Sheku Bayoh: Hearing to decide whether chair should resign begins
A former judge who is chairing a £50m public inquiry into the death of a man in police custody will hear arguments on Thursday on whether he should step down or see the job through.The Scottish Police Federation has accused Lord Bracadale of holding "secret" meetings with the family of Sheku Bayoh, who died after being restrained by police in Kirkcaldy in 2015.The organisation which represents rank and file officers believes the five meetings could lead to "perceived bias" and has called for him to "recuse" himself.Lord Bracadale has been leading the inquiry since 2020 and ordered the hearing to allow core participants to make submissions on his conduct.
If Lord Bracadale decides to stay in post, the federation has said it will seek a judicial review.His departure and the search for a last minute replacement after five years of work would delay the inquiry's findings by many months.It has already cost the public purse £24.8m, with an additional £24.3m spent by Police Scotland, including £17.3m of legal costs.The stage is now set for a robust exchange of legal arguments between senior lawyers.
Roddy Dunlop KC, dean of the Faculty of Advocates, will represent the police federation and two of the officers involved in the incident which ended with Mr Bayoh's death.The police federation has said that none of the other core participants were made aware that Lord Bracadale was meeting the family and the details of what was said have not been disclosed.The federation's general secretary David Kennedy has said it has lost confidence in the inquiry because not all core participants were being treated equally.The Bayoh family's solicitor Aamer Anwar has described the federation's actions as "a pathetic and desperate attempt to sabotage the inquiry" at the 11th hour.He claimed the hearing could cost taxpayers "in excess of a million pounds" in fees for "police lawyers."
Competing arguments
One of England's top barristers, Jason Beer KC, has been brought in as senior counsel for the inquiry itself.He is expected to argue that Lord Bracadale's actions were procedurally appropriate because of the importance of maintaining the family's confidence.Scotland's prosecution service, the Crown Office, will state its position, along with Police Scotland, the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner and the Commission for Racial Equality and Rights.Lawyers representing other police officers involved in the case will also have the opportunity to have their say.The hearing is scheduled to last two days, with Lord Bracadale issuing his decision at a later date.The inquiry has been examining what happened before and during the death of Sheku Bayou, who died in police custody. It has been looking at how the police dealt with the aftermath, the investigation into Mr Bayoh's death and whether race was a factor.Members of the public called the police after Mr Bayoh was spotted carrying a knife and behaving erratically in the streets of Kirkcaldy on May 3, 2015.He wasn't carrying the knife when officers arrived at the scene but a violent confrontation followed, with up to six officers restraining the 31-year-old on the ground.The father-of-two lost consciousness and later died in hospital.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE My tenant from hell left my £4m Belgravia home in ruins after changing the locks, dumping my possessions in a garage and secretly subletting it to football fans on Booking.com
A trusting pensioner's £4million Belgravia home was wrecked after a tenant changed the locks and secretly sublet the property to droves of tourists on booking sites. The four-bedroom London pad has been owned by Anabel Loyd's family for over three decades, and more recently the 69-year-old's mother decided to officially hand her the home. After renting it out to family 'here and there', as well as a successful stint hiring it out as an AirBnB to various tourists, the Wiltshire woman decided to turn the property into long-term let due to 'slower periods during the winter'. A family friend worked for Foxtons estate agents so she decided to go ahead with the firm, and soon a potential tenant emerged hoping for a two-year contract, which the 69-year-old accepted with break clauses, and a rent of £1,600-a-week. They passed all of the estate agents checks, so Ms Loyd assumed all was well - but things started to go wrong almost immediately. Upon moving into the home, the tenant claimed it was 'inhabitable' because of black marks on the windows despite a deep clean being carried out by the estate agents, according to Ms Loyd. But the problems didn't end there, as the tenant changed the property's locks, dumped droves of Ms Loyd's items into a garage he shouldn't have had access to and began to rent the house out on Ms Loyd told MailOnline: 'I was completely furious. [The tenant] was subletting to huge numbers of people and they would go to the pub for a drink, so the people in the pub, who are truly wonderful, knew exactly what was going on. 