's reviews.
"We'll engage with the reviews and the (US) Department of Defense about how AUKUS is tracking in Australia."
The AUKUS deal is set to be raised when Prime Minister Anthony Albanese meets with Mr Trump for a one-on-one meeting on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada on Tuesday.
The American review has prompted calls for the federal government to consider a contingency plan in the event the submarine deal is called off.
One-time coalition deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce said the US review was a concern.
"You should have a contingency plan, as soon as the United States said 'we're reviewing AUKUS', alarm bells should have rung everywhere," he told Seven's Sunrise program.
"We absolutely should have a contingency plan, but I haven't heard of any contingency plan."
Under the $368 billion program, Australia will buy at least three Virginia-class submarines from the US sometime in the early 2030s.
A new class of nuclear submarines will be built in Adelaide to be delivered in the 2040s.
Former Australian ambassador to the US Arthur Sinodinos said he was confident AUKUS would survive.
"There's a lot of bipartisan support for the deal, from day one in the (US) Congress, both Republican and Democrat," he told the Seven Network.
"Trump himself would see that we're pulling our weight, we're going to spend $370 billion."
Mr Sinodinos, who was ambassador when the deal was announced in 2021 under then-prime minister Scott Morrison, said if the US backed away from the agreement, that would play into the hands of China.
"If we look at any stage like we're second guessing ourselves, or we're not committed to really doing this ... the Chinese will say, 'well, look at the end of the day, they're all paper tigers'," he said.
"The Americans see that by having more subs actually built in the region, and being serviced in the region, that enhances their capacity to do things in the region.
"We don't need a plan B."
A US review of a deal to provide Australia with nuclear submarines is routine, the defence minister says, despite calls for a backup plan in case the Trump administration scraps AUKUS.
The Pentagon on Thursday announced a review of the three-nation pact that would give Australia nuclear submarines, to see if the agreement lined up with President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda.
But Defence Minister Richard Marles has downplayed the significance of the review, saying it's standard procedure.
"We engaged with the United Kingdom when they did their review, which is perfectly natural, and of course, when we did the defence strategic review, we also went to both the United States and the United Kingdom and sought their views," the acting prime minister told ABC Radio on Monday.
"It's a pretty natural process that we all engage in each other's reviews.
"We'll engage with the reviews and the (US) Department of Defense about how AUKUS is tracking in Australia."
The AUKUS deal is set to be raised when Prime Minister Anthony Albanese meets with Mr Trump for a one-on-one meeting on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada on Tuesday.
The American review has prompted calls for the federal government to consider a contingency plan in the event the submarine deal is called off.
One-time coalition deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce said the US review was a concern.
"You should have a contingency plan, as soon as the United States said 'we're reviewing AUKUS', alarm bells should have rung everywhere," he told Seven's Sunrise program.
"We absolutely should have a contingency plan, but I haven't heard of any contingency plan."
Under the $368 billion program, Australia will buy at least three Virginia-class submarines from the US sometime in the early 2030s.
A new class of nuclear submarines will be built in Adelaide to be delivered in the 2040s.
Former Australian ambassador to the US Arthur Sinodinos said he was confident AUKUS would survive.
"There's a lot of bipartisan support for the deal, from day one in the (US) Congress, both Republican and Democrat," he told the Seven Network.
"Trump himself would see that we're pulling our weight, we're going to spend $370 billion."
Mr Sinodinos, who was ambassador when the deal was announced in 2021 under then-prime minister Scott Morrison, said if the US backed away from the agreement, that would play into the hands of China.
"If we look at any stage like we're second guessing ourselves, or we're not committed to really doing this ... the Chinese will say, 'well, look at the end of the day, they're all paper tigers'," he said.
"The Americans see that by having more subs actually built in the region, and being serviced in the region, that enhances their capacity to do things in the region.
"We don't need a plan B."
A US review of a deal to provide Australia with nuclear submarines is routine, the defence minister says, despite calls for a backup plan in case the Trump administration scraps AUKUS.
The Pentagon on Thursday announced a review of the three-nation pact that would give Australia nuclear submarines, to see if the agreement lined up with President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda.
But Defence Minister Richard Marles has downplayed the significance of the review, saying it's standard procedure.
"We engaged with the United Kingdom when they did their review, which is perfectly natural, and of course, when we did the defence strategic review, we also went to both the United States and the United Kingdom and sought their views," the acting prime minister told ABC Radio on Monday.
"It's a pretty natural process that we all engage in each other's reviews.
"We'll engage with the reviews and the (US) Department of Defense about how AUKUS is tracking in Australia."
The AUKUS deal is set to be raised when Prime Minister Anthony Albanese meets with Mr Trump for a one-on-one meeting on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada on Tuesday.
The American review has prompted calls for the federal government to consider a contingency plan in the event the submarine deal is called off.
One-time coalition deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce said the US review was a concern.
"You should have a contingency plan, as soon as the United States said 'we're reviewing AUKUS', alarm bells should have rung everywhere," he told Seven's Sunrise program.
"We absolutely should have a contingency plan, but I haven't heard of any contingency plan."
Under the $368 billion program, Australia will buy at least three Virginia-class submarines from the US sometime in the early 2030s.
A new class of nuclear submarines will be built in Adelaide to be delivered in the 2040s.
Former Australian ambassador to the US Arthur Sinodinos said he was confident AUKUS would survive.
"There's a lot of bipartisan support for the deal, from day one in the (US) Congress, both Republican and Democrat," he told the Seven Network.
"Trump himself would see that we're pulling our weight, we're going to spend $370 billion."
Mr Sinodinos, who was ambassador when the deal was announced in 2021 under then-prime minister Scott Morrison, said if the US backed away from the agreement, that would play into the hands of China.
