'They will never remain there': Israeli minister sparks outrage over Gaza remarks
Journalists on Israel's Channel 13 had strong reactions to what French President Emmanuel Macron said recently. Macron said that France would officially recognize the State of Palestine at the September UN General Assembly. Macron also asked for an end to the war in Gaza right away and stressed the need to keep people safe.
Israeli leaders and the media quickly told France to change its mind, and many people wondered if Paris was "rewarding terrorism." The US quickly confirmed its backing for Israel, which was different from what Macron said.
Ofir Bronstein, an Israeli advisor to the French president, said that Hamas had taken advantage of the lack of power in Gaza and revealed that he had told Macron to back the idea of a Palestinian state. Macron didn't say that he agreed with the idea, but he also didn't say that he didn't.
Israeli media said that France was acting politically in a two-sided way by continuing to deny Palestinians their rights, which they said was a major cause of the October 7 killings and Operation "Al-Aqsa Flood."
In the West Bank, there was "disgraceful performance."
In a local editorial, Dror Etkes, who used to be a field worker for the Peace Now movement, gave Netanyahu a very harsh review of how he is managing the West Bank. Etkes told Israeli media that the present government has "demonstrated disgraceful operational capabilities" in many areas, mainly when it comes to settlement policies and running the government.
Etkes said that the far-right, especially Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, now has real power in the West Bank instead of the troops. Basically, he said, Smotrich uses a personal agent to handle settlement growth and civil issues, leaving the official civil administration out of the picture.
He said that this change has led to the selective application of Israeli law, which is harshly applied to Palestinians while ignoring breaches by settlers. It was told by Etkes that this trend has gotten worse under Netanyahu's present government.
He said that the government's "settlement triangle" was made up of three main parts: the building of over 100 new settlements; the moving of 80–90 Palestinian towns; and the taking of large areas of land. Etkes says that the government has given power to extreme groups of settlers at the cost of Palestinian rights and military control.
🔴🇮🇱Israeli Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu:
"The army must find ways more painful than death for the civilians in Gaza. Killing them is not enough." pic.twitter.com/0ALsvQFK3x — China in English (@ChinainEnglis) July 25, 2025
"Erasure of Gaza" is pushed by ministers.
Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu said on Channel 12 that the Gaza Strip should be fully turned into a Jewish area and that Palestinians would no longer be allowed to live there. This caused even more debate.
Eliyahu didn't like the idea of Jews living in "enclosed cantons." He said that Palestinians should be kept away from everyone else instead. "They'll never stay there." "Never," he said.
Such language supports the idea that the government is actively working to "erasure of Gaza," as Channel 12's reporter pointed out. She warned that these words will do a lot of damage to foreign relations when they are turned into other languages.
Political expert Amit Segal made it clear that these unpopular policies are not just being talked about; they are being put into action. He said that Israeli officials should know that their words have an effect on people all over the world, which strengthens the case for Palestinians abroad.
At the same time, Yinon Magal, a host on Channel 14, criticized other reporters for spreading what he called "emotional propaganda" about the humanitarian situation in Gaza. He didn't believe the stories of famine and said the media was spreading fake pity by jokingly saying they were planning donation drives to help the people of Gaza.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Jordan News
2 hours ago
- Jordan News
Report: Israeli Forces Bombed 500 Schools Sheltering Displaced Persons in Gaza - Jordan News
Report: Israeli Forces Bombed 500 Schools Sheltering Displaced Persons in Gaza Human Rights Watch confirmed on Thursday that the Israeli occupation army has bombed over 500 schools sheltering displaced people in the Gaza Strip since the beginning of the war, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of civilians. The organization emphasized that U.S.-supplied munitions have been used in these attacks. اضافة اعلان In its report, the organization described Israel's targeting of schools sheltering displaced persons as unlawful attacks, regardless of the justification provided. The report noted that the Israeli military carried out double-tap strikes on schools—hitting the same location a second time to target survivors and first responders—and that some of the attacks were indiscriminate. These strikes, it stated, have denied civilians safe access to shelters and will severely disrupt access to education for many years, as rebuilding and repairing the damaged schools will require significant resources and time. Human Rights Watch stressed that indiscriminate and unlawful attacks using U.S.