Trump says China can buy Iranian oil, urges it to buy US crude
President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that China can continue to purchase Iranian oil after Israel and Iran agreed to a ceasefire, a move that the White House clarified did not indicate a relaxation of US sanctions.
"China can now continue to purchase Oil from Iran. Hopefully, they will be purchasing plenty from the US, also," Trump said in a post on Truth Social, just days after he ordered US bombings of three Iranian nuclear sites.
Trump was drawing attention to no attempts by Iran so far to close the Strait of Hormuz to oil tankers, as a closure would have been hard for China, the world's top importer of Iranian oil, a senior White House official told Reuters.
"The president continues to call on China and all countries to import our state-of-the-art oil rather than import Iranian oil in violation of US sanctions," the official said.
After the ceasefire announcement, Trump's comments on China were another bearish signal for oil prices, which fell nearly 6 per cent.
Any relaxation of sanctions enforcement on Iran would mark a US policy shift after Trump said in February he was re-imposing maximum pressure on Iran, aiming to drive its oil exports to zero, over its nuclear program and funding of militants across the Middle East.
Trump imposed waves of Iran-related sanctions on several of China's so-called independent "teapot" refineries and port terminal operators for purchases of Iranian oil.
"President Trump's greenlight for China to keep buying Iranian oil reflects a return to lax enforcement standards," said Scott Modell, a former CIA officer, now CEO of Rapidan Energy Group.
In addition to not enforcing sanctions, Trump could suspend or waive sanctions imposed by executive order or under authorities a president is granted in laws passed by Congress.
Trump will likely not waive sanctions ahead of coming rounds of US-Iran nuclear talks, Modell said. The measures provide leverage given Tehran's demand that any deal includes lifting them permanently.
Jeremy Paner, a partner at Hughes Hubbard & Reed lawfirm, said if Trump chooses to suspend Iran oil-related sanctions, it would require lots of work between agencies.
The Treasury would need to issue licenses, and the State Department would have to issue waivers, which require Congressional notification.
'Flash the glock'
China has long opposed what it has called Washington's "abuse of illegal unilateral sanctions." China's embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment about Trump's post.
Larger purchases of Iranian oil by China and other consumers could upset US ally Saudi Arabia, the world's largest oil exporter.
The impact of
US sanctions on Iran
's exports, however, has been limited since Trump's first administration when he cracked down harder on Tehran.
Trump has "flashed the Glock" this year with sanctions on Chinese trading companies and terminals, but the results have been far more "minimum pressure" than maximum, Modell said.
State Department spokesperson
Tammy Bruce told reporters that Trump had signaled what he wanted to happen and that his administration is focused on delivering that. She would not say what the process would entail.
"But clearly we are focused on making sure that (the) guiding hand of President Trump prevails and moves this government forward, so we will have to wait and see when it comes to what that ends up looking like," Bruce said.]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
27 minutes ago
- Mint
Stocks edge up, dollar steady as ceasefire buoys confidence
TOKYO (Reuters) -Stocks ticked higher and crude oil held not far from multi-week lows on Wednesday, as investors took a ceasefire between Israel and Iran as a green light to head back into riskier assets and cast aside immediate worries about an energy shock. The dollar languished close to an almost four-year low versus the euro, with two-year U.S. Treasury yields sagging to 1-1/2-month troughs as lower oil prices reduced the risk to bonds from an inflation spike. The shaky truce has so far held, although Israel says it will respond forcefully to Iranian missile strikes that came after U.S. President Donald Trump announced an end to the hostilities. In addition, U.S. airstrikes did not destroy Iran's nuclear capability and only set it back by a few months, according to a preliminary U.S. intelligence assessment, contradicting Trump's earlier comments that Iran's nuclear programme had been "obliterated". Europe's Stoxx 600 index edged up 0.2% in early trade, while S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq futures were flat. Japan's Nikkei rose 0.4%, while Hong Kong's Hang Seng climbed 