'There were all these people going and kind of minibuses of people arriving, I mean, sort of 12 people at a time in a house which isn't terribly big, I mean you could have perhaps fitted eight at a pinch. 'The house, meanwhile, has clearly, progressively been disintegrating.' 'My language on the subject has been truly spectacular. I really felt like going round and smashing my own front windows so that they couldn't let it anymore. 'I was flabbergasted, and very bad tempered. It so bizarre that you almost are laughing about it too because you can't quite believe it is possible. She added: 'It is like having your house burgled, you feel everything is sort of dirty, in a strange way.' 'I wish I could say when I visit for the first time that I will be standing there in floods of tears, but I will be standing there in a tiring fury.' And although her property is currently in the hands of another, a tenant subletting a property without permission is usually considered a civil matter, rather than a criminal one. Recalling the moment she was told of hordes of unassuming Wigan supporters were descending on her home with crates of lager, she added: 'You do end up laughing because you can't believe it. 'And I have nothing against Wigan supporters at all.' On the property advertised by Ms Loyd's tenant as 'Regal Haven Four Bed Home Near Buckingham Palace' Luckily, her local publican and neighbours alerted her to the 'minibuses' of tourists packing into her property, which she said could only fit around seven or eight people 'at a pinch'. After briefly searching online, she quickly found her 'unprincipled' tenant had been advertising her home via describing it as a 'regal haven', boasting a 9.3 rating out of 10. And although to find her home on offer to strangers was 'salt to the wound', a string of images showing the damage to the property was 'the straw that broke the camel's back.' 'The sort of straw in the camels back was a US couple who had stayed at the property contacting us,' she said. 'There was dirty laundry, the doorknobs were falling off, a hole in the front door, and the three-foot high weeds in the backyard.' Ms Loyd estimates she would have lost £20,000 in costs after repairing her home, a stone's throw away from Buckingham Palace, as she would have to re-carpet, repaint and more. 'Its accumulative damage and mainly cosmetic, but living in London, anything like that costs a lot of money to get. 'I know I am lucky to live somewhere else, and to have another home, but this is a story of when s**t hits the fan.' 'It doesn't really make it any better. all the same.' And to add insult to injury, her tenant had also piled her possessions in the garage. Ms Loyd also argued they shouldn't have had access to this part of her home, as the author feared some of belongings may be damaged. 'There may be some things that would be of a certain value that would be very difficult to replace. 'Some things you can't rectify if they are really damaged as opposed to paintwork.' While she echoed concerns for books belonging to her husband's family, her main worry was for a painting of her beloved late pet. 'If they smash the picture of my late dog , I will wrangle somebody, because I just really mind about it. I mean, it's a pet long since gone.' she added. And although she says Foxtons have offered to return the deposit and commission fee, she doesn't think it will touch the sides on repairs as well as money spent on renting - which includes a £499.20 a month management fee to the estate agents. She added: 'The truth is had this been anywhere other than a small mews where everybody knows everybody business. 'It it wasn't for the local pub, no one would have known. From that point of view the tenant picked the wrong place for this sort of thing.' She added: 'I think I would only consider renting to someone who was not to me or at least people I know in future.' In light of her ordeal, Ms Loyd urged others to 'do their homework' when letting their properties, saying: 'Really press any agent before you let them let do something.' It is understood Foxtons had been in contact with the tenant 12 times between April and May, having also issued him with a Section 8 during this time. It is also understood the tenant has now signed a Deed of Surrender, a formal written agreement to end a tenancy earlier, and has until July 14 to vacate the property.
