Proposed bill preventing officers from asking drivers why they were pulled over dies in committee
DENVER (KDVR) — A proposed bill that would have prohibited officers from asking drivers why they were pulled over died in committee.
House Bill 25-1243, 'Peace Officer Questions During Traffic Stop,' was proposed in February and would've prevented peace officers from asking the common question when they pull over a driver: 'Do you know why I pulled you over?'
Some argue that the proposed bill that would have required police officers to tell the driver the reason they were pulled over would've protected both officers and drivers.
Skyler McKinley with AAA said the bill would have limited the time officers spend on the road while pulling someone over, which helps with safety. The less time spent on the open road, the less likely it is an officer would be hit by an oncoming car.
2 arrested after stolen vehicle spotted in Broomfield: Police
Meanwhile, Sen. Faith Winter, a Democrat who co-sponsored the bill, said it would help with officer transparency and build trust, as many of her constituents didn't know that they didn't need to answer that common question.
However, the bill was only proposed for two months before it died in committee.
During the Judiciary Committee meeting on April 2, Rep. Mandy Lindsay, a co-sponsor of the bill, said the bill stems from roadside safety, and people shouldn't have to jump through 'intellectual hoops' while being pulled over, especially since officers have a vast knowledge of the law, while drivers may not.
The discussion about the bill went on for almost two hours, with many representatives asking about the point of the proposed bill, as it didn't have any consequences for the officers if they broke the law.
Rep. Cecelia Espenoza said she's struggling with the 'why' as there is no penalty, and she was hesitant as it would be restraining the words of a peace officer without a specific public safety issue other than the anxiety of being pulled over.
FOX31 Newsletters: Sign up to get breaking news sent to your inbox
Several people agreed with the idea of the bill, but they wanted more 'teeth in it' and punishment.
The committee postponed the bill indefinitely in an 8-3 vote. The only representatives voting against the postponement were Lorena Garcia, Elizabeth Velasco and Javier Mabrey.
The proposed bill's history said it was postponed 'indefinitely, using a reversal of the previous roll call.' The reverse roll call was used since no one objected.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Embattled DNC vice chair decides not to run after diversity re-vote called
David Hogg, the 25-year-old progressive firebrand, will not compete in the new Democratic National Committee (DNC) vice chair elections that were decided today after a majority of members voted for a new election. After three days of submitting electronic ballots, DNC members voted to uphold the Credentials Committee's resolution proposed by longtime Democratic Party activist Kalyn Free to host a re-election for two vice-chair positions, currently held by Hogg and Malcolm Kenyatta. Seventy-five percent of those who cast a ballot voted in favor of the resolution, while 25% voted against it. A total of 89% of DNC members cast a ballot. "The DNC will immediately move to administer new ballots for the final two Vice Chair positions, one of which must be held by a male and one of which may be held by a candidate of any gender," said the DNC's Deputy Press Secretary Nina Raneses. "The election for the male Vice Chair position will commence tomorrow morning at 10:00AM ET." Democrats' Vice Chair Gets Ultimatum: Stay Neutral In Primaries Or Step Down From Party Leadership With Hogg's withdrawal, Kenyatta is now the only candidate for the male vice chair slot. The DNC's decision is the latest political blow to Hogg, who stirred up intraparty divisions this year for his $20 million pledge to primary-challenge older Democrats in safe blue districts he said are "asleep at the wheel" through his outside political action group, Leaders We Deserve. Read On The Fox News App "I came into this role to play a positive role in creating the change our party needs," Hogg wrote in a statement to the New York Times. "It is clear that there is a fundamental disagreement about the role of a Vice Chair — and it's OK to have disagreements. What isn't OK is allowing this to remain our focus when there is so much more we need to be focused on." "Ultimately, I have decided to not run in this upcoming election so the party can focus on what really matters," Hogg added. Meanwhile, Hogg also published a lengthy X thread explaining his decision not to run for reelection and criticizing many aspects of the Democratic Party, but deleted it shortly after posting. Hogg's decision to leave the DNC comes on the heels of a damning Politico report, which included leaked audio from a Zoom meeting of DNC Chair Ken Martin lamenting Hogg's fallout at the DNC, claiming it has made it harder for Democrats to do their jobs and for Martin to demonstrate his ability to lead. "No one knows who the hell I am, right? I'm trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to put ourselves in a position to win," Martin told Hogg on the May 15 Zoom call. "I don't think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to. So it's really frustrating," But the criticism didn't stop Hogg from defying advice and wading into additional Democrat primaries by endorsing Virginia state Del. Irene Shin in the special election to replace the late Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va. Dnc Chair Ripped David Hogg Over Party Infighting In Leaked Meeting Audio: 'Really Frustrating' Martin affirmed the DNC would stay neutral in Democratic primaries following Hogg's multimillion-dollar announcement. And the DNC chair gave Hogg the ultimatum to either rescind his vice-chair position or forego his political influence through his PAC. "I commend David for his years of activism, organizing, and fighting for his generation, and while I continue to believe he is a powerful voice for this party, I respect his decision to step back from his post as Vice Chair," Martin said in a statement following Hogg's announcement he would not seek reelection as DNC vice chair. "I have no doubt that he will remain an important advocate for Democrats across the map. I appreciate his service as an officer, his hard work, and his dedication to the party." While DNC officials, past and present, said the vote to host vice chair re-elections had nothing to do with Hogg personally, the progressive Gan