China gave Pakistan air defense support during clash with India
China provided Pakistan with air defense and satellite support during its recent military confrontation with India, Bloomberg reported on Monday, citing a think tank affiliated with the Indian Defense Ministry.
Ashok Kumar, director general at the Centre for Joint Warfare Studies in New Delhi, said China assisted Pakistan in reorganizing its radar and air defense systems, enabling them to more effectively detect Indian troop and weaponry deployments, according to the report.
'It helped them to redeploy their air defense radar so that any actions which we do from the aerial route are known to them,' Kumar told Bloomberg.
The aid indicates a more direct level of involvement from Beijing than was initially revealed, the report claimed. The think tank added that China also provided assistance to Pakistan in adjusting its satellite coverage over India during the 15-day period between the April 22 terror attacks in India's Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and India's strikes on suspected terror facilities in Pakistan-controlled territory on May 7.
China, which called on the South Asian countries to de-escalate during their four-day conflict, has traditionally enjoyed warm defense ties with Pakistan.
On Monday, Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar left for a three-day official visit to China at the invitation of Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, according to a report by state-owned media outlet Radio Pakistan.
Today, Deputy Prime Minister/Foreign Minister, Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar @MIshaqDar50 arrived in Beijing on a three day official visit from 19-21 May 2025 . He was received at the airport by senior Chinese officials and Ambassador of Pakistan to China, Khalil Hashmi. pic.twitter.com/Q4GqAC3HI8
Dar will engage in comprehensive talks with his Chinese counterpart, focusing on the changing regional dynamics in South Asia and their potential impact on peace and stability, the report stated. Additionally, the two nations will conduct a thorough review of their relations. Wang Yi speaks to India's Doval, urges "calm and restraint" after days of fighting https://t.co/ODQPFZnrfx
Pakistan has admitted using Chinese weapons in the recent standoff, according to reports. However, New Delhi has not publicly commented on Beijing's alleged involvement in the confrontation, which ended with a ceasefire on May 11.
China has condemned the April terror attack in Kashmir, which claimed 26 civilian lives, adding that it 'opposes all forms of terrorism.'
On the day the South Asian neighbors negotiated a ceasefire, Wang called Indian National Security Adviser Ajit Doval and expressed hope that India and Pakistan 'would remain calm and restrained, properly handle differences through dialogue and consultation and avoid escalating the situation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
China hits back against US ‘coercion'
China has accused the US of breaching a recent trade agreement, saying Washington's 'harmful' restrictions and 'coercion' were not the right way to engage with Beijing. US President Donald Trump last week claimed that Beijing had 'totally violated' the May 12 agreement reached in Geneva but offered no details. The consensus suspended most new tariffs imposed since early April and aimed to stabilize relations between the world's two largest economies. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian rejected the accusation, telling a regular press briefing on Tuesday that China had been 'responsibly and faithfully implementing the consensus' despite Washington's 'false' claims. He said Beijing strongly opposed what he described as 'harmful extreme measures,' including the latest US chip export controls, a block on electronic design automation (EDA) sales, and a pledge to revoke Chinese students' visas. 'Let us stress once again that pressuring and coercion are not the right way to engage China,' the spokesman said, calling on the US to stop spreading disinformation. Last week, multiple outlets reported that the Trump administration had ordered US firms to halt shipments of advanced goods to China, including chip design software and specialty chemicals. Experts warned the decision would likely inflame tensions. As part of the Geneva agreement, the US had paused a 34% tariff hike introduced on April 2 for 90 days, at which point Beijing took reciprocal action. Both sides also pledged to roll back post- April 8 tariff increases while keeping a baseline 10% duty on mutual imports. Beijing also agreed to ease certain non-tariff barriers on US goods starting May 14. However, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said last week that China had not yet lifted some of those restrictions. Trade tensions escalated sharply on April 2 when Trump imposed sweeping new duties on imports from more than 90 countries, including China, citing trade imbalances. Beijing retaliated, which led to Trump hiking US tariffs on Chinese goods to 145%, while Chinese duties on US goods reached 125%. The US extended tariff exemptions for 164 Chinese products through August 31, according to a notice by the US trade office published earlier this week. The list covers semiconductors, telecom equipment, aerospace items, and medical device components. Waivers for 14 types of solar panel gear remain in place. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Monday that Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping would 'likely talk this week.' Lin said he had no information to share on the matter.
