Will Big and Little Cottonwood canyons become state parks?
SB236 by Sen. Kathleen Riebe, D-Salt Lake City, authorizes the state Division of State Parks to receive donations of land and facilities; engage in transfers, exchanges or purchases of land in Big Cottonwood Canyon and Little Cottonwood Canyon; and enter into agreements with the U.S. Forest Service to manage and use land within those areas as state parks as part of the Utah State Park system.
The bill is in the Senate and has not had a hearing, having barely been introduced, but there is early support.
'That's a bill I hadn't heard of, but that would be exciting to do. I think we may see that eye to eye. We're actually asking the federal government to actually give us the unappropriated land so we can do exactly that in the state. We've got a lawsuit that the Supreme Court didn't take up,' said Senate President Stuart Adams, R-Layton.
'So we think we can control our lands better than the federal government. A lot of that area would be probably federally owned. So this is something we may be really aligned on. This is the first I've heard of the bill, but I think I'm pretty excited about it,' he added.
Senate Majority Leader Kirk Cullimore, R-Sandy, whose district includes part of the canyons, was also enthusiastic.
'I wasn't aware of the bill up to this point. But if we want to put it under state control and and designate it as a state park so that we can better address some of the solutions and some of the issues that we're dealing with in those canyons, that could be an interesting discussion,' he said.
The canyons are highly popular due to their close proximity to Wasatch Front residents.
The cottonwoods, along with Millcreek Canyon, received roughly 3.2 million visitors per year in an area spanning about 80,000 acres.
By comparison, Arches National Park — one of Utah's beloved national parks — receives about 1.8 million visitors per year, according to a visitor use study from last year.
Sen. Jerry Stevenson, R-Layton, was a bit more cautious.
'In any of these negotiations, the devil is always in the details. The overall concept looks really good but we'll see how it negotiates out.'
One lawmaker questioned if the state parks proposal is a way to circumvent a 2023 decision by the Utah Department of Transportation to pursue building a gondola to ease the canyon's notorious traffic congestion.
The gondola is expected to reduce motorized use of the canyon by 30%.
The plan calls for tolling and increased bus service in its first phase, as well as a mobility hub with 1,500 parking stalls by Big Cottonwood Canyon. New snow sheds are included in a second phase to address avalanche safety before a possible gondola is built. The 8-mile gondola line would offer service to Snowbird and Alta from a base with 2,500 parking spaces at the mouth of the canyon.
Cox has said the state should not be the only entity bearing the costs of the gondola.
It is unclear what impact, if any, Riebe's bill would have on that process.
Contributing: Brigham Tomco
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Chris Murphy goes all in on funding bill boycott as Dems seek bipartisanship
Chris Murphy has been warning for months that voters want Democrats to fight. This summer, the Connecticut senator is picking a battle that puts him at odds with his Democratic colleagues. Murphy has made surprising moves over the last month to protest bipartisan government funding talks as a member of the Appropriations Committee, demonstrating his vision of what opposition to President Donald Trump should look like and further stoking speculation about his own presidential ambitions. The third-term senator said in a recent interview that Trump "doesn't give a fuck what we write' into spending legislation. And so he sees no reason to participate in the drafting of funding bills if the president is going to keep withholding billions of dollars Congress already approved and goading Republican senators to claw back more. 'Every single day, there's new evidence that our democracy is falling, and you've got to take stands. You have to take fights,' Murphy explained. 'I just worry — every time that we go along with these appropriations bills, we're putting a bipartisan veneer of endorsement on an illegal process that's ultimately part of his campaign to destroy our democracy.' As the top Democrat on the appropriations panel that funds the Department of Homeland Security, Murphy occupies a role that has historically demanded across-the-aisle collaboration. But in recent weeks, he opposed all spending measures advanced during Senate Appropriations Committee markups for which he was present, challenged his Republican counterpart on the DHS funding bill and voted 'no' on the Senate's first bipartisan funding package of the year. 'I'm nothing if not consistent. I don't like the position I'm in,' Murphy said. 'It's lonely. 28-to-1 votes are lonely.' So far, Murphy isn't slamming his colleagues for embracing bipartisan negotiations, and his peers aren't directly criticizing his approach. But they aren't exactly praising him either. 'He has the right to his opinion," said the top Democratic appropriator in the Senate, Patty Murray of Washington. "And I just have the opinion that the more we can do to get bills done, the better chance we have of getting better things for our country.' Sen. Brian Schatz of Hawaii, one of Murphy's friends and another senior member of the Appropriations Committee, said Democrats have a duty to at least attempt to strike a cross-party compromise on federal spending ahead of the Sept. 30 shutdown deadline. 