Z activist framed the DNC's vote as an expedited plan to remove him as vice chair. Hogg said Martin's newly proposed "neutrality pledge" was "trying to change the rules because I'm not currently breaking them." David Hogg Slams 'Fast-track' Effort To Oust Him As Dnc Vice Chair "While this vote was based on how the DNC conducted its officers' elections, which I had nothing to do with, it is also impossible to ignore the broader context of my work to reform the party which loomed large over this vote," Hogg said after the Credentials Committee voted to elevate Free's complaint before the full committee. Free submitted her complaint following the DNC's Feb. 1 officer elections, in which Hogg and Kenyatta were elected vice chairs. Free claimed the DNC's tabulation method violated the charter's provision and parliamentary procedure and "discriminated against three women of color candidates." Last month, the Credentials Committee found the vice-chair officer elections violated parliamentary procedure and voted to recommend the DNC conduct a new election for the two vice-chair positions. Now that the full DNC has called for a new vote, they will conduct a re-election from June 12-17. One vice-chair position may be filled by a male and one may be a candidate of any gender, according to the DNC. Only the candidates who were eligible for the third ballot during the Feb. 1 election qualify for the re-election, which includes Kenyatta, Free, Jeanna Repass and Shasti Conrad. Kenyatta is reportedly the only male. "This was never about Malcolm Kenyatta or David Hogg," Free told Fox News Digital after the Credentials Committee elevated her complaint. "For me, this was about ensuring that the Democratic Party lives up to our ideals as the only political party to believe in and stand up for election integrity and a free and fair democracy." But Kenyatta, who picked up the most votes during the Feb. 1 election, has criticized Hogg for playing "fast and loose with the facts without rebuttal." "Any story about this that neatly places this into a narrative about David Hogg is wrong," Kenyatta said of the re-election buzz. "I worked my a-- off to get this role and have done the job every day since I've held it. This story is complex, and I'm frustrated — but it's not about @davidhogg111. Even though he clearly wants it to be."Original article source: Embattled DNC vice chair decides not to run after diversity re-vote called
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ballot order decided for Ruggerio's former Senate seat
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI) — The order of the candidates' names on the ballot for this summer's Senate District 4 special election has been decided. A ballot placement lottery was held Wednesday at the R.I. Board of Elections in Providence. The special election was called after Senate President Dominick Ruggerio died in April after a lengthy battle with cancer and other illnesses. For the Aug. 5 general election, Republican Alex Asermely's name will go first, followed by the Democratic nominee's name. A primary election to decide which Democrat out of the four running will face Asermely is on July 8. RELATED: Here are the candidates for Ruggerio's old Senate seat The order for the Democratic primary's ballot is North Providence District 2 Town Councilman Stefano Famiglietti, former Providence state Rep. Marcia Ranglin-Vassell, Manuel Taveras and Lenny Cioe. (Famiglietti was endorsed by the district committee, which locked in his name going first, per state law.) Stephen Tocco, an independent, filed to run for the seat but withdrew. Tocco said Wednesday he rescinded his candidacy to avoid being a spoiler candidate in the general election. The district represents parts of Providence and North Providence. This is the first time the seat has opened up since Ruggerio started representing it in 1985. NEXT: Lisa Field wins special election for late Rep. Carol Doherty's Taunton seat Download the and apps to get breaking news and weather alerts. Watch or with the new . Follow us on social media: Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court denies Bob Menendez's bid to stay out of prison
A federal appeals court on Wednesday denied former Sen. Bob Menendez's (D-N.J.) last-ditch bid to avoid reporting to prison while he appeals his corruption conviction. In a terse order that offered no reasoning, a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled 2-1 against Menendez. Judge Alison Nathan, an appointee of former President Biden, would have ruled in the New Jersey Democrat's favor. The decision lays the groundwork for Menendez to take his ask to the Supreme Court. But the clock is ticking, as he's set to report to prison on Tuesday to begin his 11-year sentence for trading bribes for political favors and other crimes. Menendez was convicted last year on 16 corruption charges, including accepting luxurious bribes with his wife, Nadine Menendez, from three New Jersey businessmen in exchange for his political clout and acting as a foreign agent of Egypt. It made him the first public official ever convicted of acting as a foreign agent while in office. Nadine Menendez was convicted on all counts she faced in April and is set to be sentenced on Sept. 11. She was accused of teaming up with her husband to accept the bribes — which included hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash, gold bars and luxury cars — and conspiring to turn him into a foreign agent of Egypt. She was initially set to be tried alongside her husband, but her trial was delayed following her breast cancer diagnosis and surgery. Two of the businessmen were also convicted at trial and reported to prison last month. The third pleaded guilty before facing a jury. A federal judge in April denied Bob Menendez's request for release, and he took the ask to the federal appeals court last month. Meanwhile, Menendez's allies have reportedly made overtures to the White House for a pardon from President Trump, who has not openly ruled out clemency for the ex-senator. The former New Jersey Democrat himself has also publicly sought to land on the president's good side. After his sentencing, he exclaimed that 'President Trump was right,' deeming his own prosecution 'political' and 'corrupted to the core' while suggesting that Trump's was, as well. Earlier Wednesday, he made a winding post on the social platform X about 'how weaponization works,' alleging similarities between his prosecution and the president's. The Hill requested comment from Menendez's lawyer. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