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
France blocking Britain from EU's massive defence fund
France is trying to shut out British arms firms from the EU's defence industrial programme despite the post-Brexit reset. A diplomatic source told The Telegraph that Paris was seeking to restrict member states looking to make a purchase under the scheme to weapons made mostly within the bloc. The European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP) is being touted by the European Commission as the largest overhaul of the Continent's industrial base. It will see EU cash pumped into joint procurement projects and the production of weapons, ammunition and other military hardware. EDIP, which has been six months in the making, is part of a wider scramble to spend €800 billion on defence by the end of the decade. French diplomats have insisted the tool should be solely used to boost firms based inside the EU, as well as Norway and Ukraine. This means any member states looking to make a purchase under the scheme will be restricted to technologies with at least 85 per cent of its parts made in the bloc. The demand means that Britain, which recently signed a flagship defence and security agreement with Brussels, will be shut out from the majority of projects being funded by the EU's budget. The UK will also be blocked from joint procurement projects under the EDIP scheme. 'Not even a month ago, we solemnly declared the turning of pages and opening of new chapters in our relationship with the UK,' an EU diplomat told The Telegraph. 'Yet, at the first occasion to turn those words into action, we have slammed the book shut.' There are also fears the hard-line French position will see potential EU funding cut from factories producing Patriot surface-to-air interceptors, because they are a US technology. It comes at a time when Nato's European allies and Canada were warned they would have to increase air defence systems by 400 per cent to protect against the prospect of a Russian attack. 'It seems self-defeating to exclude investments in the one readily available air defence system, simply because it's American,' the diplomat added. Emmanuel Macron, France's president, has consistently pushed for EU defence schemes to be used to boost the Continent's own industry, rather than allowing funds to be invested in foreign firms. Bogged down in red tape Many militaries across the EU, such as the Netherlands, Romania and Greece, have built their defensive strategies around the procurement of American systems, like Patriot air defence batteries. To mitigate concerns, there are discussions over allowing the transfer of technologies from non-EU defence firms to businesses based in the bloc. But insiders have said this mechanism will likely become bogged down in red tape, making it practically impossible to secure funds for.
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Captain Kemi needs ‘an army' but business not yet keen to follow her over the top
There was not much headroom, fiscal or otherwise, as the Tory leader spoke on the economy in the cramped basement of a City hotel. The ceiling was low but Kemi Badenoch's hopes were high as she addressed a conference of bankers who seemed under-enthused by the Chancellor's spending review. Tax Freedom Day, the point of the year when we stop working for the Exchequer, had just dawned, six days later than last year, and there was little sign of relief. The Institute for Fiscal Studies warned that Rachel Reeves was a 'gnat's whisker' away from having to hike taxes and most gnats are asking for the No 1 clippers these days. Add the grim news of GDP falling by 0.3 per cent in April, and the Chancellor's breakfast media round had been like someone trying to sing Good Vibrations to the tune of Beethoven's Funeral March. Speaking from a hospital surrounded by diagnostic equipment (all wisely unplugged to avoid images of flatlining) Reeves insisted she is 'determined' to deliver growth and that GDP is 'volatile'. This is the same Reeves who demanded an emergency Budget in 2022, when GDP fell by 0.1 per cent on the Tory watch. It was not a bad time, therefore, for a Conservative to remind those in the City who their friends are. Badenoch had come to play FTSE with financiers, but she began with a nostra culpa. She admitted the Tories had left a ropey economy – blame Covid, blame Putin, blame the Treasury, don't blame me – 'but it was not this bad'. Productivity, she added, was 'stuck in first gear' and London was experiencing the greatest exodus of wealth of any city save Moscow. She pronounced it the American way to rhyme with cow. Labour don't 'get' business because hardly any of them have a background in it, she added, which may be true but only one of the Beach Boys knew how to surf. Reform, she contended, was running a scam. 'No one is making the argument for business any more except me and my party,' she said. 'Business is a good, in and of itself, and it pays for everything.' Especially, she hoped, at that night's Tory donors' summer party. Their tummies suitably tickled, Badenoch then returned to bashing the Government, saying that borrowing is so high there is a 'significant risk of a death spiral' and that Labour is pessimistically pursuing a path of managed decline, exacerbated by a compliance culture that strangles innovation. So far so punchy, but what would she do better? Badenoch's shirt cuffs were unbuttoned but she had little up her sleeves. Her opposition to VAT on school fees was reprised and she promised to 'reverse changes to APR and BPR' (agricultural and business property relief), thus giving CPR to the economy. Beyond that, she had nothing. It is, to be fair, early in the parliament for policy. What she most wants now are allies ('Quite frankly, we need an army.') 'I'm on your side,' she told them, 'but I need you to be on mine too. You can't sit back and hope that someone else is coming along to fix this. You need to speak up. Don't just wait for other politicians to do it. You need to get on the pitch too.' Building to her conclusion with a plea for ideas, Captain Kemi hit a poetic, if metrically flawed, note. 'Back us, put your name to the cause,' she said, 'for we're not going to turn the country around with quiet applause.' She then left the stage to quiet applause. The pin-striped army liked her tone, but they are not quite ready to follow her over the top.
