Joe Rogan on David Goggins Finishing the Bigfoot 200 Mile Run: ‘That Dude Has No Knees'
If the fact that he actually finished the race isn't impressive enough, he did so in 66 hours, four minutes and 17 seconds. This time, according to one update on the race, is roughly 40 hours faster than the average finishing time of 106 hours.
Details of David Goggins' Impressive Bigfoot 200-Mile Run
The Bigfoot 200 reportedly takes runners through more than 30,000 feet of elevation, as Dexerto revealed. According to the race tracking data, Goggins maintained an average pace of 4.1 miles per hour while moving, and stopped for just over 20 hours for rest.
The race marked Goggins' return to long-distance running, and the fact that he ran any type of marathon, let alone a 200-mile ultramarathon, is unbelievable considering the circumstances.
Goggins, 50, reportedly underwent five knee surgeries over the last 18 months before shockingly managing to finish the grueling 200-mile race in 23rd overall.
Joe Rogan's Priceless Reaction to David Goggins Running the Bigfoot 200
Following Goggins' incredibly impressive feat, many high-profile names sounded off on his effort. Among them was former television host turned UFC announcer and host of The Joe Rogan Experience podcast.
While discussing Goggins finishing the Bigfoot 200-mile race on his podcast, Rogan was left in complete amazement, specifically highlighting the multiple knee surgeries Goggins underwent before this.
"Shoutout to my brother David Goggins, who just finished the Bigfoot 200. That dude has no knees, ladies and gentlemen," Rogan said. "He's got no knees and he just ran 200 miles through the f---ing mountains."
Rogan went on to respond to his guest's point that this is a great example of how "belief can break reality" by adding an interesting additional tidbit.
"It certainly broke it in the eyes of his doctor," Rogan added. "His doctor, when they first saw his knees...he was like, I can't believe you can walk on these legs, forget about run thousands of miles. Like this is nuts, he was not just bone-on-bone, his bone was distorted."
That certainly adds another level of impressive to something that I could never even fathom doing, so Goggins deserves a lot of credit for this, along with his many, many other ultramarathons.Joe Rogan on David Goggins Finishing the Bigfoot 200 Mile Run: 'That Dude Has No Knees' first appeared on Men's Journal on Aug 15, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Peralta allows 1 hit in 6 innings and Brewers beat Cubs 7-0 in 1st half of doubleheader
CHICAGO (AP) — Freddy Peralta allowed one hit and struck out six batters and the Milwaukee Brewers beat the Chicago Cubs 7-0 in the first half of a Monday doubleheader. All-Star pitcher Peralta (15-5, 2.78 ERA) shut Chicago out over six innings to help Milwaukee advance to an MLB-best record of 79-45. The Brewers, which had their franchise-record 14-game winning streak snapped by the Reds on Sunday, have won 23 of 28 games since the break. Brice Turang and Caleb Durbin each had two hits, two RBIs and a solo home run to lead the way. Milwaukee's Abner Uribe, Jared Koenig and Grant Anderson held Chicago to one combined hit over the final three innings of relief. The Brewers attacked Cubs pitcher Cade Horton (7-4, 3.08) early. After Turang's homer in the third, Horton allowed three of the next four batters to reach base and was removed from the game with a blister on his right middle finger. Reliever Drew Pomeranz retired the ensuing batter to escape the inning with a one-run deficit. Chicago called up two hitters on Monday in Luke Little and Gavin Hollowell. Little's throwing error in the sixth allowed a run to score, while Hollowell gave up four earned runs on four walks and two hits in the seventh. Key moment Down 1-0, the Cubs had an opportunity to tie or take the lead in the bottom of the fourth. Peralta walked three consecutive batters to load the bases with one out, but he struck out rookie Owen Caissie and retired Nico Hoerner to end the inning. Key stat Milwaukee surrendered just two hits to Chicago, which drops nine games behind the Brewers in the National League Central. Up next The Cubs and Brewers are set to play the second half of Monday's doubleheader at 7:05 p.m. CT. Neither team had named its starting pitcher. Chicago and Milwaukee will continue the series until Thursday. ___ AP MLB:
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
My husband's ex-wife is all over him at events for their grandkids. How do I make it stop?