1.3% and mainland Chinese blue chips gained 1.44%, closing at their highest level since March 20. An MSCI index of global stocks held steady after pushing to a record high overnight. "If the still tense situation in the Middle East does indeed continue to calm down, the stock markets could have a pleasant July ahead of them, in line with their typical seasonal pattern," analysts at Frankfurt-based Metzler said. "This would result in new all-time highs in the U.S., possibly further fuelled by renewed expectations of interest rate cuts by the Fed." A series of U.S. macroeconomic data released overnight including on consumer confidence showed possibly weaker than expected economic growth in the world's largest oil consumer, bolstering expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts this year. Brent crude rose 2% to $68.43 per barrel, bouncing a bit following a plunge of as much as $14.58 over the previous two sessions. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was up as much to trade at $65.60 per barrel. "While concerns regarding Middle Eastern supply have diminished for now, they have not entirely disappeared, and there remains a stronger demand for immediate supply," analysts at ING wrote in a note to clients. The two-year U.S. Treasury yield was at its lowest since May 8 at 3.7848%. The euro slipped 0.1% to $1.1594, still close to the overnight high of $1.1641, a level not seen since October 2021, while the U.S. dollar index, which measures the currency against six major counterparts, was only slightly higher at 98.079. Gold rose marginally to about $3,328 per ounce. Aside from geopolitics, U.S. monetary policy continues to dominate investor concerns. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said on Tuesday that higher tariffs could begin raising inflation this summer, a period that will be key to the U.S. central bank considering possible rate cuts. Markets continue to price in a roughly 19% chance that the Fed will cut rates by a quarter point in July, according to the CME FedWatch tool.
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Iran a step closer to suspending cooperation with IAEA as parliament passes bill
Iran's parliament approved a bill on Wednesday to suspend cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, state-affiliated news outlet Nournews reported. Iranian protesters hold their country's flags and posters of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in an anti-U.S. and anti-Israeli rally at Enqelab-e-Eslami (Islamic Revolution) square in downtown Tehran, Iran, Tuesday, June 24, 2025.(AP) The move follows an air war with Israel in which Iran's longtime enemy said it wanted to prevent Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon. The bill, which must be approved by Iran's unelected Guardian Council to become law, stipulates that any future inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) would need approval by the Supreme National Security Council. Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf was quoted by state media as also saying Iran would accelerate its civilian nuclear programme. Tehran denies seeking nuclear weapons and says an IAEA resolution this month declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations paved the way for Israel's attacks. Qalibaf was quoted as saying the IAEA had refused even to appear to condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities and "has put its international credibility up for sale." He said that "for this reason, the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran will suspend its cooperation with the Agency until the security of the nuclear facilities is guaranteed, and move at a faster pace with the country's peaceful nuclear programme." Parliament's national security committee approved the bill's general outline this week and the committee's spokesperson said the bill would suspend the installation of surveillance cameras, inspections and filing of reports to the IAEA. The IAEA did not immediately comment on the Iranian parliament's approval of the bill. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said on Wednesday he was seeking the return of inspectors to Iranian sites, including the plants where it was enriching uranium, until Israel launched strikes on June 13. The full extent of the damage done to nuclear sites during the Israeli attacks and US bombing of underground Iranian nuclear facilities is not yet clear. "I think that our view on our nuclear programme and the non-proliferation regime will witness changes, but it is not possible to say in what direction," Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi told Qatar's Al-Araby Al-Jadeed this week.
