Warren Buffett's favourite valuation indicator flashes buy signal
[NEW YORK] A key valuation metric touted by legendary investor Warren Buffett is signalling that equities are relatively cheap, bolstering the case that the sizzling rebound in US stocks has room to run.
The 'Buffett Indicator' measures the ratio of the total value of the US stock market via the Wilshire 5000 Index divided by the dollar value of US gross domestic product. It stands at its lowest level since early September – even after a bounce that has sent stocks screaming higher in recent weeks.
The 94-year-old chief executive of Berkshire Hathaway, which will hold its annual meeting in Omaha, Nebraska, this weekend, has said the 'single best measure of where valuations stand' was the ratio of the value of US publicly traded companies to the country's GDP. The indicator blared a warning late last year when it shot to a historic high, echoing similar signals sent during market peaks in 2021 and before the bursting of the dot-com bubble in 2000.
The measure is now at 180 per cent, around where it stood after an unwind of the Japanese yen carry trade sparked a brief but intense selloff last year. That stock-market rout cleared the path for a powerful S&P 500 Index rally in the closing months of 2024.
'This is a crucial indicator because it helps traders know when to deploy capital and buy stocks,' said Adam Sarhan, founder of 50 Park Investments, who has been piling into Big Tech stocks. 'There are reasons to still be concerned about the global trade war, but if Trump isn't playing hardball with tariffs, people are going to buy, buy, buy with valuations much more reasonably priced now.'
Valuation metrics of all types have taken on added significance this year, as investors try to determine if a tariff-fuelled sell-off has left stocks cheaper relative to their fundamentals. Those calculations are complicated by the S&P 500's 12 per cent bounce from its April lows, which has traders wondering whether to bet on momentum carrying the index further – or beef up hedges and place bearish bets on a trip back down. The index is still down nearly 9 per cent from its February record.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
In addition to the unpredictable twists of US President Donald Trump's trade war, investors are bracing for several more weeks of earnings season and next week's Federal Reserve meeting as potential catalysts that could determine the trajectory of stocks.
For its part, the indicator is still above levels it plumbed during past market bottoms, including the Covid-19 sell-off of early 2020, when it fell to nearly 100 per cent. Other commonly used valuation gauges tell a similar story: The S&P 500, for example, now sits at 20.6 times forward earnings, down about 8 per cent from earlier this year, though still above the 10-year average of 18.6 times.
Critics of the Buffett indicator argue that, among other things, the measure may ignore the effects of elevated interest rates. Higher borrowing costs can eat into company profits and weigh on stock prices. Some strategists also maintain that valuation is a poor tool for timing market moves, since assets can stay cheap or expensive for a long time before correcting.
That said, few investors would ignore a measured lauded by Buffett, who is famous for buying on the cheap. Traders are eagerly awaiting Berkshire's annual meeting on Saturday (May 3), in part to glean any clues on whether Buffett has dipped into the company's cash pile – last reported at a record US$321 billion – to take advantage of bargains in the market.
It may be one of the last meetings for Buffett, who told shareholders in the company's annual letter earlier this year that 'it won't be long before' a successor takes over as CEO, likely Berkshire's Greg Abel.
Buffett 'has always been a long-term investor', said Scott Colyer, CEO at Advisors Asset Management. 'It will be crucial to hear what he says about the economy and whether cheaper valuations indeed pushed him to deploy all that cash to buy stocks during the sell-off.' BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
35 minutes ago
- Business Times
Morgan Stanley, Goldman expect resilient economy to support stocks
WALL Street strategists are growing optimistic about US stocks, with forecasters at Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs Group Inc the latest to suggest resilient economic growth would limit any pullback over the summer. Morgan Stanley strategist Michael Wilson, who ditched his long-standing bearish call in mid-2024, said a sharp improvement in corporate America's earnings outlook bodes well for the S&P 500 Index into the year-end. He reiterated his 12-month price target of 6,500 points, implying gains of about 8 per cent from current levels. 'We have high conviction that the sharp drawdown in April was the end of a much longer correction that began a year ago with the peak rate of change on earnings revisions breadth,' he wrote in a note. A pick-up in analyst upgrades 'keeps us positive on US equities on a 12-month basis'. The S&P 500 has rebounded after President Donald Trump paused some of the highest tariffs in a century in April. Recent data signalling a healthy labour market has also fuelled the rally, putting the index about 2 per cent below a February record high. Still, the benchmark has trailed international peers this year, given the trade-related uncertainty. A slate of strategists including at JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc have raised their year-end targets for the S&P 500 in recent days, on bets that the worst shock from Trump's trade war was over. For JPMorgan, the upgrade implies no more gains for the gauge through the remainder of 2025, but still represents an about-turn from its previous target that called for a 12 per cent slump. Over at Goldman Sachs, strategist David Kostin said recent market action suggests investors are pricing an optimistic growth outlook, with economically-sensitive sectors outperforming safer defensive peers. This raises the risk of near-term equity declines should macro data deteriorate, he said, but 'the market continues to gain confidence as a result of improving soft data and friendly policy news from Washington'. 'If the recovery in soft data is sustained, it should support equity returns even as hard data weakens,' he wrote in a note. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
5 hours ago
- Business Times
Bank of England risks repeat of Brexit pessimism as growth signals diverge