'I'm not his spokesperson,' said Schatz, who is in line to be the chamber's Democratic whip in the next Congress. 'So all I can say is: We've been demanding a bipartisan process. So when there's a step in that direction, I think it's our obligation to try to be constructive.' While Murphy has never been a moderate, he has grown rapidly into a liberal firebrand in recent years. Once best known on Capitol Hill for his advocacy for gun control and his foreign policy expertise, he's now a frequent anti-Trump voice on cable news shows and has waded into controversial social topics like the nation's 'male identity' crisis. But Murphy's latest political stand against Trump comes as his name is floated for a bigger-stage battle against Republicans — this time as a presidential contender in 2028. If the 52-year-old senator seeks the Democratic nomination in three years, his protest of government funding bills could help differentiate him as a candidate who fought the Trump administration with more than just verbal criticism. 'It does fit, right? These are strategies that would make sense if he's interested in a national platform and to run for office like president,' said Hans Noel, a Georgetown University professor who studies presidential nominations. 'There's some appeal to a lot of voters — of fighting — especially at the national stage, where he doesn't have to worry about winning over allies for legislative progress,' Noel continued. 'Murphy has been somebody who's been talking on a national stage for a long time. It's not completely new. But he's somebody who's got that kind of appeal.' This past week, Murphy spent his birthday at an event with progressives in Arizona, where he talked broadly about the need for Democrats to balance opposition with real policy commitments: 'We can't just be against Donald Trump. We've got to give people a vision of something different.' Since Trump's election last November, Murphy has grown a beard, announced the end of his 17-year marriage and sparked rumors about romantic ties to a prominent Democratic strategist. In April, he hosted a town hall back in rural North Carolina — more than 500 miles from his blue home state. Then this summer, he launched a PAC aimed at taking on Trump and Republicans in Congress. Murphy hasn't always resisted negotiations with Republicans. In 2022, after a gunman left 21 people dead inside a Texas elementary school, he undertook weeks of painstaking talks that resulted in the first significant federal gun-control legislation in two decades. It was the culmination of a nearly decade-long fight for Murphy, who represented Sandy Hook Elementary School in the House at the time of that devastating 2012 shooting. His next foray into bipartisan talks did not have a happy ending. Last year he scrupulously crafted the high-profile bipartisan border deal with Oklahoma Republican Sen. James Lankford, in an attempt to enact Congress' first major immigration overhaul in more than three decades. Then Trump chilled Republican support for the bill. To Murphy, it signaled that Republicans couldn't be trusted to be good-faith actors in negotiations to fund the government: 'I think that drama was early proof that they're never going to cross him,' he said of Republicans' loyalty to Trump. This belief was further cemented when Murphy's GOP colleagues cleared Trump's $9 billion rescission request last month targeting public broadcasting and foreign aid. 'They can say that they're going to honor the words on the page,' Murphy said. Yet if Trump 'decides to ignore the law,' he continued, 'I just don't think that my Republican colleagues are going to really fight to protect it.' Democratic leadership's interest in engaging in bipartisan funding negotiations, from which Murphy is abstaining, is a relatively new development. Just a month ago, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer penned a lengthy 'dear colleague' letter insinuating that his members should cut off cross-party talks if Republicans accepted the White House's rescissions package. Nine days later, Senate Republicans banded together to pass that bill. And five days after that, Schumer stood with his House counterpart, Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, to announce that Democrats still 'want to pursue a bipartisan, bicameral appropriations process.' It has left Murphy as the lone Democratic appropriator continually opposing the funding bills his colleagues are trying to advance, even as he readily admits it's not the substance of the spending measures he's against. 'The bills themselves are good, bipartisan bills,' said Murphy. 'It's just — I don't believe that anything in there is actually going to be implemented.' This is the case Murphy said he wants to get through to Sen. Katie Britt, the Alabama Republican who chairs the Homeland Security appropriations panel opposite Murphy. The two lawmakers were seen last month in a heated exchange in the well of the Senate floor after passage of the clawback request. Britt described the conversation, captured by C-SPAN cameras, as 'a spirited dialogue,' vowing: 'I'll continue to work in good faith, as I always have.' Murphy, however, said negotiations on the DHS funding bill will be meaningless if Trump and Republicans are going to undermine the spending directives when the measure becomes law. 'We had an animated discussion,' Murphy said of his talk with Britt. 'Obviously it's hard to write a bill when the administration is going to stab you in the back as soon as you write it, especially in a space as difficult as immigration and DHS.' He pointed to specific examples of how Trump has already undermined appropriators, including the president's efforts to fund the controversial 'Alligator Alcatraz' immigration detention center in Florida by diverting money Congress appropriated for 'humane' alternatives to detainment. 'And you know,' Murphy continued, 'he's going to use the money in this budget to treat immigrants like animals.' Jordain Carney, Katherine Tully-McManus and Cassandra Dumay contributed to this report.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Chris Murphy goes all in on funding bill boycott