Russia Today
9 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukrainian Air Force admits modern Russian jets trump F-16s
Ukraine's Western-supplied F-16 fighter jets are outmatched by Russia's newer aircraft and missile systems, the head of the Communications Department of the Ukrainian Air Force, Yury Ignat, has said. Washington gave its NATO allies the green light to send their surplus US-made jets to Ukraine in 2023. 'We are getting Western equipment, we are getting aircraft. Today, we have F16s, we already have Mirages,' he said in an interview with the outlet Ukrainian Pravda published on Tuesday. 'They have already been in use. We understand that they are not the newest.' Ignat stressed the importance of the detection range of the jets' radar, and the strike range of its weapons. 'Unfortunately, Russia has planes today that see further, and missiles that shoot further. Even compared now with the F-16,' he said. Ukraine's older Soviet-era jets such as the MiG-29 and Su-27 are 'no comparison at all,' he added. 'It's like pitting a Makarov pistol against a sniper rifle.' The current modifications of the F-16 that Ukraine has 'cannot compete one-on-one in an air battle' with the newer Russian Su-35 multirole fighter, Ignat said in March. The total number of F-16s given to Kiev has not been released, but it is believed that Ukraine was given 18 last year. Three of the jets have been destroyed, Ignat has confirmed. Last month, Ignat admitted that US-designed Patriot air defense systems have also been struggling against Russian weapons. Russian Iskander cruise missiles 'perform evasive maneuvers' and drop decoy flares in their final approach phase, 'thwarting the Patriot's trajectory calculations,' he told Le Monde. Russia has repeatedly condemned the supplies of Western armaments to Kiev, stressing that they will not change the course of the conflict, and slammed F-16 deliveries as an escalation. Russian President Vladimir Putin has warned that if jets taking part in the conflict take off from air bases outside Ukraine, Moscow would consider those bases to be hostile.
Russia Today
12 hours ago
- Russia Today
China is building a power triangle to change the world
The final week of May marked a significant political development with the potential to reshape Asia's geopolitical landscape. Kuala Lumpur, the capital of Malaysia, hosted the inaugural summit involving China, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). While signs of deepening engagement among these three actors had surfaced in preceding years, the establishment of a formal trilateral cooperation mechanism is a recent development. This event did not occur in a geopolitical vacuum. The region is increasingly exposed to intensifying rivalry among China, the US, and other global powers. In April, Chinese President Xi Jinping embarked on a Southeast Asian tour – visiting Cambodia, Malaysia, and Vietnam – to consolidate Beijing's influence. Almost simultaneously, an envoy dispatched by US President Donald Trump toured Cambodia and Vietnam and met with representatives from all ASEAN member states in an effort to repair relations damaged by Trump's tariffs and to reaffirm the commitment to a 'Free and Open Indo-Pacific'. Meanwhile, the US president visited three Gulf states, making new deals and publicly denouncing the longstanding American policy of mentorship and interference in regional affairs. By the end of May, French President Emmanuel Macron also entered the scene, visiting Indonesia, Singapore, and Vietnam to remind Southeast Asian counterparts that the EU still exists and remains a potential alternative to both Beijing and Washington. It is no coincidence that the China-ASEAN-GCC summit was convened in Malaysia. As the current chair of ASEAN, Malaysia plays a pivotal role, and its prime minister, Anwar Ibrahim, is a vocal proponent of regional integration and innovative partnerships. Ahead of the trilateral summit, ASEAN members gathered in Kuala Lumpur to chart their future course. On this occasion, the ten member states adopted ASEAN's first 20-year vision – ASEAN 2045 – articulating the ambition to position Southeast Asia as a global growth engine aligned with other dynamic actors. Among them, China and the GCC member states – Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates – stand out prominently. Together, they represent a quarter of the world's population and contribute nearly the same proportion to global GDP. Their economic linkages are already well-established: China is the top trading partner for both ASEAN and the GCC. ASEAN has surpassed the EU as China's foremost economic partner, and Beijing imports over one-third of its crude oil from GCC states. The summit in Kuala Lumpur brought together the world's second- and fifth-largest economies – China and ASEAN – along with key suppliers of energy and raw materials. The leaders did not conceal their optimism. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim advanced a vision of intercultural dialogue between Confucian and Islamic civilizations, aligning with China's Global Civilization Initiative. Chinese Premier Li Qiang envisaged a 'big triangle' as a pillar of global security and prosperity, invoking the 'shared Asian values' of openness, cooperation, and integration in contrast to perceived Western norms. Notably, Beijing's official discourse increasingly emphasizes these 'Asian values'. This narrative underpins a renewed focus on neighboring states. In April, Xi convened a rare high-level conference on relations with the 'near abroad', characterizing it as essential to China's development, security, and diplomatic priorities. Among other regional actors, this recalibration may evoke concerns about a resurgence of a modern-day 'Pax Sinica'. However, Beijing refutes these interpretations, instead invoking alternative historical models such as the Silk Road, which emphasized connectivity, integration, and equality. The China-ASEAN-GCC summit was no exception: Beijing proposed extending the existing China-ASEAN Free Trade Area to include the GCC, a suggestion welcomed by Southeast Asian leaders. This could accelerate China's bid for trade liberalization and amplify the benefits of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership – the world's largest free trade zone, which includes all ASEAN nations. The summit's agenda focused heavily on economic issues, reflecting ASEAN's strategic orientation and the interests of Gulf states. Over the past decade, China has launched numerous projects with ASEAN members under the Belt and Road Initiative. Cooperation with the GCC is also expanding beyond traditional sectors such as raw materials to cutting-edge areas including artificial intelligence, the digital economy, and 5G technology. This economic emphasis is strategic, enabling stakeholders to bypass contentious political and security matters. And these contentious issues abound. While China maintains robust ties with both ASEAN and GCC members, bilateral frictions persist. Within ASEAN, territorial disputes and sovereignty concerns – particularly in the South China Sea – complicate trust-building. China's disputes with Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Vietnam are longstanding and strain regional relations. Perceptions of Chinese assertiveness also fuel anxieties over economic overdependence, potential 'debt traps', and Beijing's political leverage. These factors have prompted leaders such as Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. to move closer to the US in recent years. The broader China-US rivalry remains a defining dynamic. Both ASEAN and GCC nations have historically strong ties to the US. The US remains ASEAN's largest export market and top foreign investor. GCC countries, long aligned with Washington, now face the challenge of navigating a careful balance between American and Chinese interests, particularly on sensitive technologies and security cooperation. Washington opposes the adoption of Chinese 5G and AI technologies by Saudi Arabia, and similar concerns have led to the suspension of military agreements between the US and UAE. Additionally, discussions about conducting oil trade in the yuan challenge the petrodollar system and attract Western scrutiny. These geopolitical complexities could undermine trilateral collaboration, exposing fault lines and structural vulnerabilities. While sectors such as trade, energy, infrastructure, and advanced technology offer natural areas of convergence, geopolitical competition and cultural divergence present serious obstacles. Moreover, there is a pronounced asymmetry among the actors: Smaller ASEAN economies may lack the institutional and financial capacity to engage fully in this trilateral format. Nonetheless, the China-ASEAN-GCC platform represents a novel configuration within an emerging multipolar world order. It reflects the accelerating momentum of South-South cooperation, which integrates multipolarity with multilateralism and economic globalization. Trump's tariff storm served as a wake-up call for many US partners across ASEAN and the Gulf, underscoring the imperative of diversifying partnerships and embracing pragmatic alternatives. Closer ties with Beijing do not necessarily indicate a wholesale shift from one hegemon to another. Rather, ASEAN and the GCC are striving to engage both China and the US where feasible. Yet, recent developments suggest that Washington's strategy of pressuring states to reduce ties with China in exchange for benefits is losing traction. The key questions now are whether ASEAN can effectively balance great power rivalries to become an autonomous pole in a multipolar world; whether regional actors can sustain this delicate equilibrium and avoid the formation of military blocs in Asia-Pacific and beyond; and whether the trilateral framework itself can endure amid mounting geopolitical tensions. These remain open-ended questions – and the answers will emerge only with time.