[LONDON] Bank of England (BOE) rate-setters risk underestimating the strength of the UK economy by placing too much faith in downbeat business surveys over official growth data. Governor Andrew Bailey revealed last week he is putting more emphasis on indicators such as S&P Global's purchasing managers' index, warning that 'we have had more volatile, short-run GDP numbers of late'. However, BOE watchers caution against repeating the error made after the 2016 Brexit referendum, when officials eased policy in response to a sharp downturn registered in surveys. The conflicting signals threaten to muddy the waters at a time when the BOE is deciding how much more it can cut rates, as it weighs a fresh uptick in inflation against concerns over the economy and US President Donald Trump's trade war. Official figures show GDP growth picking up strongly in the first quarter to 0.7 per cent – the strongest performance in a year. Yet the growth signal from the Purchasing Managers' Indexes (PMIs), when an average is taken over the quarter, shows a more stable but stagnant picture – a view that the BOE believes is more indicative of the economy's underlying state. The index showed virtually zero growth in the first quarter. It then dropped into contractionary territory in April as businesses baulked at Trump's tariffs before rebounding to a flat reading in May. 'The challenge we have at the moment is that the forward looking evidence on activity in the economy, so the surveys, are nothing like as strong as that,' Bailey told Parliament's Treasury Committee last week. He called the gap a 'disjoint' and said that BOE staff believe the private-sector surveys are a better predictor of the economy's future than the previous GDP figure. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'Bailey is at risk of repeating the same error made after the Brexit referendum, of taking a weak PMI as strong evidence of actual growth, when it proved to be very misleading,' said Robert Wood, chief UK economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics. 'There is strong evidence that the PMI is far too pessimistic about growth when uncertainty rises because the qualitative nature of the survey means that it captures sentiment rather than actual growth. The same will very likely apply to Bailey's visits to firms.' The economy grew by 1.9 per cent in 2016, in line with the average of the previous six years – despite the political upheaval caused by Britain's vote to leave the European Union. While the official data for the first quarter was likely boosted by temporary factors as manufacturers rushed to get ahead of US tariffs, there were also signs of strength in services, the largest part of the UK economy. Government data have been under suspicion amid a series of statistical flaws primarily affecting the labour market data, but also covering estimates of GDP. One concern is whether they are correctly adjusting for seasonal shifts in economic output. 'There's also some evidence to suggest that the GDP data – especially the like-for-like services PMI equivalent component – has been exhibiting some strong seasonality since the pandemic, which is not evident in the PMI,' said Chris Williamson, chief business economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence. The Office for National Statistics dispute this is the case and found little evidence of this effect when it ran detailed testing on the possibility of residual seasonality last month. Economists say the PMIs also have drawbacks, particularly given they do not include certain sectors, such as retail, and government activity. 'But the surveys do capture around 80 per cent of private sector economic output, reflecting spending by both businesses and households, which is what is of primary concern to both policymakers and investors,' said Williamson. The PMI and other business and consumer surveys have also tended to drop sharply in response to political news. Brexit, Liz Truss' calamitous mini-budget in 2022 and Labour's first budget all triggered downturns that did not coincide with significant changes in the economic fundamentals in official data, such as GDP and unemployment. Research by Bloomberg Economics showed that a spike in uncertainty doesn't always result in a big near-term hit for the UK economy. Chief UK economist Dan Hanson said history shows that a spike in policy uncertainty measures 'are not as well correlated with GDP growth as indicators of financial market volatility or survey measures that capture perceptions about the economic outlook.' However, the PMI did align with the downturn seen in official data in the second half of 2023 when the cost-of-living crisis tipped the UK into a mild technical recession. 'The risk is that with different indicators sending different signals on demand, it takes longer for the BOE to understand the forces driving in the economy,' said Ruth Gregory, deputy chief economist at Capital Economics. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
6 hours ago
- Business Times
Nomura to shut branch in China as it scales back wealth business
[TOKYO] Nomura Holdings is closing one of its four branches in China, as the Japanese securities firm scales back its wealth management business in the mainland after years of losses. The company's brokerage subsidiary plans to shut its branch in Zhejiang province by the end of the year, sources familiar with the matter said, asking not to be identified as the matter is private. A Tokyo-based spokesperson declined to comment. The closure comes four years after Nomura announced the opening of the office in late 2021, when it was pushing to expand in areas that are home to rich Chinese. Japan's biggest brokerage had targeted wealth management as a key area for growth in China, but the business has struggled under President Xi Jinping's 'common prosperity' drive, a slowing economy and stiff competition. Shanghai-based Nomura Orient International Securities has posted losses every year since it was formed in 2019. The venture's loss narrowed 30 per cent to 128.7 million yuan (S$23 million) in the year ended Dec 31, making the second straight year of improvement. Nomura has been curtailing its original focus on China wealth to prioritise an expansion in brokerage and asset management, Bloomberg reported in April. Global banks have also been tempering their ambitions in China's US$69 trillion financial services industry, five years after its opening ushered in a wave of investment by firms including JPMorgan Chase and UBS Group. Mounting trade tensions under US President Donald Trump are adding to the uncertainty. Zhejiang is a wealthy province on China's east coast that's home to e-commerce giant Alibaba Group Holding as well as Yiwu city, a manufacturing hub that exports globally. Nomura's majority-owned venture with Oriental International (Holding) and Shanghai Huangpu Investment Holding (Group) has branches in Shanghai, Beijing and Shenzhen as well. BLOOMBERG
