Ramaphosa handed an MK Party ultimatum over his handling of the police minister saga
Image: Independent Media
IN ACCUSING accused President Cyril Ramaphosa of of violating his oath of office and failing to uphold the Constitution, the uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) said South African taxpayers cannot afford to pay for two ministers in one portfolio.
This was after Ramaphosa placed Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on leave and appointed Professor Firoz Cachalia as acting Police Minister.
In light of their assertions, the MKP's leader, Jacob Zuma, gave Ramaphosa until 10am on Friday to resign.
In a letter sent yesterday, Zuma said he will take action against Ramaphosa if he failed to adhere to the demand.
Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Mangwenya confirmed receipt of the letter.
'The legal team will deal with that letter,' he said.
The letter penned by KMNS attorneys, Zuma's representatives, came after the Constitutional Court dismissed the MKP's application, last week, to have a direct access to challenge Ramaphosa's decision to place Mchunu on a leave, appointing Cachalia and establishing a judicial commission of inquiry to investigate the corruption allegations in the SAPS and judiciary.
'Various reasons have been offered in respect of the decisions which were impugned by our client and uMkhonto weSizwe Party in the Constitutional Court which found that it lacked exclusive jurisdiction and/or has no basis to grant the requested direct access.
"As a result, our client has or sought urgent advice on possibly taking the relevant dispute(s) to the High Court and/or any other appropriate forum. It is assumed that you stand by the reasons previously given for the decisions announced on 13 July 2025,' read the letter.
The MKP's spokesperson, Nhlamulo Ndhlela, said: ' The judges did not want to take a decision knowing exactly that the MK Party has a strong case. By placing Mchunu on leave of absence and appointing Cachalia as an acting police minister, the country is having two ministers of police. Both ministers are acting.'
Zuma, who said he was a concerned citizen, a voter and a former President, also demanded the date and time when Ramaphosa decided to place Mchunu on leave of absence and the decision to appoint Cachalia as acting police minister, as well as their current positions.
'When exactly (date and time) was your decision to place Minister Mchunu on leave of absence taken? When exactly (date and time ) was your decision to appoint Professor Cachalia as Acting Minister of Police (was) taken, communicated to him and to the public?
'What exactly is a 'Minister Designate', from a constitutional point of view? Immediately after the swearing-in ceremony (i.e. from around 9:30am on 1 August 2025), what was the exact correct description of Professor Cachalia? Was he a minister, acting minister or minister designate? What is the present, correct, full and official description of Mr. Senzo Mchunu? If the answers are the same, for how long is it envisaged that South Africa will have and pay for two Ministers of Police at the same time?' Zuma asks in the letter.
He also wanted to know Ramaphosa's reasons for not dismissing Mchunu based on the allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police boss Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, that Mchunu had ties to criminal gangs and meddled in police investigations into politically motivated murders.
He said irrespective of the answers Ramaphosa might give, his conduct to place Mchunu on leave and appoint Cachalia remain illegal, irrational and unconstitutional.
'Due to the obvious urgency and importance of the issues raised above, these demands must be fulfilled immediately but by no later than 10h00 on Friday, August 8, 2025, failing which all our client's rights are reserved, including the right to urgently approach the courts for appropriate relief, without any further notice to you.'
[email protected]
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
12 minutes ago
- IOL News
'The President is both player and referee': Families fight Ramaphosa's attempt to delay apartheid justice case
The Pretoria High Court will hear President Cyril Ramaphosa's government bid to delay the constitutional damages case brought by families and survivors of apartheid-era human rights violations. The Pretoria High Court will on Wednesday hear an application brought by President Cyril Ramaphosa and the government seeking to reinstate their opposition in the constitutional damages case. The case, filed by 25 families and survivors of apartheid-era gross human rights violations, seeks accountability for political interference in the prosecution of crimes recommended by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). IOL previously reported that the families of victims who were forcibly disappeared or killed during apartheid, supported by the Foundation for Human Rights (FHR), filed an application against Ramaphosa and the government earlier this year. They are seeking R167 million in constitutional damages for the state's 'gross failure.' The families say there was 'a gross violation of their human rights as the state failed to investigate and/or prosecute the cases referred by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission to the National Prosecuting Authority.' The government is also requesting a postponement or stay of the case pending the outcome of a judicial commission of inquiry established on May 29, 2025. The families, survivors, and the FHR, who have welcomed the establishment of the commission in principle, have expressed strong opposition to the government's attempt to delay the matter.