-made weapons on Gaza's schools have killed hundreds and damaged or destroyed nearly all schools in the Strip. Call for Arms Embargo According to the report, two Israeli newspapers revealed that the Israeli military had established a special bombing unit tasked with systematically identifying schools, labeled as 'centers of gravity,' for the purpose of targeting them. The Israeli military allegedly justified this by claiming that Hamas fighters were hiding among hundreds of civilians. The report also highlighted that double-tap strikes—a tactic involving a second strike aimed at rescuers—have become increasingly common in recent months during attacks on schools. The organization called on the United States—which supplies munitions to Israel—to impose an arms embargo on the Israeli government and take urgent steps to enforce the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. 'Governments should suspend arms transfers to Israel, given the clear risk that these weapons will be used to commit or facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law,' the report stated. 'By continuing to provide Israel with weapons that have been repeatedly used in strikes on schools turned into shelters, and in apparent war crimes, the U.S. has become complicit in their unlawful use.' Unsubstantiated Justifications Regarding Israel's claims that it targets schools because they harbor fighters, Human Rights Watch noted that most of these claims lack any concrete evidence. The organization emphasized that even the presence of combatants in a civilian facility does not justify an attack unless all feasible precautions are taken to avoid harming civilians, as required under the laws of war. Among the documented incidents, the report cited two significant airstrikes on schools in Gaza, in which no evidence was found of military targets—making the attacks indiscriminate and illegal. On July 27, 2024, Israeli forces bombed Khadija Girls' School in Deir al-Balah, killing at least 15 people. The school was sheltering around 4,000 displaced persons, and no military activity had been recorded in or around the facility. The attack reportedly involved U.S.-made GBU-39 bombs. On September 21, 2024, an airstrike targeted Zaytoun School in Gaza City, killing 34 people, most of them women and children, and injuring dozens more—some suffering amputations. The organization reported that Israel provided no prior warning and offered no proof of any military presence at the site. Human Rights Watch also stated that the Israeli army ignored its official inquiries requesting clarification on alleged military targets or evidence for the attacks. — (Al Jazeera)
Jordan News
3 hours ago
- Jordan News
Maariv: Israeli Army Estimates All Hostages Could Be Killed If Gaza Is Reoccupied - Jordan News
Maariv: Israeli Army Estimates All Hostages Could Be Killed If Gaza Is Reoccupied The Israeli daily Maariv reported Thursday that the Israeli army estimates a potential reoccupation of the Gaza Strip could lead to the death of all hostages and result in dozens of Israeli military fatalities and hundreds of injuries. اضافة اعلان The report indicated that Israel's security establishment holds a particularly pessimistic view of the plan to reoccupy Gaza. Nonetheless, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu remains adamant about implementing it and has recently outlined the specific method he envisions for executing the operation. According to Maariv, Netanyahu is pushing for a full occupation of the Gaza Strip under pressure from far-right ministers in his government—namely Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, Settlements Minister Orit Strock, and National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. In contrast, the military leadership prefers leveraging the current gains by conducting targeted encirclement operations and raids within Gaza. Netanyahu's vision reportedly involves large-scale incursions by brigades and divisions into the remaining 20% of Gaza that is not yet under Israeli control. According to Israeli media outlets, including Israel Hayom and Maariv, the Israeli army currently controls between 75% and 80% of the Gaza Strip. Meanwhile, Gaza's Government Media Office stated on May 25 that Israel controls 77% of the besieged strip through what it described as 'ethnic cleansing, forced displacement, and systematic genocide,' in an attempt to forcibly redraw the population map. Maariv warned that the areas targeted for occupation are densely populated and, according to Israeli intelligence, heavily mined and booby-trapped. The paper noted that although Netanyahu envisions a swift operation to defeat Hamas and reoccupy Gaza, he has yet to outline a clear post-war plan, and the fate of the areas to be reoccupied remains uncertain. 'If this plan is driven by far-right ministers,' Maariv wrote, 'then the aim of occupying Gaza is to expel its population and establish Israeli settlements on evacuated lands—an objective that was not part of the original war goals.' The Israeli army is expected to present its estimate tonight of the high cost Israel would incur in a full-scale Gaza reoccupation. The Israeli security cabinet is scheduled to meet Thursday evening to discuss the plan. Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi opposes the operation, calling it a 'strategic trap.' According to Maariv, 'army estimates suggest that most of the hostages—if not all—will be killed during the operation, either by their captors or due to stray Israeli fire.' Tel Aviv believes that 50 Israeli hostages remain in Gaza, about 20 of whom are still alive. Meanwhile, more than 10,800 Palestinians are held in Israeli prisons, where they reportedly suffer from torture, starvation, and medical neglect that has claimed numerous lives, according to Palestinian and Israeli human rights reports. The newspaper added: 'The additional price of reoccupying Gaza would be dozens of Israeli soldiers killed and hundreds wounded, based on military estimates.' Moreover, the report stated that the army believes advancing the occupation could take at least two to