Grand Mufti Of India: Cleric Who Claims Role In Stopping Kerala Nurse Execution
A top Indian Muslim cleric has played a key role in the postponement of the execution of Indian nurse Nimisha Priya in Yemen's capital, Sana'a.
Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad, the Grand Mufti of India, reached out to prominent Yemeni scholar Sheikh Umar bin Hafiz, urging him to intervene with the family of Talal Abdol Mehdi, the Yemeni man Priya was convicted of killing.
Nimisha Priya, a 37-year-old nurse from Kerala, was sentenced to death in Yemen. Her legal team maintains the killing was accidental and happened during a time of abuse and distress.
After the Grand Mufti's request, Sheikh Umar sent his students to talk to the victim's family. After several rounds of talks, the family agreed to pause the execution for four hours, giving Priya's legal team more time to act.
Who Is The Grand Mufti Of India?
The title Grand Mufti of India refers to a senior Islamic legal authority, often regarded as the highest-ranking among Islamic scholars in the country. Unlike in some Muslim-majority nations where such titles are granted by the state, in India, the designation is honorary and not officially recognised by the government.
Sheikh Abubakr was officially conferred the title in February 2019 by the All India Tanzeem Ulama-e-Islam during a gathering at Delhi's Ramlila Maidan. He is recognised as the 10th individual to hold this title, particularly within the Sunni (Barelvi) Muslim community.
In Islamic tradition, a "Mufti" is a scholar qualified to issue legal opinions under Sharia law.
Who Is Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad?
Sheikh Abubakr Ahmad, also known as Kanthapuram AP Aboobacker Musliyar, is based in Kerala, the same state as Nimisha Priya, and is a respected religious leader in India and South Asia.
Born in Kozhikode, Kerala, he serves on various Islamic scholars' councils at the state and national level and is frequently invited abroad for religious lectures and conferences, especially in the Gulf and Southeast Asia.
He also leads the Markaz Knowledge City, a large educational and cultural township in Kozhikode that houses medical and law colleges, and a cultural centre.
As the Grand Mufti, he offers fatwas (Islamic legal opinions) and guides on religious and social matters, particularly within the Barelvi school of Sunni Islam.
Over the years, Sheikh Abubakr has courted controversy for some of his statements. During the 2019-20 protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), he advised women not to participate in street demonstrations, saying, "Men will take care of it".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
5 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
As Assam eviction drive continues, Naga groups worry over influx of displaced people into Nagaland
GUWAHATI: The eviction drives in Assam have left the Nagas worried about a possible influx of the displaced people into Nagaland. The Konyak Students' Union, apex student body of Konyak Nagas in Nagaland, on July 23, directed its federating units, especially in Tizit and Naginimora areas, to deploy 100 volunteers daily to every entry point of Mon district. 'The volunteers are tasked with checking all non-locals entering Mon district to ensure they are carrying valid ILP (Inner Line Permit) and proper documentation,' the students' organisation said in a notification. An offshoot of the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation of 1873, the ILP is an official document that an Indian citizen is required to carry while visiting the 'protected' states of Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh for a short period.
Hans India
5 minutes ago
- Hans India
BJP Sparks Controversy Over Samajwadi Party Leaders' Mosque Visit, Criticizes Dimple Yadav's Attire
A significant political controversy has emerged following a visit by Samajwadi Party leadership to a mosque situated near Parliament, with BJP representatives launching sharp attacks over alleged improper conduct and dress code violations. The incident has escalated into a broader debate about the intersection of politics and religious spaces, drawing accusations and counter-accusations from both major political parties. BJP Minority Morcha president Jamal Siddiqui spearheaded the criticism, alleging that Akhilesh Yadav had transformed the sacred religious space into an unofficial party headquarters. Siddiqui specifically condemned the presence of SP MP Nadvi, who serves as the mosque's imam, questioning why political discussions would occur within a place of worship. His statements suggest a violation of the traditional separation between religious and political activities. The controversy intensified when Siddiqui made pointed personal criticisms of Dimple Yadav's appearance during the mosque visit. He claimed that photographs revealed her wearing clothing that exposed parts of her body typically expected to be covered in Islamic religious settings, specifically noting the absence of a head covering. These observations led to accusations that the visit violated established mosque etiquette and disrespected Islamic customs. BJP leaders escalated their rhetoric by threatening legal action against the Samajwadi Party members, with Siddiqui announcing plans to file a formal complaint. In a provocative gesture, he declared intentions to organize a counter-meeting at the same mosque featuring national songs and anthem performances, suggesting a deliberate attempt to challenge what he characterized as SP's inappropriate use of religious space. Uttar Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Brajesh Pathak expanded the criticism to constitutional grounds, arguing that the Samajwadi Party had violated fundamental principles prohibiting political activities in religious venues. His statements portrayed the incident as part of a broader pattern of constitutional disregard by the opposition party, suggesting systematic violations of established democratic norms. The Samajwadi Party leadership responded with strong denials and counter-accusations, characterizing the BJP's complaints as politically motivated distractions from substantive governance issues. Dimple Yadav rejected claims of political meetings, explaining that the visit occurred at the invitation of MP Imam Nadvi and involved no formal party business. She accused the BJP of deliberately spreading false information to deflect attention from more pressing national concerns. Akhilesh Yadav framed his response around themes of religious unity and tolerance, suggesting that the BJP's criticism reflected their preference for divisive politics over inclusive approaches. He characterized faith as a unifying force that transcends specific religious boundaries, implying that the ruling party seeks to maintain social divisions rather than promote harmony. Supporting SP leaders provided additional context and defense of the visit, with MP Zia ur Rehman Barq questioning the logic of holding political meetings in mosques when party members have access to Parliament facilities and private residences. Regarding the dress code criticism, he suggested that Dimple Yadav had properly covered her head but that her dupatta may have shifted during photography. Congress MP Imran Masood joined the defense, describing the BJP's comments as shameful and emphasizing that the mosque's imam holds parliamentary membership, making his presence there entirely appropriate. He characterized Dimple Yadav's attire as consistent with Indian cultural nClaude can make mistakes.
Indian Express
5 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Handled with utmost professionalism': India on UK news report claiming wrong bodies returned after Air India crash
India on Wednesday responded to a report by a UK publication claiming that the remains of some British victims of the June 12 Air India crash in Ahmedabad were wrongly identified before repatriation. In a statement issued on Tuesday, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said: 'We have seen the report and have been working closely with the UK side from the moment these concerns and issues were brought to our attention. All mortal remains were handled with utmost professionalism and with due regard for the dignity of the deceased.' He added that Indian authorities are continuing to coordinate with their British counterparts to address any ongoing concerns. The Daily Mail, a tabloid newspaper published in the UK, cited an aviation lawyer representing several families, who said grieving relatives in the UK were informed of grave errors in the identification of bodies. One family had to cancel funeral plans after discovering that the coffin delivered to them contained the remains of an unidentified passenger, the report alleged. In another case, remains of more than one victim were reportedly placed in a single casket and had to be separated before burial, Daily Mail claimed. The alleged mistakes apparently came to light during identity verification conducted by Inner West London coroner Dr Fiona Wilcox, who used DNA samples provided by the families. The Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner had crashed shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad, killing 241 people onboard, including 52 British nationals. Another 19 people on the ground were also killed, and 67 were seriously injured. A preliminary report by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), released on July 10, said both of the aircraft's fuel switches were found in the cut-off position immediately after takeoff—cutting off fuel supply to the engines and leading to the crash. The controversy comes just ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to the UK, where he is expected to meet his counterpart Keir Starmer to sign a much-anticipated free trade agreement.