The Citizen
12 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Carte Blanche's John Webb, a Mzansi media legend
Webb has a simple plan, not to effect change to a television staple favourite, but rather to refine the programme and continue sharing a strong narrative across segments. It's the hot seat, where the heat is on every day. And it's been John Webb's dream to take on one of journalism's biggest challenges for some time. Being executive producer of one of South Africa's longest-running television shows, Carte Blanche, is not for sissies, and Webb's been behind the wheel for almost a handful of years. The show celebrates its thirty-seventh season this year, and keeping it relevant, sourcing compelling stories and maintaining high standards of journalism for such a long time has been no mean feat. Webb has a simple plan, not to effect change to a television staple favourite, but rather to refine the programme and continue sharing a strong narrative across segments. Said Webb: 'We are storytellers, first and foremost, that's what we call ourselves. When we come up with ideas, we call them stories. When we got to shoot them, we say, 'We're going to go shoot a story', and that is our primary focus.' He believes that focusing on characters within a story makes it more accessible to viewers, and getting that element right is not always easy. 'But when it comes together, it's magic.' Exposing rot and corruption Carte Blanche has earned a reputation over the years for its exposés, revealing some of the rot and corruption across various echelons of government, business and society. As the media landscape is changing along with consumption patterns, he believes that it's more important than ever to weave a story within a story. 'It's about more than just hearing negative news about the place we live in; we are fatigued about this. Instead, it is about finding the characters inside this picture, looking at them too, the human narrative.' It's important to him to share stories with integrity, clarity and to ensure balance in reportage. Also Read: What to watch: Stream these Netflix shows Last year, the show covered elections live for the first time. Webb said the focus remained on the human aspect, not the party-political narrative. He said: 'We needed to make a contribution to the national discussion around what was happening, so we went to four provinces, places that don't get a lot of publicity necessarily. And we told service delivery stories without actually mentioning political parties. You know, we told the stories of the people who live alongside rivers of sewage. We told the story of businesses trying to stay afloat and retain their workers when they have intermittent electricity at best.' He added that sometimes sharing in this way is harder hitting than simple reporting. It's South African stories, set in the milieu of an issue or situation, and it brings it to life and reveals home life truths, every time. Veteran broadcaster It's a strategy that works. As a presenter on talk radio for several years, including Talk at Nine on 702, Webb tackled tough issues, and his interviews were challenging for subjects who were on the receiving end of a Webb-terrogation. John Webb is a dynamic storyteller and at the reins of Carte Blanche, which he joined as a journalist and segment presenter in 2004, it's the genesis of subtle nuance to further develop the art of storytelling. Webb said he's never really thought of journalism as a job, nor a calling. The thrill of the chase is there, too, but to him, it's the never-ending flow of stories that makes every day different. The investigations, the hidden cameras that lift the veil on wrongdoing. He said: 'The team are passionate about what they do, some producers have been at it since the beginning of the show. And I have enormous respect for them.' Webb added that it's impossible not to be impacted by the show's content. 'When you are filming in abject poverty or witness injustice, it does affect you on a personal level. I think this is why we are able to speak so powerfully about issues, because we care about them. We are not standing on the outside looking in, but rather, become immersed into it and telling it as it is.' Now Read: What to watch: It's binge weekend
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
US set to swoop on SA poultry industry, says FairPlay