"If we look at any stage like we're second guessing ourselves, or we're not committed to really doing this ... the Chinese will say, 'well, look at the end of the day, they're all paper tigers'," he said.
"The Americans see that by having more subs actually built in the region, and being serviced in the region, that enhances their capacity to do things in the region.
"We don't need a plan B."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
40 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
As Trump covets Greenland, Macron detours to say it's not for sale
Nuuk, Greenland: French President Emmanuel Macron warned that Greenland is 'not to be sold' nor 'to be taken' during a key visit on Sunday to the strategic Arctic territory coveted by US President Donald Trump, saying he's conveying a message of French and European solidarity. Macron expressed strong criticism of Trump's intention to take control of the territory. 'In a few words: everybody in France, the European Union, thinks that Greenland is not to be sold, not to be taken,' he said during a news conference, applauded by the local crowd. 'The situation in Greenland is clearly a wake-up call for all Europeans. Let me tell you very directly that you're not alone,' Macron added. Sunday's symbolic stop in Greenland comes as the French leader is on his way to a summit of the Group of Seven leading industrialised nations in Canada that will also be attended by Trump. Macron was greeted in Nuuk, the territory's capital, by Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen. Asked whether France would be ready to militarily support Greenland if Trump decided to invade, Macron declined to discuss the hypothesis. 'I won't start elaborating on 'what if' scenarios publicly,' he said. 'Because I don't believe that in the end, the US, which is an ally and a friend, would ever do something aggressive against another ally.'

Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Canada is good middle ground for Albanese to meet Trump
Australia has reason to be thankful that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's first meeting with US President Donald Trump is not taking place in Washington. Trump is fond of having visiting political leaders pay court in the White House. He has been suitably gracious to some, but his unpredictability when meeting friendly allies means things can go horribly wrong, as when Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky went to the Oval Office in March only to be humiliated, bullied and sent packing. Australia has maintained close links with the US for generations, but Trump's unpredictable nature does not guarantee he will extend the hand of friendship when he meets Albanese at this week's Group of Seven meeting in Kananaskis, Canada. That said, Trump certainly behaves when overseas: he holstered his bravado when subsequently meeting Zelensky at Pope Francis' funeral in Rome. But the US president will also be mindful that he is visiting the land of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who achieved a remarkable comeback victory for the governing Liberals in April by partly positioning himself for a global role as a champion of multilateralism against Trump's more protectionist policies. Carney is not only building a coalition of like-minded countries to counterbalance Trump's shadow-boxing on long-standing arrangements, but the cornerstones in his successive campaign were the US president's ill-considered threat to annex Canada and make it the 51st state and his opponent's Trumpian policies. Trump's bluster vanished when the pair met at the White House recently, and the host was all sweetness and light. 'He won a very big election in Canada, and I think I was probably the greatest thing that happened to him,' Trump said. 'But I can't take full credit.' Loading Albanese met Carney on Monday and emerged saying he defined success with Trump as being able to argue Australia's case. The two men meet later this week at a time when there are an unusual number of sticking points in the once smooth Australia-US relationship. Their meeting comes after US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth called for Australia to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP – a potential increase of about $40 billion annually and nearly double the current level of 2 per cent – and after US Under Secretary of Defence for Policy, Elbridge Colby, announced a review of the AUKUS submarine pact last week. Admirably, Albanese parried such crude attempts at brinkmanship and strongman tactics.

Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Bibles, golf courses and crypto: How Donald Trump made his money in 2024
A meme coin released this year by the president – $USTRUMP – alone has earned an estimated $US320 million in fees, although it is not publicly known how that amount has been divided between a Trump-controlled entity and its partners. In addition to the meme coin fees, the Trump family has raked in more than $US400 million from World Liberty Financial, a decentralised finance company. The Trump family is involved, also, with a bitcoin mining operation and digital asset exchange-traded funds. In the disclosures, Trump reported $US57.35 million from token sales at World Liberty. He also reported holding 15.75 billion governance tokens in the venture. The wealth of the Republican businessman-turned-politician ranges from crypto to real estate, and a large part on paper is tied up in his stake in Trump Media & Technology Group, owner of social media platform Truth Social. Besides assets and revenues from his business ventures, Trump reported at least $US12 million in income, including through interest and dividends, from passive investments totaling at least $US211 million, a Reuters calculation shows. His biggest investments were in alternative fund manager Blue Owl Capital Corp and in government bond funds managed by Charles Schwab and Invesco. The disclosure often only gave ranges for the value of his assets and income; Reuters used the lower amount listed, meaning the total value of his assets and income was almost certainly higher. The disclosure showed income from various assets including Trump's properties in Florida. Trump's three golf-focused resorts in the state – Jupiter, Doral and West Palm Beach – plus his nearby private members' club at Mar-a-Lago generated at least $US217.7 million in income, according to the filing. Trump National Doral, the expansive Miami-area golf hub known for its Blue Monster course, was the family's single largest income source at $US110.4 million. The income figures provided are essentially revenue, not net profits after subtracting costs. Loading The disclosure underlined the global nature of the Trump family business, listing income of $US5 million in licence fees from a development in Vietnam, $US10 million in development fees from a project in India and almost $US16 million in licensing fees for a Dubai project. Trump collected royalty money, also, from a variety of deals – $US1.3 million from the Greenwood Bible (its website describes it as 'the only Bible officially endorsed by [country singer] Lee Greenwood and President Trump'); $US2.8 million from Trump Watches, and $US2.5 million from Trump Sneakers and Fragrances. Trump listed $US1.16 million in income from his NFTs – digital trading cards in his likeness – while first lady Melania Trump earned about $US216,700 from licence fees on her own NFT collection.