IN TODAY'S EDITION:— The one Dem voting against funding bills— First in IC: Cruz preps new AI bill— Trump's BLS pick has to get past Cassidy Sen. Chris Murphy wants to pick a fight with Donald Trump over government funding — even if his fellow Democrats don't, Jennifer Scholtes reports. The top Democratic Homeland Security appropriator said he's willing to shake up the typically bipartisan committee, after Republicans sided with the president to claw back billions of dollars previously approved by Congress. Trump 'doesn't give a fuck what we write' into spending legislation, the Connecticut senator told Jennifer. Murphy has opposed all the funding measures advanced during Senate appropriations markups for which he was present, challenged his Republican counterpart on the DHS appropriations subcommittee and voted against the Senate's first bipartisan funding package of the year. Murphy's national profile has been on the rise for years — especially since he's branded himself an outspoken member of the Trump resistance. His name is among those floated as a potential 2028 presidential contender. The senator's approach on appropriations, however, stands in stark contrast with the rest of his party. Senate and House Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, respectively, have publicly said they're pursuing 'a bipartisan, bicameral' process to avoid a shutdown this fall. But Murphy has been burned before in his attempts to work across the aisle against the backdrop of Trump's influence. Although Murphy successfully negotiated with Republicans in 2022 to pass the first significant federal gun-control legislation in decades, his subsequent effort to pass a bipartisan border deal floundered after Trump, then a candidate for reelection in 2024, signaled disapproval. Murphy's fellow Democratic appropriators have largely avoided criticizing his strategy — but they aren't exactly praising him, either. 'He has the right to his opinion,' said top Senate Democratic appropriator Patty Murray. Murphy's friend and another appropriator, Sen. Brian Schatz, told Jennifer, 'I'm not his spokesperson.' Murphy, for his part, isn't slamming his colleagues for embracing bipartisan negotiations. But he said in an interview he wished more Democrats on the Appropriations panel would join him in taking a stand. 'It's lonely,' Murphy said. '28-to-1 votes are lonely.' GOOD WEDNESDAY MORNING. Are you placing a bid in the upcoming auction featuring items from the late Sen. Dianne Feinstein's estate? Email us: cdumay@ crazor@ and bguggenheim@ THE LEADERSHIP SUITE Jeffries takes on redistricting fights, D.C. police takeover Jeffries spent Tuesday in Illinois backing Texas Democrats who left their state to block a GOP mid-decade redistricting attempt. 'I had the opportunity to express thanks to them for their courage, their character and their conviction,' Jeffries told Shia Kapos of his meeting with the Texas lawmakers. 'I indicated that we'll support them every step of the way.' In a joint interview with Texas House Minority Leader Gene Wu aired on MSNBC Tuesday, Jeffries said that to respond to Republican attempts to redraw congressional maps, his party needs to use 'any tools in the toolbox in California, in New York and in Illinois' — where Democrats are floating redistricting efforts in their own party's favor. House Democrats will hold a virtual caucus meeting at noon today on the redistricting fight. Former Attorney General Eric Holder, who heads the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, is expected to attend. Jeffries also told Shia he's been in communication with District of Columbia Mayor Muriel Bowser amid Trump's aggressive targeting of the capital city's locally elected government and takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department. 'We're going to strongly support her efforts to defend the sovereignty and integrity of the District,' Jeffries said. The minority leader said he planned to connect with District Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton Tuesday evening regarding the police takeover. POLICY RUNDOWN FIRST IN INSIDE CONGRESS: EARLY LOOK AT SENATE COMMERCE AI BILL — Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz is prepping draft legislation that would allow companies seeking to use artificial intelligence to apply for waivers from regulations, Benjamin scoops this morning. It's an idea that has the backing of the White House, and Cruz is expected to advance the bill this fall amid his effort to ensure the U.S. comes out ahead in the global AI race with China. The framework would allow companies to ask a federal agency to waive or modify regulations that are posing barriers to their work with AI. Industry groups are welcoming the proposal, though they're still pushing for a 10-year moratorium on AI regulations that was cut from the GOP's sweeping domestic policy bill, Benjamin reports with Anthony Adragna. Regulatory sandboxes have been tried before in sectors like fintech, though some experts say such waivers often stretch indefinitely and are expensive to implement. It's also not clear whether Democrats will support the proposal. CASSIDY TO VET