Hindustan Times
31 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Terms of trade: West Asia isn't the Empire's Achilles' heel anymore
This column is being written on a day when US President Donald Trump seems to have, or claims to have engineered a cease fire between Iran and Israel despite the US having helped the latter with its bombing of Iran's underground nuclear installations. The cease fire followed what seems like token missile attacks by Iran on US military bases in Qatar. The developments so far have turned all doomsday predictions of experts from various ideological standpoints -- they include MAGA's fears of the US entering yet another long-drawn war in West Asia, liberal voices fearing an uncontrolled escalation using even non-conventional means and market watchers fearing a large geopolitical disruption to the global economy and trade or energy flows -- gross overestimates. So, are seemingly knowledgeable people getting worked up about nothing? Or is Trump really a master of brokering deals, and most of the commentariat is unable to see this quality because of its prejudice towards him? There is another way to look at this question. It is best approached by quoting from the Wall Street Journal's 23 June Hard on the Street column. The cease fire followed what seems like token missile attacks by Iran on US military bases in Qatar. (AFP) 'Back in 1977, just before the Iranian Revolution began and planted the seeds of the Second Oil Crisis, the US had net imports of about 3.1 billion barrels of petroleum and refined products, or 14 barrels per person. That per-capita number was unchanged as recently as 2003 at the time of the Iraq war. The US also was a significant importer of natural gas in both of those years. Today, because of hydraulic fracturing, the US has net exports of about 2.5 barrels per capita and is also the world's largest seller of liquefied natural gas. The technology isn't new, but improvements in the past 15 years have been transformational,' it says. The US's military involvement in West Asia, especially in the post-WWII period has had a deep relationship with the petroleum economy. But things have changed in the last decade or so. The US is no longer an energy importer and therefore much more immune from any energy shocks coming from a disruption in this region. To be sure, a lot of friendly oil exporting countries in West Asia continue to be important for the US, more importantly the current US president. The legacy of this energy economy via the petrodollars means that these countries have a lot of money to invest/spend in the rest of the world and both Trump and the US would like a large part of this. But all the US had to do to keep this gravy train going was to derail the transition from fossil fuel use, which Trump has already done by killing the climate deal. If energy security is not really a concern, then why is Trump risking an involvement with Israel's military aggression in the region, one might ask then. The simplest answer to this question is that being seen as not standing with Israel would put the Trump administration in a position which would force a rupture with the neoconservative and Zionist lobby in US's domestic politics. This will have severe financial and ideological consequences. The pro-Israel lobby still controls a lot of purse strings for political finance in the US. Not standing with Israel at the current moment would also be seen as playing into the hands of a pro-Palestinian voice which does not stand against things such as Hamas, Hezbollah or Iran's other violent proxies. Also Read:India welcomes Iran-Israel truce, reiterates concern about stability in region However, Trump is shrewd enough to ensure that it is him and not Benjamin Netanyahu who is seen as the boss in the ongoing chain of events. His outburst including using expletives on Tuesday while referring to both Iran and Israel on Tuesday was meant to send exactly this message. The only other US president who is said to have used an expletive after having met Netanyahu is Bill Clinton, who was frustrated that it was the Israeli and not the American who got away with playing the superpower in that meeting held in 1996. The West Asian or Middle East (as the Americans and Europeans call it) contradiction for the US has lost its economic criticality significantly compared to what it used to be in the 20th century because of the US's self-sufficiency in energy. However, the Israeli aggression in the region – it is only expected to become worse – is creating a deep super-structural fault line in the West, US included, as the Muslim population rises in these countries and they assume a growing role in domestic politics. But it is the non-right-wing parties such as the Democratic Party in the US and Labour in the UK which are facing most of the growing strain because of this cleavage. Does this mean Trump can keep going from one deal or chutzpah to another? Not necessarily. A politics of schadenfreude – best seen in things such as Trump penalising Harvard University for refusing to crack down on alleged antisemitic behaviour on campus – can keep Trump's working class conservative base animated for some time. But it can do precious little to solve the economic contradiction which drove this lot to Trump's fold in the first place. This contradiction is best described as America's success in keeping down inflation by importing from the Global South, most importantly China, but which also entailed unleashing a deindustrialisation and destruction of blue-collared jobs in its domestic economy. Trump's knee jerk response to this problem, his reciprocal tariffs, which he himself put in abeyance, and even a crackdown on illegal migration will likely create more problems for his working-class base than bring back the glory days of the Golden Age of Capitalism. Trump's, or for that matter, all of the neo-right's political legacy will depend on what they can do to solve this primary contradiction rather than running away from it by seeking gratification from periodic acts of schadenfreude or chutzpah. We are very far from the final act in this larger political economy tension in the advanced capitalist world. Also Read: Iran Israel's fragile ceasefire in place - What's next? Explained History, if one were to make a provocative statement to end this column, is still moving at a pace when it changes in decades rather than weeks. an obsessive tracking of flashpoints in the past few weeks seems to have convinced many people that we are living in times where the latter is true. Roshan Kishore, HT's Data and Political Economy Editor, writes a weekly column on the state of the country's economy and its political fall out, and vice-versa