The government is hinting at yet another blow to the country's poultry producers, says Fairplay Image: Umfanekiso ogciniweyo The government is feeding South Africa's chickens to eagles swooping in from the United States. Not for the first time, the country's poultry industry is being sacrificed to secure a trade deal with the US. Worse, it is happening without consultation with the industry on the details or implications of what it is proposing, or possible alternatives. No trade deal has yet been concluded, and there is little information about what South Africa is putting on the table. Yet, as it attempts to avert the 30% tariffs on all South African exports that President Donald Trump has threatened, the government is hinting at yet another blow to the country's poultry producers. A statement by trade minister Parks Tau gave little away. Outlining what South Africa had proposed – so far without any response from the US – Tau said South Africa had offered increased access to South African markets for US poultry producers. This would be achieved 'by (the) simplifying of US poultry exports under the 2016 tariff rate quota and unlock approximately $91 million in trade'. Exactly what this means is anybody's guess – the only thing that is clear is that, as in 2015, the poultry industry is once again going to be made to suffer for the sake of a trade deal. The 2016 quota which Tau hopes to 'simplify' resulted from negotiations in 2015 when the US demanded that South Africa exempt huge volumes of US chicken from the anti-dumping duties that should apply according to World Trade Organisation rules. This was a make-or-break condition for the renewal of South Africa's benefits under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa). The result was an annual quota which started at 65 000 tonnes in 2016 and rose to 72 000 tonnes last year. It was effectively a licence to dump chicken in this country – US producers could send South Africa their chicken offcuts at any price they chose, and the country could do nothing about it unless the quota was exceeded. The quota was exceeded in early years, rising to nearly 83 000 tonnes in 2019, before US exports dropped sharply as bird flu spread across the country. The fact that US negotiators are once again pushing for duty-free chicken exports indicates that they anticipate the flow will resume. The sting was that the US chicken quota was tied to the Agoa agreement, which is itself under threat. In terms of the US Agoa legislation up for renewal again this year, if South African industries lost their beneficial access to US markets, then the chicken quota falls away. Because of tariffs already ranging from 10% to 25%, those benefits have been lost by South Africa's steel, automotive and fruit industries, so the quota should no longer apply. Poultry producers have asked for the quota to be nullified, but they have so far been ignored. Does Minister Tau intend to 'simplify' the quota by making it a standalone item, not linked in any way to Agoa, which may or may not be renewed? That would expose South African poultry producers to a potential R1.65 billion worth of unfairly priced US bone-in chicken pieces such as leg quarters. These are the cuts specified in the anti-dumping duties which the US has demanded should not apply. Minister Tau should remember that those anti-dumping duties were recommended by the trade regulator ITAC, which falls under his department. Since 2000, ITAC has repeatedly renewed anti-dumping duties - and has just done so again – because, in terms of World Trade Organisation rules, it has found that US chicken is being imported at unfairly low prices, threatening the local poultry industry and its jobs. Now Minister Tau wants to make it even easier for US poultry producers to dump their chicken here, competing with the popular packs of locally produced individually quick frozen (IQF) chicken pieces. South African chicken farmers and South African jobs will be at risk. Not only does this extend the contravention of international trade rules, but it is completely against the spirit and objectives of the poultry master plan, which he is in charge of resuscitating. The master plan aims to protect the South African poultry industry from unfairly priced imports, boost local chicken consumption and expand local production and job creation to meet increased demand from domestic and export markets. In terms of the first phase of the master plan, signed in 2019, the poultry industry invested more than R1.5 billion to increase production. Unfortunately, some of that new capacity has been idle, because the government failed to come to the party, particularly in terms of promoting domestic consumption and expanding export markets. That is what Minister Tau should be doing, instead of meekly acceding to US demands that anti-dumping duties should not apply to them. Clearly, he is under extreme pressure to offer the Trump administration something that would prevent 30% tariffs applying to everything South Africa sends to the US. However, if he is going to ask the poultry industry to make costly and job-threatening sacrifices, as it did in 2015, then he should take poultry industry leaders into his confidence and ask for their input. Better still, he should give the poultry industry a seat at the negotiating table, instead of ignoring their request. It is their future that is at stake. Francois Baird is founder of the FairPlay movement. Image: Supplied Francois Baird is founder of the FairPlay movement. *** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Independent Media or IOL. BUSINESS REPORT