Welcome back to "Ask Amy & T.J." This week, they take on some grandma drama. Whether they're building an audio empire like Taylor and Travis or throwing the wedding of the year like the Bezoses, power couples inspire awe and envy. But mixing business and romance isn't always sunshine and roses. If you need advice on how to keep your relationship and your business afloat, send your question to askamyandtj@ If you want to hear more from Amy and T.J., check out their podcast. Amy & T.J., My husband has grandchildren from a previous marriage, which isn't a problem. However, their grandmother, Betty (the ex-wife), is always around. I've told him I can tolerate her being there for things like their grandkids' graduation, but not every time we get invited somewhere. For example, last weekend we were at a birthday party for someone on his side of the family (her ex-in-laws). Why is she there? And every time they meet, Betty is hugging and kissing on my husband. She can't just say hi and move along. I've asked him over and over to set boundaries but he acts like he doesn't know what that means. I told him I'm not comfortable going to our next event if she'll be there and he said 'OK, I'm going anyway.' Really? What do I do? — Gut reaction T.J. Holmes: Yes, this is partly about grandparents and grandchildren. But this is just a plain old 'Why is the ex always around' story. Amy Robach: This is about respect. It doesn't seem like your husband respects you, and certainly, the ex-wife doesn't. On further thought... TJH: We get very few no-brainer questions, but I think this is one. I'm trying to see your husband's perspective, but I just can't. I can't see why the ex-wife is of such value to him that it's worth upsetting you, the woman that he's declared he wants to spend the rest of his life with. Now, I don't know how long he and the ex-wife were married, or how close she is to the family and to the kids and grandkids. Maybe it was 25 or 30 years or more. But I still don't think that it's ever OK for any partner to treat their spouse the way he's treating you, constantly. This should be a simple conversation, ending with him saying, 'Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't know you felt that way, I respect that,' and then you can move on. But I don't know why you don't insist that this stop. AR: Yes, it's about respect. Ask him to reverse the situation: How would he feel in your shoes? And it's not simply that Betty is there; you're saying that she is effusive and touching your husband. That would be an issue for any second wife. I think the reason your husband is continuing to allow this has to be his ego. It feels really good when you've got two women who are both fighting for you. Maybe he thinks he can placate everyone. But by letting this go on, he's saying he doesn't care what you think or what your feelings are. And how could you possibly have a relationship that way? If you don't respect or care what your partner thinks, you don't have a marriage. TJH: Another possibility: He's a guy. He's an idiot. Sometimes we can be clueless about such things. It doesn't seem like much of an excuse, but could he just be unaware? AR: If that's the case, you need to just make a decision. You're either going to have to accept this and let it go — which is really hard — or do something, which could mean leaving the marriage. The worst thing you could do is nothing. TJH: Yes, and tell your husband, 'This is what I need from you. Are you able to provide it?' We're grown folks. You look directly at him and tell him what you want. We don't do ultimatums, but you have to confront this. And at some point, you have to stop blaming him if you continue to stay. If he's not willing to work on it, that's a red flag that he doesn't care. Meanwhile, your husband, Betty and even you are not keeping your eyes on what's important: making sure there isn't tension for the family. What do the grandkids want? Do they love Betty being around? Are they uncomfortable seeing how she is around your husband? Amy and I have dealt with tension in our blended families before. You have to put that first. Figure out what you, as the adults, need to do to ensure the kids and grandkids are OK. AR: For certain special events, it's important for the grandkids to have all the people in their lives there. But it doesn't mean that Betty needs to be all up on and all over your husband. There can be clear boundaries of no touching. The final word TJH: Well, it's hugging and kissing. Maybe this is just a hug when Betty and the husband see each other, and that's it? AR: Then do a fist bump instead. TJH: The grandparents need to ... dab up? AR: Dab up! I don't think that's unreasonable. I don't want anybody kissing on you! Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sinner vows to play US Open after Cincy retirement
Jannik Sinner insisted on Monday he would be ready to defend his US Open crown after illness forced him to retire from his Cincinnati Open final clash with Carlos Alcaraz. World number one Sinner -- who is due to to play in the US Open's revamped mixed doubles tournament on Tuesday -- conceded defeat to Alcaraz on Monday after going 5-0 down in the first set. The Italian did not speak to journalists after the loss, issuing a statement saying only that he would definitely play at the US Open in New York, where the singles main draw starts on Sunday. "I love Grand Slams a lot, they are the main tournaments for, for my season and my career," Sinner said. "The US Open is going to be a tough tournament, but in the same time, I'm looking forward to it if I'm ready, physically and mentally. "I will be ready to push ... now a couple of days of recovery, and then we get again back to work, and hopefully we'll be ready. "(The Open) is for sure, the main goal here in the US. For now, recovery is the most important." Sinner was due to partner Katerina Siniakova in the US Open mixed doubles, which gets under way in New York on Tuesday. Sinner did not address his participation in the mixed doubles in his statement. str/rcw