BLS NOM — Trump's pick to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni, will need to first survive Senate HELP. The panel is led by Sen. Bill Cassidy, who has shepherded through dozens of Trump's nominees since January — even as some selections, most notably HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., have struggled to win over other committee Republicans. Antoni would be taking over the nonpartisan agency at a time of heightened scrutiny about its independence and methods of data collection. He has been a fierce critic of former BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, who Trump fired and accused, without evidence, of rigging job report data for political purposes. In a statement, Cassidy spokesperson Stephen Lewerenz didn't give a strong read on where the panel's chair might come down on the nominee. 'We need a BLS Commissioner committed to producing accurate, unbiased economic information to the American people,' Lewerenz said. 'Chairman Cassidy looks forward to meeting with Dr. Antoni to discuss how he will accomplish this.' Best of POLITICO Pro and E&E: THE BEST OF THE REST Republican Gets Booed in Furious Town Hall Trainwreck: 'F*** You!', from Janna Brancolini at The Daily Beast Texas redistricting fight provides Democratic Senate contenders with a megaphone, from Ben Kamisar and Andrew Arenge at NBC News THE CARRYOUT A recess section for lawmakers' Capitol Hill food recs Rep. Tim Burchett said he brings in homemade peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. 'I'm not a fan of the food up here,' Burchett said. 'It's not very good.' What's your go-to lunch to pack for a day on the Hill? Email crazor@ CAMPAIGN STOP CASAR STANDS GROUND VS. DOGGETT — Rep. Greg Casar isn't backing down from a primary against 16-term Rep. Lloyd Doggett. New congressional maps proposed by Republicans in Texas would draw the two Democrats into the same district in Austin. Doggett has suggested Casar run in a newly formed district in a different part of the state. In a new statement obtained by POLITICO from the Progressive Caucus chair's chief of staff Stephanie Trinh, Casar turned down that option. 'Greg leaving Austin to run in this new south Texas seat would deprive Austin of Greg's voice and growing influence as new chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, and it would undercut Democrats' chance to win in the new south Texas seat by running a candidate with deep ties to that community,' Trinh wrote. 'As Greg has said clearly: his focus is on fighting the maps, but whatever happens he will be running for reelection in Austin.' BRAUN LEAVES REDISTRICTING DOOR OPEN — Gov. Mike Braun has been noncommittal on calling a special session to redraw Indiana's congressional map, but said Tuesday that GOP leaders are 'considering it seriously.' 'I think mostly what happens here is going to depend on where Texas goes, because I think they've got five seats in play,' the former senator told the Indiana Capital Chronicle. IN OTHER SENATE CAMPAIGN NEWS — Sherrod Brown will run for Senate in Ohio in 2026, according to two people familiar with his thinking, Holly Otterbein and Gregory Svirnovskiy report. Brown is making a play for his old job just months after losing to Republican Sen. Bernie Moreno in November. Brown will face GOP Sen. Jon Husted, who was appointed after JD Vance vacated the seat to become vice president. Republican Rep. Barry Moore, meanwhile, is running for Senate in Alabama next year, he announced Tuesday. HAPPY BIRTHDAY Former Reps. Tom Marino and Pete Visclosky … Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders … acting CFTC Chair Caroline Pham … Karine Jean-Pierre … former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen … Larry Weitzner … Grace Davis of Rep. Tim Moore's office … State Department's Bridget Roddy … Adam Sharon … GrayRobinson's Chris McCannell … Gabriel Laizer … AP's Kelly Daschle … Gonzo Gallegos … Kelly Rzendzian … former Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders (92) … Sara Sorcher … Herald Group's Ansley Bradwell … Douglas Rivlin TRIVIA TUESDAY'S ANSWER: Andrew Stahovec correctly answered that a suffrage activist's demonstration at Woodrow Wilson's State of the Union address got Capitol visitors banned from leaning over chamber balconies. TODAY'S QUESTION, from Andrew: Which U.S. president attempted to retract the original treaty of the annexation of Hawaii authored under the Benjamin Harrison administration? The first person to correctly guess gets a mention in the next edition of Inside Congress. Send your answers to insidecongress@
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alabama congressman seeks Senate seat
MOBILE, Ala. (WKRG) — Alabama Congressman Barry Moore announced he is running for a U.S. Senate position. UPDATE: Mobile police identify 2 men killed in industrial incident Moore currently serves as the United States representative for Alabama's District 1 after when the state redrew its congressional districts. In his announcement Tuesday morning, Moore promised to stand with President Donald Trump. Moore previously served in the Alabama State House for eight years as the District 91 representative. During his time in the state house, Moore served as chairman of the Military and Veterans Affairs Committee, as well as the vice-chair of the Small Business and Commerce Committee. If Moore were to win the election, he would be taking Tommy Tuberville's seat, as Tuberville previously announced . Atmore arrests: 6 held for immigration crimes, FBI says The Senate election will be held on Nov. 3, 2025. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
