Starmer facing growing backbench rebellion over planned disability benefit cuts
A senior Labour MP has said the government needs to take "corrective action" over planned disability cuts - as Sir Keir Starmer faces a growing backbench rebellion.
Tan Dhesi, chair of the influential Commons defence committee, told the Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge the "disappointing" local election results show the government must listen and learn, particularly over welfare reforms.
The government has proposed tightening the eligibility requirements for the personal independent payment, known as PIP.
A claimant must score a minimum of four points on one PIP daily living activity, such as preparing food, washing and bathing, using the toilet or reading, to receive the daily living element of the benefit.
Mr Dhesi, the MP for Slough, said "corrective action" needs to be taken but insisted if the government changed tact, it would not be a U-turn as the disability cuts were only proposals.
"A government which is in listening mode should be looking at what the electorate is saying," he said.
"And we need to make sure that it's our moral duty, responsibility, to look after the most vulnerable within our community, whether that's in Slough, whether that's elsewhere across the country.
"So, I hope that the government will be taking on board that feedback and many of us as MPs are giving that feedback in various meetings happening here in Westminster and then we need to take corrective action."
Minister Alex Davies-Jones told the Politics Hub a Labour government "will always seek to protect the most vulnerable" and it wants to "listen to people who have got real lived experience".
She added she has the "utmost respect for Tan, he's a great constituency MP and he's doing exactly what he should be doing, is representing his constituency".
Sir Keir is facing a rebellion from Labour MPs, with about 40 in the Red Wall - Labour's traditional heartlands in the north of England - reposting a statement on social media in which they said the leadership's response to the local elections had "fallen on deaf ears".
8:27
Several backbench Labour MPs also spoke out against the plans during a debate on PIP and disabled people in parliament on Wednesday.
Ian Byrne, MP for Liverpool West Derby, said he would "swim through vomit to vote against" the proposed changes and said: "This is not what the Labour Party was formed to do."
Bell Ribeiro-Addy, the MP for Clapham and Brixton Hill, said she feared tightening PIP eligibility would cause deaths, adding: "Lest we forget that study that attributed 330,000 excess deaths in Britain between 2012 and 2019 to the last round of austerity cuts [under the Conservative government]."
Diane Abbott, the longest-serving female MP, accused the government of putting forward "contradictory arguments".
"On the one hand, they insist they are helping the disabled by putting them back to work," she said.
"But on the other hand, they say this cut will save £9bn. Well, you can't do both."
1:23
However, fellow Labour MP David Pinto-Duschinsky, said MPs cannot "ignore this issue" of health-related benefit claimant figures rising at "twice the rate of underlying health conditions".
Responding for the government, social security minister Sir Stephen Timms said PIP claims were set to "more than double, from two million to over 4.3 million this decade".
"It would certainly not be in the interests of people currently claiming the benefits for the government to bury its head in the sand over that rate of increase," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Independent Scotland would cut ties with Israel, says SNP Westminster leader
An independent Scotland would sever diplomatic ties with Israel, the SNP's Westminster leader has said. Speaking on the News Agents podcast, Stephen Flynn said he was 'deeply upset and angry' about what was happening in Gaza as he hit out at the UK Government's 'weak' position on the issue. The Scottish Government, under the leadership of both Humza Yousaf and John Swinney, has been outspoken on the conflict, consistently calling for a ceasefire and for humanitarian aid to be able to enter Gaza. The Aberdeen South MP also said the UK Government should do something to catch the Israeli government's attention as it looks to ramp up pressure. Asked if an independent Scotland would close its embassies in Israel and break off relations with the country, Mr Flynn said it would. 'I've gone into the House of Commons on God knows how many occasions now and listened to David Lammy and Hamish Falconer, the Middle East minister, and they've told us how 'we're going to do this, or we're going to do that, and this is the latest thing we're going to do'. 'And then he stands up and says, 'but they're ignoring us'. 'Well, if they're ignoring you, then do something that captures their attention.' Mr Flynn's comments come as the Foreign Secretary announced the UK would be sanctioning two Israeli ministers. Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, Israel's security minister and finance minister respectively, have been 'inciting violence against Palestinian people for months and months and months, they have been encouraging egregious abuses of human rights', David Lammy said. Both will be subject to a travel ban and asset freeze. The Westminster SNP leader went on to say that it would not be 'wise' for his party's MPs to visit Israel, claiming they were likely to be turned away from the country, as happened with Labour MPs earlier this year, owing to the party's outspoken opposition to the conduct of the war in Gaza. 'I'd be amazed if any of them did, because they're not daft, and they probably know that they would get turned around and stuck on a plane right back out Israel,' he said. 'Look, I'm deeply, deeply upset and angry about what's happened in Gaza, and what continues to happen in Gaza, and the fact that the UK position has been so weak for far too long in respect of this. 'I think it's important that you convey your views to people who are rational actors.'
