Heathrow fire cost airport tens of millions of pounds, says CEO
Giving the hub's first public estimate on the bill from the blaze, Thomas Woldbye said Heathrow had yet to decide whether to pursue National Grid for damages, as it awaited the findings of the energy regulator Ofgem into the incident.
Heathrow was criticised for its lack of resilienceafter more than 270,000 passenger journeys were disrupted when an overnight fire and power outage stopped flights landing or taking off on 21 March.
Woldbye, who slept through the night with his phone on silent, said he 'would have liked to see my personal role play out differently'.
A report by the National Energy System Operator found that the fire was due to a known, preventable fault at the North Hyde substation, and that insufficient action was taken to remedy problems detected in 2018. Ofgem has launched an investigation.
Woldbye said that Heathrow would also be 'investing in agreement with the airlines to improve the physical resilience' of the airport.
The comments came as Heathrow revealed that profits fell by a third in the first half of the year despite passenger numbers reaching a record high, with 39.9m journeys in the six months to 30 June.
Woldbye said the fall in pre-tax profits to £203m was down to higher costs, 'primarily finance costs, as the consequence of higher interest rates'.
Heathrow this month submitted a five-year investment plan to the Civil Aviation Authority to improve its facilities and raise charges by about £5 per passenger. The airport is due to submit further plans next week to the government for a third runway, after the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, signalled support to restart the controversial scheme.
Woldbye said: 'If we are to meet customers' requirements, and I think we should, particularly on capacity, that will cost money. Heathrow is a very space constrained airport. We already have two or three times as many passengers per square metre of airport as our competitors in Europe. Creating additional capacity is not easy, and hence it's costly.'
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
He said the runway would not be in operation until 2035 at the earliest and indicated that the airport would be pursuing it with caution. 'The government has asked for input. If customers are not clear, they want it, if the country is not clear they want it, why would we do this?'
The submission is expected to spell out the need for action on new flight paths and planning reform before Heathrow commits major investment, but it will include a 'baseline plan' for the runway, which in its last iteration required major work and diversions to the UK''s busiest motorway, the M25, and would increase the number of flights at Heathrow by up to 50%.
However, he added: 'I think it is very important for the country, because I think we are already lagging behind on aviation capacity in the London area, and we'll continue to do that for a while. We need to create the right conditions for both airlines and airport to make sure that it's a success. Will Heathrow survive without a third runway? Yes.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
Peterborough farmland homes granted despite affordability worry
More than 1,000 homes on farmland on the outskirts of a city have been approved, despite a concern over the number of affordable to build the properties land in Paston, Peterborough - which would join 870 homes already granted - was unanimously approved by city councillors on Tuesday.A request had been made for 30% of the homes to be affordable, but an independent consultant concluded that these figures were "unviable" .It was agreed that one in 10 of the homes would be Asim Mahmood supported the application, but had reservations over the "extremely low" percentage proposed."I think as an authority we should be doing more than just going for the 10%, but I do understand that viability sometimes doesn't allow us to do that," he Dickinson, assistant director at the applicant's agent Deloitte, told the planning committee the development would bring "significant benefits to Peterborough".He said it included "important infrastructure which is essential to delivery of the whole allocation". Tracey Westley, from the area, told the BBC the new homes were a "really good idea"."But I do think the infrastructure needs to be in place first," the 54-year-old said. "Quite a lot of the time, they build a housing estate and then add the rest afterwards. I'd like to see it done the right way round." Specific designs for the 2,000 planned homes will be submitted at a later date.A new A16 roundabout and improvements to Newborough Road have already been agreed, as well as £26.5m towards local Jeeves, 35, said she welcomed the homes. "If they're treated well, I can't see why it wouldn't succeed and the families that go in them, succeed as well," she said. "If they're going to put people out of bad situations and into a better one, why not?" But Tim Clark, 53, suggested the homes should be closer to the city centre."I think it's a bit out in the sticks," he said. "It should be a bit nearer to Peterborough itself. I'm not too bothered about it being greenbelt land, but make it local. Make it closer to the city." Jurga Ziliene, 49, also had reservations, suggesting the roads were too narrow to deal with an influx of traffic."We already have a lot of new homes here," she said. "Why does everything have to be in Peterborough?" Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Martin Lewis reveals green way to save hundreds on your energy bills