three months, while 'clearing operations' could take another two years—a term interpreted as forced displacement of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip. The army also warned that by the end of the operation, Israel would be obliged under international law to establish a military administration and assume responsibility for the 2.5 million residents of Gaza as an occupying power. Maariv concluded that 'the occupation of Gaza would impose a significant societal burden on Israel.' The army estimates that this burden would involve the immediate large-scale mobilization of tens of thousands of reservists and the redeployment of all regular forces to resume combat in Gaza in the coming days. According to Israeli media, internal divisions are deepening. Netanyahu is reportedly determined to reoccupy all of Gaza—including areas believed to be holding Israeli hostages—according to his office. In contrast, the chief of staff proposes a strategy of encirclement across multiple axes in Gaza to increase military pressure on Hamas and force it to release the hostages. On Wednesday, Chief of Staff Halevi described Netanyahu's plan as a 'strategic trap,' warning it would exhaust the army for years and endanger the hostages' lives. —(Anadolu)
Jordan Times
4 hours ago
- Jordan Times
Lebanon's Hizbollah rejects cabinet decision to disarm it
BEIRUT, Lebanon - Hizbollah said Wednesday that it would treat a Lebanese government decision to disarm the militant group "as if it did not exist", accusing the cabinet of committing a "grave sin". Amid heavy US pressure and fears Israel could expand its strikes on Lebanon, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said Tuesday that the government had tasked the army with developing a plan to restrict weapons to government forces by year end. The plan is to be presented to the government by the end of August for discussion and approval, and another cabinet meeting is scheduled for Thursday to continue the talks, including on a US-proposed timetable for disarmament. Hizbollah said the government had "committed a grave sin by taking the decision to disarm Lebanon of its weapons to resist the Israeli enemy". The decision is unprecedented since Lebanon's civil war factions gave up their weapons three and a half decades ago. "This decision undermines Lebanon's sovereignty and gives Israel a free hand to tamper with its security, geography, politics and future existence... Therefore, we will treat this decision as if it does not exist," the Iran-backed group said in a statement. 'Serves Israel's interests' The government said its decision came as part of implementing a November ceasefire that sought to end more than a year of hostilities between Israel and Hizbollah, which culminated in two months of full-blown war. Hizbollah said it viewed the government's move as "the result of dictates from US envoy" Tom Barrack. It "fully serves Israel's interests and leaves Lebanon exposed to the Israeli enemy without any deterrence", the group said. Hizbollah was the only faction that kept its weapons after Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war. It emerged weakened politically and militarily from its latest conflict with Israel, its arsenal pummelled and its senior leadership decimated. Israel has kept up its strikes on Hezbollah and other targets despite the November truce, and has threatened to keep doing so until the group has been disarmed. An Israeli strike on the southern town of Tulin on Wednesday killed one person and wounded another, the health ministry said. Israel also launched a series of air strikes on southern Lebanon, wounding at least two people according to the health ministry. The Israeli military said it struck "weapons storage facilities, a missile launcher and Hezbollah terrorist infrastructure which stored engineering tools that allowed for the re-establishment of terrorist infrastructure in the area". Hizbollah said Israel must halt the attacks before any domestic debate about its weapons and a new defence strategy could begin. 'Pivotal moment' "We are open to dialogue, ending the Israeli aggression against Lebanon, liberating its land, releasing prisoners, working to build the state, and rebuilding what was destroyed by the brutal aggression," the group said. Hizbollah is "prepared to discuss a national security strategy", but not under Israeli fire, it added. Two ministers affiliated with Hezbollah and its ally the Amal movement walked out of Tuesday's meeting. Hizbollah described the walkout as "an expression of rejection" of the government's "decision to subject Lebanon to American tutelage and Israeli occupation". The Amal movement, headed by parliament speaker Nabih Berri, accused the government of "rushing to offer more gratuitous concessions" to Israel when it should have sought to end the ongoing attacks. It called Thursday's cabinet meeting "an opportunity for correction". Hizbollah opponent the Lebanese Forces, one of the country's two main Christian parties, said the cabinet's decision to disarm the militant group was "a pivotal moment in Lebanon's modern history -- a long-overdue step toward restoring full state authority and sovereignty". The Free Patriotic Movement, the other major Christian party and a former ally of Hezbollah, said it was in favour of the army receiving the group's weapons "to strengthen Lebanon's defensive power". Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a televised interview that any decision on disarmament "will ultimately rest with Hizbollah itself". "We support it from afar, but we do not intervene in its decisions," he added, noting that the group had "rebuilt itself" following setbacks during its war with Israel.