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Pride crumble' served in House of Lords
The House of Lords canteen has served peers a 'pride crumble' dessert with a rainbow-coloured topping. The River Restaurant in Parliament, which caters for peers and other staff on the parliamentary estate, offered as its hot dessert option on Tuesday a 'pride crumble'. The topping of the £2.15 pudding appeared to be dyed with red and blue food colouring in horizontal stripes, and was served with custard to mark Pride month. It is unclear whether the crumble was designed to resemble a particular LGBT flag, such as the rainbow flag, or the pink, blue and white transgender flag. It comes after the House of Lords removed Pride flags from its canteen put up at the start of June following a complaint from a peer. The 'Progress Pride' flag, which was among the decorations, includes the colours of the transgender movement and is seen by many as indicative of support for gender ideology – the idea that sex is a spectrum and that people can change their identity. Baroness Nicholson, a Tory peer, complained to the Lord Speaker, Lord McFall, and officials agreed that the flags should be taken down as they had not been sanctioned by the authorities. During her time in Parliament, she voted in favour of section 28, which banned the 'promotion of homosexuality' by local authorities, and against gay marriage. The Progress Pride flag, designed in 2021, is replacing the traditional rainbow Pride flag in many venues. It includes an extra triangle of colour on the left hand side, made up of stripes including white, pink and light blue – the colours of the transgender movement. The flags were not on display in the House of Commons restaurants. The canteen also served rainbow couscous for peers last week as part of its Pride celebrations. The Pride flag was flown from Parliament for the first time in history in June 2016. Last month, Reform UK announced that its councils would not be allowed to fly any LGBT or Pride flags, restricting local authorities to flying only the Union Jack and the St George's Cross.
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Calling us Nimbys is ‘hate speech', anti-solar campaigner tells Government
The term 'Nimby' is hate speech, the leader of a campaign trying to block Britain's biggest solar farm has said. Prof Alex Rogers, the chair of the Save Botley West community group, is organising efforts to prevent the construction of a £800 million solar farm covering almost 3,500 acres in the Oxfordshire countryside. If approved, it would become the largest in Europe – and equivalent in size to Heathrow Airport. Save Botley West called on the King to intervene on the grounds of an obscure law from the early 18th century. But the 57-year-old marine biologist has hit out against the Government by describing Labour's use of the term 'Nimby' as a form of 'hate speech'. Nimby, which stands for 'not in my backyard', is used to describe people who oppose new housing developments because they live near them. The term has been used by prominent figures in the Government including Sir Keir Starmer, who in January vowed to end a 'challenge culture' against new developments by 'taking on the Nimbys'. Prof Rogers said: 'We've heard the term Nimby bandied about by the Labour Government in particular, effectively that is pejorative language deliberately used to alienate and isolate ordinary people who are legitimately concerned about the really serious impacts of what is, in effect, a non-sustainable project. 'I would view a sustainable project as one which obviously benefits the climate, which this does, but also benefits people who live in the region and benefits wider aspects of the environment - and this scheme certainly does not do that.' He added: 'I do have a message, particularly for the Labour Party, in respect of the use of 'Nimbys' or 'Nimbyism'. 'If you look at the UN definition of hate speech, the use of that term falls within that UN definition, and I think Labour would be appalled if people were using these sorts of terms to alienate other sections of society.' The UN defines hate speech as: 'any kind of communication in speech, writing or behaviour, that attacks or uses pejorative or discriminatory language with reference to a person or a group on the basis of who they are, in other words, based on their religion, ethnicity, nationality, race, colour, descent, gender or other identity factor.' On Sunday, activists opposed to the solar farm are walking from the gates of Blenheim palace to Winston Churchill's grave in Bladon – both of which will be affected by the proposal – in protest. Prof Rogers said although he recognises the severity of climate change, the plans were 'too big' and in 'the wrong place' – and worries about the impact it will have on the local landscape. The proposal is currently at the examination stage where representations are being submitted. The final decision will be made by Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, because Botley West is classified as a nationally significant infrastructure project. The King is yet to respond to the group's letter.