Money expert Martin Lewis has shared how households can save hundreds every year on their energy bills by taking advantage of an often misunderstood green technology. Solar panels are becoming an increasingly common sight on UK homes, but many people are still unsure of how to install them or if their property is eligible FOR WHAT?. Advice from Mr Lewis' Money Saving Expert service says that the high upfront cost of installing solar panels – which averages around £6,100 – means that homeowners should be sure about the move before they commit. But the high cost can be worth it for the savings on energy bills – making them up to £350 cheaper a year, according to experts. At this rate, the break-even point is around 10 years, meaning anyone looking to move to a new property within a decade might want to consider it. There is also a lot of support on offer for those looking to install solar panels. Several solar panel grants and funding schemes are available, particularly for low-income households, which can help them fund up to the entire cost of the project. Can you save more money if you already have solar panels? With more homes now being fitted with solar panels, a rising number of people are finding themselves living in houses that had the technology fitted when they moved in. Around 1.5 million UK homes now have solar panels, research by energy company Sunsave has found. This is up 500,000 since 2022, with 5.5 per cent of properties now fitted. Pre-installed solar panels give homeowners or renters an automatic saving on energy bills. However, there could be scope for even more money to be saved, Mr Lewis has found. The key factor is whether the panels were installed before or after April 2019. If they were installed after, the owner will be on the Smart Export Guarantee (SEG) system. This sets the tariff for how much the household is paid for units of electricity they generate, and separately for how much they export back to the grid. Many solar panel owners may mistakenly believe they are stuck with their current rate, but they are free to switch. Shopping around for a better deal can save hundreds a year, so it is well worth doing. Those with solar panels installed before April 2019 will likely instead be on a 'Feed-In Tariff' (FIT) system. This pays a good rate for generating electricity (up to 7.39p per kWh), although it has dropped in recent years. Mr Lewis advises that those on the FIT system can switch to the SEG system, but still keep the previous electricity generation rates while boosting export rates. This can raise the amount paid for generating electricity to a market-leading 30p per kWh, resulting in big savings.
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Taylor Wimpey slumps to loss on £222m fire safety hit
Taylor Wimpey has plunged to a half-year loss after taking another £222 million cost hit for removing cladding from high-rise buildings following the Grenfell Tower fire tragedy. The housebuilder reported pre-tax losses of £92.1 million for the six months to June 29 against profits of £99.7 million a year earlier. It said this was largely due to an extra £222.2 million provision for fire safety measures. The company also said full-year earnings would be lower than expected at £424 million after taking an unexpected £20 million charge for historical defective work by a former contractor. Experts at AJ Bell said the latest cladding cost has seen Taylor Wimpey's total bill swell to more than £550 million in the wake of the Grenfell fire in 2017, which killed 72 people. They estimated the cost to FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 housebuilders had now reached more than £3.5 billion. Large housebuilders agreed in 2022 to pay to fix cladding issues on their properties following public and political pressure. Taylor Wimpey's shares fell 5% on Thursday after its interim results laid bare the impact of the costs. Jennie Daly, chief executive of Taylor, said: 'The safety of our customers remains our highest priority – this principle has consistently guided our approach, and we have increased our cladding fire safety provision to reflect findings from updated fire risk assessments and investigations in the first half.' The group said it was also pushed to a loss by an £18 million payout after an investigation into information sharing in the sector by the UK competition watchdog. Taylor was one of seven builders that recently agreed to pay a record £100 million between them as part of a package of commitments to address concerns following the probe by the Competition and Markets Authority into whether they shared commercially sensitive information. In its latest results, Taylor said it saw 'softer' market conditions in the second quarter as affordability continues to hamper demand, particularly from first-time buyers. 'While affordability remains constrained, particularly amongst first-time buyers, lenders remain committed to the UK mortgage market and long-term fundamentals are positive, with significant unmet need for UK housing,' Ms Daly said.
